The time for dancing on the head of a pin is no more.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
25,045
Reaction score
21,016
Points
2,320
How Trump Is Trying to Consolidate Power Over Courts, Congress and More

President Trump called for one federal judge seeking basic information about his deportation efforts to be impeached amid mounting concern about a constitutional showdown. Another judge found that Mr. Trump’s efforts to shut down a federal agency probably violated the Constitution and stripped Congress of its authority. The president was accused of overstepping his executive authority yet again in firing two Democratic commissioners from an independent trade commission. And that was just Tuesday.
Nearly two months into his second term, Mr. Trump is trying to consolidate control over the courts, Congress and even, in some ways, American society and culture.

His expansive interpretation of presidential power has become the defining characteristic of his second term, an aggressive effort across multiple fronts to assert executive authority to reshape the government, drive policy in new directions and root out what he and his supporters see as a deeply embedded liberal bias.

“We’ve never seen a president so comprehensively attempt to arrogate and consolidate so much of the other branches’ power, let alone to do so in the first two months of his presidency,” said Stephen Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/...date-power-over-courts-congress-and-more.html

Opinions may differ as to whether a prez inherently has the powers trump is claiming for himself. Or whether a prez should have those powers. But the debate over whether he IS seeking them has ended by virtue of his actions. Call it dictatorial, call it autocratic, call it what you will, trump is actively in pursuit of executive power that flies in the face of the Founder's intentions for co-equal branches of government. If successful it will fundamentally change America.
 
Yep, the unelected lawyer judges can be ignored. They don't have the power per the constitution to manage the executive branch of government
You mean like those unelected judges that ruled a President is above the law?

Why does Trump only get outraged when cases go against him?
 
You mean like those unelected judges that ruled a President is above the law?

Why does Trump only get outraged when cases go against him?
I was reminded of the instance of trump attacking a judge recently.

Over the course of 12 minutes, Donald Trump used a campaign rally in San Diego on Friday night to lace into the judge overseeing a lawsuit over Trump University, calling him a “hater” and speculating about his ethnicity.

“The trial is going to take place sometime in November. There should be no trial. This should have been dismissed on summary judgment easily,” Trump said. “Everybody says it, but I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He’s a hater. His name is Gonzalo Curiel.”


The Felon-in-Chief hates the enforcement of law because he is on the wrong side of it so often.
 
I was reminded of the instance of trump attacking a judge recently.

Over the course of 12 minutes, Donald Trump used a campaign rally in San Diego on Friday night to lace into the judge overseeing a lawsuit over Trump University, calling him a “hater” and speculating about his ethnicity.

“The trial is going to take place sometime in November. There should be no trial. This should have been dismissed on summary judgment easily,” Trump said. “Everybody says it, but I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He’s a hater. His name is Gonzalo Curiel.”


The Felon-in-Chief hates the enforcement of law because he is on the wrong side of it so often.
 
How Trump Is Trying to Consolidate Power Over Courts, Congress and More

President Trump called for one federal judge seeking basic information about his deportation efforts to be impeached amid mounting concern about a constitutional showdown. Another judge found that Mr. Trump’s efforts to shut down a federal agency probably violated the Constitution and stripped Congress of its authority. The president was accused of overstepping his executive authority yet again in firing two Democratic commissioners from an independent trade commission. And that was just Tuesday.
Nearly two months into his second term, Mr. Trump is trying to consolidate control over the courts, Congress and even, in some ways, American society and culture.

His expansive interpretation of presidential power has become the defining characteristic of his second term, an aggressive effort across multiple fronts to assert executive authority to reshape the government, drive policy in new directions and root out what he and his supporters see as a deeply embedded liberal bias.

“We’ve never seen a president so comprehensively attempt to arrogate and consolidate so much of the other branches’ power, let alone to do so in the first two months of his presidency,” said Stephen Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/...date-power-over-courts-congress-and-more.html

Opinions may differ as to whether a prez inherently has the powers trump is claiming for himself. Or whether a prez should have those powers. But the debate over whether he IS seeking them has ended by virtue of his actions. Call it dictatorial, call it autocratic, call it what you will, trump is actively in pursuit of executive power that flies in the face of the Founder's intentions for co-equal branches of government. If successful it will fundamentally change America.
So, you're jealous that the other side is doing what Democrats had been doing?
 
How Trump Is Trying to Consolidate Power Over Courts, Congress and More

President Trump called for one federal judge seeking basic information about his deportation efforts to be impeached amid mounting concern about a constitutional showdown. Another judge found that Mr. Trump’s efforts to shut down a federal agency probably violated the Constitution and stripped Congress of its authority. The president was accused of overstepping his executive authority yet again in firing two Democratic commissioners from an independent trade commission. And that was just Tuesday.
Nearly two months into his second term, Mr. Trump is trying to consolidate control over the courts, Congress and even, in some ways, American society and culture.

His expansive interpretation of presidential power has become the defining characteristic of his second term, an aggressive effort across multiple fronts to assert executive authority to reshape the government, drive policy in new directions and root out what he and his supporters see as a deeply embedded liberal bias.

“We’ve never seen a president so comprehensively attempt to arrogate and consolidate so much of the other branches’ power, let alone to do so in the first two months of his presidency,” said Stephen Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/...date-power-over-courts-congress-and-more.html

Opinions may differ as to whether a prez inherently has the powers trump is claiming for himself. Or whether a prez should have those powers. But the debate over whether he IS seeking them has ended by virtue of his actions. Call it dictatorial, call it autocratic, call it what you will, trump is actively in pursuit of executive power that flies in the face of the Founder's intentions for co-equal branches of government. If successful it will fundamentally change America.
yeah, ok----a little as a manifestation of an EXPANSIVE
nature----nothing new in presidents and it will come to
nothing new.
 
How Trump Is Trying to Consolidate Power Over Courts, Congress and More

President Trump called for one federal judge seeking basic information about his deportation efforts to be impeached amid mounting concern about a constitutional showdown. Another judge found that Mr. Trump’s efforts to shut down a federal agency probably violated the Constitution and stripped Congress of its authority. The president was accused of overstepping his executive authority yet again in firing two Democratic commissioners from an independent trade commission. And that was just Tuesday.
Nearly two months into his second term, Mr. Trump is trying to consolidate control over the courts, Congress and even, in some ways, American society and culture.

His expansive interpretation of presidential power has become the defining characteristic of his second term, an aggressive effort across multiple fronts to assert executive authority to reshape the government, drive policy in new directions and root out what he and his supporters see as a deeply embedded liberal bias.

“We’ve never seen a president so comprehensively attempt to arrogate and consolidate so much of the other branches’ power, let alone to do so in the first two months of his presidency,” said Stephen Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/...date-power-over-courts-congress-and-more.html

Opinions may differ as to whether a prez inherently has the powers trump is claiming for himself. Or whether a prez should have those powers. But the debate over whether he IS seeking them has ended by virtue of his actions. Call it dictatorial, call it autocratic, call it what you will, trump is actively in pursuit of executive power that flies in the face of the Founder's intentions for co-equal branches of government. If successful it will fundamentally change America.
I've noticed a pattern by the left of abusing their authority, and when they lose power, they prevent a duly elected president from carrying out his duties.

I think it's clear we aren't dealing with Americans. We're dealing with Domestic Terrorists. I don't care if they call themselves Democrats. They're still terrorists, and every one of them needs to answer for their support of these terrorist acts.
 
I've noticed a pattern by the left of abusing their authority, and when they lose power, they prevent a duly elected president from carrying out his duties.

I think it's clear we aren't dealing with Americans. We're dealing with Domestic Terrorists. I don't care if they call themselves Democrats. They're still terrorists, and every one of them needs to answer for their support of these terrorist acts.
are you surprised?
 
So, you're jealous that the other side is doing what Democrats had been doing?
Not jealous of what trump is doing, alarmed is more accurate. Also of the shirking of their responsibilities by House Repubs.

Congress, which is controlled by Republicans, has ceded some of its core duties to Mr. Trump, handing off elements of the legislative branch’s spending authority to the White House and standing aside as congressionally chartered agencies are shuttered. The president has threatened to “lead the charge” against the re-election of the rare Republican who dares challenge his agenda, and the party has bent to his will at every turn.

Mr. Trump has dismantled independent measures of checks and balances, fired inspectors general and installed loyalists at the Justice Department willing to carry out his campaign of retribution. He has targeted private law firms with connections to those he views as political enemies and cowed previously skeptical or hostile business leaders into pledging public support, even as he has imprinted his “MAGA” stamp on the private sector by trying to dictate hiring practices.
 
I've noticed a pattern by the left of abusing their authority, and when they lose power, they prevent a duly elected president from carrying out his duties.
His duties include respecting judicial rulings until they are overturned on appeal. Ignoring them is an abuse of power for which he should be held in contempt.
 
Yep, the unelected lawyer judges can be ignored. They don't have the power per the constitution to manage the executive branch of government
So the president can pick and choose which court rulings he needs to obey?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
His duties include respecting judicial rulings until they are overturned on appeal. Ignoring them is an abuse of power for which he should be held in contempt.
Not really. Obama and Biden ignored rulings by judges before. They went ahead and did what they wanted. To a Democrat the law is just a tool to use against their opposition.
 
It's dictatorial, autocratic, illiberal, and authoritarian.
If you have the ability to read it Jamelle Bouie has a great editorial making the point trump is more anti-constitutional than unconstitutional.
 
Not jealous of what trump is doing, alarmed is more accurate. Also of the shirking of their responsibilities by House Repubs.

Congress, which is controlled by Republicans, has ceded some of its core duties to Mr. Trump, handing off elements of the legislative branch’s spending authority to the White House and standing aside as congressionally chartered agencies are shuttered. The president has threatened to “lead the charge” against the re-election of the rare Republican who dares challenge his agenda, and the party has bent to his will at every turn.

Mr. Trump has dismantled independent measures of checks and balances, fired inspectors general and installed loyalists at the Justice Department willing to carry out his campaign of retribution. He has targeted private law firms with connections to those he views as political enemies and cowed previously skeptical or hostile business leaders into pledging public support, even as he has imprinted his “MAGA” stamp on the private sector by trying to dictate hiring practices.
The president has the authority to fire anyone who is a political appointee.
He also has the authority to order RIFs from time to time.
He doesn't have to have a reason to fire these people when he is reorganizing departments in the Executive Branch.
 
The president has the authority to fire anyone who is a political appointee.
This prez is asserting that authority. Multiple courts disagree. Some agency heads can only be fired for cause because their positions were designed to have protection from politically motivated firings. Protections trump has routinely violated.

Trump Fires Democrats on Federal Trade Commission​

The decision to fire the two members of the traditionally independent regulatory body is likely to face a legal challenge.
 
Back
Top Bottom