The question I'd like to put out for discussion is, has the response to the violations of law always been part.....

[Toddsterpatriot]

The court says this country doesn't operate on guilty without your day in court.

Sadly it does too often but on occasion we see our values get upheld in the courts.

They can appeal when they get back to their own country.

 

[schmidlap]

It's remarkable that anyone would seriously endorse just ignoring the judicial branch of our government whenever it suits one's fancy, rather than following the law and appealing decisions through the legal recourse available.

We used to be a nation of laws, not of men, and it worked quite well on the whole.

 

[kyzr]

It's remarkable that anyone would seriously endorse just ignoring the judicial branch of our government whenever it suits one's fancy, rather than following the law and appealing decisions through the legal recourse available.
We used to be a nation of laws, not of men, and it worked quite well on the whole.

we endorse constitutional order.
activist judges that exceed their lawful authority need to be ignored.
a district judge cannot tell the president how to use his Article 2 powers
the SCOTUS has the ultimate power of interpreting the Constitution

 

[pknopp]

we endorse constitutional order.
activist judges that exceed their lawful authority need to be ignored.
a district judge cannot tell the president how to use his Article 2 powers
the SCOTUS has the ultimate power of interpreting the Constitution

Its crazy how ignorant so many (including you) are of our judicial system.

I dont know if you are really this ignorant or just this brain washed.

It has to go through these courts to get to the Supreme Court.

 

[schmidlap]

we endorse constitutional order.
activist judges that exceed their lawful authority need to be ignored.
a district judge cannot tell the president how to use his Article 2 powers
the SCOTUS has the ultimate power of interpreting the Constitution

Judges who are accused of being "activist that exceed there legal authority" is a proper matter for appeal in our nation of laws, not defied by every churlish, hyper-partisan accuser.

​

"I don’t care what the judges think!"​

 

[kyzr]

Its crazy how ignorant so many (including you) are of our judicial system.
I dont know if you are really this ignorant or just this brain washed.
It has to go through these courts to get to the Supreme Court.

Not true. SCOTUS could weigh in whenever they want.
POTUS is rightfully ignoring a low level activist district judge who can't oppose Article 2 powers because he has no constitutional authority.

 

[kyzr]

Judges who are accused of being "activist that exceed there legal authority" is a proper matter for appeal in our nation of laws, not defied by every churlish, hyper-partisan accuser.

"I don’t care what the judges think!"​

Article 2 gives presidents authority, district judges don't have the constitutional authority to oppose presidential authority.

 

[pknopp]

Not true. SCOTUS could weigh in whenever they want.

If appealed to them and it's considered an emergency.

But appealed to them.

It wasn't.

POTUS is rightfully ignoring a low level activist district judge who can't oppose Article 2 powers because he has no constitutional authority.

And yet he does as a federal judge. The Supreme Court acknowledged that in their last ruling against Trump.

 

[kyzr]

If appealed to them and it's considered an emergency.
But appealed to them. It wasn't.
And yet he does as a federal judge. The Supreme Court acknowledged that in their last ruling against Trump.

Not necessarily. Here is one recent example of SCOTUS stepping up:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/26/politics/supreme-court-foreign-aid-state-usaid/index.html

Chief Justice John Roberts pauses order for Trump admin to pay $2 billion in foreign aid by midnight​

So if Boasberg's orders are way outside his lane, why doesn't Roberts step up and take the ball off him and say Trump's Article 2 powers supersede Boasberg's authority?

 

[pknopp]

Not necessarily. Here is one recent example of SCOTUS stepping up:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/26/politics/supreme-court-foreign-aid-state-usaid/index.html

Chief Justice John Roberts pauses order for Trump admin to pay $2 billion in foreign aid by midnight​

So if Boasberg's orders are way outside his lane, why doesn't Roberts step up and take the ball off him and say Trump's Article 2 powers supersede Boasberg's authority?

From the article......

The emergency appeal

Don't act like you are countering my argument while actually enforcing it.

 

[kyzr]

From the article......
The emergency appeal
Don't act like you are countering my argument while actually enforcing it.

OK, my assumption is that all stupid court orders are appealed to SCOTUS.

 

[pknopp]

OK, my assumption is that all stupid court orders are appealed to SCOTUS.

That's all Trump had to do here. Instead he thumbed his nose at the rule of law, pretending he is the law.

 

[schmidlap]

Article 2 gives presidents authority, district judges don't have the constitutional authority to oppose presidential authority.

That is a matter that is properly adjudicated, not brazenly defied.

 

[kyzr]

That is a matter that is properly adjudicated, not brazenly defied.

You say the president is brazen, we say that judge Boasberg is brazen.
We'll see how it shakes out over time.

 

[schmidlap]

You say the president is brazen, we say that judge Boasberg is brazen.
We'll see how it shakes out over time.

Homan's contempt for the judicial branch of government is the particular matter that must be addressed by our courts.

butthole's refusal to accept the democratic process in 2020 - despite having never concocted any culprits in his fanciful "stolen landslide" - presaged such contempt for America. He still lacks the integrity to respect the will of the People.

Trump Tweets About “Sacred Landslide Victory!” ​

Newsmax Withdraws False Claims About 2020 Election​

Also, butthole has yet to identify one Black immigrant eating pets.

​

 

[kyzr]

Homan's contempt for the judicial branch of government is the particular matter that must be addressed by our courts. butthole's refusal to accept the democratic process in 2020 - despite having never concocted any culprits in his fanciful "stolen landslide" - presaged such a contempt for America. He still lacks the integrity to respect the will of the People.

Trump Tweets About “Sacred Landslide Victory!” ​

Newsmax Withdraws False Claims About 2020 Election​

Also, butthole has yet to identify one Black immigrant eating pets.

All you need to know is that 312>226 EC votes
Also, 77m >75m popular votes

Enjoy the next 4-years. Your whining isn't getting democrats any more popular.
Democrats poll at 27%, the lowest rating in US history.

Putting up nonsense about Trump only helps Trump and buries democrats even deeper. Thanks!!

 

[schmidlap]

All you need to know is that 312>226 EC votes
Also, 77m >75m popular votes

Enjoy the next 4-years. Your whining isn't getting democrats any more popular.
Democrats poll at 27%, the lowest rating in US history.

Putting up nonsense about Trump only helps Trump and buries democrats even deeper. Thanks!!

All you need to know is that in 2020, as in 2024, all fifty states certified their electoral votes, and no significant instances of voter fraud have ever been found, nor anyone anywhere charged with stealing a landslide.

And, neither butthole nor his, oligarch, nor his lickspittles are above the law:

Chief Justice John Roberts rebukes Trump and allies ​

Judge finds Elon Musk likely acted unconstitutionally in shuttering USAID​

The cult is outraged.

 

[kyzr]

All you need to know is that in 2020, as in 2024, all fifty states certified their electoral votes, and no significant instances of voter fraud have ever been found, nor anyone anywhere charged with stealing a landslide.
And, neither butthole nor his, oligarch, nor his lickspittles are above the law: The cult is outraged.

In 2020:
1. Zuckerbucks bought the election (google it)
2. 51 traitors and the FBI covered up the fact that Hunter Biden's laptop contained evidence of crimes
3. Trump got 11,000,000 more votes than in 2016
4. Trump "lost" by about 35,000 votes in AZ, WI, GA
5. There were obviously fraudulent mail-in ballots since there were more "votes" in 2020 than in 2024. The GOP was more vigilant in 2024.
6. Biden won in 2020 but not legitimately.

The Biden presidency will always be known as a disaster. 9% inflation, a zombie president, the "free press" covering up everything, including his obvious senility, a lying press secretary, a lying Mayorkas, his open borders let in millions of criminals. Biden's VP was so incompetent she still can't speak coherently.

Thank God voters came to their senses, ignored the MSM propaganda, and elected a competent president.

 

[schmidlap]

In 2020:
1. Zuckerbucks bought the election (google it)
2. 51 traitors and the FBI covered up the fact that Hunter Biden's laptop contained evidence of crimes
3. Trump got 11,000,000 more votes than in 2016
4. Trump "lost" by about 35,000 votes in AZ, WI, GA
5. There were obviously fraudulent mail-in ballots since there were more "votes" in 2020 than in 2024. The GOP was more vigilant in 2024.
6. Biden won in 2020 but not legitimately.

The Biden presidency will always be known as a disaster. 9% inflation, a zombie president, the "free press" covering up everything, including his obvious senility, a lying press secretary, a lying Mayorkas, his open borders let in millions of criminals. Biden's VP was so incompetent she still can't speak coherently.

Thank God voters came to their senses, ignored the MSM propaganda, and elected a competent president.

butthole lost and, despite his cult clinging to his lies, no significant voter fraud was ever found anywhere.

 

[kyzr]

butthole lost and, despite his cult clinging to his lies, no significant voter fraud was ever found anywhere.

Trump lost in 2020, that is a fact. Trump won in 2024, that is also a fact.

Trump is a competent president, Biden was an incompetent disaster.