The photo says it all!

Obama gave Iran their own money that had been frozen because of their nuclear development

Once they ended their nuclear program
There was no justification to keep it
And gave them a huge chunk of change to fund their terrorist proxies. Win win right ?
 
Obama gave Iran their own money that had been frozen because of their nuclear development

Once they ended their nuclear program
There was no justification to keep it
Obama and Lurch gave Iran the pathway for a nuclear bomb with the 'nuclear deal'. :eusa_whistle:
 
Yep, history always destroys America hating morons like you.

Next?
↑↑↑↑↑↑ How to say you're mindless, warmongering, far rightwing lemming, that refuses to learn from their previous mistakes without stating you're a mindless, warmongering far rightwing lemming, that refuses to learn from their previous mistakes.

smh-well.gif


#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC #AmericaIsSoScrewedUnderGOPAdministrations
 
Last edited:
Obama and Lurch gave Iran the pathway for a nuclear bomb with the 'nuclear deal'. :eusa_whistle:
How in your twisted mind does taking away their nuclear material make them closer to a nuclear bomb?
 
They had stockpiles of weapons grade uranium that Obama got to surrender

Guess who let them build it back?
They never surrendered anything, instead over the past four years have been allowed to stockpile it

Trump took care of it
 
How in your twisted mind does taking away their nuclear material make them closer to a nuclear bomb?
It is all too clear that what Obama has offered today is a far cry from the deal he outlined to the country before these negotiations. It was easy for the President to talk tough to Mitt Romney in the course of their 2012 debates by then claiming it was “straightforward” that Iran has to “give up” its nuclear program in its entirety. As the President once recognized, there are no peaceful ends for which Iran needs a nuclear program. It is awash in oil, and it can satisfy any desire for medical isotopes by buying off-the-shelf products from any of a dozen nations that would be thrilled to supply them for free.

The agreement dramatically changes Iran’s status as an international aggressor. Elliott Abrams gives us the grim tally. Right off the bat, Iran’s nuclear program has gone from illegal to legal. The new agreement lets Iran keep 6,000 centrifuges and it allows the country to continue to do its own weapons research. It is likely that it can do a lot more outside the agreement as well. In five years the agreement lifts an arms embargo and in eight years all restrictions on ballistic missiles will be lifted.

It is often said that negotiation involves the process of give and take, by which it is not meant that the United States and its allies give and Iran takes. Unfortunately, that pattern has been observed in this recent deal. Iran had no hesitation in stating in the eleventh hour that various limitations on its sovereignty, e.g. inspections, were “unacceptable.” Today its position is that the sanctions must be lifted immediately. But the Obama administration was extraordinarily reluctant to say that any Iranian proposal was unacceptable. The drama in the negotiation was how far the Iranians would push the agreement to their side of the table—which is exactly what to expect from any negotiation that relies exclusively on carrots and disdains all sticks.

This agreement does not require detailed study to conclude that it is a dead loser. Nonetheless, the United States has put it forward in the United Nations for approval before Congress has spoken, and the President, incorrigible as ever, has announced that he will veto any Congressional legislation that seeks to block the treaty. Many members of his own party do not share the President’s unfailing instinct for self-destruction. They should join the Republicans to reject the treaty by veto-proof majorities in both houses before the President and his team can do any further harm.


You are so gullible, willful or not, Comrade.
 
It is all too clear that what Obama has offered today is a far cry from the deal he outlined to the country before these negotiations. It was easy for the President to talk tough to Mitt Romney in the course of their 2012 debates by then claiming it was “straightforward” that Iran has to “give up” its nuclear program in its entirety. As the President once recognized, there are no peaceful ends for which Iran needs a nuclear program. It is awash in oil, and it can satisfy any desire for medical isotopes by buying off-the-shelf products from any of a dozen nations that would be thrilled to supply them for free.

The agreement dramatically changes Iran’s status as an international aggressor. Elliott Abrams gives us the grim tally. Right off the bat, Iran’s nuclear program has gone from illegal to legal. The new agreement lets Iran keep 6,000 centrifuges and it allows the country to continue to do its own weapons research. It is likely that it can do a lot more outside the agreement as well. In five years the agreement lifts an arms embargo and in eight years all restrictions on ballistic missiles will be lifted.

It is often said that negotiation involves the process of give and take, by which it is not meant that the United States and its allies give and Iran takes. Unfortunately, that pattern has been observed in this recent deal. Iran had no hesitation in stating in the eleventh hour that various limitations on its sovereignty, e.g. inspections, were “unacceptable.” Today its position is that the sanctions must be lifted immediately. But the Obama administration was extraordinarily reluctant to say that any Iranian proposal was unacceptable. The drama in the negotiation was how far the Iranians would push the agreement to their side of the table—which is exactly what to expect from any negotiation that relies exclusively on carrots and disdains all sticks.

This agreement does not require detailed study to conclude that it is a dead loser. Nonetheless, the United States has put it forward in the United Nations for approval before Congress has spoken, and the President, incorrigible as ever, has announced that he will veto any Congressional legislation that seeks to block the treaty. Many members of his own party do not share the President’s unfailing instinct for self-destruction. They should join the Republicans to reject the treaty by veto-proof majorities in both houses before the President and his team can do any further harm.


You are so gullible, willful or not, Comrade.
Hoover.org is a rightwing think tank....


Hardly a source for news, facts and information.
 
Hoover.org is a rightwing think tank....


Hardly a source for news, facts and information.
The facts ARE there Marc. You can extrapolate what you want from it.
 
15th post
So why not make Iran earn it instead of giving it to them to promote terror?
Biden enabled Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis by giving Iran $billions.
Just days ago Israel took out a key Iranian money man who was about to funnel another $50 million in weapons to Hamas.
 
If Iran minded it's own business, just ran it's country and left other countries alone they would be a wealthy, modern nation. But Iran made it, it's mission to destroy Israel.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom