The photo says it all!

You guys keep creating your own facts

Iran surrendered its stockpiles of enriched uranium…..verified by international inspectors

Iran destroyed its centrifuges……verified by international inspectors

International inspectors from the U.S., EU, China and Russia verified Iran was in compliance with the treaty.

Only TRUMP said otherwise…..with no evidence
Really... hmmm what did IEA report?
Enough uranium to build 9 bombs!

And what did I provide .... the following information compared to Rightwinger?
Rightwinger provided NO Proof, links, substantiation! JUST a personal uninformed and unintelligent comment!!!

When asked by the BBC about Israel's claims on Monday, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, said:
"This is their evaluation of the situation. I'm not familiar with the internal reports or information that they may have."
However, he noted that the IAEA's latest quarterly report released in late May, 2025 warned that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short, technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. That was "a source of legitimate concern", he said.

ProofLinks?.webp
 
Hoover.org is a rightwing think tank....


Hardly a source for news, facts and information.
Disprove their facts with your own cite, Simp.

Step up for once with something besides whining and crying about Barry Hussein getting exposed as a fraud MarcATL
 
Obama gave Iran their own money that had been frozen because of their nuclear development

Once they ended their nuclear program
There was no justification to keep it
So where is your proof IRAN ended their nuclear program?
FACTS NOT guesses ok?
eally... hmmm what did IEA report?
Enough uranium to build 9 bombs!

And what did I provide .... the following information compared to Rightwinger?
Rightwinger provided NO Proof, links, substantiation! JUST a personal uninformed and unintelligent comment!!!

When asked by the BBC about Israel's claims on Monday, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, said:
"This is their evaluation of the situation. I'm not familiar with the internal reports or information that they may have."
However, he noted that the IAEA's latest quarterly report released in late May, 2025 warned that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short, technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. That was "a source of legitimate concern", he said.

FACTS!.webp
 
Based on the stated facts, Marc.
These facts???
In 2003, Iran suspended its formal nuclear weapons program, and claims its program is for peaceful purposes only, yet analysts and the IAEA have criticized such claims. Iran is currently enriching uranium to 60% purity, and has been accelerating its nuclear advancements by installing more advanced centrifuges.
 
Really... hmmm what did IEA report?
Enough uranium to build 9 bombs!

And what did I provide .... the following information compared to Rightwinger?
Rightwinger provided NO Proof, links, substantiation! JUST a personal uninformed and unintelligent comment!!!

When asked by the BBC about Israel's claims on Monday, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, said:
"This is their evaluation of the situation. I'm not familiar with the internal reports or information that they may have."
However, he noted that the IAEA's latest quarterly report released in late May, 2025 warned that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short, technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. That was "a source of legitimate concern", he said.

View attachment 1127511
Do you understand the English language?

What you posted had nothing to do with my post other than confirm it.

I posted that Obama got Iran to give up its nuclear program and that Trump allowed them to restart it


Looks like I am right once again
 
Do you understand the English language?

What you posted had nothing to do with my post other than confirm it.

I posted that Obama got Iran to give up its nuclear program and that Trump allowed them to restart it


Looks like I am right once again
But the fact yet never gave it up dummy! And what did Obama do? Gave access to billions to build Irans nuclear weapons facilities! And you are proud of that?
 
But the fact yet never gave it up dummy! And what did Obama do? Gave access to billions to build Irans nuclear weapons facilities! And you are proud of that?
Obama unfroze Iranian assets to get them to abandon their nuclear program

As you pointed out

Trump allowed them to restart it
 
So why not make Iran earn it instead of giving it to them to promote terror?
Biden enabled Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis by giving Iran $billions.

Wrong.
They already earned it, that is why it was already theirs when they used it to pay for the 2 ships we failed to deliver.

How hard is it to understand that failing to return the prepayment for ships we failed to deliver, is criminal theft?
 
Nope i am not making it up..in fact the UN just said they were in violation

WRONG!

You obviously did not read the article.
It said:
{...
The development follows serious warnings from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) earlier this week that inspectors have been unable to determine whether Iran’s nuclear programme was “exclusively peaceful” – as per the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States subsequently withdrew.
...}

That means the US ended the deal, allowing Iran to then legally do whatever it wanted to.
Iran was NOT in "violation" of anything because there was no treaty in place, because the US withdrew from the treaty first.
 
But the fact yet never gave it up dummy! And what did Obama do? Gave access to billions to build Irans nuclear weapons facilities! And you are proud of that?

Wrong.
By giving Iran their own money back, Obama got Iran to put their nuclear program on hold.
That is all any president can legally do.
What Trump did was illegal.
 
WRONG!

You obviously did not read the article.
It said:
{...
The development follows serious warnings from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) earlier this week that inspectors have been unable to determine whether Iran’s nuclear programme was “exclusively peaceful” – as per the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States subsequently withdrew.
...}

That means the US ended the deal, allowing Iran to then legally do whatever it wanted to.
Iran was NOT in "violation" of anything because there was no treaty in place, because the US withdrew from the treaty first.
Yes the USA withdrew from the deal, not sure your point, other counties were a party to it and the UN made clear that Iran was enriching uranium to weapons grade

What does the US being in a deal have to do with it?
 
15th post
Link us up to the end of the nuke program. Date and time, please.

Keep in mind the IAEA and Iran both acknowledge it;s been ongoing.

Watch the worm squirm……

{...
2017
President Donald Trump announced the United States would exit a nuclear pact with Iran and re-impose sanctions on Tehran, saying the Obama-era deal failed to contain the regime’s nuclear ambitions and regional meddling.

The U.S. withdrawal advanced Trump’s campaign vow to shake up the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which had originally been joined by six additional world powers. Under the deal, Iran scaled back its nuclear program in exchange for relief from crippling sanctions.
...}
 
Yes the USA withdrew from the deal, not sure your point, other counties were a party to it and the UN made clear that Iran was enriching uranium to weapons grade

What does the US being in a deal have to do with it?

The point of the deal by Obama was to stop uranium enrichment, which it did.
What caused the uranium enrichment to start up again was Trumps withdraw from the treaty, and the illegal economic sanctions.
 
Ok but that’s not their govt they weren’t living in SA even

And what does that have to do with victims of Iran getting a civil judgement and Obama giving them billions instead of to the Americans that got their legal judgement?

There were NO victims of Iran.
Iran has never been legally accused of any terrorism anywhere.
 
Nope i am not making it up..in fact the UN just said they were in violation

The UN said Iran was in violation of the treaty only AFTER Trump withdrew from the treaty and illegally imposed economic sanctions.
 
Back
Top Bottom