Saying that my "side," whatever that is, is not necessarily an "embrace of sexual immorality," whatever this is, in any form. No one "normalizes pedophilia."
Yours is the side that openly promote and defends the teaching of the perverted LGBpbi
WTF agenda to children in elementary school. This very obviously has no purpose other than to groom these children for further sexual exploitation and abuse.
Why do you think that I wrote what I did about the sexual threats to young girls? But "your side" seems to want to normalize sexual trafficking, as well as the sickness that underlies the ridiculous evil known as the double standard of "morality."
That is a flat-out lie, and you know damn well that it is. Nobody on my side supports, defends, or tolerates sexual trafficking, nor the sexual abuse of young girls or boys.
You use sexual ignorance as a weapon, even sacrificing your own children. Nobody is teaching anyone's "agenda" in public schools, even yours, or they are not supposed to be. However, given the
federal funding of "abstinence education," it is your "agenda" that is being pushed in public schools, in spite of the fact that a good deal of Americans do not wait for marriage. Many more studies and polls have focused on girls and women, so information on males is harder to come by, but culture, anecdotal stories, and word-of-mouth suggest that males pretty much do not wait until marriage, regardless of their stated religious affiliation. Consider whether you personally have observed the rules of sexual morality put forth by your religion. Consider whether you or your religious fellows view anyperson's virginity as a commodity.
Preventing unwanted pregnancies, teen pregnancies, the spread of STDs, too-early marriages, with the goal of producing healthy and educated adults prepared to take their places in society and make positive contributions are legitimate concerns of the public. Whether a person is abstinent until marriage is not of public concern. It has to do only with personal religious issues and preferences. And as I said above, a person given practical information about sexual topics has a choice of using this information or not. This is a choice.
I have never heard of sexual activity of any sort being mentioned to elementary school children. I have, however, witnessed at a county school board meeting in the early 1990's that was held to decide whether to cover LGBT students under the anti-harassment rules, a bunch of very small children bused in from some supposedly "Christian" church, walking around holding signs that read "sodomy is not child's play." It was this "church" and their parents who apparently were responsible for this.
Moreover, your "side" has never responded clearly to allegations of hatred of women and gays, and perhaps more veiled hatred of people of color and other religions, nor allegations of attempts to establish patriarchy and sexual subjugation of women, and of attempts to replace our government with a theocracy run by exponents of your crap.
