Mr.Conley
Senior Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Alright, to review:musicman said:You're babbling now, Mr.Conley. At least try to give your replies some obscure relevance to the conversation.
I asked you your opinion.
You said the article was a joke.
I asked you why.
You said you read the article
I sarcastically said that was a good rebuttal.
You said you were, "just giving you a straight answer to your question,"
I said you are going to have to give some more justification.
You just said I'm sidetracking the conversation by asking for said justification.
Now I don't know about you, but asking an argument more detailed then, "
[I support this conclusion] by reading that bullshit article you posted," isn't without, "some obscure relevance to the conversation".
You're going to have to do better than that.
Do you have anything to say to support you position?
Must there be a hidden conspiracy everywhere? You're sounding almost like rtwng. Only this time it's the liberals.musicman said:But you didn't POST "On Bullshit". You posted a "tried - unsuccessfully - to be sneaky" hit piece that used "On Bullshit" as a point of departure. You have an agenda, Mr.Conley; you're just not terribly clever about it.
I would love to post "On Bullshit." The problem is that the essay is available only in print and I don't feel like typing all 70-odd-whatever-number-of-pages-the-thing-is all at once. This essay was the best substitute I could find.
Out of curiosity, what is my agenda? Am I nothing but a pawn of the evil liberals? Am I here for no reason other than to slowly destroy your undying faith in the Republican party? What is it musicman?
Okay, now I know your drunk. I'll talk to you tomorrow. Get some sleep.musicman said:Ah, good - you've abandoned all pretense of having any respect for me whatsoever. I much prefer fresh air and the light of day.
Out of curiosity, you do understand what at least the wikipedia article is saying, right? Do you get what the premise states? We can quibble all you want about whatever it is your trying to insinuate, but you understand what the articles are describing.musicman said:Immaterial. This is not what you initially posted. This is not what you tried to slide in under the door. And, "what you're trying to get across" couldn't be any clearer if it was a buttonhook in the well water.