Boasberg escalates contempt inquiry over Alien Enemies Act deportations

[westwall]

"Boasberg escalates contempt inquiry over Alien Enemies Act deportations



The judge ordered testimony from two of the top DOJ lawyers involved in the March deportation operation.


A federal judge is escalating his inquiry into whether Trump administration officials deliberately flouted his March 15 order to prevent immigration officials from delivering more than 100 Venezuelan men to a notorious prison in El Salvador.

James Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, said Monday that it’s “premature” to recommend criminal prosecution of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who revealed last month that she gave the order to turn over the men to Salvadoran authorities on the advice of administration lawyers.

Boasberg is now demanding that two of the top Justice Department lawyers involved in the March deportation operation — including one who has since been fired for resisting some of the administration’s moves — appear for questioning next week."

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/08/judge-boasberg-alien-enemies-act-deportations-el-salvador-00681503

Boasberg appears to be heading the Democrats' shadow gov't. Now, he's his own executive branch investigating the democratically elected executive branch. Who elected Boasberg?

He needs to be in prison.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's not difficult to understand, if you came here illegally you can't stay here. We have immigration laws.

 

[Edgetho]

So until the Congress “checks” the rulings of a rogue, leftist judge trying to undermine the president’s wishes (and the people who elected him), the default position is to allow the judge to cancel orders of the U.S. president?

More weight is being given to an unelected radical judge who is putting the interests of illegals ahead of the president who is putting the interests of Americans first.

Something isn’t adding up.

The only reason dimocrap FILTH hate Trump is because he is disrupting their way of life. The kind that all parasites live in, where they worm their way into the body of a Healthy, Living Organism and contribute nothing while slowly gnawing away at its very life functions.

95% of lawyers are either dyed-in-the-wool leftists or lean hard that way. It's just the way it is. Look it up. And ALL Judges are lawyers. Do the math.

They make their living from the suffering and misery of others. They'll tell you that they're here to protect us from some evil, unseen force and when you look into it you will find that force is -- Other Lawyers. Mostly elected ones. Why is it that most of the dimocrap scum party consists of lawyers?

Biden was a lawyer, the Lying ********** (aka; the bastard son of Frank Marshall Davis) was a lawyer, his skunk-ape 'wife' was a lawyer, Bill The Rapist Clinton and Ubercunt were lawyers, Algore (aka' ManBearPig) was a lawyer, Kumswalla was a lawyer.... They're all lawyers or have some other completely and totally useless degree.

They know nothing, they've never been anywhere or done anything, never accomplished anything, never built anything..... They are social parasites to a person. ALL of them. Thieves and criminals. ALL of them.

And the people they cater to are the fringe elements of society. Either at the very bottom, the lowest of the low just looking for something for nothing or the Elites of The ELites looking for another scam, another way to rip off The People so they can live in their Ivory Towers while taking away the rights and privileges of being an American Citizen.

Think I'm wrong? Then tell me why it is that any time there is a conflict between the interests of America, and Americans, and -- Anybody.... Be it Illegal beanerhead immigrants, Drug Runners, Iran, Hamas, Gaza, Venezuela....... You name it. Anybody.

Notice that dimocrap scum, in here, in the DISGUSTING FILTH of the Media, in the Halls of Congress, on the street and in here..... They take the side of the Anti-Americans. Every time.

And look who's knee-deep in it -- Lawyers. Every time. And ALL Judges are Lawyers.

They'll try to tell you they're looking out for you, that the Constitution says this, that or the other when it clearly doesn't.

They're all part of the same parasitic organism that makes up the dimocrap scum party.

You can do something about it now or you can wait until it's too late. It's up to you. I did my part years ago. It's somebody else's time now.

Good luck. And remember, when you get them down, kick them in the head and don't let them up because if you do, they'll stab you in the back.

 

[Edgetho]

How long will it be before a 'Judge' tells us this is 'illegal'

Venezuela accuses US of 'piracy' after seizing massive oil tanker

Venezuela condemns U.S. seizure of oil tanker as "blatant theft" after joint operation targets sanctioned vessel carrying crude off Venezuelan coast.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Lisa558]

Correct, something didn't add up because you skipped:

• The Judicial branch checks illegal actions of the Executive Branch by applying the law based on the laws Congress passes and stare decisis of higher court rulings.

The appeals process checks a "rogue, leftist judge" because no individual judge will make the final call. An emergency appeal can be filed when needed so that the judges order can be reviewed and "checked" if needed.

WW

But the appeals process takes time, and until it checks the rogue leftist judge, the default position is “do what the judge says, not the U.S. President? Do you not see the problem with that?

IOW:

1) The president says “Do A,” which is what he was elected to do by the nation.

2) The judge, who prioritizes the interests of illegals over Americans, says “No! Do B instead!”

So why do we have to default to doing B, until the appeals process goes through? The default should go to the U.S. President. Otherwise, any American-hating leftist judge can stop any action he disagrees with.

 

[WEATHER53]

Gangly ghoul say what?

 

[SweetTea]

The check on a federal judge is the appeals process, including, if needed, the Supreme Court. That’s the mechanism the system relies on to correct a ruling that’s wrong or too politically skewed.

And the standard for injunctions is actually pretty simple:

If any harm to a party can be fixed later, the government usually gets to keep going.

If the harm can’t be fixed later, the party asking for protection usually gets it. Works both ways by the way. So the government is protected from harm too.


That’s the general rule, not a partisan trick.

As for repercussions: beyond being overturned, there usually aren’t any unless you can prove outright corruption, which is a very high bar. That’s intentional. The founders chose lifetime appointments precisely so judges wouldn’t fear losing their job every time they angered a president or a political party or for that matter fear making decisions that are unpopular but legally correct. The trade-off is fewer ways to punish them when they make a bad call, but the upside is more independence from political pressure.

If any part of that didn’t make sense, tell me, happy to go into more detail rather than talk past each other.

The idea that a single district judge can, in effect, override the elected President nationwide, even if only temporarily, is ludicrous to me. That’s an enormous amount of power for one unelected official at the lowest level of the federal judiciary, and it can effectively paralyze and/or influence national policy based on the views of one person, who is not the President.

I’m not saying presidents should be above the law or beyond judicial review. But if we’re talking about blocking or delaying the actions of a nationally elected executive, I believe that should require the Supreme Court, or at minimum a multi-judge appellate panel, not a single, appointed trial judge.

 

[Edgetho]

The idea that a single district judge can, in effect, override the elected President nationwide, even if only temporarily, is ludicrous me. That’s an enormous amount of power for one unelected official at the lowest level of the federal judiciary, and it can effectively paralyze and/or influence national policy based on the views of one person, who is not the President.

I’m not saying presidents should be above the law or beyond judicial review. But if we’re talking about blocking or delaying the actions of a nationally elected executive, I believe that should require the Supreme Court, or at minimum a multi-judge appellate panel, not a single, appointed trial judge.

The answer to rogue Judges is simple -- Ignore them.

What are they gonna do about it? Answer that, dimocrap scum...... WHAT.THE.****. are they gonna do about it?

Here's a hint -- Nothing. Not a goddamned thing. Zero, Zilch, Squat.

The Executive Branch bows to the Judicial as a Courtesy ONLY.

Constitutional Crisis, you say? No shit. When a President is elected by ALL The People and is thwarted by a SINGLE JUDGE, that is a Constitutional Crisis.

When a president tells a Judge to go **** his dead aunt, that is COTUS working as it should. The Judiciary has no business telling a President what to do. Even if it's a Piece of ******* Shit dimocrap scum president.

The Judiciary has no business interferring in politics.

 

[Edgetho]

Here they go again. This is not the purview of the Judiciary. They are becoming Activists and that flies in the face of their purpose in our government

Federal judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia released from ICE custody

U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has ordered the U.S. to release Kilmar Abrego Garcia from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody.

www.foxnews.com

 

[SweetTea]

The answer to rogue Judges is simple -- Ignore them.

What are they gonna do about it? Answer that, dimocrap scum...... WHAT.THE.****. are they gonna do about it?

Here's a hint -- Nothing. Not a goddamned thing. Zero, Zilch, Squat.

The Executive Branch bows to the Judicial as a Courtesy ONLY.

Constitutional Crisis, you say? No shit. When a President is elected by ALL The People and is thwarted by a SINGLE JUDGE, that is a Constitutional Crisis.

When a president tells a Judge to go **** his dead aunt, that is COTUS working as it should. The Judiciary has no business telling a President what to do. Even if it's a Piece of ******* Shit dimocrap scum president.

The Judiciary has no business interferring in politics.

I tend to agree that the only reasonable recourse is to ignore the federal judge until the Supreme Court hears the case, otherwise we could have a flurry of political activist judges from both sides of the aisle issuing injunctions left and right against a President with which they don't agree. These cases can be triaged by the Supreme Court based on their criticality.

 

[Edgetho]

I tend to agree that the only reasonable recourse is to ignore the federal judge until the Supreme Court hears the case, otherwise we could have a flurry of political activist judges from both sides of the aisle issuing injunctions left and right against a President with which they don't agree. These cases can be triaged by the Supreme Court based on their criticality.

Both sides?

Self-Respecting Conservatives don't become lawyers. It's like thinking there are Transvestite SEALs or that Delta Force has a lot of pencil-necked College Boys with Womens Studies Degrees kicking in doors to rescue hostages or track down terrorists.

95% of Lawyers are dimocraps. Just the way it is. The 5% that aren't learn what the system is all about afterwards, but even they started out as leftists. Most of the ones that figure it out, leave the profession.

And, OBTW, 100% of Judges are Lawyers. The Constitution doesn't require it, but they are. 100%.

So do the math.

 

[toobfreak]

Boasberg is now demanding that two of the top Justice Department lawyers involved in the March deportation operation — including one who has since been fired for resisting some of the administration’s moves — appear for questioning next week."

Of course! They want to question the guy who refused orders--- as a turncoat, he'd make a perfect witness to testify for the democrats.

Boasberg appears to be heading the Democrats' shadow gov't. Now, he's his own executive branch investigating the democratically elected executive branch. Who elected Boasberg?

Boasberg appears to be aligning himself as the shadow president of the democrat's new shadow government of insurrection and sedition. The democrat party wants to be every bit the traitors and insurrectionists they accuse everyone else of being from the Civil War combatants to J6 attendees.

 

[SweetTea]

Both sides?

Self-Respecting Conservatives don't become lawyers. It's like thinking there are Transvestite SEALs or that Delta Force has a lot of pencil-necked College Boys with Womens Studies Degrees kicking in doors to rescue hostages or track down terrorists.

95% of Lawyers are dimocraps. Just the way it is. The 5% that aren't learn what the system is all about afterwards, but even they started out as leftists. Most of the ones that figure it out, leave the profession.

And, OBTW, 100% of Judges are Lawyers. The Constitution doesn't require it, but they are. 100%.

So do the math.

I agree, most judges are Democrats and many Democrats put their political ideology above all else. That goes for Democratic doctors, lawyers, judges, scientists, etc. I was just making the point that all federal judgements against an order by the President should be scrutinized by a higher court, not ONE judge.

 

[Edgetho]

Of course! They want to question the guy who refused orders--- as a turncoat, he'd make a perfect witness to testify for the democrats.


Boasberg appears to be aligning himself as the shadow president of the democrat's new shadow government of insurrection and sedition. The democrat party wants to be every bit the traitors and insurrectionists they accuse everyone else of being from the Civil War combatants to J6 attendees.

 

[Lisa558]

Both sides?

Self-Respecting Conservatives don't become lawyers. It's like thinking there are Transvestite SEALs or that Delta Force has a lot of pencil-necked College Boys with Womens Studies Degrees kicking in doors to rescue hostages or track down terrorists.

95% of Lawyers are dimocraps. Just the way it is. The 5% that aren't learn what the system is all about afterwards, but even they started out as leftists. Most of the ones that figure it out, leave the profession.

And, OBTW, 100% of Judges are Lawyers. The Constitution doesn't require it, but they are. 100%.

So do the math.

I remember when a radical left Jewish lawyer from the ACLU defended the neo-Nazis for their right to march against Jews in Skokie, IL (where there were many Holocaust survivors, which is why the Nazis picked it).

Reminds me of the radical left Jews of today who march alongside the HAMAS supporters chanting “Death to Jews”!

 

[Lisa558]

View attachment 1192669

Do you know why NJ has so many toxic waste dumps, and CA has so many lawyers?

 

[Edgetho]

Do you know why NJ has so many toxic waste dumps, and CA has so many lawyers?

I give

 

[Lisa558]

I give

Because they had a contest to decide which goes where, and NJ won.

 

[toobfreak]

The answer to rogue Judges is simple -- Ignore them.

I thought the SCOTUS had already ruled that these judges were to mind their own districts?

What are they gonna do about it? Answer that, dimocrap scum...... WHAT.THE.****. are they gonna do about it?

Someone needs to grow a pair and announce that further interference from lower courts will not be allowed and all further violators will be prosecuted and removed from their positions. Congress has the power to remove these judges, where is Johnson at???

 

[Edgetho]

I thought the SCOTUS had already ruled that these judges were to mind their own districts?


Someone needs to grow a pair and announce that further interference from lower courts will not be allowed and all further violators will be prosecuted and removed from their positions. Congress has the power to remove these judges, where is Johnson at???

Gutless RINO's can't even get Trump's nominees installed. dimocrap FILTH are holding them up with their "Blue Slip' bullshit.

This obscure Senate tradition may decide whether Biden beats Trump's record on judges

Democrats have opened the door slightly to curtailing the "blue slip" courtesy, warning Republicans not to abuse it to block district judges who oversee their home states.

www.nbcnews.com

Biden crossed the milestone of getting 100 new judges through the Senate, with Democrats making clear they intend to confirm many judges this session, with or without GOP approval, in their quest to remake the judiciary. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told NBC News he intends to top the 234 judges that former President Donald Trump and the Republican-led Senate secured in four years.