MindWars
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2016
- 42,227
- 10,743
- 2,040
- Banned
- #1
“Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals” was written by community organizer Saul Alinsky in 1971. It has become the de facto progressive manifesto for effecting political change.
Opening: “What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.”
Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton met with Saul Alinsky several times in 1968 while she was writing her college thesis on his community organization theories. President Barack Obama’s education was also greatly influenced by Alinsky and his theories.
What is The Truth About Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals – and how does it work?
Sources: [YouTube] The Truth About Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals - New Freedomain Radio Content and Updates - Freedomain Radio Message Board
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is good information to learn how people are socially engineered, how these protests tend to take place in such large numbers.
Hillary Clinton did a paper on Saul Alinsky I believe it was one of her Thesis. this is a tactic used by the Government (s) that work on people and how they think , why they think the way they do.
It is a rule used to gain power and the radical liberals are the victims of it. They do not know what they don't know. This is one of the reasons they don't know what they don't know they are sold bs lies.
-----------------------------------------------
If radicals were to be in the vanguard of the movement to transfer power from the Haves to the Have-Nots, Alinsky’s first order of business was to define precisely what a radical was. He approached this task by first distinguishing between liberals and radicals. Alinsky had no patience for those he called the liberals of his day -- people who were content to talk about the changes they wanted, but were unwilling to actively work for those changes. Rather, he favored “radicals” who were prepared to take bold, decisive action designed to transform society, even if that transformation could be achieved only slowly and incrementally. Wrote Alinsky:
"Liberals fear power or its application.… They talk glibly of people lifting themselves by their own bootstraps but fail to realize that nothing can be lifted except through power…. Radicals precipitate the social crisis by action -- by using power…. Liberals protest; radicals rebel. Liberals become indignant; radicals become fighting mad and go into action. Liberals do not modify their personal lives[,] and what they give to a cause is a small part of their lives; radicals give themselves to the cause. Liberals give and take oral arguments; radicals give and take the hard, dirty, bitter way of life."[13]
If the purpose of radicalism is to bring about social transmutation, the radical must be prepared to make a persuasive case for why such change is urgently necessary. Alinsky’s convic......................
Saul Alinsky - Discover the Networks
