The Socialist Plan

What you call Sanders' 'socialist' agenda, point by point, is more popular with the American people than the average rightwing anti-socialist agenda.
That IS Sanders platform RETARD. NOT what I am calling it what HE is calling it idiot. Do you DENY Sanders is a socialist? HE says He is.

He's a democratic socialist. The best position anyone can have in the 21st century.
Whatever. He wants to turn the USA into a marxist regime
From those according to their abilities. To those according to their needs.
And we know how that worked out.....
Once you run out of people and things to tax...
Abilities. Exactly what you are afraid of. The common man/woman with abilities.
 
This thread is about more more more from Bernie Sanders......when we already have massive spending on Welfare and anti poverty measures as the number in this group increase.................

The reports posted, via CATO, shows there is no incentive to get off of these measures since in many cases they would be actually losing money if they did so.....................

The amounts listed by CATO are staggering regarding the amounts going out in some states................and the people in this country wonder why we are going broke..............add in the illegals getting them some too and we are headed for financial ruin...................

Bernie Sanders wants to hit the accelerator when we need to hit the brakes.


No, this thread is about the American people and the fact that we're sick of being ripped off and abused by the wealthy.

There is no incentive to get off of welfare because for many people available jobs (if there are any) do not pay a fair wage.

They have a choice:

1. Find a job, work your butt off to make someone else wealthy, live in abject poverty at a standard that's beneath that of a slave.

2. Live off of welfare, at the expense of the same wealthy people who would enslave you.

You're standard of living is about the same either way.

In most cases, if working paid a living wage, the vast majority would rather work. But that's not an option.

Many select #2 - and in a weird way, they are just being capitalists!
 
12138620_10156248883600389_9172284338607640920_o.jpg
 
My limited understanding of Marx's writings was that communism was an evolution of capitalism.
Capitalism, it builds what you need through exploitation, Socialism, it reduces the exploration and creates a more decent society, then Communism, the utopia (they can't be had here) if you make it that far and most won't.

Marx supported capitalism, which is why he mostly wrote about it, it's the first and necessary step.
I would hardly view capitalism as inherently exploitive. I would not view humans as inherently exploitive either. Regulations for those who are are necessary however.
Your Pollyanna views of capitalism and human nature are noted, and rejected. Humans, nearly without exception, will try and get away with any ******* thing they can. That is their nature.
If there is one frame of mind that is guaranteed to destroy a society more than any other it is that one's fellow man is inherently evil.
 
My limited understanding of Marx's writings was that communism was an evolution of capitalism.
Capitalism, it builds what you need through exploitation, Socialism, it reduces the exploration and creates a more decent society, then Communism, the utopia (they can't be had here) if you make it that far and most won't.

Marx supported capitalism, which is why he mostly wrote about it, it's the first and necessary step.
I would hardly view capitalism as inherently exploitive. I would not view humans as inherently exploitive either. Regulations for those who are are necessary however.
Your Pollyanna views of capitalism and human nature are noted, and rejected. Humans, nearly without exception, will try and get away with any ******* thing they can. That is their nature.
If there is one frame of mind that is guaranteed to destroy a society more than any other it is that one's fellow man is inherently evil.
That is not a frame of mind. That, my little dumbfuck, is human history.
 
Can you provide some examples?
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.


Observation is a form of measurement.
No, it is not. If I'm watching an ice cube melt I'm watching a solid become a liquid. No measurement is required. God you people are so ******* stupid.

You are observing one ice cube transition from one state to a second state, within a certain time period. That's a measurement.

Why don't you stick to subjects that you know about? Like getting drunk?
No, dumbfuck, I am watching a change of state which doesn't require any form of measurement. I could be observing a dog take a shit instead. Just give it up, dumbshit, you are ******* clueless like most here.


O.K. - what are your qualification regarding science exactly? Do you have any? I think it's obvious that you are the one that is clueless. (Wow, I'm an electrical engineer making a six figure income, yet you think that I'm a dumbshit huh?. Your stupidity is boundless!).
 
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.


Observation is a form of measurement.
No, it is not. If I'm watching an ice cube melt I'm watching a solid become a liquid. No measurement is required. God you people are so ******* stupid.

You are observing one ice cube transition from one state to a second state, within a certain time period. That's a measurement.

Why don't you stick to subjects that you know about? Like getting drunk?
No, dumbfuck, I am watching a change of state which doesn't require any form of measurement. I could be observing a dog take a shit instead. Just give it up, dumbshit, you are ******* clueless like most here.


O.K. - what are your qualification regarding science exactly? Do you have any? I think it's obvious that you are the one that is clueless. (Wow, I'm an electrical engineer making a six figure income, yet you think that I'm a dumbshit huh?. Your stupidity is boundless!).
Your Authority Appeal is noted, and tossed as it should be. Learn ******* science, dumbass, which is not what you do because we already did the science for you.

Argument from authority - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
4557131838_e482a77b84.jpg
 
Last edited:
You have no idea of what is meant by 'The Scientific method'. It is the cornerstone of science and it is all about taking measurements.
Measurement is only one part of science, dumbfuck. Introduction to the Scientific Method

If any one part is omitted then it is not the scientific method.

Oh, and just to play your infantile game:

You, sir, are a do-do head!
Science does not necessarily require measurement, dumbfuck. Next time just STFU.

Can you provide some examples?
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.

Without measurement how do you know theories are true or just the prejudice of the researcher?

Just take Frued's theories. How do we know there's an "id" and an "ego?" All we have is Freud's say-so on those issues.
 
This thread is about more more more from Bernie Sanders......when we already have massive spending on Welfare and anti poverty measures as the number in this group increase.................

The reports posted, via CATO, shows there is no incentive to get off of these measures since in many cases they would be actually losing money if they did so.....................

The amounts listed by CATO are staggering regarding the amounts going out in some states................and the people in this country wonder why we are going broke..............add in the illegals getting them some too and we are headed for financial ruin...................

Bernie Sanders wants to hit the accelerator when we need to hit the brakes.


No, this thread is about the American people and the fact that we're sick of being ripped off and abused by the wealthy.

There is no incentive to get off of welfare because for many people available jobs (if there are any) do not pay a fair wage.

They have a choice:

1. Find a job, work your butt off to make someone else wealthy, live in abject poverty at a standard that's beneath that of a slave.

2. Live off of welfare, at the expense of the same wealthy people who would enslave you.

You're standard of living is about the same either way.

In most cases, if working paid a living wage, the vast majority would rather work. But that's not an option.

Many select #2 - and in a weird way, they are just being capitalists!
Your dear leader just ensured more jobs leaving with the TPP...............

Your dear leader has halted foreign investment, like the Key Stone Pipeline that would have given that opportunity to some.........

Your dear leader has blocked permits in Federal Land that would do the same.............

Perhaps you need to vote for someone else.........

Finally, those capable of working should work if able..............irregardless if it is better to stay on Welfare or not.............because it is the right thing to do................unless they have a mentality like you...........

I'm not for the TPP or the other Free Trade deals sending our jobs offshore.........never have been........I'm also not for those who would rather sit on their ass when capable of working even if it's being a garbage man..........

There is a significant difference between our mentalities..............we cannot sustain this level of spending and it needs to stop.
 
Measurement is only one part of science, dumbfuck. Introduction to the Scientific Method

If any one part is omitted then it is not the scientific method.

Oh, and just to play your infantile game:

You, sir, are a do-do head!
Science does not necessarily require measurement, dumbfuck. Next time just STFU.

Can you provide some examples?
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.

Without measurement how do you know theories are true or just the prejudice of the researcher?

Just take Frued's theories. How do we know there's an "id" and an "ego?" All we have is Freud's say-so on those issues.
I can know that ice cubes melt, without any ******* bias or measurements, dumbfucks.
 
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.


Observation is a form of measurement.
No, it is not. If I'm watching an ice cube melt I'm watching a solid become a liquid. No measurement is required. God you people are so ******* stupid.

You are observing one ice cube transition from one state to a second state, within a certain time period. That's a measurement.

Why don't you stick to subjects that you know about? Like getting drunk?
No, dumbfuck, I am watching a change of state which doesn't require any form of measurement. I could be observing a dog take a shit instead. Just give it up, dumbshit, you are ******* clueless like most here.


O.K. - what are your qualification regarding science exactly? Do you have any? I think it's obvious that you are the one that is clueless. (Wow, I'm an electrical engineer making a six figure income, yet you think that I'm a dumbshit huh?. Your stupidity is boundless!).
I've been doing electrical and instrumentation work since 1984...........I've been red lining prints from electrical engineers most of that time when the designs don't work..............

You may draw the prints..........but someone has to make it work...........hopefully your not the type who we have to fix and red line your prints to get the equipment online......................Because it seems too many engineers should have had to spend some time in the field to get a working knowledge of getting it done.....................

Are you one of those types...............or are you Jam up.........which one.................
 
Can you provide some examples?
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.


Observation is a form of measurement.
No, it is not. If I'm watching an ice cube melt I'm watching a solid become a liquid. No measurement is required. God you people are so ******* stupid.

You are observing one ice cube transition from one state to a second state, within a certain time period. That's a measurement.

Why don't you stick to subjects that you know about? Like getting drunk?
No, dumbfuck, I am watching a change of state which doesn't require any form of measurement. I could be observing a dog take a shit instead. Just give it up, dumbshit, you are ******* clueless like most here.


You are an idiot that apparently believes that watching an ice cube melt or a dog take a shit is science! What a total fool!

You are an embarrassment to the human race.

BTW, it's obvious that someone who constantly declares other people to be stupid or dumb, the way you do, is desparately compensating for the fact that those terms have been repeatedly applied to you since you've been young. I'm truly sorry for that. You should seek professional help.
 
Observation is a form of measurement.
No, it is not. If I'm watching an ice cube melt I'm watching a solid become a liquid. No measurement is required. God you people are so ******* stupid.

You are observing one ice cube transition from one state to a second state, within a certain time period. That's a measurement.

Why don't you stick to subjects that you know about? Like getting drunk?
No, dumbfuck, I am watching a change of state which doesn't require any form of measurement. I could be observing a dog take a shit instead. Just give it up, dumbshit, you are ******* clueless like most here.


O.K. - what are your qualification regarding science exactly? Do you have any? I think it's obvious that you are the one that is clueless. (Wow, I'm an electrical engineer making a six figure income, yet you think that I'm a dumbshit huh?. Your stupidity is boundless!).
I've been doing electrical and instrumentation work since 1984...........I've been red lining prints from electrical engineers most of that time when the designs don't work..............

You may draw the prints..........but someone has to make it work...........hopefully your not the type who we have to fix and red line your prints to get the equipment online......................Because it seems too many engineers should have had to spend some time in the field to get a working knowledge of getting it done.....................

Are you one of those types...............or are you Jam up.........which one.................

Actually, I worked as an electronic technician, then an engineering technician and finally an engineer, so I know what you mean about getting designs that don't work and having to do modifications. But, make no mistake about it engineers have a world of knowledge that techs do not.

Read up on the square root of negative one, for example. Yes, it exists and is used for calculating inductive reactance.
 
If any one part is omitted then it is not the scientific method.

Oh, and just to play your infantile game:

You, sir, are a do-do head!
Science does not necessarily require measurement, dumbfuck. Next time just STFU.

Can you provide some examples?
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.

Without measurement how do you know theories are true or just the prejudice of the researcher?

Just take Frued's theories. How do we know there's an "id" and an "ego?" All we have is Freud's say-so on those issues.
I can know that ice cubes melt, without any ******* bias or measurements, dumbfucks.

Cavemen knew that ice cubes melt, but they weren't scientists now were they?
 
Cavemen knew that ice cubes melt, but they weren't scientists now were they?
They were if they were watching it as a scientist would. Science is a process, not a title you dumbfuck. All they had to do to be doing science was observe, a fundamental part of the process, which you would know if you weren't such a dogmatic ******* moron.
 
Science does not necessarily require measurement, dumbfuck. Next time just STFU.

Can you provide some examples?
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.

Without measurement how do you know theories are true or just the prejudice of the researcher?

Just take Frued's theories. How do we know there's an "id" and an "ego?" All we have is Freud's say-so on those issues.
I can know that ice cubes melt, without any ******* bias or measurements, dumbfucks.

Cavemen knew that ice cubes melt, but they weren't scientists now were they?
It is a matter of perspective. Please stop all of you!!!!
 
15th post
That would be for circuit board calculations on ic chips and boards more than likely......you know the ands ors nors exclusive and so on..................ujt firing circuits and so on

EIMB if my memory serves me correct would be the book to get the logic for input output design of micro chips on circuit boards.

In the Navy we trouble shot down to the individual component using O Scopes and Octopus attachments.

I've migrated into the standard FT, PT, LT, PDT and programming and calibration of the same..............

Just because you are an engineer doesn't make your grey matter better than others on this discussion anyway.
 
Can you provide some examples?
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.

Without measurement how do you know theories are true or just the prejudice of the researcher?

Just take Frued's theories. How do we know there's an "id" and an "ego?" All we have is Freud's say-so on those issues.
I can know that ice cubes melt, without any ******* bias or measurements, dumbfucks.

Cavemen knew that ice cubes melt, but they weren't scientists now were they?
It is a matter of perspective. Please stop all of you!!!!
It is nothing like a matter of perspective. That's utter bullshit.
 
Easy, dumbass, watch the behavior of anything, children, dogs, ants, you name it. No measurement is required. Freud made a living from observation, not measurement, and he was doing science.

Without measurement how do you know theories are true or just the prejudice of the researcher?

Just take Frued's theories. How do we know there's an "id" and an "ego?" All we have is Freud's say-so on those issues.
I can know that ice cubes melt, without any ******* bias or measurements, dumbfucks.

Cavemen knew that ice cubes melt, but they weren't scientists now were they?
It is a matter of perspective. Please stop all of you!!!!
It is nothing like a matter of perspective. That's utter bullshit.
You are arguing with an engineer about science. WTF do you think he is going to say? Must you persist? Really?
 
This thread is about more more more from Bernie Sanders......when we already have massive spending on Welfare and anti poverty measures as the number in this group increase.................

The reports posted, via CATO, shows there is no incentive to get off of these measures since in many cases they would be actually losing money if they did so.....................

The amounts listed by CATO are staggering regarding the amounts going out in some states................and the people in this country wonder why we are going broke..............add in the illegals getting them some too and we are headed for financial ruin...................

Bernie Sanders wants to hit the accelerator when we need to hit the brakes.


No, this thread is about the American people and the fact that we're sick of being ripped off and abused by the wealthy.

There is no incentive to get off of welfare because for many people available jobs (if there are any) do not pay a fair wage.

They have a choice:

1. Find a job, work your butt off to make someone else wealthy, live in abject poverty at a standard that's beneath that of a slave.

2. Live off of welfare, at the expense of the same wealthy people who would enslave you.

You're standard of living is about the same either way.

In most cases, if working paid a living wage, the vast majority would rather work. But that's not an option.

Many select #2 - and in a weird way, they are just being capitalists!
Your dear leader just ensured more jobs leaving with the TPP...............

Your dear leader has halted foreign investment, like the Key Stone Pipeline that would have given that opportunity to some.........

Your dear leader has blocked permits in Federal Land that would do the same.............

Perhaps you need to vote for someone else.........

Finally, those capable of working should work if able..............irregardless if it is better to stay on Welfare or not.............because it is the right thing to do................unless they have a mentality like you...........

I'm not for the TPP or the other Free Trade deals sending our jobs offshore.........never have been........I'm also not for those who would rather sit on their ass when capable of working even if it's being a garbage man..........

There is a significant difference between our mentalities..............we cannot sustain this level of spending and it needs to stop.

First of all, conservatives support TPP, not liberals. That's another topic entirely. Try not to lose control and rant...

Secondly, while I agree that every able bodied person should work, I also believe that everyone should receive a fair wage based on the value of their productivity, not on the minimum that an employer is willing to pay based on market conditions.

Third, we can afford this and much greater spending levels because the American workers have produced enough wealth to pay for it easily. Unfortunately, control of all of tat wealth has gone to the wealthiest 0.01% instead of to those that earned it. (Actually, it's not the fault of the 0.01% that the rest of America is dumb as shit, but still stealing from the stupid is wrong.)

The problem lies with workers being grossly underpaid for many years, and the wealthy abandoning America in order to take advantage of the cheap labor overseas.
 
Back
Top Bottom