The Official Bret Baier/Kamala Harris Interview Thread

[Man With A Plan]

Clearly, that's the current difference between Dems and trumpfluffers. We support the rule of law.
How do you feel about trump using the military to arrest and punish the democrat "enemy within" Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff? You cool with that?

He was referring to how he would deal with the gangs that Biden/Harris have let into the country not everyday Americans.

You claim that Democrats "support the rule of law", Onasis but you're the ones who have used "lawfare" against your political opponents...something you'd typically see in a place that DOESN'T have the rule of law to protect it's citizens from the people in power!

 

[john doe 101]

I don't know. How about you look at that and get back to me.

Exactly. You don't know. Which should be your answer on here most of the time.

 

[X.Onasis]

He was referring to how he would deal with the gangs that Biden/Harris have let into the country not everyday Americans.

WRONG. Sorry pal.

"I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within—not even the people that have come in and destroyed our country, by the way, totally destroying our country. The towns, the villages, they're being inundated. But I don't think they're the problem in terms of Election Day."

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics. And I think they're the—and it should be very easily handled by—if necessary, by [the] National Guard or, if really necessary, by the military, because they can't let that happen."



Trump doubled down Tuesday on his remarks over the weekend referring to Democrats as the “enemy from within.”

During a taped town hall of all-women voters in Cumming, Georgia, with Fox News’ Harris Faulkner, the host asked Trump about his “enemy from within” comment, which he made during the network’s “Sunday Morning Futures” this past weekend.

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were “lunatics” and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.

“I always say, we have two enemies,” Trump said, adding: “We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries.”

He also suggested that the military could be called in to handle any unrest on Election Day from "radical left lunatics."

Trump doubled down on those comments during his Tuesday night town hall, also calling Democrats “evil” and “dangerous.”

“They’re Marxists and communists and fascists, and they’re sick,” Trump added. “We have China, we have Russia, we have all these countries. If you have a smart president, they can all be handled. The more difficult are, you know, the Pelosis, these people, they’re so sick and they’re so evil,” Trump said.

Perhaps consider not getting your news from FOX, the rightard trough of brain slop. Just saying...

 

[Care4all]

If they don't have access to photocopy equipment then vote in person. It wasn't that long ago that very VERY few people voted absentee and we had to have a valid reason to request an absentee ballot. Most of us got our butts to our precinct's polling place and cast our votes. And nobody, Democrat, Republican or anybody else, thought that disenfranchised anybody.

"Wasn't that long ago" was 25 years ago Foxy, a quarter of a century, no excuse mail in voting has been expanding with more States each year since 2000...

and this is not your issue nor do you have any say, other than for your own state and me for my own state etc. etc

How the Native American Vote Continues to be Suppressed

Many Native Americans living on reservations continue to be excluded from the democratic process of voting because they cannot provide a residential address and may have a form of ID not compliant with voting laws.

www.americanbar.org

How Voter Suppression Laws Target Native Americans

Since the federal government formally gave Native Americans the right to vote in 1924 they have had to fight to use it.

www.brennancenter.org

Montana Supreme Court Strikes Down Voting Laws Intended to Disenfranchise Indigenous Voters | American Civil Liberties Union

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana Supreme Court today ruled in favor of a collection of Native American organizations and tribes, holding that two state...

www.aclu.org

I don't think photocopying ID is the answer. I would prefer those mailing in ballots have them notarized and put their signature on the ballot itself so if there needs to be an audit the signatures are not separated from the ballots. Those who want to vote anonymously again can get themselves to the polls, show photo ID and vote in person.

Notorizing on reservations would be ten times harder than the ID laws themselves....

Isn't the GOAL to NOT disenfranchise citizens of their constitutional right to vote ....

But to make it easier for citizens ...and harder for non citizens to cheat and illegally vote?

 

[X.Onasis]

 

[Foxfyre]

"Wasn't that long ago" was 25 years ago Foxy, a quarter of a century, no excuse mail in voting has been expanding with more States each year since 2000...

and this is not your issue nor do you have any say, other than for your own state and me for my own state etc. etc

How the Native American Vote Continues to be Suppressed

Many Native Americans living on reservations continue to be excluded from the democratic process of voting because they cannot provide a residential address and may have a form of ID not compliant with voting laws.

www.americanbar.org

How Voter Suppression Laws Target Native Americans

Since the federal government formally gave Native Americans the right to vote in 1924 they have had to fight to use it.

www.brennancenter.org

Montana Supreme Court Strikes Down Voting Laws Intended to Disenfranchise Indigenous Voters | American Civil Liberties Union

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana Supreme Court today ruled in favor of a collection of Native American organizations and tribes, holding that two state...

www.aclu.org

Notorizing on reservations would be ten times harder than the ID laws themselves....

Isn't the GOAL to NOT disenfranchise citizens of their constitutional right to vote ....

But to make it easier for citizens ...and harder for non citizens to cheat and illegally vote?

Most Americans no longer trust the electoral process and it is a trend toward mail in ballots that is a large reason for it. And that is very much my issue and it should be an issue for every American who understands why it is important that most Americans do trust the electoral process.

Maybe fraud is rare as is claimed by those who don't want more safeguards. I don't know. I do know people don't believe it is rare anymore. And that is a problem.

Yes having a ballot signature notarized would be hard. Maybe hard enough to encourage more people to vote in person. If having your signature notarized is ruled out, the signature should be on the ballot itself or the ballots must be kept with the signed envelope until all audits, challenges, recounts are completed.

 

[Care4all]

That's quite racist.

That's quite ignorant!

 

[Care4all]

Most Americans no longer trust the electoral process and it is a trend toward mail in ballots that is a large reason for it. And that is very much my issue and it should be an issue for every American who understands why it is important that most Americans do trust the electoral process.

Maybe fraud is rare as is claimed by those who don't want more safeguards. I don't know. I do know people don't believe it is rare anymore. And that is a problem.

Yes having a ballot signature notarized would be hard. Maybe hard enough to encourage more people to vote in person. If having your signature notarized is ruled out, the signature should be on the ballot itself or the ballots must be kept with the signed envelope until all audits, challenges, recounts are completed.

The way to make people more secure is to educate them on all the checks and balances in place for both mail in ballots and in person voting imo.

Then the people pushing the lies about our elections being insecure, can be fought with facts and knowledge.

 

[SweetSue92]

The way to make people more secure is to educate them on all the checks and balances in place for both mail in ballots and in person voting imo.

Then the people pushing the lies about our elections being insecure, can be fought with facts and knowledge.

That ship has not only sailed, it sunk.

2020/Covid planted such deep distrust in the govt/institutions that we can hardly even speak about it yet.

The govt effed up massively and the consequences will be deep distrust for decades.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

I caught some highlights
Uh boy
She's gonna go on Rogan ..really.lol
She couldn't handle fake opposition corporate establishment media .

The leftist narrative is on how stunning and brave she was to go on such a channel...

And it was all about Trump rotflmao

That was her answer for everything...buht trump


What a train wreck

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Pjw chimes in

 

[j-mac]

I'm a torch compered to your matchstick.

Is that what your mommy told you?

 

[j-mac]

I caught some highlights
Uh boy
She's gonna go on Rogan ..really.lol
She couldn't handle fake opposition corporate establishment media .

The leftist narrative is on how stunning and brave she was to go on such a channel...

And it was all about Trump rotflmao

That was her answer for everything...buht trump


What a train wreck

All she is, is a leftist hack, without any seriousness to her. Much like what we see in here from the TDS warriors…

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yes having a ballot signature notarized would be hard. Maybe hard enough to encourage more people to vote in person. If having your signature notarized is ruled out, the signature should be on the ballot itself or the ballots must be kept with the signed envelope until all audits, challenges, recounts are completed.

Thumbprint. Everyone has one (or an alternative). Exceptionally hard to forge.

 

[Lakhota]

Bret Baier Says He Made A ‘Mistake’ In Kamala Harris Interview, Played Wrong Trump Clip​

Ex-Fox News Host Calls BS On Bret Baier’s Claim He Made A ‘Mistake’​

 

[M14 Shooter]

All she is, is a leftist hack, without any seriousness to her. Much like what we see in here from the TDS warriors…

She's only where she is because she is the colored woman Biden chose as his DEI VP.
There is literally no other reason for her to be the nominee.
She could never, ever, make it to where she is now on her own merits.

And the useful idiots tell us she's the best thing since sliced bread.

 

[Lisa558]

She's only where she is because she is the colored woman Biden chose as his DEI VP.
There is literally no other reason for her to be the nominee.
She could never, ever, make it to where she is now on her own merits.

And the useful idiots tell us she's the best thing since sliced bread.

It’s likely given her lack of ability and intelligence that she never would have even been a lawyer. She’s been skating on the Female Black card her entire adult life.

And the notable thing is that after being hoisted up due to her race, she really believes that she actually is capable of being the United States president. If she were white, she probably would be a low-level manager, at best - but ultimately fired because her entire staff quits on her.

 

[ozro]

"Wasn't that long ago" was 25 years ago Foxy, a quarter of a century, no excuse mail in voting has been expanding with more States each year since 2000...

and this is not your issue nor do you have any say, other than for your own state and me for my own state etc. etc

How the Native American Vote Continues to be Suppressed

Many Native Americans living on reservations continue to be excluded from the democratic process of voting because they cannot provide a residential address and may have a form of ID not compliant with voting laws.

www.americanbar.org

How Voter Suppression Laws Target Native Americans

Since the federal government formally gave Native Americans the right to vote in 1924 they have had to fight to use it.

www.brennancenter.org

Montana Supreme Court Strikes Down Voting Laws Intended to Disenfranchise Indigenous Voters | American Civil Liberties Union

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana Supreme Court today ruled in favor of a collection of Native American organizations and tribes, holding that two state...

www.aclu.org

Notorizing on reservations would be ten times harder than the ID laws themselves....

Isn't the GOAL to NOT disenfranchise citizens of their constitutional right to vote ....

But to make it easier for citizens ...and harder for non citizens to cheat and illegally vote?

Some of us off the rez had trouble getting an address too. You might be shocked to learn that when I need a notary, or a copy machine, post office, grocery store or to vote, I leave my home and go to the Navajo Nation where there are plenty of those things. You are arrogantly ignorant.
You know, the Navajo and Zuni even have electricity from power companies,while those of us in the surrounding areas do not.
These days "Lo, the poor Indian" has been doing pretty well for himself.

 

[Foxfyre]

The way to make people more secure is to educate them on all the checks and balances in place for both mail in ballots and in person voting imo.

Then the people pushing the lies about our elections being insecure, can be fought with facts and knowledge.

The people have been told over and over about those checks and balances. They no longer believe those claimed checks and balances are producing fair, honest, secure elections.

 

[Foxfyre]

Thumbprint. Everyone has one (or an alternative). Exceptionally hard to forge.

That would work too but how many poll workers have the skills to compare thumb prints and I would think it would require a lot more time to scrutinize than does a signature. The thing is that mail in ballots are much harder to keep in a secure chain of custody and lend themselves to more undetectable or obvious hanky panky than does voting in person. And it is impractical for poll watchers to supervise the process with mail in ballots arriving over many days or weeks.

In 2000 my husband and I who live alone received five applications for absentee ballots. One for each of us, one each for our son and then daughter-in-law who had lived with us years before but have been long gone out of state for more than a decade. And one for the deceased previous owner of our house. We didn't use any of them but we could have obtained five ballots by sending in all of them. And if we were skillful with forging signatures we could likely have voted five times. The odds that all the ballots would have been accepted are pretty good.

But mostly there is eroding faith in the integrity of our elections because the Democrats work so hard to prevent any measures that make it harder to cheat: purging the rolls of inactive voters, voter ID, requiring proof of citizenship to register, etc. That makes it look very much like they WANT to be able to cheat.