gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 79,406
- 43,695
- 2,605
Look up Gary Webb. Then research US actions on the poppy fields in Afghanistan.What illegal drugs are those, and who do you say is pushing them ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look up Gary Webb. Then research US actions on the poppy fields in Afghanistan.What illegal drugs are those, and who do you say is pushing them ?
Dumb. Always dumb.No actually I disagree with a lot of republicans and libertarians
It’s just you are a leftist that defends leftist regimes like Meduro’s
What illegal drugs are those, and who do you say is pushing them ?
Yes your defense of narcoterrorist is dumbDumb. Always dumb.
What benefit did Trump get from it? Be sure to be specific, with proof, not some wild conspiracy theory either.
It wasn't just in Detroit either.
![]()
Marines ignore opium — Taliban's cash crop
Marines in Afghanistan are not destroying poppy plants. In fact, they are reassuring villagers the plants won't be touched.www.nbcnews.com
When it benefits us, it's OK.
Or when it benefits the president.
![]()
Trump pardons cocaine kingpin who ruled Honduras
Trump said Nov. 28 that he planned to pardon the former Honduran leader, and a White House official confirmed Dec. 2 that the pardon had been issued.www.usatoday.com
Your acceptance of anything an R potus says is really dumb.Yes your defense of narcoterrorist is dumb
Well that's your problem, i've accepted Maduro was a narcoterrorist since your Dem president said it.Your acceptance of anything an R potus says is really dumb.
Lol. So if a D POTUS says it you believe it. Lol.Well that's your problem, i've accepted Maduro was a narcoterrorist since your Dem president said it.
It's just I don't defend or support it, like you all
frankly, I don't need a President to tell me, it's obvious.Lol. So if a D POTUS says it you believe it. Lol.
Uniparty dupe forever.
Where are those WMD in Iraq?
Enforcing illegitimate laws like the drug laws DOES NOT contribute to security for our nation. Indeed, the policy of prohibition and the enforcement of those laws causes harm to our nation and its security and way of life and legal principles.When the law is violated, and it hasn't been, then no.
But YOU don't get to twist and cherry-pick disparate laws effectively roadblocking the legitimate enforcement of security for our nation.
So, yeah, **** the rule of law when Democrats are in power but make up bullshit for when Republicans are in power.
The countries that are in bed with these terrorists are enemies of the American people, and they should get no quarter for anything.
I'm pointing out the simple knowledge that the drug prohibition is unconstitutional and harmful to this country and its principles. I'm further pointing out that said cartels would not exist if not for our asinine policy of prohibition.Nope, reality. You're claiming the fact that the cartels are terrorists is fiction (propaganda). Just showing you the hundreds of politicians alone, in Mexico alone, that have been murdered by the cartels. Terror is how they do and keep in business. They are terrorists.
How are drug law unconstitutional?I'm pointing out the simple knowledge that the drug prohibition is unconstitutional and harmful to this country and its principles. I'm further pointing out that said cartels would not exist if not for our asinine policy of prohibition.
No sir, I do not expect you to understand those things. You are highly emotional, and that always works against critical thinking.
There is no authority in the Constitution for the federal government to tell the citizen what he may or may not ingest. If you believe there is, I would appreciate your citing that part.How are drug law unconstitutional?
And you big poopyhead. I winI'm pointing out the simple knowledge that the drug prohibition is unconstitutional and harmful to this country and its principles. I'm further pointing out that said cartels would not exist if not for our asinine policy of prohibition.
No sir, I do not expect you to understand those things. You are highly emotional, and that always works against critical thinking.
Art 1 Section 8There is no authority in the Constitution for the federal government to tell the citizen what he may or may not ingest. If you believe there is, I would appreciate your citing that part.
I know the Commerce clause allows the Federal Govt to regulate the drug trade in the United States, and I know the SCOTUS of the United States has routinely held just that.struth
You don't know shit from shinola on constitutional matters, which makes you a typical brainwashed american.
You don't know shit. Actually, all you do know is what some talking head on TV has told you. You cannot distinguish between fact and fiction, and that makes you a very ordinary brainwashed American.I know the Commerce clause allows the Federal Govt to regulate the drug trade in the United States, and I know the SCOTUS of the United States has routinely held just that.
But hey, you are an island and believe whatever you want to believe....I am sure that arguement of yours will hold up well in Court.
Well actually I just read art 1 section 8 clause three of the us constitutionYou don't know shit. Actually, all you do know is what some talking head on TV has told you. You cannot distinguish between fact and fiction, and that makes you a very ordinary brainwashed American.