The Pentagon is no longer going to tell the public how many troops are in Iraq and Syria

[danielpalos]

Can you cite any delegated power for a War on Terror in our federal Constitution?

We have a general welfare clause.

I would say letting in the very people who want to kill you would fly in the face of the general welfare clause.
But thats just me...

in other words, just right wing, "feel good" policy?

No...that would be take care of your damn self policy.

our policies are creating, more refugees. are you going to stop whining about refugees?

House them in their own damn country like we've always done in the past.

we didn't have, alleged, global wars back then. what if their own country is in turmoil?

 

[danielpalos]

Good. The whole world has no business knowing our troops' strengths and where they are located.

As for the utter bullshit of those stupid progressives wanting to mourn over US Soldier's deaths, I find it disgusting. that there was nary a peep from you people from the deaths under Obama.

it has to do with fiscal forms of accountability; how much are we spending on those ventures, and why does the right wing, blame the poor for using social services, with our general welfare clause.

Because the general welfare clause does not mean spending money on people.

Yes, it does. It means, the general welfare, not the specific welfare.

The common defense, is not the common offense.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Good. The whole world has no business knowing our troops' strengths and where they are located.

As for the utter bullshit of those stupid progressives wanting to mourn over US Soldier's deaths, I find it disgusting. that there was nary a peep from you people from the deaths under Obama.

it has to do with fiscal forms of accountability; how much are we spending on those ventures, and why does the right wing, blame the poor for using social services, with our general welfare clause.

Because the general welfare clause does not mean spending money on people.

Yes, it does. It means, the general welfare, not the specific welfare.

You just contradicted yourself.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I would say letting in the very people who want to kill you would fly in the face of the general welfare clause.
But thats just me...

in other words, just right wing, "feel good" policy?

No...that would be take care of your damn self policy.

our policies are creating, more refugees. are you going to stop whining about refugees?

House them in their own damn country like we've always done in the past.

we didn't have, alleged, global wars back then. what if their own country is in turmoil?

What ever happened to the UN? They used to set up refugee zones and UN troops would protect them.

 

[danielpalos]

Good. The whole world has no business knowing our troops' strengths and where they are located.

As for the utter bullshit of those stupid progressives wanting to mourn over US Soldier's deaths, I find it disgusting. that there was nary a peep from you people from the deaths under Obama.

it has to do with fiscal forms of accountability; how much are we spending on those ventures, and why does the right wing, blame the poor for using social services, with our general welfare clause.

Because the general welfare clause does not mean spending money on people.

Yes, it does. It means, the general welfare, not the specific welfare.

You just contradicted yourself.

no, i didn't. the general welfare is not the specific welfare. you have only specific welfare by limiting disbursement.

 

[danielpalos]

in other words, just right wing, "feel good" policy?

No...that would be take care of your damn self policy.

our policies are creating, more refugees. are you going to stop whining about refugees?

House them in their own damn country like we've always done in the past.

we didn't have, alleged, global wars back then. what if their own country is in turmoil?

What ever happened to the UN? They used to set up refugee zones and UN troops would protect them.

Mr. Trump wants to "defund" them.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

No...that would be take care of your damn self policy.

our policies are creating, more refugees. are you going to stop whining about refugees?

House them in their own damn country like we've always done in the past.

we didn't have, alleged, global wars back then. what if their own country is in turmoil?

What ever happened to the UN? They used to set up refugee zones and UN troops would protect them.

Mr. Trump wants to "defund" them.

You might as well. They havent been relevant for the last twenty years.
Unless of course you approve of the push for a one world government.

 

[danielpalos]

our policies are creating, more refugees. are you going to stop whining about refugees?

House them in their own damn country like we've always done in the past.

we didn't have, alleged, global wars back then. what if their own country is in turmoil?

What ever happened to the UN? They used to set up refugee zones and UN troops would protect them.

Mr. Trump wants to "defund" them.

You might as well. They havent been relevant for the last twenty years.
Unless of course you approve of the push for a one world government.

How about a federal Constitution, to ban war among the several States of the Union?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

House them in their own damn country like we've always done in the past.

we didn't have, alleged, global wars back then. what if their own country is in turmoil?

What ever happened to the UN? They used to set up refugee zones and UN troops would protect them.

Mr. Trump wants to "defund" them.

You might as well. They havent been relevant for the last twenty years.
Unless of course you approve of the push for a one world government.

How about a federal Constitution, to ban war among the several States of the Union?

WTF are you talking about?