The Road to Auschwitz Ran Through American Genocide

Alexandre Fedorovski

Gold Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,536
1,161
210
Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.

At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

250px-De_Bry_1c.JPG
 
Aww so heart tugging. Never mind the natives violence against each other. Never mind the incans and mayans sacrificing sawing off heads. Oh yes, the world was all peaceful and roses before columbus showed up. Lol.
 
WOW...

You went all the way back to 1400's to blame AMERICANS for Hitlers KILLING OF JEWS......

Let me guess.. Your an atheist and antisemitic...


Is that what he did? I lost interest pretty quickly.


Christopher Columbus was a great explorer. If the Mexicans are butthurt over that, because they identify more with the bloodthirsty Aztecs than the Christian Spaniards, that is not to their credit.
 
It would have been a much shorter trip, and on target, to discuss American eugenics and Auschwitz.
 
It would have been a much shorter trip, and on target, to discuss American eugenics and Auschwitz.



Though true that would be a shorter trip, why discuss American eugenics as though it was particularly relevant to Nazi dogma and later policies?
 
It would have been a much shorter trip, and on target, to discuss American eugenics and Auschwitz.



Though true that would be a shorter trip, why discuss American eugenics as though it was particularly relevant to Nazi dogma and later policies?

Hitler was jealous that the US was able to legitimize eugenics via law. Eugenics was a thing in the UK, Canada, the US, etc. and so on. Hitler wanted to join the club. Nobody gave a damn about Hitler. And then they saw just how far it could go and...........quietly cut their crap and walked away backwards.
 
WOW...

You went all the way back to 1400's to blame AMERICANS for Hitlers KILLING OF JEWS......

Let me guess.. Your an atheist and antisemitic...

Hitler's killing of jews was an issue created by THE CATHOLIC CHURCH---not by
Columbus ----alone
 
It would have been a much shorter trip, and on target, to discuss American eugenics and Auschwitz.



Though true that would be a shorter trip, why discuss American eugenics as though it was particularly relevant to Nazi dogma and later policies?

Hitler was jealous that the US was able to legitimize eugenics via law. Eugenics was a thing in the UK, Canada, the US, etc. and so on. Hitler wanted to join the club. Nobody gave a damn about Hitler. And then they saw just how far it could go and...........quietly cut their crap and walked away backwards.



To be clear, are you trying to put some form of moral responsibility for the Holocaust on lawmakers in the South, for passing laws to do shit like not share bathrooms with blacks?


Cause that seems unfair.
 
Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.

At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

250px-De_Bry_1c.JPG
Shitforbrains thinks Chris Columbus was an American.

Everything that occurred prior to 1776 was EUROPEAN, Dufus.

The level of education coming out of schools today is mind boggling
 
It would have been a much shorter trip, and on target, to discuss American eugenics and Auschwitz.



Though true that would be a shorter trip, why discuss American eugenics as though it was particularly relevant to Nazi dogma and later policies?

Hitler was jealous that the US was able to legitimize eugenics via law. Eugenics was a thing in the UK, Canada, the US, etc. and so on. Hitler wanted to join the club. Nobody gave a damn about Hitler. And then they saw just how far it could go and...........quietly cut their crap and walked away backwards.



To be clear, are you trying to put some form of moral responsibility for the Holocaust on lawmakers in the South, for passing laws to do shit like not share bathrooms with blacks?


Cause that seems unfair.

Uh.......no. You know......eugenics and compulsory sterilization laws. The first law was in 1907 in the state of Indiana.
EugenicsArchive

Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States

Then {{meta.pageTitle}}

And that whole little kidnap Appalachian folks and sterilization thing. And Puerto Ricans. And Black women. And experiments were a thing too.

Edwin Black has an excellent book on it.
 
Last edited:
WOW...

You went all the way back to 1400's to blame AMERICANS for Hitlers KILLING OF JEWS......

Let me guess.. Your an atheist and antisemitic...

Hitler's killing of jews was an issue created by THE CATHOLIC CHURCH---not by
Columbus ----alone
I would say supported is a better word than created.

not really----the issue is precedent----not only facilitation contemporary to the time.
Adolf was the son of the church and of such luminaries thereof like Martin Luther
 
WOW...

You went all the way back to 1400's to blame AMERICANS for Hitlers KILLING OF JEWS......

Let me guess.. Your an atheist and antisemitic...

Hitler's killing of jews was an issue created by THE CATHOLIC CHURCH---not by
Columbus ----alone


The Catholic Church? That seems like crazy talk.

try paying attention next time you are in church or reading the literature thereof
 
It would have been a much shorter trip, and on target, to discuss American eugenics and Auschwitz.



Though true that would be a shorter trip, why discuss American eugenics as though it was particularly relevant to Nazi dogma and later policies?

Hitler was jealous that the US was able to legitimize eugenics via law. Eugenics was a thing in the UK, Canada, the US, etc. and so on. Hitler wanted to join the club. Nobody gave a damn about Hitler. And then they saw just how far it could go and...........quietly cut their crap and walked away backwards.



To be clear, are you trying to put some form of moral responsibility for the Holocaust on lawmakers in the South, for passing laws to do shit like not share bathrooms with blacks?


Cause that seems unfair.

Uh.......no. You know......eugenics and compulsory sterilization laws. The first law was in 1907 in the state of Indiana.
EugenicsArchive

Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States

Then {{meta.pageTitle}}

And that whole little kidnap Appalachian folks and sterilization thing. And Puerto Ricans. And Black women. And experiments were a thing too.

Edwin Black has an excellent book on it.

true that he was influenced by the EUGENICS thing-----but the USA did not invent
that one either-------in fact it goes all the way back to the ancient Greeks who
had no problem leaving "defective" infants exposed on a rock
 
Prologue

October 14th is the National day of the bastard, moral monster, misanthrope, killer and slave trader...

In the center of New York stands a monument to Christopher Columbus. Cities, squares, streets, and the Federal District are named after this person. Columbus Day is an American national holiday.

At the same time, all the monuments to Columbus and Cortes are demolished in Mexico, renaming cities and streets. His name is cursed and oblivious ...

So, whom do we Americans honor?

Since the first contact of Columbus, a Franciscan monk, according to some sources, with the indigenous people of America in Columbus, a slave trader in the recent past, two desires fought in him:

on the one hand, he wanted to assimilate them, so that they were like he wanted the Indians to be like himself, and on the other, to convert them to Christianity. He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force (!!!)”.

He wrote to the Queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another ...and we ” would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish ... ”

He wanted to convert the Indians to propagate the Gospel. This intention was the fundamental to Columbus’s initial project. He declared: “I have known that they were people disposed to submit themselves to and to convert to out Holly Faith much more readily by love than by force”.

He also wrote to the queen of Spain that “These people have no religion, nor are they idolators, but very gentle and ignorant of evil and do not even know how to kill one another…” … fifty men Your Highnesses would hold them all in subjection and do with them that you could wish…”

But then something went wrong. It turned out that the Indians did not want to accept a culture alien to them, in particular, the Christian religion.

Here is what Bartholome, the brother of the slave trader Columbus, wrote about this:

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth (the first sign that they had religious ideas about how to fight evil - A.F.) and pissed upon it. "

Watching that Bartholome decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

The Indians received the first visual lesson on how to kill. Moreover, not just kill, but with particular cruelty and sadism…


But then something went wrong.

“After having left the chapel, these men flung the images to the ground, covered them with a heap of earth and pissed upon it”.

Watching that Bartholome Columbus brother) decided to punish Indians just in the Christian fashion:

“As lieutenant of the Viceroy and governor of the islands, he brought these wretched men to justice and, their crimes being duly attested to, he caused them to be burned alive in public” (Ramon Pane, in Columbus, 62, 26).

So, Columbus gave the Indians, people, “... who did not know how to kill one another” the first visual lesson of Christian cruelty ...

I want to note that the Christian religion in history was everywhere imposed by violence. In Russia, in particular, the so-called Prince Vladimir (in fact, he was not a “prince”, but received a document on the right to reign from the Tatars to rule in Russia), allegedly the son of a Jewish woman, the housekeeper of his father Svyatoslav, drove the inhabitants of the city of Kiev into the Dnieper River with “fire and sword” and carried out baptization.

The struggle with the Christian religion in Russia lasted two hundred years. Her victims were hundreds of thousands of Slavs, adherents of their faith.

A little later, Columbus changed his views. He decided that his mission was to rob the Indians of gold and give them the Christian religion in return. Spaniards give religion and take gold as for exchange.

During the fourth voyage Columbus finally understood that Indians did not seem especially enthusiastic about the declaration of Spanish sovereignty over their lands and them (by this time they finally began to understand the essence of the rite of establishing the Spanish flag on their land).

When the Spaniards began to build houses and fortresses the land of their leader (Columbus exchanged lands of the Chief for a pair of gloves and a red hat), the Chief ordered to destroy and burn those houses and kill all Spaniards in return (by this time the Spaniards had taught the once innocent Indians a good lesson in cruelty.) Columbus ordered the Chief’s extended family and relative to be held hostage to send them to Spain.

Here is what the son of the former and future slave trader, Franciscan monk Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand wrote about this:

"The remaining prisoners were seized with despair, for they had not had not escaped with their comrades, and it was discovered the next morning that they had hanged themselves from the bridge-poles with some ropes they had managed to find there, bending their knees to do so, for otherwise there was not enough room for them to hang themselves properly ”

That was the time when the killer, Columbus, shifted from assimilationalizm, based on principal of equality, to an ideology of enslavement. To be consistent, the criminal established distinctions between “innocent, potentially Christian Indians and idolatrous Indians, practicing cannibalism (being immune to foreign languages, he misinterpreted the word“ canabi ”’s, Canary Islands’s name, often used by the Indians, and thought it meant “ cannibals ”and therefore , should be punished "thereby deserve to be punished, ... become slaves: there is no middle path".

Columbus was a good economist: Spanish ships carrying arms, soldiers, and livestock should not have been empty. This is what he wrote to the queen ":

“... From here one might send, in the name of the Holy Trinity, as many slaves as could be sold, as well as a quantity of Brazil (timber - A.F.). If the information I have is correct it appears that we could sell four thousand slaves, who might be worthy twenty millions and more ”(Letter to the Sovereigns, September 1498).

250px-De_Bry_1c.JPG

Columbus was Italian and the Conquistadors were Spanish.
 

Forum List

Back
Top