The Secret Sauce Behind How They Steal Elections Has FINALLY Been Revealed...It’s All HERE!

It is funny that the same folks who swear they need guns to protect against the federal government are all to willing to give the federal government more of their personal information.

One guy was suggesting that you turn over your fingerprints as well to verify your voter information....

Bizarre.
 

THE JIG IS UP! The Secret Sauce Behind How They Steal Elections Has FINALLY Been Revealed...It’s All HERE!​

1 Dec 2022 ~~ By Patty McMurray
guest post by the brilliant Jay Valentine

Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud​

Database latency — a geeky term, but that’s how they did it!

A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago, a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store — so the police are on alert.
No database latency.
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3. Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
The National Change of Address Database (NCOA) will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine — except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database — the one that was changed, then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
Welcome to database latency.
Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back, and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file — months after the election.
What are you going to do about it? Reverse the election?
The new and current “ballot gathering strategy” mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games — exploiting database latency.
Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when current reality lags the underlying record. We all experience it in our electronics-driven society.
The ballot-gathering scammers know about latency — it’s their ground game!
To Republicans, election engineering is civics. To Democrats, it’s business — and they are great at it!
~Snip~
Our bad guys are happy to give up a few retail-level ballots to hide the wholesale-level ballot-gathering apparatus. They count on it.
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
  • Count the in-person votes on election day.
  • Count the early, in-person votes.
  • Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County, everything).
  • Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes then changed them back.
  • Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
  • Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
Floating ballots are the lifeblood Democrats need to win — and win they do.
Ballot gatherers know Republicans use dumb technology — relational databases, SQL, NCOA, Melissa, all non-real-time, highly latent systems.
~Snip~
We learned the core strategy to fight ballot-gathering fraud in real time analysis of voter rolls and cast ballots. It is also real-time analysis of ballot collection points — like large apartment complexes and dorms where ballots gather because there is not an apartment number.
The question now is whether Republicans want to start leading with technology or continue to spend millions on “big data” “data driven” batch buzzwords.
We are about to find out.


Commentary:
The voter fraud is diverse and ubiquitous. It changes depending on several factors. In AZ the Democrats knew 90% of GOP voters vote in person on Election Day. So a large percentage of the machines were down in primarily Republican precincts on Election Day. This cost Lake hundreds of thousands votes. In Michigan the Dems SOS made sure ballot petitions were tossed so the candidate who would have definitely beaten Whitmer were removed from the primary.
Democrats that pay people to deliver harvested ballots by the ballot are capable or orchestrating a massive redirection of mail in ballots? It only takes a few ‘leaders’ in each district to coordinate. Only a few hackers to massage the databases. Only a few people to look the other way.
Its all motivated by under the table payoffs. The ‘mules’ don't have to see the big picture, they just want their promised payoff.
:thankusmile: :yes_text12: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: You triggered the paid shills from Langley so you obviously hit a home run and totally nailed it.:2up:
 

THE JIG IS UP! The Secret Sauce Behind How They Steal Elections Has FINALLY Been Revealed...It’s All HERE!​

1 Dec 2022 ~~ By Patty McMurray
guest post by the brilliant Jay Valentine

Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud​

Database latency — a geeky term, but that’s how they did it!

A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago, a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store — so the police are on alert.
No database latency.
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3. Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
The National Change of Address Database (NCOA) will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine — except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database — the one that was changed, then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
Welcome to database latency.
Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back, and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file — months after the election.
What are you going to do about it? Reverse the election?
The new and current “ballot gathering strategy” mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games — exploiting database latency.
Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when current reality lags the underlying record. We all experience it in our electronics-driven society.
The ballot-gathering scammers know about latency — it’s their ground game!
To Republicans, election engineering is civics. To Democrats, it’s business — and they are great at it!
~Snip~
Our bad guys are happy to give up a few retail-level ballots to hide the wholesale-level ballot-gathering apparatus. They count on it.
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
  • Count the in-person votes on election day.
  • Count the early, in-person votes.
  • Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County, everything).
  • Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes then changed them back.
  • Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
  • Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
Floating ballots are the lifeblood Democrats need to win — and win they do.
Ballot gatherers know Republicans use dumb technology — relational databases, SQL, NCOA, Melissa, all non-real-time, highly latent systems.
~Snip~
We learned the core strategy to fight ballot-gathering fraud in real time analysis of voter rolls and cast ballots. It is also real-time analysis of ballot collection points — like large apartment complexes and dorms where ballots gather because there is not an apartment number.
The question now is whether Republicans want to start leading with technology or continue to spend millions on “big data” “data driven” batch buzzwords.
We are about to find out.


Commentary:
The voter fraud is diverse and ubiquitous. It changes depending on several factors. In AZ the Democrats knew 90% of GOP voters vote in person on Election Day. So a large percentage of the machines were down in primarily Republican precincts on Election Day. This cost Lake hundreds of thousands votes. In Michigan the Dems SOS made sure ballot petitions were tossed so the candidate who would have definitely beaten Whitmer were removed from the primary.
Democrats that pay people to deliver harvested ballots by the ballot are capable or orchestrating a massive redirection of mail in ballots? It only takes a few ‘leaders’ in each district to coordinate. Only a few hackers to massage the databases. Only a few people to look the other way.
Its all motivated by under the table payoffs. The ‘mules’ don't have to see the big picture, they just want their promised payoff.

They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?

If your claims were true, there would have been thousands of such complaints. Perhaps tens of thousands.

How many ya got?

Even worse, many of them would have been charged with voter fraud for voting twice.

How many of them ya got?

My guess is -- ZERO

Because that never happened. It's fun making shit up? Huh?
 
They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?

If your claims were true, there would have been thousands of such complaints. Perhaps tens of thousands.

How many ya got?

Even worse, many of them would have been charged with voter fraud for voting twice.

How many of them ya got?

My guess is -- ZERO

Because that never happened. It's fun making shit up? Huh?
~~~~~~
**********​
**********​
**********​
**********​
 
Last edited:
~~~~~~
**********​
**********​
**********​
**********​

The story in your first link was about the primaries, not the general election and it was later updated. In the general election, there were just a "handful" of cases...


A year and a half later, an investigation by his own office has found less double voting than he had suspected.

[...]

The investigation so far indicates about 300 voters cast two ballots in the June 2020 primary and August 2020 primary runoff, almost always because of mistakes by confused voters and poll workers. The number of double voters could rise because about 100 cases remain under investigation.

[...]

Double voting allegations were rarer in the general election in November, with a handful of isolated cases verified by investigators.

Your 2nd link had nothing to do with your bullshit claim of double voting.

Your 3rd link had nothing to do with your bullshit claim of double voting.

Your 4th link was a list of people who were convicted of ballot harvesting. Many being Republican but none where they voted with someone else's ballot for whom that actual voter also voted.

Your 5th link was just about how the CEO of Cyber Ninja's was invited into an area he was not authorized to be in.

Did you even bother to read your own links? None of them support your baseless allegations.
 
In

THE JIG IS UP! The Secret Sauce Behind How They Steal Elections Has FINALLY Been Revealed...It’s All HERE!​

1 Dec 2022 ~~ By Patty McMurray
guest post by the brilliant Jay Valentine

Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud​

Database latency — a geeky term, but that’s how they did it!

A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago, a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store — so the police are on alert.
No database latency.
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3. Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
The National Change of Address Database (NCOA) will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine — except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database — the one that was changed, then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
Welcome to database latency.
Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back, and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file — months after the election.
What are you going to do about it? Reverse the election?
The new and current “ballot gathering strategy” mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games — exploiting database latency.
Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when current reality lags the underlying record. We all experience it in our electronics-driven society.
The ballot-gathering scammers know about latency — it’s their ground game!
To Republicans, election engineering is civics. To Democrats, it’s business — and they are great at it!
~Snip~
Our bad guys are happy to give up a few retail-level ballots to hide the wholesale-level ballot-gathering apparatus. They count on it.
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
  • Count the in-person votes on election day.
  • Count the early, in-person votes.
  • Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County, everything).
  • Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes then changed them back.
  • Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
  • Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
Floating ballots are the lifeblood Democrats need to win — and win they do.
Ballot gatherers know Republicans use dumb technology — relational databases, SQL, NCOA, Melissa, all non-real-time, highly latent systems.
~Snip~
We learned the core strategy to fight ballot-gathering fraud in real time analysis of voter rolls and cast ballots. It is also real-time analysis of ballot collection points — like large apartment complexes and dorms where ballots gather because there is not an apartment number.
The question now is whether Republicans want to start leading with technology or continue to spend millions on “big data” “data driven” batch buzzwords.
We are about to find out.


Commentary:
The voter fraud is diverse and ubiquitous. It changes depending on several factors. In AZ the Democrats knew 90% of GOP voters vote in person on Election Day. So a large percentage of the machines were down in primarily Republican precincts on Election Day. This cost Lake hundreds of thousands votes. In Michigan the Dems SOS made sure ballot petitions were tossed so the candidate who would have definitely beaten Whitmer were removed from the primary.
Democrats that pay people to deliver harvested ballots by the ballot are capable or orchestrating a massive redirection of mail in ballots? It only takes a few ‘leaders’ in each district to coordinate. Only a few hackers to massage the databases. Only a few people to look the other way.
Its all motivated by under the table payoffs. The ‘mules’ don't have to see the big picture, they just want their promised payoff.
Interesting indeed.
 

THE JIG IS UP! The Secret Sauce Behind How They Steal Elections Has FINALLY Been Revealed...It’s All HERE!​

1 Dec 2022 ~~ By Patty McMurray
guest post by the brilliant Jay Valentine

Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud​

Database latency — a geeky term, but that’s how they did it!

A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago, a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store — so the police are on alert.
No database latency.
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3. Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
The National Change of Address Database (NCOA) will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine — except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database — the one that was changed, then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
Welcome to database latency.
Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back, and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file — months after the election.
What are you going to do about it? Reverse the election?
The new and current “ballot gathering strategy” mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games — exploiting database latency.
Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when current reality lags the underlying record. We all experience it in our electronics-driven society.
The ballot-gathering scammers know about latency — it’s their ground game!
To Republicans, election engineering is civics. To Democrats, it’s business — and they are great at it!
~Snip~
Our bad guys are happy to give up a few retail-level ballots to hide the wholesale-level ballot-gathering apparatus. They count on it.
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
  • Count the in-person votes on election day.
  • Count the early, in-person votes.
  • Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County, everything).
  • Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes then changed them back.
  • Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
  • Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
Floating ballots are the lifeblood Democrats need to win — and win they do.
Ballot gatherers know Republicans use dumb technology — relational databases, SQL, NCOA, Melissa, all non-real-time, highly latent systems.
~Snip~
We learned the core strategy to fight ballot-gathering fraud in real time analysis of voter rolls and cast ballots. It is also real-time analysis of ballot collection points — like large apartment complexes and dorms where ballots gather because there is not an apartment number.
The question now is whether Republicans want to start leading with technology or continue to spend millions on “big data” “data driven” batch buzzwords.
We are about to find out.


Commentary:
The voter fraud is diverse and ubiquitous. It changes depending on several factors. In AZ the Democrats knew 90% of GOP voters vote in person on Election Day. So a large percentage of the machines were down in primarily Republican precincts on Election Day. This cost Lake hundreds of thousands votes. In Michigan the Dems SOS made sure ballot petitions were tossed so the candidate who would have definitely beaten Whitmer were removed from the primary.
Democrats that pay people to deliver harvested ballots by the ballot are capable or orchestrating a massive redirection of mail in ballots? It only takes a few ‘leaders’ in each district to coordinate. Only a few hackers to massage the databases. Only a few people to look the other way.
Its all motivated by under the table payoffs. The ‘mules’ don't have to see the big picture, they just want their promised payoff.
Makes you wonder how the Dems lost the House... LOL
 

Forum List

Back
Top