The Right To Destroy Jewish History

No, this is justice and the letter of the law,
generosity suggests beyond what one deserves.

While you try to race bate talking about European Zionists,
the majority of Israelis are people expelled by Arabs from the Middle East.

No one was expelled from any Moslem country.
In fact, Moslem countries had made it illegal to emigrate to Israel.
They all snuck out to go to Israel, illegally.
You are just deliberately lying.
And the proof is that there are still Jews in all Moslem countries.
There are over 30,000 Jews living in Tehran alone.
 
There are no "Arab" Jews. There only Jews who left Arab conquered lands.

Since you have never met an Arab who likes Jews, and especially Israelis, you keep talking from the side of your mouth.

Go to Israel, meet Arabs who are citizens of Israel, who live and work and deal with Jews on a daily basis, and then come back and spew all of that nonsense again.

Liar.
The ONLY real Jews are Arabs, as the original Hebrew tribes are Arab.
The only Jews who are not Arab are converts.
 
No one was expelled from any Moslem country.
In fact, Moslem countries had made it illegal to emigrate to Israel.
They all snuck out to go to Israel, illegally.
You are just deliberately lying.
And the proof is that there are still Jews in all Moslem countries.
There are over 30,000 Jews living in Tehran alone.
The number of Jews in Iran has plummeted since the 1979 Islamic Revolution
636704738085043474-082118-IRAN-JEWS22-ONLINE.png

-------------------
The lost Jewish communities of the Arab world


-------
Although the issues surrounding the Palestinian refugees are frequently addressed at the United Nations (”U.N.”), in the news media, and in legal journals, very little has been written about the Jews displaced from Arab lands. In light of the little known fact that approximately 50% of Israelis are Jews from Arab lands or their descendents, this Article will use Jews from Iraq as a case study in examining the history and rights of Jews from Arab countries, who were expelled or forced to seek refuge elsewhere. Part I of this Article examines the historical legal status of Jews in Iraq and the discriminatory and prosecutorial events that triggered the expulsion of Jews from Iraq. Part II demonstrates that actions taken by Iraq against Jews violated international law stan- dards and other laws applicable now and at that time. Part III addresses the question of whether Jews from Arab lands currently have any available remedies for these violations of their rights. Finally, the Article concludes that a full accounting of the rights of Jews from Arab lands must accompany any discussions aimed at providing a regional peace agreement for the Middle East, if such an agreement is to have strength and legitimacy under international law.

 
LInk? That is not my understanding. And the usage of anti-Semite usually refers to Jews in the US.

The use of anti-Semitic to imply Jew was a German journalistic artifact starting around 1890.
The original and real meaning of the word "Semitic" is Arab, coming from Shem, a son of Noah, who is supposedly the father or all Arabs, including Hebrew.
In particular,. the word "Semitic" means "of an Arab language group".

{...
First used in the 1770s by members of the Göttingen School of History, this biblical terminology for race was derived from Shem (Hebrew: שֵׁם‎), one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis,[9] together with the parallel terms Hamites and Japhetites.

In archaeology, the term is sometimes used informally as "a kind of shorthand" for ancient Semitic-speaking peoples.[8]
...
The term Semitic in a racial sense was coined by members of the Göttingen School of History in the early 1770s. Other members of the Göttingen School of History coined the separate term Caucasian in the 1780s. These terms were used and developed by numerous other scholars over the next century. In the early 20th century, the racialist classifications of Carleton S. Coon included the Semitic peoples in the Caucasian race, as similar in appearance to the Indo-European, Northwest Caucasian, and Kartvelian-speaking peoples.[10] Due to the interweaving of language studies and cultural studies, the term also came to be applied to the religions (ancient Semitic and Abrahamic) and ethnicities of various cultures associated by geographic and linguistic distribution.[11]
...}

The word "anti-Semitic" did not start having a Jewish connotation until around 1890 German authors.

{...
The terms "anti-Semite" or "antisemitism" came by a circuitous route to refer more narrowly to anyone who was hostile or discriminatory towards Jews in particular.[12]

Anthropologists of the 19th century such as Ernest Renan readily aligned linguistic groupings with ethnicity and culture, appealing to anecdote, science and folklore in their efforts to define racial character. Moritz Steinschneider, in his periodical of Jewish letters Hamaskir (3 (Berlin 1860), 16), discusses an article by Heymann Steinthal[13] criticising Renan's article "New Considerations on the General Character of the Semitic Peoples, In Particular Their Tendency to Monotheism".[14] Renan had acknowledged the importance of the ancient civilisations of Mesopotamia, Israel etc. but called the Semitic races inferior to the Aryan for their monotheism, which he held to arise from their supposed lustful, violent, unscrupulous and selfish racial instincts. Steinthal summed up these predispositions as "Semitism", and so Steinschneider characterised Renan's ideas as "anti-Semitic prejudice".[15]

In 1879 the German journalist Wilhelm Marr began the politicisation of the term by speaking of a struggle between Jews and Germans in a pamphlet called Der Weg zum Siege des Germanenthums über das Judenthum ("The Way to Victory of Germanism over Judaism"). He accused the Jews of being liberals, a people without roots who had Judaized Germans beyond salvation. In 1879 Marr's adherents founded the "League for Anti-Semitism",[16] which concerned itself entirely with anti-Jewish political action.

Objections to the usage of the term, such as the obsolete nature of the term "Semitic" as a racial term and the exclusion of discrimination against non-Jewish Semitic peoples, have been raised since at least the 1930s.[17][18]
..}

For anyone to imply that "Semitic" means Jewish, is horrific cultural appropriation.
It is an attempt by modern Zionists to steal the ancient heritage of all the ancient Arab civilizations, of which Hebrew and Jews are very minor members.
For example, Jerusalem is an ancient Canaanite city where Canaanites have always been the majority.
Jews got their name from the Canaanite city, not that the Jews named Jerusalem after them.
Jews were almost never significant in number or power.
They only ruled Jerusalem for a few hundred years, and left no significant marks, construction, or cultural relevance.
The only thing they did do was transcript the Old Testament, hundreds of years after it was supposed to have taken place.
 
Why did Mohammad create an army? Why did they have swords? Because it looked good on them?
In other words, tribes in Arabia after his death did not try to return to their ancient gods and way of life? According to whom?

Well, all the people in Arabia simply fell in love with Islam and wanted to convert. The Kurds also fell in love with Islam? Maybe some saw the wisdom of not fighting but joining, you know the saying/

All other peoples simply could not resist Allah and his superior authority over all other gods.

Oh, yeah.

There was a need for Arab unity to defeat and fill the void of the Roman imperialists.
Mohammad also had to fight Polytheists who attacked him.
But Islam was not the invading imperialist driving force.
That did not happen until around 1200 BC, with the Asian invaders who took over Islam, like the Mongols, Moghuls, Moors, Mamelukes, and Turks.
 
The number of Jews in Iran has plummeted since the 1979 Islamic Revolution
636704738085043474-082118-IRAN-JEWS22-ONLINE.png

-------------------
The lost Jewish communities of the Arab world


-------
Although the issues surrounding the Palestinian refugees are frequently addressed at the United Nations (”U.N.”), in the news media, and in legal journals, very little has been written about the Jews displaced from Arab lands. In light of the little known fact that approximately 50% of Israelis are Jews from Arab lands or their descendents, this Article will use Jews from Iraq as a case study in examining the history and rights of Jews from Arab countries, who were expelled or forced to seek refuge elsewhere. Part I of this Article examines the historical legal status of Jews in Iraq and the discriminatory and prosecutorial events that triggered the expulsion of Jews from Iraq. Part II demonstrates that actions taken by Iraq against Jews violated international law stan- dards and other laws applicable now and at that time. Part III addresses the question of whether Jews from Arab lands currently have any available remedies for these violations of their rights. Finally, the Article concludes that a full accounting of the rights of Jews from Arab lands must accompany any discussions aimed at providing a regional peace agreement for the Middle East, if such an agreement is to have strength and legitimacy under international law.


That is naïve propaganda.
The reason most Jews moved to Israel is that Israel was offering free homes (confiscated from Arabs), and good jobs (based on US foreign aid).
Being Jewish, I was also offered a free home and good job in Israel.

There was ZERO forced displacement of Jews from Moslem lands.
The Quran is very clear "there can be no coercion over religion", and "Jews and Christians are Brothers of the Book", meaning the same Old Testament.

In fact, your post proves the opposite, that there were very large, successful, and happy Jewish population all through out the Moslem countries.
 
That is naïve propaganda.
The reason most Jews moved to Israel is that Israel was offering free homes (confiscated from Arabs), and good jobs (based on US foreign aid).
Being Jewish, I was also offered a free home and good job in Israel.

There was ZERO forced displacement of Jews from Moslem lands.
The Quran is very clear "there can be no coercion over religion", and "Jews and Christians are Brothers of the Book", meaning the same Old Testament.

In fact, your post proves the opposite, that there were very large, successful, and happy Jewish population all through out the Moslem countries.
You are the poster boy for "The Right to Destroy Jewish History "
 
https://www.france24.com › France 24 › Live news

Mar 28, 2021 — At the Habibiya Jewish cemetery in the capital Baghdad, wedged between the Martyr Monument erected by ex-dictator Saddam Hussein and the restive ...
-------

Your link is totally false.
It claims Iraq was on the Moslem side of the 1948 war, and that is a lie.
It claimed Jews were forced to leave Iraq, and that is a lie.
It claimed anti Zionist laws were anti Jewish, and that is a lie.
The truth is Iraq barred Jews from legally emigrating in 1952.
{... in 1952, Iraq’s government barred Jews from emigrating...}
 
You are the poster boy for "The Right to Destroy Jewish History "

You clearly are tying to appropriate Arab history as well as Arab Palestine.
Jews are just a small part of Arab history, and are trying to take credit for all of the Arab accomplishments.
For example, the modern Hebrew script is based on the old Arab Phoenician script, and is not old or original.
 
Your link is totally false.
It claims Iraq was on the Moslem side of the 1948 war, and that is a lie.
It claimed Jews were forced to leave Iraq, and that is a lie.
It claimed anti Zionist laws were anti Jewish, and that is a lie.
The truth is Iraq barred Jews from legally emigrating in 1952.
{... in 1952, Iraq’s government barred Jews from emigrating...}
But before 1952........you have wipe out all that happened between 1950 and 1952.
 
But before 1952........you have wipe out all that happened between 1950 and 1952.

Which is not much except the illegal confiscation of about a third of the Arab land in Israel.
The Zionist massacres of Arab villages were bad enough, but then Israel prevented the Arab refugees from returning to their homes in Palestine.
That is what rightfully angered the Arab neighbors and caused Israel to be a pariah that needs still to be destroyed if they do not change.
The denial of the "Right of Return" of the Arab refugees to their home in Israel and Palestine, is a blatant war crime.
No one can blame the Moslems for being angry with Jews about that.
 
The use of anti-Semitic to imply Jew was a German journalistic artifact starting around 1890.
The original and real meaning of the word "Semitic" is Arab, coming from Shem, a son of Noah, who is supposedly the father or all Arabs, including Hebrew.
In particular,. the word "Semitic" means "of an Arab language group".

{...
First used in the 1770s by members of the Göttingen School of History, this biblical terminology for race was derived from Shem (Hebrew: שֵׁם‎), one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis,[9] together with the parallel terms Hamites and Japhetites.

In archaeology, the term is sometimes used informally as "a kind of shorthand" for ancient Semitic-speaking peoples.[8]
...
The term Semitic in a racial sense was coined by members of the Göttingen School of History in the early 1770s. Other members of the Göttingen School of History coined the separate term Caucasian in the 1780s. These terms were used and developed by numerous other scholars over the next century. In the early 20th century, the racialist classifications of Carleton S. Coon included the Semitic peoples in the Caucasian race, as similar in appearance to the Indo-European, Northwest Caucasian, and Kartvelian-speaking peoples.[10] Due to the interweaving of language studies and cultural studies, the term also came to be applied to the religions (ancient Semitic and Abrahamic) and ethnicities of various cultures associated by geographic and linguistic distribution.[11]
...}

The word "anti-Semitic" did not start having a Jewish connotation until around 1890 German authors.

{...
The terms "anti-Semite" or "antisemitism" came by a circuitous route to refer more narrowly to anyone who was hostile or discriminatory towards Jews in particular.[12]

Anthropologists of the 19th century such as Ernest Renan readily aligned linguistic groupings with ethnicity and culture, appealing to anecdote, science and folklore in their efforts to define racial character. Moritz Steinschneider, in his periodical of Jewish letters Hamaskir (3 (Berlin 1860), 16), discusses an article by Heymann Steinthal[13] criticising Renan's article "New Considerations on the General Character of the Semitic Peoples, In Particular Their Tendency to Monotheism".[14] Renan had acknowledged the importance of the ancient civilisations of Mesopotamia, Israel etc. but called the Semitic races inferior to the Aryan for their monotheism, which he held to arise from their supposed lustful, violent, unscrupulous and selfish racial instincts. Steinthal summed up these predispositions as "Semitism", and so Steinschneider characterised Renan's ideas as "anti-Semitic prejudice".[15]

In 1879 the German journalist Wilhelm Marr began the politicisation of the term by speaking of a struggle between Jews and Germans in a pamphlet called Der Weg zum Siege des Germanenthums über das Judenthum ("The Way to Victory of Germanism over Judaism"). He accused the Jews of being liberals, a people without roots who had Judaized Germans beyond salvation. In 1879 Marr's adherents founded the "League for Anti-Semitism",[16] which concerned itself entirely with anti-Jewish political action.

Objections to the usage of the term, such as the obsolete nature of the term "Semitic" as a racial term and the exclusion of discrimination against non-Jewish Semitic peoples, have been raised since at least the 1930s.[17][18]
..}

For anyone to imply that "Semitic" means Jewish, is horrific cultural appropriation.
It is an attempt by modern Zionists to steal the ancient heritage of all the ancient Arab civilizations, of which Hebrew and Jews are very minor members.
For example, Jerusalem is an ancient Canaanite city where Canaanites have always been the majority.
Jews got their name from the Canaanite city, not that the Jews named Jerusalem after them.
Jews were almost never significant in number or power.
They only ruled Jerusalem for a few hundred years, and left no significant marks, construction, or cultural relevance.
The only thing they did do was transcript the Old Testament, hundreds of years after it was supposed to have taken place.

The term Jew originated from the Roman "Judean" and denoted someone from the southern kingdom of Judah.[105] The shift of ethnonym from "Israelites" to "Jews" (inhabitant of Judah), although not contained in the Torah, is made explicit in the Book of Esther (4th century BCE),[106] a book in the Ketuvim, the third section of the Jewish Tanakh. In 587 BCE Nebuchadnezzar II, King of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, besieged Jerusalem, destroyed the First Temple, and deported the most prominent citizens of Judah.[107]
 
The term Jew originated from the Roman "Judean" and denoted someone from the southern kingdom of Judah.[105] The shift of ethnonym from "Israelites" to "Jews" (inhabitant of Judah), although not contained in the Torah, is made explicit in the Book of Esther (4th century BCE),[106] a book in the Ketuvim, the third section of the Jewish Tanakh. In 587 BCE Nebuchadnezzar II, King of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, besieged Jerusalem, destroyed the First Temple, and deported the most prominent citizens of Judah.[107]

Can't be.
The term "Jews" predates the Romans.
Some people are claiming it comes from the Hebrew word for praise, but that is likely also after the fact.
In reality is came from how happy the Hebrew were to have captured Jerusalem from the Canaanites.
But here is the "official" story.

{...
The term "Jew" is derived from the name of Jacob's fourth son, Judah--Yehudah, in the Hebrew—and may have originally applied only to Judah's descendents, who comprised one of the twelve tribes of Israel. On his deathbed, Jacob assigned Judah the role of leader and king—a prophesy that was fulfilled in 869 BCE when all twelve tribes submitted to the reign of King David of the tribe of Judah.
...}

But I know this is wrong because the Hebrew spelling, Yehudah, is all wrong.
Jerusalem, Jericho, Jordan River all are with a 'j', just like Jew.
 
Can't be.
The term "Jews" predates the Romans.
Some people are claiming it comes from the Hebrew word for praise, but that is likely also after the fact.
In reality is came from how happy the Hebrew were to have captured Jerusalem from the Canaanites.
But here is the "official" story.

{...
The term "Jew" is derived from the name of Jacob's fourth son, Judah--Yehudah, in the Hebrew—and may have originally applied only to Judah's descendents, who comprised one of the twelve tribes of Israel. On his deathbed, Jacob assigned Judah the role of leader and king—a prophesy that was fulfilled in 869 BCE when all twelve tribes submitted to the reign of King David of the tribe of Judah.
...}

But I know this is wrong because the Hebrew spelling, Yehudah, is all wrong.
Jerusalem, Jericho, Jordan River all are with a 'j', just like Jew.
Would this still be an issue if the Jews had named their State, Judea instead?
 
The number of Jews in Iran has plummeted since the 1979 Islamic Revolution
636704738085043474-082118-IRAN-JEWS22-ONLINE.png

-------------------
The lost Jewish communities of the Arab world


-------
Although the issues surrounding the Palestinian refugees are frequently addressed at the United Nations (”U.N.”), in the news media, and in legal journals, very little has been written about the Jews displaced from Arab lands. In light of the little known fact that approximately 50% of Israelis are Jews from Arab lands or their descendents, this Article will use Jews from Iraq as a case study in examining the history and rights of Jews from Arab countries, who were expelled or forced to seek refuge elsewhere. Part I of this Article examines the historical legal status of Jews in Iraq and the discriminatory and prosecutorial events that triggered the expulsion of Jews from Iraq. Part II demonstrates that actions taken by Iraq against Jews violated international law stan- dards and other laws applicable now and at that time. Part III addresses the question of whether Jews from Arab lands currently have any available remedies for these violations of their rights. Finally, the Article concludes that a full accounting of the rights of Jews from Arab lands must accompany any discussions aimed at providing a regional peace agreement for the Middle East, if such an agreement is to have strength and legitimacy under international law.


There were still Jews in Tripoli, Libya in 1973 and they were successful and prosperous.. like the Bahraini Jews today.
 
But before 1952........you have wipe out all that happened between 1950 and 1952.

In 1950 Weismann approached Ibn Saud and ARAMCO to forcibly expell the rest of the Palestinians to work in Arabia on TAPLINE. That would have taken jobs from Saudis. .. and Arabia had already taken 50,000 Palestinians.
 
You clearly are tying to appropriate Arab history as well as Arab Palestine.
Jews are just a small part of Arab history, and are trying to take credit for all of the Arab accomplishments.
For example, the modern Hebrew script is based on the old Arab Phoenician script, and is not old or original
There were still Jews in Tripoli, Libya in 1973 and they were successful and prosperous.. like the Bahraini Jews today.
Try present day Lybia:

Not a single Jew remains in Libya today.

Though Libya had been home to a Jewish community for thousands of years, and though the Jews had lived under Greek, Roman, Ottoman, Italian, British, and Arab rule, no trace of this once-thriving community exists anymore.




Bahrain's tiny Jewish community, about 50 people, have practised their faith behind closed doors since 1947, when the Gulf country's only synagogue was destroyed in disturbances at the start of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

 
In 1950 Weismann approached Ibn Saud and ARAMCO to forcibly expell the rest of the Palestinians to work in Arabia on TAPLINE. That would have taken jobs from Saudis. .. and Arabia had already taken 50,000 Palestinians.
Source
 
Try present day Lybia:

Not a single Jew remains in Libya today.

Though Libya had been home to a Jewish community for thousands of years, and though the Jews had lived under Greek, Roman, Ottoman, Italian, British, and Arab rule, no trace of this once-thriving community exists anymore.




Bahrain's tiny Jewish community, about 50 people, have practised their faith behind closed doors since 1947, when the Gulf country's only synagogue was destroyed in disturbances at the start of the Arab-Israeli conflict.


I know.. I used to live in Tripoli. Bahraini Jews did suffer everytime Israel pulled a stunt like attacking Egypt or causing the Suez crisis or attacking the USS Liberty or invading Lebanon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top