Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dear QW -
The main thing is for you to avoid facts. Under no circumstance at all must you address the issue. Use any tactics possible to avoid dealing with the bleeding obvious.
Best wishes,
the NRA.
You said that the US has a homicide rate that is 10 times higher than any civilized nation.
You said that the US has a homicide rate that is 10 times higher than any civilized nation.
Yeah, and don't forget about gang killings there Sai ---
Did you ever remove gang related deaths and re-compare???
Guess what... we are virtually the same as England except for the fact that we have a TON of gang killing compared to them.
Like I stated before - - We have a GANG problem, not a GUN problem!!!
...and you know that it's true!!
Obamanation -
Do you have a link?
yeah, and don't forget about gang killings there sai ---
did you ever remove gang related deaths and re-compare???
Guess what... We are virtually the same as england except for the fact that we have a ton of gang killing compared to them.
Like i stated before - - we have a gang problem, not a gun problem!!!
...and you know that it's true!!
yup
mostly in liberal gun controlled areas ta boot
QW -
Yes, of course 'gun-related homicides' are a subset of all 'homicides' - which is why I posted both the sets of data you are now ignoring.
If it makes you feel better, then what I should have said initially is that the US has a gun-related homicide rate more than 10 times that of the UK. I apologise if you found my post confusing.
Let's go back to you refusing to address the topic now.
The puny little backwater colony of the Americas took on and defeated the most powerful army in the world once back in the eighteenth century. I am pretty sure that the 300,000,000 gun owners in the USA can take on and beat the army in a war over the rights which are granted by our birth. It might be an ugly gorrila war fought in the streets of every city across the nation but the enemy is outnumbered and without resolve. They can't use heavy weapons to wipe out civilians inside cities without massive collateral damage so they will be forced to go house to house in small teams just like they did in the middle east. In a war of attrition the people will win.
The puny little backwater colony of the Americas took on and defeated the most powerful army in the world once back in the eighteenth century. I am pretty sure that the 300,000,000 gun owners in the USA can take on and beat the army in a war over the rights which are granted by our birth. It might be an ugly gorrila war fought in the streets of every city across the nation but the enemy is outnumbered and without resolve. They can't use heavy weapons to wipe out civilians inside cities without massive collateral damage so they will be forced to go house to house in small teams just like they did in the middle east. In a war of attrition the people will win.
England was defeated by great distances and great aid to the rebels from France.
If we expect to be 'saved' by the massively over-weight minority that is ready to actually shoot at another person and risk being killed, we expect far too much.
The men who faced the Redcoats were hard, strong, enduring people. It is dreaming to think the population that would really resist is like those forerunners.
The puny little backwater colony of the Americas took on and defeated the most powerful army in the world once back in the eighteenth century. I am pretty sure that the 300,000,000 gun owners in the USA can take on and beat the army in a war over the rights which are granted by our birth. It might be an ugly gorrila war fought in the streets of every city across the nation but the enemy is outnumbered and without resolve. They can't use heavy weapons to wipe out civilians inside cities without massive collateral damage so they will be forced to go house to house in small teams just like they did in the middle east. In a war of attrition the people will win.
England was defeated by great distances and great aid to the rebels from France.
If we expect to be 'saved' by the massively over-weight minority that is ready to actually shoot at another person and risk being killed, we expect far too much.
The men who faced the Redcoats were hard, strong, enduring people. It is dreaming to think the population that would really resist is like those forerunners.
Try us...
The puny little backwater colony of the Americas took on and defeated the most powerful army in the world once back in the eighteenth century. I am pretty sure that the 300,000,000 gun owners in the USA can take on and beat the army in a war over the rights which are granted by our birth. It might be an ugly gorrila war fought in the streets of every city across the nation but the enemy is outnumbered and without resolve. They can't use heavy weapons to wipe out civilians inside cities without massive collateral damage so they will be forced to go house to house in small teams just like they did in the middle east. In a war of attrition the people will win.
England was defeated by great distances and great aid to the rebels from France.
If we expect to be 'saved' by the massively over-weight minority that is ready to actually shoot at another person and risk being killed, we expect far too much.
The men who faced the Redcoats were hard, strong, enduring people. It is dreaming to think the population that would really resist is like those forerunners.
The puny little backwater colony of the Americas took on and defeated the most powerful army in the world once back in the eighteenth century. I am pretty sure that the 300,000,000 gun owners in the USA can take on and beat the army in a war over the rights which are granted by our birth. It might be an ugly gorrila war fought in the streets of every city across the nation but the enemy is outnumbered and without resolve. They can't use heavy weapons to wipe out civilians inside cities without massive collateral damage so they will be forced to go house to house in small teams just like they did in the middle east. In a war of attrition the people will win.
England was defeated by great distances and great aid to the rebels from France.
If we expect to be 'saved' by the massively over-weight minority that is ready to actually shoot at another person and risk being killed, we expect far too much.
The men who faced the Redcoats were hard, strong, enduring people. It is dreaming to think the population that would really resist is like those forerunners.
And how exactly do you think the war would have ESCALATED ENOUGH to grab the attention of France if we were disarmed?
In other words, if the people had no arms to INITIATE the war, France itself would not have been involved.
And how exactly do you think the war would have ESCALATED ENOUGH to grab the attention of France if we were disarmed?
In other words, if the people had no arms to INITIATE the war, France itself would not have been involved.
First, that is not the subject in this thread.
Second, this poster never said anything about disarming anyone.
Third, in the late 18th century, it was at least possible, though seldom successful, for armed civilians to resist soldiers that were equipped with the same technology.
The revolution did not succeed due to citizens being armed. It succeeded by an army, trained and armed and reinforced by France, finally tiring the British into giving up.
Who changed the subject?
Oh, and goodbye.
Obamanation -
No, I can not provide a link to back up your claims. This is probably because no such proof exists.
QW -
It's good to know that when you refuse to address the topic, it is not because you are ignoring it.
