It seems to be in their genetic make up.
Scott Walker had committed some huge blunders in my estimation and his timing on this last thing could not be worse.
Does that constitute a war on women. Hardly.
Now, do I think our huge divorce rate is creating all kinds of casualties among women. You bet.
This so-called 'war on women' is difficult for me to fathom as I have spent a good deal of my working life holding jobs more commonly held by men, and I can't count a single time that my wages were less than a man's for doing those jobs. I never flet discriminated against for being a gal. I have never paid a woman less than a man in the same job for anybody I have ever hired or supervised.
A woman who takes time off work to have kids and be with them when they are little is to be commended and applauded for having her priorities straight. But when she goes back to work, she can hardly expect to be at the point of experience and seniority that she would have been if she hadn't taken that time off. Ditto the woman who has to miss work to be home with sick kids or to attend school functions, or that can't work overtime when everybody else does because the kids are due home from school, etc. may sacrifice some wages and delay promotion opportunities to employees who are able to give full attention to their jobs. That is not discrimination. That is a life choice that the woman makes and few women ever regret making it.
Among women who choose full time careers and can give full attention to them, I believe the statistics now show that women on average, especailly young women, are out earning the guys, they recieve better pay as part timers, and enjoy somewhat lower unemployment rates during this recession.
There will always be exceptions, both among women and men, but the anecdotal anomaly is not a war on women.