The Right To Destroy Jewish History

The Arabs took care of all the Holy sites for 1300 years before Jordan ever existed.
And Arabs also took care that for most of those 1300 years Jews would not be allowed to worship at their holy sites. Not peacefully.

The Hashemites, from 1948 to 1967 - and even now, continue in the tradition of prohibiting, or attempting to prohibit, Jews from worshiping at their sites.

Before that, Al Husseini saw to it that Jews would have no right to their holy sites:



The article below will give you an idea what it is like to all who live in Israel when it comes to their holy sites:



Why aren't Jews allowed to pray at their holiest site?

Why do Muslims continuously attempt to destroy Jewish Holy sites like the Rachel and Joseph Tombs?

Not sure that building a Mosque on top of Solomon's Temple is "taking care of " Jewish sites, but instead telling the Jews that they have conquered their land.

-----
But this was your original question:

" What holy place are the Jews allowing Palestinians to worship?"

I hope


answers your questions.
 
“When i reported that another illegal 1,355 homes were on the way, the Camera pro-Israel lobbying group was quick to complain that we hadn’t mentioned that ‘Israel is also set to approve 1,600 units for Palestinians in the areas of the West Bank that it controls,’ a fact that it said was needed for ‘context,'” he wrote.

“Well, here’s some more context,” Day continued.

“The Palestinians seek the West Bank, along with the Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem — areas Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war — to build a state they don’t have. The presence of 700,000 Israeli settlers is the main obstacle to peace.”

Day went on quote denunciations from Tor Wennesland, UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, as well as Hagit Ofran of Peace Now, and belittle U.S. military aid to Israel.

CAMERA-UK, naturally, defended itself and picked apart Day’s mischaracterizations of Israel. First, the organization is a media watchdog, not a “lobby group.” Next, settlements aren’t an obstacle to peace because even when the Arabs controlled Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip between 1948-1967, they still couldn’t accept Israel’s existence.

Memo to Day: When Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran, the casus belli for the Six-Day War, there were no “settlements.”

Talk about an overreaction. As if there aren’t more important issues for Day and his readers than haggling over the meaning of 1,600 housing units for Palestinians in Area C.

In any event, CAMERA UK apparently got the final vindication. The article that started it all, “Israel approves 2,800 settler homes,” can no longer be found on the i news site.

(full article online)

 
And Arabs also took care that for most of those 1300 years Jews would not be allowed to worship at their holy sites. Not peacefully.

The Hashemites, from 1948 to 1967 - and even now, continue in the tradition of prohibiting, or attempting to prohibit, Jews from worshiping at their sites.

Before that, Al Husseini saw to it that Jews would have no right to their holy sites:



The article below will give you an idea what it is like to all who live in Israel when it comes to their holy sites:



Why aren't Jews allowed to pray at their holiest site?

Why do Muslims continuously attempt to destroy Jewish Holy sites like the Rachel and Joseph Tombs?

Not sure that building a Mosque on top of Solomon's Temple is "taking care of " Jewish sites, but instead telling the Jews that they have conquered their land.

-----
But this was your original question:

" What holy place are the Jews allowing Palestinians to worship?"

I hope


answers your questions.

For the most part Palestine was sleepy and apolitical. The Ottomans left the groups alone to govern themselves. You should rethink your incessant defense and victim mindset.
 
For the most part Palestine was sleepy and apolitical. The Ottomans left the groups alone to govern themselves. You should rethink your incessant defense and victim mindset.

Until Arab supremacists expelled Jews from all their holy cities?

Report from Safed about the Arab massacres of 1834:
"Now I have come to announce the large losses and afflictions that have been created in Israel in four countries, ie Jerusalem,and Hebron and the Upper Galilee, namely Safed. And the lower Galilee, namely the city of Tabriya. By the hands of the plunderers and looters that rose in the country. And they come only upon the Jews...

On Sunday, eight days in the month of Sivan, the looters, inhabitants of the villages joined with the inhabitants of the cities. They had weapons of war and shields and fell upon all the Jews and stripped their clothes from men and women. They expelled them naked from the city, and plundered all their property...

The remnants were coerced and raped whether men or women. Tore all the Torah scrolls, and their talit and tefilin and the city was abandoned... This was so for 33 days, so was done in the city of Safed, so was done in other towns."


Periodicals of people of Israel in Eretz Israel - Menachem Mendel ben- Aaaron 1800-1873
 
For the most part Palestine was sleepy and apolitical. The Ottomans left the groups alone to govern themselves. You should rethink your incessant defense and victim mindset.
Were Jews keeping Arabs and other Muslims down in ancient Israel for the past 1400 years? No, it has been the other way around.

Were Jews attacking Arabs and other Muslims in ancient Israel for the past 1400 years? No, it has been the other way around.

Did the Ottoman Empire do anything to stop any attacks on Jews? No.


You continue to talk in generalizations, never specifics.

I cannot ever rethink that the Muslim and Arab mindset is the one which wants to destroy Israel and possibly even kill all the Jews, as they continuously repeat this idea in just about every Muslim school, not only in Asia, but in Europe, the Americas, Australia, and everywhere where Muslims have moved to and are trying to turn other people's minds against Israel.

It is called protecting and defending one's people's right to exist, to live in peace in one's own sovereign homeland.

It is no different than our ancestors defending our land and people from the Philistines, the Greeks, the Romans and later on from the British and Muslims and Christians who cannot see Jews as human beings with rights, but as second class citizens who must do as they are told or be expelled or killed.

When you figure that out, let me know.
 
The agreement is not saying that the boundary between Israel and Jordan is in question. It is instructing any maps created based on this agreement to include language that says Judea and Samaria's legal status has not been determined.

Under accepted international law, maps themselves are generally regarded as evidence, but have no legal value in and of themselves. The text in a map does not have the same weight as a legal agreement, unless it is attached as part of the agreement itself. The ICJ ruled as such in 1986.

The crucial point is that there was no such map attached to the agreement itself. Without that, the agreement text is the only legal definition of the border between Israel and Jordan - meaning that under international law, Israel's border ends where Jordan's begins.

Whatever legal status Judea and Samaria have, the 1949 armistice lines were not legal boundaries (borders) in 1949, nor in 1967, and certainly not after this 1994 agreement.

The EU knows this. It calls the 1949 armistice lines "borders" anyway.

Which means that the EU is knowingly lying about the facts to push its own political agenda of creating a Palestinian state on borders that never existed in any way.

In any other context, this would be a huge scandal. But when it comes to Israel, facts suddenly become optional and narratives are what drives EU resolutions.

(full article online)

 
Were Jews keeping Arabs and other Muslims down in ancient Israel for the past 1400 years? No, it has been the other way around.

Were Jews attacking Arabs and other Muslims in ancient Israel for the past 1400 years? No, it has been the other way around.

Did the Ottoman Empire do anything to stop any attacks on Jews? No.


You continue to talk in generalizations, never specifics.

I cannot ever rethink that the Muslim and Arab mindset is the one which wants to destroy Israel and possibly even kill all the Jews, as they continuously repeat this idea in just about every Muslim school, not only in Asia, but in Europe, the Americas, Australia, and everywhere where Muslims have moved to and are trying to turn other people's minds against Israel.

It is called protecting and defending one's people's right to exist, to live in peace in one's own sovereign homeland.

It is no different than our ancestors defending our land and people from the Philistines, the Greeks, the Romans and later on from the British and Muslims and Christians who cannot see Jews as human beings with rights, but as second class citizens who must do as they are told or be expelled or killed.

When you figure that out, let me know.

There were very few Jewish people in Palestine prior to 1920 and in 1922 they organized to protest the flood of European immigrants.
 
The agreement is not saying that the boundary between Israel and Jordan is in question. It is instructing any maps created based on this agreement to include language that says Judea and Samaria's legal status has not been determined.

Under accepted international law, maps themselves are generally regarded as evidence, but have no legal value in and of themselves. The text in a map does not have the same weight as a legal agreement, unless it is attached as part of the agreement itself. The ICJ ruled as such in 1986.

The crucial point is that there was no such map attached to the agreement itself. Without that, the agreement text is the only legal definition of the border between Israel and Jordan - meaning that under international law, Israel's border ends where Jordan's begins.

Whatever legal status Judea and Samaria have, the 1949 armistice lines were not legal boundaries (borders) in 1949, nor in 1967, and certainly not after this 1994 agreement.

The EU knows this. It calls the 1949 armistice lines "borders" anyway.

Which means that the EU is knowingly lying about the facts to push its own political agenda of creating a Palestinian state on borders that never existed in any way.

In any other context, this would be a huge scandal. But when it comes to Israel, facts suddenly become optional and narratives are what drives EU resolutions.

(full article online)


They weren't given the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights by the mandate. Arabs, Christian and Muslim, had been the majority for more than a thousand years. Even before the birth of Christ more Jews lived outside of Israel in Alexandria, Elephantine Island, Damascus, Aleppo and Persia... and all around the Med Sea.
 
There were very few Jewish people in Palestine prior to 1920 and in 1922 they organized to protest the flood of European immigrants.
There were lots of Jews before the Kurdish Muslims invaded, and then the Arabs.

There were a lot of First Nation People in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand before the Europeans invaded and took all, if not most of it.

Arabs, Under Al Husseini, were protesting Jews. If those coming had been Muslims, or even Christians not wanting sovereignty over the land, they would have been ok.

Ancient Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people, whether they moved to Europe, Americas, Australia, or the Moon and they had every right to return to their homeland. They were not expecting a warm welcome, although they were treated well before the Mandate happened.

You are basically saying that if the Christian Copts somehow managed to separate some part of their ancient land in Egypt for themselves, or all of it, the Muslims would say that they actually were not indigenous of the land, and the Muslims were.

Or the Kurds, who at 5 Million or more, have not been allowed to declare Independence on their own homeland because other Muslims, specifically Arabs and Turks, do not see them as the rightful owners of those lands.


Blame European Jew hatred, piled on top of Muslim Jew hatred for the Arabs living in ancient Israel not having a peaceful life, as it should have been, and one of progress for the past 100 years.

Arabs who live in Israel see what Jews are like, live with them, work with them and are proud of being citizens of Israel. That is how it would have been for all Arabs, Muslim and Christians, if Al Husseini had not declared war on the Jewish people re constructing their Nation ON their ancient homeland.
 
They weren't given the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights by the mandate. Arabs, Christian and Muslim, had been the majority for more than a thousand years. Even before the birth of Christ more Jews lived outside of Israel in Alexandria, Elephantine Island, Damascus, Aleppo and Persia... and all around the Med Sea.
Forget the Mandate. The British had no intention of giving any part of the Jewish Homeland to the Jews.
78% was given to the Hashemites, 22% was going to go to the British.

Indigenous rights to their ancient homeland has nothing to do with how many there were at any particular time. You do know that. That goes for ALL indigenous people on the planet.

As far as Muslims are concerned, Southern Spain, Vienna and all other European areas once conquered by Muslims belong to Muslims to this day, and they want it back.

Palestine, to Muslims, is not about who is indigenous or how many of each people were living at any given time.
It is about Muslims, once they conquered any land, that land becomes Muslims and only Muslim.

And that is how Al Husseini saw it, and incited all Arabs and Muslims to think like, in order to keep the Jews from rightfully, legally, reconstructing their ancient homeland, because Islam and Christianity do not want Jews to have a home of their own. Both religions think Jews must be forever punished for denying their religions and not converting to them.


Something for you to finally think about?
 
Forget the Mandate. The British had no intention of giving any part of the Jewish Homeland to the Jews.
78% was given to the Hashemites, 22% was going to go to the British.

Indigenous rights to their ancient homeland has nothing to do with how many there were at any particular time. You do know that. That goes for ALL indigenous people on the planet.

As far as Muslims are concerned, Southern Spain, Vienna and all other European areas once conquered by Muslims belong to Muslims to this day, and they want it back.

Palestine, to Muslims, is not about who is indigenous or how many of each people were living at any given time.
It is about Muslims, once they conquered any land, that land becomes Muslims and only Muslim.

And that is how Al Husseini saw it, and incited all Arabs and Muslims to think like, in order to keep the Jews from rightfully, legally, reconstructing their ancient homeland, because Islam and Christianity do not want Jews to have a home of their own. Both religions think Jews must be forever punished for denying their religions and not converting to them.


Something for you to finally think about?

They were very generous with the Jewish immigrants and refugees. They took land away from the Arab majority to give the European zionists a home. Chaim Weismann was very unhappy . He wanted it all no matter who had lived there for 2,000 years.
 
Forget the Mandate. The British had no intention of giving any part of the Jewish Homeland to the Jews.
78% was given to the Hashemites, 22% was going to go to the British.

Indigenous rights to their ancient homeland has nothing to do with how many there were at any particular time. You do know that. That goes for ALL indigenous people on the planet.

As far as Muslims are concerned, Southern Spain, Vienna and all other European areas once conquered by Muslims belong to Muslims to this day, and they want it back.

Palestine, to Muslims, is not about who is indigenous or how many of each people were living at any given time.
It is about Muslims, once they conquered any land, that land becomes Muslims and only Muslim.

And that is how Al Husseini saw it, and incited all Arabs and Muslims to think like, in order to keep the Jews from rightfully, legally, reconstructing their ancient homeland, because Islam and Christianity do not want Jews to have a home of their own. Both religions think Jews must be forever punished for denying their religions and not converting to them.


Something for you to finally think about?

They are not demanding Spanish real estate or killing Spaniards for their land. They Jews fought with the Muslims to gain control of Muslim Spain.


 
They are not demanding Spanish real estate or killing Spaniards for their land. They Jews fought with the Muslims to gain control of Muslim Spain.



Arab supremacists don't kill Spaniards??
They demand the Entire Middle east
and then some...

 
They are not demanding Spanish real estate or killing Spaniards for their land. They Jews fought with the Muslims to gain control of Muslim Spain.


Muslims are quietly taking over Europe. No need for guns, or to fire any shots.

But you do not read what you do not want to read, and that way you do not have to know:



Unlike the larger Islamic community, the Muslim Brotherhood’s ultimate goal is not helping Muslims be the best citizens they can be, but rather to extend Islamist ideology throughout Europe and the United States and infiltrate judiciary and legislative branches of governments.

Through four decades of teaching, grooming and cultivation paid off. The student refugees who migrated from the Middle East forty years ago and their descendants now lead organizations that represent the local Muslim communities in their engagement with Europe’s political elite, funded by diverted charity money and generous contributors from their wealthy members and others working in the Arabian Gulf States, they preside over a centralized network that spans nearly every European country.

These Muslim Brotherhood represent themselves as mainstream tolerant Muslims, even as they continue to embrace the Islamist radical views and maintain links to terrorists.

The Islamist grew their influence by maintaining false moderate rhetoric and well-spoken German, Dutch, and French, they have gained acceptance among European governments and media alike.

Politicians across the political spectrum rush to engage them whenever an issue involving Muslims arises or, the MB successfully started gaining positions in the political scene as aids and allies the political elite rely on to secure votes of the Muslim community.

But those tolerant and peace loving Islamist drop their facade and embrace radicalism when speaking Arabic or Turkish in front of their followers. While their “face” representatives like community leaders, future politicians and influential figures speak about interfaith dialogue and integration on television, their mosques preach hate and radicalized worshippers using the evil west analogy while they publicly condemn the terrorist attacks, they continue to raise money for Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations.

MB capitalize on Europeans, eagerness to create a dialogue with their Muslim communities, political correctness forced politicians to overlook this duplicity in fear of cancel culture, that’s particularly visible in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

The MB capitalized on the victim card to retain and expand their place in Europe, the MB slowly but surely started to rebranding themselves distancing themselves from extremist groups and Islamist labels in public and sticking to it secretly.

What sets the MB apart from other political groups is their ability to adapt, circumvent, absorb crises and move towards new paths for it through their deep theoretical and ideological beliefs and its Machiavellian focus on the end that justifies the means.

From decline in Egypt and Syria in the 1960s to renewed activity in Europe and GCC states via old platforms such as the Islamic Group in Germany (GID) that was founded in 1958. The German branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe founded by the MB Godfather in Europe the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, Said Ramadan in 1958, and was chaired by the German-Egyptian Ibrahim Al-Zayat.

The Federation of “Islamic” Organizations in France, which was established in 1989 and the existing formations as well as some new pocket organizations funded by the State of Qatar in the early 2000s and indirectly managed by the Brotherhood, such as the ANELD Fund which was established and funded by Qatar with a total of one hundred million euros in coordination with the French government, to finance entrepreneurship projects for “Muslims” in the most marginalized suburbs of Paris that successfully lured the children of immigrants from the second and third generations into the fold of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Now you know, now the truth is out, what will you do?

 
Arab supremacists don't kill Spaniards??
They demand the Entire Middle east
and then some...


You are a fool. Arab oil producers spend a lot of money on holidays in Spain.. Its a very popular vacation destination. They aren't stealing or even claiming land in Spain and Portugal.
 
They are not demanding Spanish real estate or killing Spaniards for their land. They Jews fought with the Muslims to gain control of Muslim Spain.


Some more Arab history you do not seem to be aware of, regardless of being born and raised in Arabia:


The indigenous peoples of North Africa, disparagingly called Barbarians or Berbers by Greeks and Romans because they spoke neither Greek nor Latin, were forcibly Islamized by the Arab conquest, but they kept their identity and their own language throughout the centuries.

They, too, fought alongside their conquerors, and Berbers who converted to Islam founded the Almoravid and Almoads dynasties, which adhered to a stringent brand of Islam and were among the rulers of Spain.

What Kurds and Berbers have in common is that they are both indigenous, non-Arab populations; have both been forcibly Islamized; and even participated with their new rulers in conquests fought in the name of Islam. Yet neither was treated as equals by the Arabs, who boast of their prophet and of the divine apparition of the Koran in Arabic, and look down on those who embraced their religion but remained “foreigners.”

Then there are the Copts, the indigenous population of Egypt. They converted to Christianity in the 1st century, and stubbornly refused to relinquish their faith through 1,400 years of Arab-Islamic occupation and repression. The Coptic church is Orthodox, autonomous and independent, and led by a pope. Today, Copts make up 10 percent of the population of Egypt.

They do not look for autonomy and feel an integral part of the country, but would like to be treated as equals. It is not likely to happen soon.
 
Muslims are quietly taking over Europe. No need for guns, or to fire any shots.

But you do not read what you do not want to read, and that way you do not have to know:


Unlike the larger Islamic community, the Muslim Brotherhood’s ultimate goal is not helping Muslims be the best citizens they can be, but rather to extend Islamist ideology throughout Europe and the United States and infiltrate judiciary and legislative branches of governments.

Through four decades of teaching, grooming and cultivation paid off. The student refugees who migrated from the Middle East forty years ago and their descendants now lead organizations that represent the local Muslim communities in their engagement with Europe’s political elite, funded by diverted charity money and generous contributors from their wealthy members and others working in the Arabian Gulf States, they preside over a centralized network that spans nearly every European country.

These Muslim Brotherhood represent themselves as mainstream tolerant Muslims, even as they continue to embrace the Islamist radical views and maintain links to terrorists.

The Islamist grew their influence by maintaining false moderate rhetoric and well-spoken German, Dutch, and French, they have gained acceptance among European governments and media alike.

Politicians across the political spectrum rush to engage them whenever an issue involving Muslims arises or, the MB successfully started gaining positions in the political scene as aids and allies the political elite rely on to secure votes of the Muslim community.

But those tolerant and peace loving Islamist drop their facade and embrace radicalism when speaking Arabic or Turkish in front of their followers. While their “face” representatives like community leaders, future politicians and influential figures speak about interfaith dialogue and integration on television, their mosques preach hate and radicalized worshippers using the evil west analogy while they publicly condemn the terrorist attacks, they continue to raise money for Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations.

MB capitalize on Europeans, eagerness to create a dialogue with their Muslim communities, political correctness forced politicians to overlook this duplicity in fear of cancel culture, that’s particularly visible in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

The MB capitalized on the victim card to retain and expand their place in Europe, the MB slowly but surely started to rebranding themselves distancing themselves from extremist groups and Islamist labels in public and sticking to it secretly.

What sets the MB apart from other political groups is their ability to adapt, circumvent, absorb crises and move towards new paths for it through their deep theoretical and ideological beliefs and its Machiavellian focus on the end that justifies the means.

From decline in Egypt and Syria in the 1960s to renewed activity in Europe and GCC states via old platforms such as the Islamic Group in Germany (GID) that was founded in 1958. The German branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe founded by the MB Godfather in Europe the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, Said Ramadan in 1958, and was chaired by the German-Egyptian Ibrahim Al-Zayat.

The Federation of “Islamic” Organizations in France, which was established in 1989 and the existing formations as well as some new pocket organizations funded by the State of Qatar in the early 2000s and indirectly managed by the Brotherhood, such as the ANELD Fund which was established and funded by Qatar with a total of one hundred million euros in coordination with the French government, to finance entrepreneurship projects for “Muslims” in the most marginalized suburbs of Paris that successfully lured the children of immigrants from the second and third generations into the fold of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Now you know, now the truth is out, what will you do?


Muslim Brotherhood was a reaction to Zionist behavior in Palestine and British colonialism..

They are banned in the Gulf States.
 
You are a fool. Arab oil producers spend a lot of money on holidays in Spain.. Its a very popular vacation destination. They aren't stealing or even claiming land in Spain and Portugal.
It is not about tourism. It is about Muslim extremist dreaming and working on reconquering land which had once been conquered by Muslims.

Islam is the only religion where its extremists think that way and will act on it.
 
Muslim Brotherhood was a reaction to Zionist behavior in Palestine and British colonialism..

They are banned in the Gulf States.
Educate yourself.

Jews returning to their homeland is an AFRONT to extremist Muslims, which is what the Muslim Brotherhood is.

Not even Egypt could stand them and kicked them out after a year.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top