The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History

[Chillicothe]

"Go Trump, fuck you demscum shit for brains."

Is such, gonna make America great again....or ever?
Is that MAGA?

I ask that, as I am curious if other MAGA's on this chatroom, or even the QAnon'rs that lurk and post here, well, I'm curious if they think the poster JusticeHammer speaks for them? Fairly represents them? Is he (she?) cut from the same cloth as most MAGA's? Does he have the same demeanor, civility, grasp of our language, and perceptive thinking that any MAGA would be proud to call one of theirs?

Just curious.

 

[Hollie]

------------------------------------------------------------
I read it.
It is from Jim Hoft's Gateway Pundit.
And written by Jim Hoft.

It says that Carroll "helped" the efforts to get this law passed. Carroll herself stated such, if Hoft's account is accurate.
OK, so?
Lots and lots of women...and men.....helped to get it passed.
But it's inception, it's intent was NOT to exclusively help a single litigant against Don Trump, to wit, E. Jean Carroll.
It was to protect ALL victims of sexual abuse, hence "Adult Survivors Act".

I would posit that Republican and Democrat legislators in Albany....have lots and lots of reasons to enhance protection for abuse victims, and potential abuse victims. For example, Hollie, please note there are lots and lots of 'survivors' of sexual abuse in that state......(and other states). More than 6,000 in the state of New York last year.

So, your conspiracy that that law was crafted, introduced, and passed (bi-partisan) simply and only to help E. Jean Carroll get Don Trump, simply ain't true. And I know you know that. Everybody knows that.

(Show us testimony or legislative notes from the Legislators who drafted and introduced the bill that articulate that it was their sole intent to get Trump). Jim Hoft's opinion ain't a source that we can use for the legislator's intent. And you know that, too.

Did E.Jean Carrol benefit by the passage? Yeah, probably.

But she probably benefitted by a whole raft of laws that were passed in Albany over the years. As did millions of New York residents. THAT is the intent of legislating ....to benefit the vast majority of the state's population.
So E.Jean Carroll benefitted by the change in the law......but the real intended beneficiaries were the millions of New York women...and men, and children....who have suffered sexual abuse or may suffer it in the future.

And you really do know that, poster Hollie. Everybody can know that.

Your attempt at conspiracy theory is weak.

The facts remain that in a Dem / Socialist controlled state with the assistance of Soros controlled DA’s, it is no coincidence that those Dems / Socialists changed the law with the intention of using those laws to target Trump.

You can excuse such manipulative and unethical actions to defend such behavior but you really do know that such behavior is intended to be selective and punitive. That really speaks to the repulsive behavior of Dems / Socialists. It’s a complete abandonment of any ethical standard.

 

[otto105]

Yep. The story is fraudulent, and take from a TV show.

E . Jean Carroll is a nutter and a liar.

...​

​

Far from a compelling claim, the 80-year-old writer initially laid out the story that her supposed rape occurred either in 1994, before altering the day to be “in the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996.” She couldn’t remember the specifics. What she did remember was that she was wearing a “Donna Karan coatdress and high heels but not a coat.” She later refused to produce said coat for DNA testing despite admitting to still owning it, describing it as “unworn and unlaundered since that evening.” It later came to light that the coatdress was not made in 1994 or 1995.​

​

It didn’t matter to Carroll, who has accused multiple men of sexually assaulting or raping her throughout her life, including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.​

​

...​

​

But even if your sympathies still lay with Carroll, consider this. Carroll – a self-declared Law and Order TV show fan – first made her allegations against Trump in a 2019 book, just a few years after an episode of the show saw characters discuss a role-played rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.​

​

...​

​

Carroll’s entire character is one of bizarre sexual thoughts, antics, and actions. Another piece of evidence the judge refused to allow was that Carroll named her cat “Vagina” and posted repeatedly about anal sex, celebrity fantasies, and pornography.​

​

In fact, in 2012, Trump himself was the subject of one of these fantasies Carroll shared on her Facebook page: “Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” before going on to suggest that in her fantasy scenario, Trump may not be able to speak. An odd thing to post for someone who alleges that the same man raped her less than two decades prior.​

​

Again, none of this was allowed to be heard by the jury that awarded Carroll nearly $85 million today, in addition to the $5.5 million another Manhattan jury already awarded her in her first case.​

​

Carroll has admitted that she first considered bringing a suit against Trump during a house party hosted by far-left blogger Molly Jong-Fast.​

​

Jong-Fast, a writer for the viciously ‘Never Trump’ publications the Atlantic, the Bulwark, the Daily Beast, and Vanity Fair, is the daughter of feminist activist Erica Jong and anti-gun author Jonathan Fast. She is also the granddaughter of communist author Howard Fast.​

​

...​

KASSAM: The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History.

The awarding of nearly $90 million to the second-rate advice columnist E. Jean Carroll will doubtless be remembered for generations as the greatest miscarriage of justice in contemporary American history. Jean Carroll’s case was not just ludicrous on the face of it, but between the judge, the...

thenationalpulse.com

Wrong, it's the conservative court's Citizens United ruling.

 

[otto105]

Your attempt at conspiracy theory is weak.

The facts remain that in a Dem / Socialist controlled state with the assistance of Soros controlled DA’s, it is no coincidence that those Dems / Socialists changed the law with the intention of using those laws to target Trump.

You can excuse such manipulative and unethical actions to defend such behavior but you really do know that such behavior is intended to be selective and punitive. That really speaks to the repulsive behavior of Dems / Socialists. It’s a complete abandonment of any ethical standard.

Hilarious coming from a cheeto messiah supporter.

 

[Invisibleflash]

Yep. The story is fraudulent, and take from a TV show.

E . Jean Carroll is a nutter and a liar.

...​

​

Far from a compelling claim, the 80-year-old writer initially laid out the story that her supposed rape occurred either in 1994, before altering the day to be “in the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996.” She couldn’t remember the specifics. What she did remember was that she was wearing a “Donna Karan coatdress and high heels but not a coat.” She later refused to produce said coat for DNA testing despite admitting to still owning it, describing it as “unworn and unlaundered since that evening.” It later came to light that the coatdress was not made in 1994 or 1995.​

​

It didn’t matter to Carroll, who has accused multiple men of sexually assaulting or raping her throughout her life, including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.​

​

...​

​

But even if your sympathies still lay with Carroll, consider this. Carroll – a self-declared Law and Order TV show fan – first made her allegations against Trump in a 2019 book, just a few years after an episode of the show saw characters discuss a role-played rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.​

​

...​

​

Carroll’s entire character is one of bizarre sexual thoughts, antics, and actions. Another piece of evidence the judge refused to allow was that Carroll named her cat “Vagina” and posted repeatedly about anal sex, celebrity fantasies, and pornography.​

​

In fact, in 2012, Trump himself was the subject of one of these fantasies Carroll shared on her Facebook page: “Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” before going on to suggest that in her fantasy scenario, Trump may not be able to speak. An odd thing to post for someone who alleges that the same man raped her less than two decades prior.​

​

Again, none of this was allowed to be heard by the jury that awarded Carroll nearly $85 million today, in addition to the $5.5 million another Manhattan jury already awarded her in her first case.​

​

Carroll has admitted that she first considered bringing a suit against Trump during a house party hosted by far-left blogger Molly Jong-Fast.​

​

Jong-Fast, a writer for the viciously ‘Never Trump’ publications the Atlantic, the Bulwark, the Daily Beast, and Vanity Fair, is the daughter of feminist activist Erica Jong and anti-gun author Jonathan Fast. She is also the granddaughter of communist author Howard Fast.​

​

...​

KASSAM: The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History.

The awarding of nearly $90 million to the second-rate advice columnist E. Jean Carroll will doubtless be remembered for generations as the greatest miscarriage of justice in contemporary American history. Jean Carroll’s case was not just ludicrous on the face of it, but between the judge, the...

thenationalpulse.com

Dunno, but it is right up there at the top.

 

[skye]

 

[otto105]

View attachment 894057

Hilarious bitch

His innocence was determined in the first trial. He was found guilty of sexual misconduct.

 

[skye]

 

[otto105]

View attachment 894070

Paula jones had her day in court.

Tara reade has never filed any action.

The fuckup lost in court.

 

[Moonglow]

Yep. The story is fraudulent, and take from a TV show.

E . Jean Carroll is a nutter and a liar.

...​

​

Far from a compelling claim, the 80-year-old writer initially laid out the story that her supposed rape occurred either in 1994, before altering the day to be “in the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996.” She couldn’t remember the specifics. What she did remember was that she was wearing a “Donna Karan coatdress and high heels but not a coat.” She later refused to produce said coat for DNA testing despite admitting to still owning it, describing it as “unworn and unlaundered since that evening.” It later came to light that the coatdress was not made in 1994 or 1995.​

​

It didn’t matter to Carroll, who has accused multiple men of sexually assaulting or raping her throughout her life, including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.​

​

...​

​

But even if your sympathies still lay with Carroll, consider this. Carroll – a self-declared Law and Order TV show fan – first made her allegations against Trump in a 2019 book, just a few years after an episode of the show saw characters discuss a role-played rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.​

​

...​

​

Carroll’s entire character is one of bizarre sexual thoughts, antics, and actions. Another piece of evidence the judge refused to allow was that Carroll named her cat “Vagina” and posted repeatedly about anal sex, celebrity fantasies, and pornography.​

​

In fact, in 2012, Trump himself was the subject of one of these fantasies Carroll shared on her Facebook page: “Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” before going on to suggest that in her fantasy scenario, Trump may not be able to speak. An odd thing to post for someone who alleges that the same man raped her less than two decades prior.​

​

Again, none of this was allowed to be heard by the jury that awarded Carroll nearly $85 million today, in addition to the $5.5 million another Manhattan jury already awarded her in her first case.​

​

Carroll has admitted that she first considered bringing a suit against Trump during a house party hosted by far-left blogger Molly Jong-Fast.​

​

Jong-Fast, a writer for the viciously ‘Never Trump’ publications the Atlantic, the Bulwark, the Daily Beast, and Vanity Fair, is the daughter of feminist activist Erica Jong and anti-gun author Jonathan Fast. She is also the granddaughter of communist author Howard Fast.​

​

...​

KASSAM: The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History.

The awarding of nearly $90 million to the second-rate advice columnist E. Jean Carroll will doubtless be remembered for generations as the greatest miscarriage of justice in contemporary American history. Jean Carroll’s case was not just ludicrous on the face of it, but between the judge, the...

thenationalpulse.com

Poh, fellow puzzy grabbers are not gonna like getting sued.

 

[skye]

The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History​

If not the greatest certainly near the top of the list

Second that!

 

[Moonglow]

Paula jones had her day in court.

Tara reade has never filed any action.

The fuckup lost in court.

I laugh at him every time I think of it, he has paid dearly for that ego he has.

 

[Moonglow]

You're going to hell

That boy sure loves him some Trump yet claims not to be gay.

 

[Chillicothe]

"...those Dems / Socialists changed the law with the intention of using those laws to target Trump."

That sounds ominous, good poster Holly.
Dire and portentous even.
So.......
.....can you prove any of it?

Prove it without offering the forum the RWNJobbery of uber-conspiracist Jim Hoft?

Do you have any other credible, verifiable sources? In lieu of Jim Hoft? Or, Alex Jones?

And then, what about Red state Texas? What about Red state Iowa?
Did they too change some of their laws to protect sexual abuse victims......in order to hunt down Trump too?

Thanx in advance, Hollie.
And remember, this is Adult Swim......you are supposed to be responsible and trustable in your postings.

 

[toobfreak]

The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History

Wow. 90 million dollars defamation for someone who nobody has ever heard of, in a case where all her facts are unproven and conflicted over an event that supposedly occurred 40 years ago?

That is insane.

 

[Hollie]

That sounds ominous, good poster Holly.
Dire and portentous even.
So.......
.....can you prove any of it?

Prove it without offering the forum the RWNJobbery of uber-conspiracist Jim Hoft?

Do you have any other credible, verifiable sources? In lieu of Jim Hoft? Or, Alex Jones?

And then, what about Red state Texas? What about Red state Iowa?
Did they too change some of their laws to protect sexual abuse victims......in order to hunt down Trump too?

Thanx in advance, Hollie.
And remember, this is Adult Swim......you are supposed to be responsible and trustable in your postings.

I understand you were embarrassed that links to statements by E. Jean Carroll and her attorney conflicted with your specious, unsupported opinion but why get angry and emotive?

Do you have any credible, verifiable evidence that the link you requested contains false information? Do you have any credible, verifiable evidence to refute what you were given?

And remember, you should be responsible for supporting your claims.

 

[otto105]

Wow. 90 million dollars defamation for someone who nobody has ever heard of, in a case where all her facts are unproven and conflicted over an event that supposedly occurred 40 years ago?

That is insane.

Actually it's $83.3 million and in the first trail the fuckup never contested her testimony or that of her witnesses.

Second, his fuckup ego caused the second defamation trail which he lost.

 

[john doe 101]

If i was Trump, i would round up every single illegal in the nation and shove them all into NY and then build a wall around the state. I would WRECK that fucking place. I would deny all federal funding to them, even if they have a natural disaster or terrorist attack. I would turn that shithole into something similar to "Escape from New York", except this time we wont be sending in Snake Pliskin to save the day.

You'll sit there and do nothing. By the way....Trump is a rapist.

 

[toobfreak]

View attachment 894070

I believe all these cases are contrived by far left Trump-haters knowing full well their cases have no basis in fact and will be overturned in the long run but that they can railroad Trump with only by dint of their judicial authority to bring them despite all facts to the contrary, with the intent of just costing Trump a fortune in legal fees fighting them, then yet more money to acquit himself on appeal, as a way of just "getting" him while he is still a private citizen because no other way worked.

 

[otto105]

I believe all these cases are contrived by far left Trump-haters knowing full well their cases have no basis in fact and will be overturned in the long run but that they can railroad Trump with only by dint of their judicial authority to bring them despite all facts to the contrary, with the intent of just costing Trump a fortune in legal fees fighting them, then yet more money to acquit himself on appeal, as a way of just "getting" him while he is still a private citizen because no other way worked.

The former fuckup caused ALL his legal issues.

You just want to kiss the cheeto messiah's ring.