The Right To Bear Arms

The Prussians were mercenaries. They weren't fighting for Germany. 6000 fought for the British... Over 1000 deserted.


Hezbollah Hannah posts shit as openly dishonest as she is.

"OPENLY GAY"

But then if you read you find;

" He also downplayed rumors "

"Rumors" and "openly" and contradictory.

Desperate to rewrite history to fit your narrative.

Tell us Hannah, what are gay rights in your beloved homeland of Iran?

1653572575048.png
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why the Nazis don't pass a law forbidding people from murdering children in school?

Since the only thing lacking is a law, as the fascists keep telling us, they need to pass one...
Just pass a law preventing people from thinking about going to school and murdering children. Action precedes the thought, right?
:dunno:

It is a sad, disgusting bit of naivety to believe that we can have laws that are proactive while people remain free. It will never happen. It will always lead to tyranny and oppression.

Anyone attempting to enact a proactive law (like banning guns because .00003% might use them incorrectly) is a miserable tyrant who MUST be put to death in the most brutal way possible.
 
Just pass a law preventing people from thinking about going to school and murdering children. Action precedes the thought, right?
:dunno:

It is a sad, disgusting bit of naivety to believe that we can have laws that are proactive while people remain free. It will never happen. It will always lead to tyranny and oppression.

Anyone attempting to enact a proactive law (like banning guns because .00003% might use them incorrectly) is a miserable tyrant who MUST be put to death in the most brutal way possible.

It's not naivety, it's cynicism. The fascists want to crush civil rights. They react with glee to these things because they see it as an opportunity to further their sick agenda.

The left LOVES school shootings. I'd go as far as to suggest they'd promote them behind the scenes if they thought they could get away with it.
 
The Prussians were mercenaries. They weren't fighting for Germany. 6000 fought for the British... Over 1000 deserted.

There were 30,000 Hessians not 6000. Again they would not desert because their families in Germany were kept up by the state for their service.
 

How could the 2nd amendment ever become obsolete somehow?
The decentralized requirements of a democratic republic, can never change.
A democratic republic has to remain with all legal authority emanating from the inherent rights of individuals, so can never allow top down gun control.
That would require government to be the autocratic source of legal authority instead of a democratic republic.

Just ask yourself if right now, do we trust the armed members of the government, like the police and military?
And clearly the answer is no.
We have the police routinely murdering innocent people, like children playing with a toy gun in a park, a med tech in her own home when the police decide to conduct a no-knock-warrant, etc.
We have the army lying about Iraqi WMD and murdering half a million innocents.
So clearly to reduce the murder of innocents, it is government guns we need to confiscate, not private guns.
 
Trying to live modern life according to the Constitution is much like trying to live modern life according to the Bible. Both are subject to vast interpretation.

No one should live according to the Old Testament.
It is clearly barbaric.
The New Testament is also weak because Roman imperialism is clearly immoral and illegal, but would have been dangerous to openly oppose.

The constitution however, is only a few hundred years old, and nothing has or could significantly change.
The main principle is constant and will always be valid, which is that government can NEVER be fully trusted, and only the population as a whole should ever be trusted.

Gun control is inherently flawed because it is saying to trust government completely, and allow no one else any say at all.
 
There were 30,000 Hessians not 6000. Again they would not desert because their families in Germany were kept up by the state for their service.

A little more complex than that.

{...
About 900 Hessian soldiers and officers were taken prisoner by General Washington and the Continental Army following the Battle of Trenton on December 26, 1776. Have you ever wondered what happened to them?
...

Once they arrived in Pennsylvania, the Hessian officers were separated from the enlisted soldiers, who were immediately marched to Newtown and divided between a prison and Newtown Presbyterian Church. The officers—about 26 of them in all—were held overnight in a single room of the McConkey’s Ferry Inn.

The next day, they were marched to Newtown, too, but they were housed quite comfortably in private homes. The special treatment, Seabright explains, was because of their status.

...

From Newtown, the Hessian officers and soldiers were marched to Philadelphia and paraded through the streets before they were ultimately settled in a barracks. Washington promptly published a proclamation stating that the Hessians were not the enemy. They were forced into the war and should be treated humanely, it said.

From that point, people started to bring food to the barracks, and they treated the Hessians with great kindness—much to their surprise. Quite notoriously, the British and Hessians treated their American prisoners brutally, especially on the prison ships anchored in the Hudson River.

“The Hessian officers eventually signed something called a ‘parole,’ saying they wouldn’t do anything to get in Washington’s way,” Seabright says. “As a result, they were pretty much given free rein.”

From the barracks in Philadelphia, the Hessian soldiers were marched to Lancaster County, where they were put to work on farms. The officers were sent to Virginia. “When they reached the Virginia border,” Seabright says, “the American guards basically released them on their own recognizance.”

According to historian David Hackett Fischer, about 23 percent of the Hessians who survived the war remained in America. Other estimates go as high as 40 percent.

A significant portion returned to America after the war with their families. “So it was not a bad ending for the Hessian prisoners,” Seabright says.
...}

 
Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment . We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997) , and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001) , the Second Amendment extends, prima facie,to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.
 
A little more complex than that.

{...
About 900 Hessian soldiers and officers were taken prisoner by General Washington and the Continental Army following the Battle of Trenton on December 26, 1776. Have you ever wondered what happened to them?
...

Once they arrived in Pennsylvania, the Hessian officers were separated from the enlisted soldiers, who were immediately marched to Newtown and divided between a prison and Newtown Presbyterian Church. The officers—about 26 of them in all—were held overnight in a single room of the McConkey’s Ferry Inn.

The next day, they were marched to Newtown, too, but they were housed quite comfortably in private homes. The special treatment, Seabright explains, was because of their status.

...

From Newtown, the Hessian officers and soldiers were marched to Philadelphia and paraded through the streets before they were ultimately settled in a barracks. Washington promptly published a proclamation stating that the Hessians were not the enemy. They were forced into the war and should be treated humanely, it said.

From that point, people started to bring food to the barracks, and they treated the Hessians with great kindness—much to their surprise. Quite notoriously, the British and Hessians treated their American prisoners brutally, especially on the prison ships anchored in the Hudson River.

“The Hessian officers eventually signed something called a ‘parole,’ saying they wouldn’t do anything to get in Washington’s way,” Seabright says. “As a result, they were pretty much given free rein.”

From the barracks in Philadelphia, the Hessian soldiers were marched to Lancaster County, where they were put to work on farms. The officers were sent to Virginia. “When they reached the Virginia border,” Seabright says, “the American guards basically released them on their own recognizance.”

According to historian David Hackett Fischer, about 23 percent of the Hessians who survived the war remained in America. Other estimates go as high as 40 percent.

A significant portion returned to America after the war with their families. “So it was not a bad ending for the Hessian prisoners,” Seabright says.
...}

The point is they didn't desert
 
Why is it you morons keep posting stupid things like that?

If you would simply take the time to have someone read the Heller decision to you, you might understand how dumb you are....

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way.



Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

--------

You do realize that the time and effort necessary for LaCooter to do the unfamiliar work of actually thinking would seriously cut into the time she can spend feeling self-righteous about what a vile specimen she is, right?
 
You are an idiot. the second amendment does not rest only on the militia. It stands alone as an individual right, In fact the anti gunners argue that if it rests on a militia that it is no longer needed due to a militia no longer existing,
Where did I suggest that the 2nd Amendment rests only on the militia? Who's the idiot? You're the one with the reading comprehension deficiency.
 
You are an idiot. the second amendment does not rest only on the militia. It stands alone as an individual right, In fact the anti gunners argue that if it rests on a militia that it is no longer needed due to a militia no longer existing,
The idiocy in your comment is in your belief that the militia no longer exists or that it is no longer necessary. You're wrong in both counts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top