The photo says it all!

[irosie91]

The UN said Iran was in violation of the treaty only AFTER Trump withdrew from the treaty and illegally imposed economic sanctions.

how are economic sanctions "illegal ?

 

[Rigby5]

No it wasn't moron. It was in our Banks, in American Legal Tender, American Currency, ergo -- American Money. Ours. Period.

We had it in our possession which makes it ours. In legal terms, we had Care, Custody and Control of the money.

Ours. Not theirs. Ours. That money was totally, completely and absolutely our money. Period.

Only an idiot would believe otherwise.

Only a scumbag would give it back to the goatfuckers. Or -- Another Goat ******. You know, like a Goatfucking Shia POTUS?

Baghdad Scuttlebutt: Pssst! Obama's a Shi'ite

When he learns that I live in New York, Ridha Mohammed leans toward me and lowers his voice to a conspiratory whisper. "I will tell...

time.com

I guess he'd rather **** a goat than a Skunk Ape anyway. Don't blame him

Wrong.
Lots of foreign nationals and foreign countries have money in US banks but it is NOT US money. It belong to whomever put it into the bank.
Only a criminal would consider keeping money prepaid for ships that were never delivered.
And even the World Court would have ruled against us if we had returned it to its rightful owner.

 

[Billiejeens]

Obama gave Iran their own money that had been frozen because of their nuclear development

Once they ended their nuclear program
There was no justification to keep it

There was no ending, troll.

 

[Rigby5]

how are economic sanctions "illegal ?

The 1906 Geneva Convention made any and all economic sanctions totally illegal.
Their intent was to stop the Medieval practice of capturing cities by encircling them and starving them out.
But what it says is that you can't interfere with civilian commerce in any way.

I realize that just 12 years later, the Allies illegally forced the surrender of Germany by an illegal food blockade. But the fact no one did anything about it, does not mean it was not illegal.

The point of the Geneva Conventions was to prevent illegal abuse of civilians or POWs.
That is basically what the Declaration of Independence reiterated.
All individuals have rights, and it is illegal to violate them, even if you are at war with their country.

 

[Billiejeens]

Link us up to the end of the nuke program. Date and time, please.

Keep in mind the IAEA and Iran both acknowledge it;s been ongoing.

Watch the worm squirm……

Trolls dont squirm

 

[healthmyths]

Wrong.
By giving Iran their own money back, Obama got Iran to put their nuclear program on hold.
That is all any president can legally do.
What Trump did was illegal.

So the reality that Iran has very publicly told the world they want to kill all Israelis and Americans is a lie? Why did the nuclear experts think from their research Iran was just days from have enough nuclear bomb material they created to build nine bombs in a few more body authorized to inspect facilities on site, Tehran is now capable of producing 34 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% per month. In its March 2025 report, the agency estimated, based on data provided by the Islamic Republic, that the country then had 274.8 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% days? I’m not saying it the experts are!

 

[Rigby5]

There was no ending, troll.

Wrong.
The IAEA did the inspections, and verified that Iran has ended enrichment and got rid of most of its stockpiles.

 

[Billiejeens]

Wrong.
The IAEA did the inspections, and verified that Iran has ended enrichment and got rid of most of its stockpiles.

Nope

 

[struth]

The UN said Iran was in violation of the treaty only AFTER Trump withdrew from the treaty and illegally imposed economic sanctions.

Not sure your point? They said this a few weeks ago. Iran was enriching and stofkpilijg weapons grade uranium…that’s all that matters

Sanctions clearly weren’t working,

 

[struth]

Wrong.
The IAEA did the inspections, and verified that Iran has ended enrichment and got rid of most of its stockpiles.

Geez man i just showed a link showing that wasn’t true, just from a few weeks ago

 

[struth]

There were NO victims of Iran.
Iran has never been legally accused of any terrorism anywhere.

Of course they have

And the people being oppressed by the regime would disagree, they are victims

 

[struth]

The point of the deal by Obama was to stop uranium enrichment, which it did.
What caused the uranium enrichment to start up again was Trumps withdraw from the treaty, and the illegal economic sanctions.

No it didn’t

 

[Billiejeens]

Of course they have

And the people being oppressed by the regime would disagree, they are victims

He is the craziest **** on here
On every subject.

 

[struth]

{...
2017
President Donald Trump announced the United States would exit a nuclear pact with Iran and re-impose sanctions on Tehran, saying the Obama-era deal failed to contain the regime’s nuclear ambitions and regional meddling.

The U.S. withdrawal advanced Trump’s campaign vow to shake up the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which had originally been joined by six additional world powers. Under the deal, Iran scaled back its nuclear program in exchange for relief from crippling sanctions.
...}

Um your quote doesn’t say anything about iran ending their nuke program

 

[Rigby5]

Really... hmmm what did IEA report?
Enough uranium to build 9 bombs!

And what did I provide .... the following information compared to Rightwinger?
Rightwinger provided NO Proof, links, substantiation! JUST a personal uninformed and unintelligent comment!!!

When asked by the BBC about Israel's claims on Monday, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, said:
"This is their evaluation of the situation. I'm not familiar with the internal reports or information that they may have."
However, he noted that the IAEA's latest quarterly report released in late May, 2025 warned that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short, technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. That was "a source of legitimate concern", he said.

Was Iran months away from producing a nuclear bomb?

Israel's PM says it struck Iran at the heart of its "weaponization programme", but Iran insists its nuclear facilities were peaceful.

www.bbc.com

View attachment 1127511

Wrong.
Only 60% enrichment is not enough for nuclear fission.
Iran never had what it takes to create anything close to an atomic bomb.

And going from 60% to 90% is the hardest part.
That is the part that takes a couple years.

It was the US who violated the nuclear treaty with Iran, not Iran.

 

[Rigby5]

Of course they have

And the people being oppressed by the regime would disagree, they are victims

Wrong.
The regime in Iran now is the one selected by the people in national elections.
Way better than the brutal Shah, who murdered tens of thousands and imprisoned millions.

 

[struth]

Wrong.
Only 60% enrichment is not enough for nuclear fission.
Iran never had what it takes to create anything close to an atomic bomb.

And going from 60% to 90% is the hardest part.
That is the part that takes a couple years.

It was the US who violated the nuclear treaty with Iran, not Iran.

Actually it’s the easiest part according to UN watchdog

60 percent is weapons grade

you are really ignorant on these topics

 

[struth]

Wrong.
The regime in Iran now is the one selected by the people in national elections.
Way better than the brutal Shah, who murdered tens of thousands and imprisoned millions.

Really when is the supreme leader elected by the people??

 

[Rigby5]

Um your quote doesn’t say anything about iran ending their nuke program

The deal included inspections, and obviously Iran stopped their nuke program, or else they would have had nukes a decade ago.

 

[Billiejeens]

Wrong.
The regime in Iran now is the one selected by the people in national elections.
Way better than the brutal Shah, who murdered tens of thousands and imprisoned millions.

They elected you The Supreme Wackado.