The truth on the Renee Good shooting lies in the middle

[Concerned American]

IF that is accurate...it's yet more evidence that he shot her out of anger, not because he genuinely believed she was a threat to his life.

He shot her after her vehicle struck him. Video/audio evidence clearly prove that the shot was fired milliseconds after he was struck. LOL, I doubt he had time to form an emotion.

Immediately after shooting her, he said "fuckin *****".... which doesn't look good for him, at all.

Immediately after being intentionally struck by her vehicle he made a perfectly understandable remark given the circumstances which is really irrelevant to anything.

Maybe because she was familiar with their track record of excessive force, she didn't want to get beaten or pepper sprayed or worse. But even if her decision to flee was a bad one, fleeing alone is not a capital crime.

If there was to be excessive force used, it would have been used on the lover as she walked around the vehicle goading the officers. BTW, her decision to flee and striking a LE officer with a deadly weapon is a crime of violence and the officer has the right to defend himself.

 

[Stann]

If she would have injured or killed the agent, the left would be celebrating with glee and calling her a hero.

Fact.

If it ever gets to that point you will finally have something to blame on trump.He is the insane driving force in all of this.

 

[Marener]

She was breaking the law. That’s reason enough to pull her out of the car. Impeding traffic is breaking the law.

Once again, you are free to block a roadway by parking your car perpendicular to traffic.

Be a good warrior and show your mettle, sniveling coward.

Just go around. Seems like pretty easy to me. Others got the idea.

 

[Hollie]

You still don’t answer my question. I know why.

I answered your nonsense question. I understand you don’t like the answer.

Why was her vehicle parked in such a manner as to block traffic?

 

[Leo123]

LOL, what do you mean he stopped her from killing him? To confirm, are you saying that if he didn't discharge his weapon, she would have killed him in that moment?
Btw which part of the car was he hit by? The hood right? Which part of the hood...center, left, right?

The bullet hole clearly shows the gun was in front of the car on the driver's side so she must have been heading straight for him. What is the matter with you? Do you actually think that officer was out to kill her? You guys are mentally impaired with TDS and it is really showing.

 

[Hollie]

Just go around.

Learn how to park. Her actions were designed to create a confrontation.

Your celebration of her death is sickening.

 

[RedrickTheCoat]

The bullet hole clearly shows the gun was in front of the car on the driver's side so she must have been heading straight for him. What is the matter with you? Do you actually think that officer was out to kill her? You guys are mentally impaired with TDS and it is really showing.

That didn't answer the question I was asking at all.

If he didn't discharge his weapon, do you think he would be dead right now?

 

[Leo123]

Just go around. Seems like pretty easy to me. Others got the idea.

Yeah, slow down and go around while ICE watchers are threatening you. That is obstructing.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Actually the bullet in the windshield clearly shows the gun was IN FRONT of the car. If the bullet hit the windshield at an angle it would not have changed course to an almost right angle to go directly toward Good. You are seeing only what you want to see. You are the one being 'dismissive' of the facts.

Actually, until you know where the bullet ended up you DO NOT know the shooter was directly in front of the vehicle. A shot left of the driver side fender could still go through the window.

The bullet hole is a point of reference, until you know where the bullet ended up, you don't have a trajectory.

Those are facts.

And BTW - who said anything about a bullet making a right angle turn? We DO NOT KNOW if the first shot even his Good.

Have you seen a ballistic report?

WW

 

[Marener]

I answered your nonsense question. I understand you don’t like the answer.

Why was her vehicle parked in such a manner as to block traffic?

You didn’t. You’re a coward.

She put her car there.

Why didn’t ICE go around?

 

[Stann]

He wasn't "going to an assignment." He got out of his car, walked around it to photograph the people inside of it, and was generally antagonistic.

Nor was she trying to run him over. The three shots were from the SIDE of the vehicle, not the front.

That's exactly what I saw.and the woman was cordial in telling him she wasn't mad at him. He had to be antagonistic in order for her to say that.

 

[Concerned American]

Better yet , ICE has no business being in our cities. Time to end this insane practice of militarizing our cities. It should have ever happened in the first place

Democrats spread illegal foreign invaders throughout the country. ICE is tasked with the removal of immigrants who are illegally in this country. Quit voting for democrats and things like this will cease to happen. LOL, your stance is akin to saying that a violent bank robber wouldn't have been killed if the law enforcement that is tasked with protecting the American public didn't do their jobs. SMFH. Ignorant.

 

[Marener]

Yeah, slow down and go around while ICE watchers are threatening you. That is obstructing.

What did she say that was threatening?

 

[Leo123]

That didn't answer the question I was asking at all.

If he didn't discharge his weapon, do you think he would be dead right now?

Yes. There is a very good case to be made that she would have hit him straight on because we know he was in front of the vehicle on the driver's side. There is photos of her looking straight at him as well. You are either dumb as a box of rocks or just ignorant.

 

[WorldWatcher]

That’s pretty radical as the left already has answers regarding this as ‘murder’, get with the program, fella.

I haven't called it a murder.

I'm even saying the first shot might have been justified.

In my mind the 2nd and 3rd through the drivers window are more in question as at that point the officer was not in danger.

WW

 

[Concerned American]

See, this is what I mean. You guys are really bad at making rational arguments.

Your opinion of our arguments is not the topic--return to the topic of the TRUTH ON THE RENEE GOOD SHOOTING LIES IN THE MIDDLE or be reported, troll.

 

[Leo123]

What did she say that was threatening?

Going down a rabbit hole doesn't make your point. We were not discussing what she said. We were discussing her actions.

 

[Stann]

Why are you so obsessed about this woman's sexual orientation?

They think people that aren't like them aren't normal. He doesn't see another hunan being. Things are easier to hate.

 

[toobfreak]

Left says it was murder by out of control ICE agent.
Right says she tried to drive into the agent.

Nah, the Right says she almost ran him over, and would have if he had not managed to mostly get out of her way enough to keep from getting killed. No one knows what she "tried" to do.

1. She never should have been there to begin with
2. She was an anti ICE crusader.
3. She may or may not have tried to drive over the agent. Video inconclusive.
4. The agent was trigger happy.

3: Her /intentions/ are irrelevant. Her intentions do not affect whatever threat she was perceived by the officer.
4: Maybe. Unless a person was actually right there and saw it all up close in real time, it is impossible to ever know for sure.

My guess, when in doubt, unless it involves clear, unquestionable, egregious violations of policy codes, one should always err in favor of the officer who puts his life on the line every day he walks out there to do his job.

 

[Hollie]

You didn’t. You’re a coward.

She put her car there.

Why didn’t ICE go around?

You’re dodging as usual. Why did she put her car there?

Fire department first responders likely would not be able to maneuver a truck around a car deliberately blocking traffic.

Once again, you are desperate to make excuses for your jihad hero.