The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist

Gosh, I wish you could be thrown into that cell with that big hairy one who is so proud of what he and the others accomplished that day.
Why would you wish that for me??

I am a loyal American that loves my country.

Just because I believe Mossad was behind the attack doesn't make me less patriotic. .. :cool:

SM, let me ask you a sensitive question, if the US was attacked and invaded by a sunni nation, on which side would you fight?
 
Why would you wish that for me??

I am a loyal American that loves my country.

Just because I believe Mossad was behind the attack doesn't make me less patriotic. .. :cool:

Dude, to these people if you don't love israel more your not an American.

How fucked up is that?

That's not true at all

Because you're from canada.

If canada was attacked by israel, on which side would you fight?
 
Last edited:
Sunni....

A Month of Horror for Christians under Islam


There, al-Qaeda-linked jihadis fired mortars and missiles into at least two ancient churches before looting them; some 80 Christians trying to defend their homes were killed. Others who could not flee were forced, on pain of death, to convert to Islam.

One man's last words before being slaughtered by the rebels were: "I am a Christian, and if you want to kill me for that, I do not object to it." A nun involved with humanitarian relief said the man "is a Martyr in Christ in the full sense of this word, since he was murdered solely because of religious hatred!"

The Christian Post reports:


Jihadists reportedly forced one man to convert to Islam at gunpoint and slit the throat of another Christian woman's fiancé and then [mockingly] told her, "Jesus didn't come to save him."…. "I saw people wearing Al-Nusra headbands who started shooting at crosses," the Christian senior told the AFP. One of the shooters, he said, "put a pistol to the head of my neighbor and forced him to convert to Islam by obliging him to repeat 'there is no God but God' [Islamic shehada]...Afterwards they joked, 'he's one of ours now.'"

In al-Thawrah, Syria, Christians were also singled out for attack by jihadi invaders. In one incident, they stopped three residents, released two who identified themselves as Muslims, and bludgeoned to death the third after he identified himself a Christian (graphic image). They also destroyed, among other churches, the Antiochian Orthodox church of Sts. Sergius and Bacchus.

In Raqqah, a city in northern Syria, the al-Qaeda linked "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" broke the crosses off the area's two Christian churches and placed on them al-Qaeda's Islamic flags. They also set the contents of the Church of the Annunciation and the Church of Martyrs aflame. In one video, a Muslim "freedom fighter" smashes a statue of Virgin Mary to shouts of Islam's war-cry cry, "Allahu Akbar!" ["Allah is Greater!"]

These latest attacks come in the context of yet another fatwa that appeared in September, and issued by 36 Islamic scholars who legitimized "the right of the faithful Sunni Muslims to seize and take possession of goods, homes, property belonging to Christians, Druze and Alawite and members of other religious minorities 'who do not profess the Sunni religion of the Prophet.'" (Earlier, before the "sex jihad" solved the problem by luring Muslim women from Tunisia and elsewhere to provide their sexual services to jihadis in Syria fighting to make Allah's word supreme, another fatwa permitted jihadis to rape all non-Sunni women.)

Meanwhile, when publicly asked about the jihadi nature of the rebellion and that the rebels often shout Islam's supremacist war cry, Allahu Akbar (such as when firing at Chrisitan churches), U.S. Senator John McCain insisted that shouting "Allahu Akbar!" is equivalent to a Christian saying "Thank God," and that the rebels in Syria are "moderates and I guarantee you they are moderates."

A Month of Horror for Christians under Islam: September 2013 :: Gatestone Institute
.........................^^^ Gatestone Institute is a jewish funded Islamophobic hate site. .. :cuckoo: :lol: :lol:

The info is from the Christian Times.
 
What does that have to do with you making stuff up about posters here?

Does it upset you that I generalize and entire group of people for the actions of a few?

No, it just shows that you're a bigot

As you can see he is like a parrot repeating what others have said about this generalization bit. A man with the first name of Mohammed from Pakistan writing to Letters to the Editor of Dawn.com said that if there were only a small percentage of Muslims who were terrorists that could mean millions. He was a Muslim whose eyes were open to what was goin on, and he didn't like what he saw. No doubt there are many other Muslims who don't like what is going on.
 
I think every country where these Jihadists are coming from has to be worried, not only Great Britain.

The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist
Scotland Yard is right to be worried about British jihadists bringing the war home

By Con Coughlin

8:16PM GMT 03 Dec 2013

As adventures go, it might seem that there are few more worthy causes than fighting for the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad’s brutal dictatorship in Syria. This, after all, is a government that has waged a merciless campaign against its own citizens, with children regularly tortured to death and whole neighbourhoods razed to the ground by conventional – and occasionally non-conventional – weaponry.

With the death toll now well past 100,000 after nearly three years of bloodshed, it is easy to understand why so many young men and women in the West, incensed by the Assad regime’s disregard for human life, would want to offer their services to help overthrow this vile regime.

Continue reading at:

The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist - Telegraph
The US invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq managed to kill off an older order of terrorist who had, at least in some cases, studied in the west and recognized some of the virtues of democracy and self-determination.

Not so for the generation that's rising now in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. These terrorists have been raised on a steady diet of US murder, maiming, displacement, and incarceration, and they want absolutely nothing to do with western "values."

This from 2005:


"The chaos of Iraq is giving rise to a new generation of 'professional' terrorists who will eventually replace al-Qaida as a global threat, according to a CIA thinktank. A report by the National Intelligence Council says the war in Iraq has provided a training and recruitment ground for Islamist militants, much as Afghanistan did for the founding generation of al-Qaida during the war against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s.

"As new terror organisations emerge on the world stage, al-Qaida will splinter into regional separatist groups, says the report, which forecasts global trends over the next 15 years.

"'Iraq and other possible conflicts in the future could provide recruitment, training grounds, technical skills and language proficiency for a new class of terrorists who are "professionalised" and for whom political violence becomes an end in itself,' the report says.

"It gives warning that veterans of the conflict in Iraq could disperse around the world, exporting their deadly expertise.

"Specifically, the report warns that the US faces an increasing risk of an attack involving biological agents, such as anthrax, and that an emerging and more sophisticated generation of terrorists could also use chemical weapons.

"The bleak forecast undermines one of the Bush administration's central justifications for invading Iraq: that it was necessary to curb terrorism; that the country was a central front in the 'war on terror'; and that the deposed Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, had links to al-Qaida's chief, Osama bin Laden.

"Instead, the report describes how hundreds of foreign terrorists entered Iraq after the US invasion, and how the insurgency against American forces was viewed by radical Muslims as a war against a foreign occupier, akin to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

Iraq war is breeding a new generation of professional terrorists
 
I think every country where these Jihadists are coming from has to be worried, not only Great Britain.

The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist
Scotland Yard is right to be worried about British jihadists bringing the war home

By Con Coughlin

8:16PM GMT 03 Dec 2013

As adventures go, it might seem that there are few more worthy causes than fighting for the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad’s brutal dictatorship in Syria. This, after all, is a government that has waged a merciless campaign against its own citizens, with children regularly tortured to death and whole neighbourhoods razed to the ground by conventional – and occasionally non-conventional – weaponry.

With the death toll now well past 100,000 after nearly three years of bloodshed, it is easy to understand why so many young men and women in the West, incensed by the Assad regime’s disregard for human life, would want to offer their services to help overthrow this vile regime.

Continue reading at:

The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist - Telegraph
The US invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq managed to kill off an older order of terrorist who had, at least in some cases, studied in the west and recognized some of the virtues of democracy and self-determination.

Not so for the generation that's rising now in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. These terrorists have been raised on a steady diet of US murder, maiming, displacement, and incarceration, and they want absolutely nothing to do with western "values."

This from 2005:


"The chaos of Iraq is giving rise to a new generation of 'professional' terrorists who will eventually replace al-Qaida as a global threat, according to a CIA thinktank. A report by the National Intelligence Council says the war in Iraq has provided a training and recruitment ground for Islamist militants, much as Afghanistan did for the founding generation of al-Qaida during the war against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s.

"As new terror organisations emerge on the world stage, al-Qaida will splinter into regional separatist groups, says the report, which forecasts global trends over the next 15 years.

"'Iraq and other possible conflicts in the future could provide recruitment, training grounds, technical skills and language proficiency for a new class of terrorists who are "professionalised" and for whom political violence becomes an end in itself,' the report says.

"It gives warning that veterans of the conflict in Iraq could disperse around the world, exporting their deadly expertise.

"Specifically, the report warns that the US faces an increasing risk of an attack involving biological agents, such as anthrax, and that an emerging and more sophisticated generation of terrorists could also use chemical weapons.

"The bleak forecast undermines one of the Bush administration's central justifications for invading Iraq: that it was necessary to curb terrorism; that the country was a central front in the 'war on terror'; and that the deposed Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, had links to al-Qaida's chief, Osama bin Laden.

"Instead, the report describes how hundreds of foreign terrorists entered Iraq after the US invasion, and how the insurgency against American forces was viewed by radical Muslims as a war against a foreign occupier, akin to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

Iraq war is breeding a new generation of professional terrorists


George has no problem with Muslims killing millions. He just pulls up one of his old sites to blame the U.S. as per usual.
 
"In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: 'As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia,Sudan and finishing off Iran.'"

Only one country on this planet openly discusses plans to topple the governments of seven sovereign states on the opposite side of the world from its homeland, and it isn't Syria or Iraq.

Wesley Clark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist
Scotland Yard is right to be worried about British jihadists bringing the war home

Sorry, George. Jihadis are not "created" or "made" by acts of U.S. (or any others'), foreign policy. They are, however, mobilized by it when it rejects their goals and resists them. It is obvious that the names the terrorist groups operate under, proclaim that they are subordinate to and in fact, advancing the cause of their ideology. That ideology, of course, is jihad—scripturally defined warfare intended to expand the domination of Islam, all as delineated in the koran.

People like Salman Rushdie, Ali Sina and Ibn Warraq and others, all live under threat of death for doing nothing more than subjecting Islam to the same strictures of critique and reasoned analysis that people have every right to subject religion and philosophy to. They must now live in hiding, anonymously, or under protective guard because they have dared to criticize Islam. And now, since Theo Van Gogh was killed, Ms. Hirsi Ali is still in hiding. Isn't it about time we honestly question why such brutal violence and heavy-handed censure will often result to those who objectively assess, openly question and truthfully define Islam? Are we perhaps afraid of learning that it may actually be because of Islam’s internal dynamics that such things happen? That is why these atrocious street killings, beheadings, mass murders, etc., are happening, and have happened. They are Islamic.
 
Last edited:
The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist
Scotland Yard is right to be worried about British jihadists bringing the war home

Sorry, George. Jihadis are not "created" or "made" by acts of U.S. (or any others'), foreign policy. They are, however, mobilized by it when it rejects their goals and resists them. It is obvious that the names the terrorist groups operate under, proclaim that they are subordinate to and in fact, advancing the cause of their ideology. That ideology, of course, is jihad—scripturally defined warfare intended to expand the domination of Islam, all as delineated in the koran.

People like Salman Rushdie, Ali Sina and Ibn Warraq and others, all live under threat of death for doing nothing more than subjecting Islam to the same strictures of critique and reasoned analysis that people have every right to subject religion and philosophy to. They must now live in hiding, anonymously, or under protective guard because they have dared to criticize Islam. And now, since Theo Van Gogh was killed, Ms. Hirsi Ali is still in hiding. Isn't it about time we honestly question why such brutal violence and heavy-handed censure will often result to those who objectively assess, openly question and truthfully define Islam? Are we perhaps afraid of learning that it may actually be because of Islam’s internal dynamics that such things happen? That is why these atrocious street killings, beheadings, mass murders, etc., are happening, and have happened. They are Islamic.
Where does the name Al-Qaeda come from, Hollie?

"Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook wrote that the word al-Qaeda should be translated as 'the database', and originally referred to the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen militants who were recruited and trained with CIA help to defeat the Russians.[68]

"In April 2002, the group assumed the name Qa'idat al-Jihad, which means 'the base of Jihad'. According to Diaa Rashwan, this was 'apparently as a result of the merger of the overseas branch of Egypt's al-Jihad (Egyptian Islamist Jihad, or EIJ) group, led by Ayman al-Zawahiri, with the groups Bin Laden brought under his control after his return to Afghanistan in the mid-1990s.'"

Islamic fundamentalism was funded by the US and other western interests after the Second World War in order to diminish the influence of Arab secular nationalists who believed they were entitled to control the flow of their own sovereign oil.

Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The Syrian civil war is breeding a new generation of terrorist
Scotland Yard is right to be worried about British jihadists bringing the war home

Sorry, George. Jihadis are not "created" or "made" by acts of U.S. (or any others'), foreign policy. They are, however, mobilized by it when it rejects their goals and resists them. It is obvious that the names the terrorist groups operate under, proclaim that they are subordinate to and in fact, advancing the cause of their ideology. That ideology, of course, is jihad—scripturally defined warfare intended to expand the domination of Islam, all as delineated in the koran.

People like Salman Rushdie, Ali Sina and Ibn Warraq and others, all live under threat of death for doing nothing more than subjecting Islam to the same strictures of critique and reasoned analysis that people have every right to subject religion and philosophy to. They must now live in hiding, anonymously, or under protective guard because they have dared to criticize Islam. And now, since Theo Van Gogh was killed, Ms. Hirsi Ali is still in hiding. Isn't it about time we honestly question why such brutal violence and heavy-handed censure will often result to those who objectively assess, openly question and truthfully define Islam? Are we perhaps afraid of learning that it may actually be because of Islam’s internal dynamics that such things happen? That is why these atrocious street killings, beheadings, mass murders, etc., are happening, and have happened. They are Islamic.
Where does the name Al-Qaeda come from, Hollie?

"Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook wrote that the word al-Qaeda should be translated as 'the database', and originally referred to the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen militants who were recruited and trained with CIA help to defeat the Russians.[68]

"In April 2002, the group assumed the name Qa'idat al-Jihad, which means 'the base of Jihad'. According to Diaa Rashwan, this was 'apparently as a result of the merger of the overseas branch of Egypt's al-Jihad (Egyptian Islamist Jihad, or EIJ) group, led by Ayman al-Zawahiri, with the groups Bin Laden brought under his control after his return to Afghanistan in the mid-1990s.'"

Islamic fundamentalism was funded by the US and other western interests after the Second World War in order to diminish the influence of Arab secular nationalists who believed they were entitled to control the flow of their own sovereign oil.

Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yes, George, I see your point. The 1,400 year long Islamic jihad was created and funded by America. Yowza!

Jihad is world wide, diffuse and self-motivating for the jihadist. Al-Qaeda is just a name. So are Islamic Jihad, Abu Sayyaf, Hizbullah, Harakat al-Muqawamah al-Islamiyyah (Hamas), Al-Ikhwan Al-Moslemoon (the Muslim Brotherhood), Tanzim Qa'idat Al-Jihad in Bilad al-Rafidayn (al-Qaeda in Iraq), and the countless other Islamic terrorist organizations. Whatever name the Islamists prefer to call themselves, they always pass the same message: To kill the infidels and non-believers who would stand between Islam and its delusions of total world supremacy.
 
Sorry, George. Jihadis are not "created" or "made" by acts of U.S. (or any others'), foreign policy. They are, however, mobilized by it when it rejects their goals and resists them. It is obvious that the names the terrorist groups operate under, proclaim that they are subordinate to and in fact, advancing the cause of their ideology. That ideology, of course, is jihad—scripturally defined warfare intended to expand the domination of Islam, all as delineated in the koran.

People like Salman Rushdie, Ali Sina and Ibn Warraq and others, all live under threat of death for doing nothing more than subjecting Islam to the same strictures of critique and reasoned analysis that people have every right to subject religion and philosophy to. They must now live in hiding, anonymously, or under protective guard because they have dared to criticize Islam. And now, since Theo Van Gogh was killed, Ms. Hirsi Ali is still in hiding. Isn't it about time we honestly question why such brutal violence and heavy-handed censure will often result to those who objectively assess, openly question and truthfully define Islam? Are we perhaps afraid of learning that it may actually be because of Islam’s internal dynamics that such things happen? That is why these atrocious street killings, beheadings, mass murders, etc., are happening, and have happened. They are Islamic.
Where does the name Al-Qaeda come from, Hollie?

"Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook wrote that the word al-Qaeda should be translated as 'the database', and originally referred to the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen militants who were recruited and trained with CIA help to defeat the Russians.[68]

"In April 2002, the group assumed the name Qa'idat al-Jihad, which means 'the base of Jihad'. According to Diaa Rashwan, this was 'apparently as a result of the merger of the overseas branch of Egypt's al-Jihad (Egyptian Islamist Jihad, or EIJ) group, led by Ayman al-Zawahiri, with the groups Bin Laden brought under his control after his return to Afghanistan in the mid-1990s.'"

Islamic fundamentalism was funded by the US and other western interests after the Second World War in order to diminish the influence of Arab secular nationalists who believed they were entitled to control the flow of their own sovereign oil.

Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yes, George, I see your point. The 1,400 year long Islamic jihad was created and funded by America. Yowza!

Jihad is world wide, diffuse and self-motivating for the jihadist. Al-Qaeda is just a name. So are Islamic Jihad, Abu Sayyaf, Hizbullah, Harakat al-Muqawamah al-Islamiyyah (Hamas), Al-Ikhwan Al-Moslemoon (the Muslim Brotherhood), Tanzim Qa'idat Al-Jihad in Bilad al-Rafidayn (al-Qaeda in Iraq), and the countless other Islamic terrorist organizations. Whatever name the Islamists prefer to call themselves, they always pass the same message: To kill the infidels and non-believers who would stand between Islam and its delusions of total world supremacy.
"There are two commonly accepted meanings of jihad: an inner spiritual struggle and an outer physical struggle.[2]

"The 'greater jihad' is the inner struggle by a believer to fulfill his religious duties.[2][6]

"This non-violent meaning is stressed by both Muslim[7] and non-Muslim[8] authors.

"However, there is consensus amongst Islamic scholars that the concept of jihad will always include armed struggle against persecution and oppression.[9]"

Possibly you've missed the persecution and oppression the US military has inflicted upon millions of Muslim civilians since 1991? How many civilian infidels have they murdered, maimed, displaced, or forcibly converted in your home town?

Jihad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Fighters from around the region and the world are fighting in Syria, each for their own reasons, and little to do with the country or the people. Every faction is fighting at least two enemies at the same time. Soon the majority of people in syria will be foreigners not syrians.
Syria is today's armageddon.
Who suffers? Syrians. Half the population is now either a refugee or displaced with in the country. There are more syrian refugees in desperate need than there are palestinians. Some are resorting to eating lions and even some reports of cannibalism. Disease, weather, lack of clean water, even being attacked by the citizenry of the host countries and burning of their tents just adds to their woes.
Israel have been proving help where they can on both sides of the border, but they can't allow the flood of refugees in. Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey and even Iraq or over whelmed and unable to cope. Money is not going to cure the problem, just prolong the suffering. A band-aid on a broken damn.
 

Forum List

Back
Top