The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[PoliticalChic]

"Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times
Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan during and after Election Day testified during a public Michigan Senate Oversight Committee hearing Tuesday, describing in detail the fraud and impropriety they’d allegedly seen. "

Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times

Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan testified Tuesday. One said she saw Xerox military ballots be submitted.

www.bizpacreview.com

No wonder we no longer hear 'no evidence, no evidence.'

No corroborating evidence.

"Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence

As a lawyer who once represented the Maricopa County Elections Department, it has been appalling for me to see the mainstream media (MSM) breathlessly blabbing over and over that there is no "evidence" of election fraud.

They even had the nerve to claim that Sidney Powell, a former high-level Justice Department attorney, who served as lead counsel in more than 500 appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, had no evidence of fraud in the presidential election. They pretended she just put her hard-earned reputation on the line to hold a press conference with Rudy Giuliani based on lies. Sadly, the MSM is able to fool a lot of the public, because the public doesn’t understand the law.

Powell and the Trump legal team have compiled hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits from people swearing to election fraud in the presidential election. Affidavits are evidence."

Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence * WorldNetDaily * by Rachel Alexander

... Read more

www.wnd.com

Now....what were you saying?

 

[PoliticalChic]

They still think this is going to happen.

This is incredible to watch.

I never said that.

Shall we count this as one more lie I've caught you in?

 

[mamooth]

"We got a few crazy, stupid and corrupt people to sign an affidavit, so the presidential election must be overturned!".

Yeah, that's a great precedent to set -- "To hell with the vote count, whoever can parade the most cranks wins!". That would be why it's getting laughed out of every court.

 

[busybee01]

Georgia:

Suitcases of ballots pulled out during the night when there were no witnesses:

A lie.

Election supervisors were present.
The workers left because they were through for the day
The worker who remained was scanning ballots which by law has to be scanned after they are open
The so-called suitcase was a empty bin to put the ballots in after they were scanned
No one was ordered out
The number of ballots matched the number of voters.

As usual you are spreading propaganda from your master.

1. I'm never wrong. Watch this:

2. There are two requirements to support the belief that the election was fair and equitable. The first is to have two members of opposing parties sitting next to each other viewing mail-in ballots….registration of the voter, and signature comparison, agree that ballot is filled out correctly. This was not done. In fact, the Democrat strongholds would not allow Republican poll watchers and vote watcher into the room….and even put up cardboard to prevent viewing of vote counting from outside.



In some cases boxes of ‘votes’ were brought in after closing of the site, with no one around to see except Democrats.


3. Perhaps the most glaring example that indicates illegality is the prevalence of over-voting in swing states, where more votes turn up than registered voters, or more mail-in votes than the number of mail-in or absentee ballots requested.



Second only to that, is the discrepancy in swing states between fully filled out ballots, and those with only Biden filled in, and no down-ballot voting indicated.



“In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”



Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.



In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?


4. For comparison, check out a non-swing state, like Wyoming. Trump: 193,454 GOP Sen: 197,961 Dif:4,507 Biden: 73,445 Dem Sen: 72,720 Dif: 725 No massive flood of mysterious empty Biden votes. It's fraud. The Democrats are committing voter fraud in the Swing states.



Another control state, which Dems aren't currently trying to steaI. Montana Trump: 340,635 GOP Sen: 330,317 Dif: 10,318 Biden: 243,278 Dem Sen: 270,735 Dif: 27,457 Stable numbers for GOP, and when you factor in 3rd party vote, no mysterious Biden-only ballots like the swings.”

Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?

Via ZeroHedge In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candi…

www.theburningplatform.com

44 states seem to have a normal election......



......but those swing states....almost as if it had been planned......

Republican poll watchers were allowed to observe. Even the Trump lawyers admit that.

"Republican election officials confirmed they were allowed to monitor the process and denied any irregularities. Independent fact-checkers have likewise found no evidence to corroborate the Trump Team's allegations.

The campaign quietly dropped the accusation from its lawsuit on Sunday. And Porter Wright, the law firm which filed the legal challenge, withdrew from the case entirely, the campaign's lawyers confirmed in a court filing.

Even though the allegation was struck from its lawsuit, the Trump campaign denied that it had dropped its argument."

Trump campaign drops claim that GOP poll observers weren't allowed to watch Pennsylvania vote count | Salon.com

There was no overvoting The results in Detroit amounted to a 450 vote difference in Wayne County. No boxes of votes were snuck in. These were legally cast mail in votes.

Wisconsin and Pennsylvanis had no Senate elections. The Senate race in Michigan followed the Presidential race. The Republican jumped out to a early lead only to fall behind once mail in ballots were counted. In Georgia, Orsoff fell behind Biden's pace because he got 52% of the hispanic vote to Biden's 62%.

All the states had normal elections. Just because you don't like the results does not meaqn they are normal.

 

[busybee01]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

Nazi......NationalSOCIALISTGermanWorker's Party.

Socialist......just like you.

The Nazis were not socialists. They were nationalists. Maybe you need to read history.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"We got a few crazy, stupid and corrupt people to sign an affidavit, so the presidential election must be overturned!".

Yeah, that's a great precedent to set -- "To hell with the vote count, whoever can parade the most cranks wins!". That would be why it's getting laughed out of every court.

Signing an affidavit is swearing under oath.

It's actual evidence.

Good to see you worry.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

Nazi......NationalSOCIALISTGermanWorker's Party.

Socialist......just like you.

The Nazis were not socialists. They were nationalists. Maybe you need to read history.

The national socialist party weren't socialist.

This is how dumb Democrats are.

 

[busybee01]

View attachment 425323

The same Giuliani that was shushing one of his crazy witnesses. She sees a lot of pink elephants as well. As was pointed out by a Republican legislator, the number of votes cast matched up with the number of voters.

So you're no longer saying "no evidence"?

Excellent.

Obviously there is some fraud in any election. It is never enough to turn a ele ction unless it is a single digit race. You want to claim every vote against Trump is fraud.

 

[Toro]

"Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times
Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan during and after Election Day testified during a public Michigan Senate Oversight Committee hearing Tuesday, describing in detail the fraud and impropriety they’d allegedly seen. "

Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times

Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan testified Tuesday. One said she saw Xerox military ballots be submitted.

www.bizpacreview.com

No wonder we no longer hear 'no evidence, no evidence.'

No corroborating evidence.

"Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence

As a lawyer who once represented the Maricopa County Elections Department, it has been appalling for me to see the mainstream media (MSM) breathlessly blabbing over and over that there is no "evidence" of election fraud.

They even had the nerve to claim that Sidney Powell, a former high-level Justice Department attorney, who served as lead counsel in more than 500 appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, had no evidence of fraud in the presidential election. They pretended she just put her hard-earned reputation on the line to hold a press conference with Rudy Giuliani based on lies. Sadly, the MSM is able to fool a lot of the public, because the public doesn’t understand the law.

Powell and the Trump legal team have compiled hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits from people swearing to election fraud in the presidential election. Affidavits are evidence."

Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence * WorldNetDaily * by Rachel Alexander

... Read more

www.wnd.com

Now....what were you saying?

And yet, Trump's legal team has not been able to prove in court one single instance of fraud.

Not one.

 

[busybee01]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

Nazi......NationalSOCIALISTGermanWorker's Party.

Socialist......just like you.

The Nazis were not socialists. They were nationalists. Maybe you need to read history.

The national socialist party weren't socialist.

This is how dumb Democrats are.

Hitler was a dictator who seized power after he was democratically elected. Sort of like what Trump is trying to do. Another parallel is that as allied forces raced across Europe, Hitler's generals refused to tell him he was losing. Republicans are too afraid to tell Trump he lost.

 

[Mac1958]

They still think this is going to happen.

This is incredible to watch.

I never said that.

Shall we count this as one more lie I've caught you in?

You don't know lies from reality.

You're just another Trumpster.

You can think whatever you want.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

Nazi......NationalSOCIALISTGermanWorker's Party.

Socialist......just like you.

The Nazis were not socialists. They were nationalists. Maybe you need to read history.

"The Nazis were not socialists."



This is just too darn easy.
Dealing with government school grads is like debating a dead person.



Watch this: I'm gonna wipe up the floor with you.


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.


Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.



"Workers Welfare Programs:

In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either."

Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies

Click Here for Adolf Hitler and World War 2. What is NAtional SoZIalism. Economic, Social and Political policies of Adolf Hitler and NA...

lovkap.blogspot.com

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

 

[busybee01]

"We got a few crazy, stupid and corrupt people to sign an affidavit, so the presidential election must be overturned!".

Yeah, that's a great precedent to set -- "To hell with the vote count, whoever can parade the most cranks wins!". That would be why it's getting laughed out of every court.

Signing an affidavit is swearing under oath.

It's actual evidence.

Good to see you worry.

Not by itself. You still need corroborating evidence. US Attorneys are not even taking these things seriously. The DOJ has said they have seen no evidence of fraud that would change the results.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

Nazi......NationalSOCIALISTGermanWorker's Party.

Socialist......just like you.

The Nazis were not socialists. They were nationalists. Maybe you need to read history.

The national socialist party weren't socialist.

This is how dumb Democrats are.

That's government schooling!

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 425323

The same Giuliani that was shushing one of his crazy witnesses. She sees a lot of pink elephants as well. As was pointed out by a Republican legislator, the number of votes cast matched up with the number of voters.

So you're no longer saying "no evidence"?

Excellent.

Obviously there is some fraud in any election. It is never enough to turn a ele ction unless it is a single digit race. You want to claim every vote against Trump is fraud.

"Obviously there is some fraud in any election."



Gettin' warm!

 

[shoshi]

Did the Soviets not call themselves Socialist? Communism was a idea a goal they hoped to reach but never did. Under communism you have state controlled monopoly. Fascism there is not monopolies but the firms such as Volkswagon and BMW are state controlled. It is a marriage of state and business interest.
The nationalist regimes who ruled who ruled Iraq Syria and Egypt under Nasser were influnced by fascism. They used Arabic translations of Nazi slogans.

 

[busybee01]

"Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times
Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan during and after Election Day testified during a public Michigan Senate Oversight Committee hearing Tuesday, describing in detail the fraud and impropriety they’d allegedly seen. "

Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times

Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan testified Tuesday. One said she saw Xerox military ballots be submitted.

www.bizpacreview.com

No wonder we no longer hear 'no evidence, no evidence.'

No corroborating evidence.

"Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence

As a lawyer who once represented the Maricopa County Elections Department, it has been appalling for me to see the mainstream media (MSM) breathlessly blabbing over and over that there is no "evidence" of election fraud.

They even had the nerve to claim that Sidney Powell, a former high-level Justice Department attorney, who served as lead counsel in more than 500 appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, had no evidence of fraud in the presidential election. They pretended she just put her hard-earned reputation on the line to hold a press conference with Rudy Giuliani based on lies. Sadly, the MSM is able to fool a lot of the public, because the public doesn’t understand the law.

Powell and the Trump legal team have compiled hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits from people swearing to election fraud in the presidential election. Affidavits are evidence."

Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence * WorldNetDaily * by Rachel Alexander

... Read more

www.wnd.com

Now....what were you saying?

Then she claimed Hugo Chavez was behind a international conspiracy to commit voter fraud. Is he endorsing that? That was evden too much for Trump as she was dropped from the team.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times
Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan during and after Election Day testified during a public Michigan Senate Oversight Committee hearing Tuesday, describing in detail the fraud and impropriety they’d allegedly seen. "

Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times

Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan testified Tuesday. One said she saw Xerox military ballots be submitted.

www.bizpacreview.com

No wonder we no longer hear 'no evidence, no evidence.'

No corroborating evidence.

"Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence

As a lawyer who once represented the Maricopa County Elections Department, it has been appalling for me to see the mainstream media (MSM) breathlessly blabbing over and over that there is no "evidence" of election fraud.

They even had the nerve to claim that Sidney Powell, a former high-level Justice Department attorney, who served as lead counsel in more than 500 appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, had no evidence of fraud in the presidential election. They pretended she just put her hard-earned reputation on the line to hold a press conference with Rudy Giuliani based on lies. Sadly, the MSM is able to fool a lot of the public, because the public doesn’t understand the law.

Powell and the Trump legal team have compiled hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits from people swearing to election fraud in the presidential election. Affidavits are evidence."

Hey media, affidavits are considered evidence * WorldNetDaily * by Rachel Alexander

... Read more

www.wnd.com

Now....what were you saying?

And yet, Trump's legal team has not been able to prove in court one single instance of fraud.

Not one.

But you're not saying there wasn't fraud, are you.

Kinda reminds of this one...


“They are telling this of Lord Beaverbrook and a visiting Yankee actress. In a game of hypothetical questions, Beaverbrook asked the lady: ‘Would you live with a stranger if he paid you one million pounds?’ She said she would. ‘And if be paid you five pounds?’ The irate lady fumed: ‘Five pounds. What do you think I am?’ Beaverbrook replied: ‘We’ve already established that. Now we are trying to determine the degree.”

 

[busybee01]

View attachment 425323

The same Giuliani that was shushing one of his crazy witnesses. She sees a lot of pink elephants as well. As was pointed out by a Republican legislator, the number of votes cast matched up with the number of voters.

So you're no longer saying "no evidence"?

Excellent.

Obviously there is some fraud in any election. It is never enough to turn a ele ction unless it is a single digit race. You want to claim every vote against Trump is fraud.

"Obviously there is some fraud in any election."



Gettin' warm!

Doesn't change the results. The DOJ agrees with me. They are not the least bit interested in these affadavits. It shows they don't even take them seriously.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

Nazi......NationalSOCIALISTGermanWorker's Party.

Socialist......just like you.

The Nazis were not socialists. They were nationalists. Maybe you need to read history.

The national socialist party weren't socialist.

This is how dumb Democrats are.

Hitler was a dictator who seized power after he was democratically elected. Sort of like what Trump is trying to do. Another parallel is that as allied forces raced across Europe, Hitler's generals refused to tell him he was losing. Republicans are too afraid to tell Trump he lost.

But you don't care to repeat your claim that the Nazis weren't socialists, just like you and your party, huh?


Excellent.


Another one bites the dust.