tyroneweaver
Diamond Member
being a Mormon I try and be a good Christian. Sometimes I don't do very well. Hopefully Christ will judge with some shades of gray.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Glenn Beck is a mormon. I dont want any part of a religion that Glenn Beck is part of.
Period.
God Bless.
can you rationalize any harder?that's the second biggest lie the Mormons have ever told..Sure did. Plenty of it. and plenty more to come. But you pholks call them "Maya" ruins.
. Argument #3: Archaeologists confirm the historical content of the B of Mormon
1. Statements by the Smithsonian Institution and the National Geographic Society:
•"The Smithsonian Institution has never used the Book of Mormon in any way as a scientific guide. Smithsonian archaeologists see no connection between the archaeology of the New, World and the subject matter of the Book." Official Statement, 1979
•"Neither representatives of the National Geographic Society nor, to my knowledge, archeologists connected with any other institution or equal prestige have ever used the Book of Mormon in locating historic ruins in Middle America or elsewhere." Dr. Neal Judd
Historical inaccuracy of the Book of Mormon
Hah!!! The Smithsonian??? What a joke!!! Of course they must and absolutely must ignore the Book of Mormon! To consider it for a moment would shatter all their ideas about God not existing and their theories and convolutions about he origins of man on all continents, let alone the Western Hemisphere. Ignorance is bliss to that well funded quack society who refuses to consider all evidence.
Do you base your life on that good ol boys network?
Snow White is a better story -- and more intelligently written.no it's a much a fantasy as snow white.I guess the book of mormons is just another analogical based religious text?
Can't rationalize any better!can you rationalize any harder?that's the second biggest lie the Mormons have ever told..
. Argument #3: Archaeologists confirm the historical content of the B of Mormon
1. Statements by the Smithsonian Institution and the National Geographic Society:
•"The Smithsonian Institution has never used the Book of Mormon in any way as a scientific guide. Smithsonian archaeologists see no connection between the archaeology of the New, World and the subject matter of the Book." Official Statement, 1979
•"Neither representatives of the National Geographic Society nor, to my knowledge, archeologists connected with any other institution or equal prestige have ever used the Book of Mormon in locating historic ruins in Middle America or elsewhere." Dr. Neal Judd
Historical inaccuracy of the Book of Mormon
Hah!!! The Smithsonian??? What a joke!!! Of course they must and absolutely must ignore the Book of Mormon! To consider it for a moment would shatter all their ideas about God not existing and their theories and convolutions about he origins of man on all continents, let alone the Western Hemisphere. Ignorance is bliss to that well funded quack society who refuses to consider all evidence.
Do you base your life on that good ol boys network?
Snow White is a better story -- and more intelligently written.no it's a much a fantasy as snow white.I guess the book of mormons is just another analogical based religious text?
.
I was certainly surprised -- and appalled -- that anyone could have brains so crude that they could not immediately perceive that such garbage was the production of a 19th century illiterate hick from upstate New York.One of these days, I'd like the critics of the Book of Mormon to actually read it for themselves instead of relying on what others say about it. I think it would surprise them.
One of these days, I'd like the critics of the Book of Mormon to actually read it for themselves instead of relying on what others say about it. I think it would surprise them.
I HAVE. take my word for it, the phone book is a better read.One of these days, I'd like the critics of the Book of Mormon to actually read it for themselves instead of relying on what others say about it. I think it would surprise them.
That sword cuts both ways. I have run into many Mormons who express highly negative opinions of mainstream Christianity with no knowledge of the doctrine, history, or practice of the groups they are trashing. BYU is a particularly fertile ground for misinformation and naked prejudice.
BTW I have no dog in the fight, not being Christian of any flavor myself. And I refrain from comment on the BoM or D&C as I have not read them (and have no desire to).
One of these days, I'd like the critics of the Book of Mormon to actually read it for themselves instead of relying on what others say about it. I think it would surprise them.
That sword cuts both ways. I have run into many Mormons who express highly negative opinions of mainstream Christianity with no knowledge of the doctrine, history, or practice of the groups they are trashing. BYU is a particularly fertile ground for misinformation and naked prejudice.
BTW I have no dog in the fight, not being Christian of any flavor myself. And I refrain from comment on the BoM or D&C as I have not read them (and have no desire to).
I was certainly surprised -- and appalled -- that anyone could have brains so crude that they could not immediately perceive that such garbage was the production of a 19th century illiterate hick from upstate New York.One of these days, I'd like the critics of the Book of Mormon to actually read it for themselves instead of relying on what others say about it. I think it would surprise them.
I still regret the hours I spent as a teenager plowing through such fecal matter in a misguided attempt to be fair to the opinions of religious cranks. To think I could have been improving my mind by reading the works of Machiavelli !!
Forget about the absurd content of this long, tedious screed -- the pathetic attempt to imitate the style of the Bible should be an abomination to anyone with sensitive feelings.
Anyone who could read such poorly written trash without feeling offended certainly did not deserve to graduate from a high school English class !!
.
I was certainly surprised -- and appalled -- that anyone could have brains so crude that they could not immediately perceive that such garbage was the production of a 19th century illiterate hick from upstate New York.One of these days, I'd like the critics of the Book of Mormon to actually read it for themselves instead of relying on what others say about it. I think it would surprise them.
I still regret the hours I spent as a teenager plowing through such fecal matter in a misguided attempt to be fair to the opinions of religious cranks. To think I could have been improving my mind by reading the works of Machiavelli !!
Forget about the absurd content of this long, tedious screed -- the pathetic attempt to imitate the style of the Bible should be an abomination to anyone with sensitive feelings.
Anyone who could read such poorly written trash without feeling offended certainly did not deserve to graduate from a high school English class !!
.
The BoM is bad Bible Fan Fic.
I was kind of hoping the defeat of Mitt Romney would mean I wouldn't have to talk about these fools anymore.
Here's the overall problem. Unlike the Bible, which can be seen as a collection of slanted history, there is only one conclusion one can draw from the Book of Mormon.
Joseph Smith made it all up. That is proven by the fact that there is no evidence of the Nephite civilization having ever existed.