montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,107
- 280
You are amusing, what can I say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
P F Tinmore, et al,
Just like you deny the reality of a Civil War prior to the War of Independence, so it is that you see something within the Treaty of Lausanne that is not there; a political delusion and abnormally meaningless revelation of a latent reality.
You want the outcome to be so necessarily favorable to the Arab Palestinian Cause, that your Mental Acuity become twisted and the Emotional Competence and Rational Understanding become dysfunctional.
(COMMENT)I am just going by what the treaty said.If they are lies then why cant you prove they are, is it because there is no evidence to back you up ?You can throw lies at it as often as you want. It doesn't change the facts.Addressed more times than I can remember.
What do you have?
You are absolutely correct that the Treaty of Lausanne neither creates nor recognized the new Palestinian national identity. You are correct that neither the citizenship clauses in the Palestine Order in Council, or the 1925 Citizenship Order recognized the new Palestinian national identity. In intent of these three documents in the regard of Citizenship and Nationality was to establish a framework for the international protection of stateless persons. Its specific application to persons within the venue of the Government of Palestine (that being the territory placed in the care of the Mandatory - Briton) was to provide for stateless persons; and that they enjoy, at a minimum, the same treatment as other non-nationals. The solution was to make them citizens under the Government of Palestine. In fact, it was only after the Oslo Agreement that the Palestinian Authority (PA) (created by the Oslo Accords) (1995) was there issuance of a PA Passport.
The Treaty does not further you argument except for the prevention of Stateless Persons as the result of WWII.
Most Respectfully,
R
Native people defending themselves from a foreign invader is not a civil war. The Jews came from Europe.
No one is coming to deny that the Arabs of the land has connection to the homeland, just like the Jews do. But unlike the Jews, they're not told that sitting in a certain areas is illegal just because they're Arabs. Those Palestinians who are not free to sit anywhere on the land is because of the war and because it risks the lives of Jews.
Descrimination is convenient against the Jews of the land.
Once land is "redeemed" by Jews, non-Jews if is off limits to non-Jews. You continue to propagate lies.
Facts are not slogans. Your Zionist propaganda is fraught with slogans. You understand Zionist propaganda. I state fact. But you knew that.
You are amusing, what can I say.
Originally posted by ForeverYoung
Except for 1970, I've never seen the Palestinians, Jordanians and Syrians wage war against each other. Besides there has been the American Civil War, the Spanish Civil War, etc. In ancient times the Greek city-states fought against each other, Antony of Rome fought against Octavian, Israel fought against Judah, etc.
Originally posted by PF Tinmore
Indeed, there has been little trouble between Palestine and its neighbors.
What little there has been was centered around Israel. Black September would not have happened without Israel.
The Palestinians have fought an uphill battle against Israel and its super power supporters to defend their country. Lesser people would have lost long ago.
Israel's Legal Right To Exist