The question I'd like to put out for discussion is, has the response to the violations of law always been part.....

Where was the proof that all of those millions of people Biden released into the country were qualified for assylum?
If they were processed at the border it was deemed that they had a case to receive asylum based on evidence presented by them.
The trump admin has so far produced no evidence, and has not allowed for due process, in handling the deportation of the men sent to El Salvador.
 
If they were processed at the border it was deemed that they had a case to receive asylum based on evidence presented by them.
The trump admin has so far produced no evidence, and has not allowed for due process, in handling the deportation of the men sent to El Salvador.

The Illegal Aliens haven't produced any evidence that they are legit either.

The burden is on an alien to show they aren't a danger to Americans.

BTW, at the Tremendous CECOT Penitentiary, they will have full due process as they use Zoom calls to have hearing for the miscreants right their in the pods. You should educate yourself about the joint.
 
Musk’s Role in Dismantling Aid Agency Likely Violated Constitution, Judge Finds

Judge Chuang wrote that a group of unnamed aid workers who had sued to stop the demolition of U.S.A.I.D. and its programs was likely to succeed in the lawsuit. He agreed with the workers’ contention that Mr. Musk’s rapid assertion of power over executive agencies was likely in violation of the Constitution’s appointments clause.

We will not be tolerating your fascism. Bite me.


People are protesting all over the country,
So what?
and Republicans are scared to hold town halls because the shit you like is pissing people off.
Only paid Democrat protesters, sent by people who hate free speech.
So I would suggest that you tone down with the MAGA bs because it could end up badly for you.
Is that a threat, boy?
 
If they were processed at the border it was deemed that they had a case to receive asylum based on evidence presented by them.
Wrong. They only needed claim assylum to be released and given a court date, which the overwhelming majority have not shown up for.
The trump admin has so far produced no evidence, and has not allowed for due process, in handling the deportation of the men sent to El Salvador.
If they did not show up for court dates, they refused to participate in due process.
 
So what?

Only paid Democrat protesters, sent by people who hate free speech.

Is that a threat, boy?
The people protesting are not paid Democrats. You need to stop listening to the lie. What I said was no threat. It is a reality of the outcome if Trump continues doing the shit he is doing. People can't get to Trump, but they can get to you Trump supporters. Free speech means we are free to oppose your speech. Learn that bitch.

Finally, people never like it when their rights are being taken away. Things like that create violent upheavals. Trump is taking rights from people and if you think Americans are just going to sit there and accept the crap Trump is doing because you have been brainwashed to believe that everything Trump does is right, you are sadly mistaken.
 
Wrong. They only needed claim assylum to be released and given a court date, which the overwhelming majority have not shown up for.

If they did not show up for court dates, they refused to participate in due process.

These ne-er-do-wells from Venezuela that are now on ice in El Salvador weren't in America washing dishes in a hotel or picking crops.

They were taking over apartment building, selling fentanyl and molesting children.

What would other countries do if a gang of illegals came into their country acting out like this?

What would Dubai do? or the Empire of Japan? the Russian Federation?

American youtube influencer Johnny Somali is sitting in stir in South Korea for a lot less than what these Venezuelan gangs have done.

 
......of the plan or did the pushback catch the admin off guard?

A federal judge on Saturday ordered the Trump administration to cease use of an obscure wartime law to deport Venezuelans without a hearing, saying that any planes that had departed the United States with immigrants under the law needed to return.

As of early Sunday morning, it was unclear whether any such planes had departed or returned.

On Saturday, the administration published an executive order invoking the law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to target Venezuelan gang members in the United States.

But shortly after the announcement, James E. Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., said he would issue a temporary order blocking the government from deporting any immigrants under the law.


Put another way, when Russ Vought sat down to write the P 2025 playbook, the one trump knows nothing about ;), was it his desire to see virtually every part of its enactment challenged in court? Did Pam Bondi know what was coming when she incredulously answered a question during her confirmation testimony about how she would handle trump asking her to use the DoJ for illegal acts?

Does the board think the necessity of funneling multiple cases questioning the authority trump is asserting to his friendly SC was eagerly anticipated or an unexpected obstacle?

Is the rule of law being intentionally broken so it can be reshaped to match trump's desires or did they think the fictitious mandate Don has claimed would be enough to steamroll the Constitution?

BTW, Judge Boasberg was originally nominated to be a judge by Shrub.
The Jude is a hyper-partisan puke, who needs put in his place, and impeached for endangering more American lives, by keeping those drug dealing thugs here, and maybe you should share in the blame.
 
The Jude is a hyper-partisan puke, who needs put in his place, and impeached for endangering more American lives, by keeping those drug dealing thugs here, and maybe you should share in the blame.
"The Jude is a hyper-partisan puke"...........If that was true he would have already held the admin in contempt for stonewalling his requests for more info.
 
Wrong. They only needed claim assylum to be released and given a court date, which the overwhelming majority have not shown up for.

If they did not show up for court dates, they refused to participate in due process.
From AI......Yes, individuals arriving at the border seeking asylum must demonstrate a "well-founded fear of persecution" based on protected grounds (race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion) to be granted asylum.
 
......of the plan or did the pushback catch the admin off guard?

A federal judge on Saturday ordered the Trump administration to cease use of an obscure wartime law to deport Venezuelans without a hearing, saying that any planes that had departed the United States with immigrants under the law needed to return.

As of early Sunday morning, it was unclear whether any such planes had departed or returned.

On Saturday, the administration published an executive order invoking the law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to target Venezuelan gang members in the United States.

But shortly after the announcement, James E. Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., said he would issue a temporary order blocking the government from deporting any immigrants under the law.


Put another way, when Russ Vought sat down to write the P 2025 playbook, the one trump knows nothing about ;), was it his desire to see virtually every part of its enactment challenged in court? Did Pam Bondi know what was coming when she incredulously answered a question during her confirmation testimony about how she would handle trump asking her to use the DoJ for illegal acts?

Does the board think the necessity of funneling multiple cases questioning the authority trump is asserting to his friendly SC was eagerly anticipated or an unexpected obstacle?

Is the rule of law being intentionally broken so it can be reshaped to match trump's desires or did they think the fictitious mandate Don has claimed would be enough to steamroll the Constitution?

BTW, Judge Boasberg was originally nominated to be a judge by Shrub.
Simply this...

Next time
Tell the lawyer it is his responsibility to get this done.
If the Lawyer can't prove he was blocked he goes to jail until they are returned. Contempt of Court.
The person that blocked it then goes to jail until they are returned.
 
I don't get where Leftist judges think its a good idea to bring Venezuelan Gang Bangers into the country. Do they think that these pieces of shit are going to be exempting their children from being molested?
Couple things...

There is no proof that these people are 'Venezuelan Gang Bangers'... Actually there is proof they are not, but where was the trial to show that?

This is the thing, there was no due process and the Judge is right about that... The Conservative Judge... You see conservative judges respect the law and they know that this administration deliberately broke the law...
Simply start putting them in jail for contempt
 
Couple things...

There is no proof that these people are 'Venezuelan Gang Bangers'... Actually there is proof they are not, but where was the trial to show that?

This is the thing, there was no due process and the Judge is right about that... The Conservative Judge... You see conservative judges respect the law and they know that this administration deliberately broke the law...
Simply start putting them in jail for contempt

They're illegals, good enough for me
 
Wrong. They only needed claim assylum to be released and given a court date, which the overwhelming majority have not shown up for.

If they did not show up for court dates, they refused to participate in due process.
Vast majority of asylum seekers show up to court.


1742397121160.webp
1742397138126.webp


So we established that you are full of shit....

What was your point again?
 
I generally agree. But surely some of the sycophants he has surrounded himself with aren't as stupid as he is. I assume they must have known there would be legal challenges to P 2025. Did they want them is the question? Has the lawbreaking been intentional in order to get cases before his SC in order to legally expand the power of the prez beyond what it has been historically?
Sure seems so… and that’s scary as hell
 
If they were processed at the border it was deemed that they had a case to receive asylum based on evidence presented by them.
The trump admin has so far produced no evidence, and has not allowed for due process, in handling the deportation of the men sent to El Salvador.

If they were processed at the border it was deemed that they had a case to receive asylum based on evidence presented by them.

Cool story. I can't wait to see the evidence the deported gang members presented.
 
Back
Top Bottom