The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[Toro]

I would like to think this would all lead to Biden/Harris not becoming President but it won’t. The victory I am looking for is no more Mail-In balloting. Too many stories of irregularities, improprieties, and mathematical impossibilities are only going to erode voter confidence.

That's because it's all fiction.

If it wasn't, you guys wouldn't be 1-39 in courts.

 

[Toro]

And Scamming Sydney's Krappen "lawsuits" are going to get tossed from GA and WI courts.

It's all about reinforcing the cult and keeping the cash flowing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why did the Democrats prevent Republican observers from watching the 'counting'?

That's not the case. You're lying again.

Given your history, we know that "That's not the case, you're lying again" will be the correct answer to any question you ask.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?

That's what anyone who isn't an open Stalinist ratfuk says. You Trump cultists are open Stalinist ratfuks, hence your reliance on the BigLie technique.

If you're lyin' you're dyin'.........won't miss ya'


“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Top of Form
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."

​

Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com


















https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf



Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.





Is a sworn affidavit evidence?

An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.


What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature







AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.8.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.11.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17

Georgia's GOP secretary of state says recount results will show 'no substantial changes' | CNN Politics

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said Wednesday they have seen "no substantial changes" in the state's election recount and expects to re-certify President-elect Joe Biden as the winner.

www.cnn.com

What does your post have to do with the one you linked to?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I would like to think this would all lead to Biden/Harris not becoming President but it won’t. The victory I am looking for is no more Mail-In balloting. Too many stories of irregularities, improprieties, and mathematical impossibilities are only going to erode voter confidence.

That's because it's all fiction.

If it wasn't, you guys wouldn't be 1-39 in courts.

View attachment 424333

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

One would imagine that Democrat voters would respond to claims that the party they support is now running on an agenda of the above…
…with informed arguments proving this untrue.

But they don’t….because they can’t: every claim above is true, correct, and accurate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And Scamming Sydney's Krappen "lawsuits" are going to get tossed from GA and WI courts.

It's all about reinforcing the cult and keeping the cash flowing.

I never said Trump would win, and your post suggests that the title of the thread is corrct.


And.....how does the term 'cult' apply when it is your party that called your candidate god, Jesus and the messiah?
It appears you're a bit sensitive about the term 'cult.'


And it looks like you're doing it again: Biden.....the 'savior'???????


PBS ‘Journalist’ Reports Biden Team Like The Avengers ‘Come To Save Us All’ (VIDEO)
Yamiche Alcindor works for the taxpayer funded outlet PBS and she is nothing more than an activist for the Democrat party.

During a recent appearance on MSNBC, Alcindor swooned over Biden’s team picks and relayed a comment from a Democrat who said they’re like the Avengers, ‘come to save us all.’

This is not journalism, its’ cheerleading. It’s amazing this woman was ever allowed into the White House press briefing room.

Hot Air reports:

Yamiche Alcindor Swoons: Biden’s Cabinet Picks Are “Superheroes To Come And Save Us All”

American Lookout Headlines

Looking Out For America • headlines.americanlookout.com

americanlookout.com

Do you feel the need to bow the neck and the knee when you say 'Biden'????

 

[berg80]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

OMG. Trump lost the election. Get over it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Georgia:

Suitcases of ballots pulled out during the night when there were no witnesses:

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[busybee01]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

 

[busybee01]

Georgia:

Suitcases of ballots pulled out during the night when there were no witnesses:

A lie.

Election supervisors were present.
The workers left because they were through for the day
The worker who remained was scanning ballots which by law has to be scanned after they are open
The so-called suitcase was a empty bin to put the ballots in after they were scanned
No one was ordered out
The number of ballots matched the number of voters.

As usual you are spreading propaganda from your master.

 

[busybee01]

Why did the Democrats prevent Republican observers from watching the 'counting'?

That's not the case. You're lying again.

Given your history, we know that "That's not the case, you're lying again" will be the correct answer to any question you ask.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?

That's what anyone who isn't an open Stalinist ratfuk says. You Trump cultists are open Stalinist ratfuks, hence your reliance on the BigLie technique.

If you're lyin' you're dyin'.........won't miss ya'


“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Top of Form
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."

​

Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com


















https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf



Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.





Is a sworn affidavit evidence?

An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.


What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature







AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.8.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.11.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17

They put up the cardboard not to block observers. They were protestors who clearly were trying to intimidate workers.

Affadavits are nothing without corroborating evidence. The DOJ has said there is no evidence of any fraud that would overturn the election. Apparently the US Attorneys see these affadavits for what they are. An attempt to steal a election.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

We know that Biden won the election amd we know you idiots will never accept it. What we are holding our breath for is whether Trump can steal the election. We are seeing how fragile our democracy is and how eas9ily it can be subverted. What if the Georgia Secretary of State had done what Lindsay Graham wanted him to do. Throw out legally cast Biden votes. Or state legislatures in swing states had decided to overrule the will of the voters. Even now we can expect a assault on voting rights in states like Georgia and Arizona.

Republicans should be concerned about the fact that Biden won fewer counties but still swon the election. It shows the Trump Republican Party is dying away. Those counties that Trump won are dying out as people die or move away. The suburban areas are the areas that are growing and becoming more Democrat.

Georgia is the perfect example. In Cobb County, 327,499 people voted with Clinton winning by 2 points. In 2020, 387,305 people voted with Biden winning by 14 points. In Gwinnet, 325,636 people voted and Clinton won by 6. In 2020, 408,240 voted with Biden winning by 18 points.

The answers are already there.
1. It is a easy question. In many states, mail in votes could not be counted until after the election. We saw that is atates that were able to count mail in ballots early. Biden jumped to early leads in states like Kansas and Misswouri where he was not going to win.

2. They were not unusually high. Biden was expected to have a huge lead in mail in votes. No mystery there.

3. That is not evidence of anything. You can't accept the fact that people figured it out. When you have a average, some numbers are below average.

4. That has been denied as well. Anyone can say anything they want. No one was prevented from observing.

5. Redstate is a fake news site with columnists who use questionable sources.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?


Speak up, dunce.

You are the dunce. You are the brain dead Nazi who wants to seize power.

There is no evidence of any massive fraud.

Nazi......NationalSOCIALISTGermanWorker's Party.

Socialist......just like you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why did the Democrats prevent Republican observers from watching the 'counting'?

That's not the case. You're lying again.

Given your history, we know that "That's not the case, you're lying again" will be the correct answer to any question you ask.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?

That's what anyone who isn't an open Stalinist ratfuk says. You Trump cultists are open Stalinist ratfuks, hence your reliance on the BigLie technique.

If you're lyin' you're dyin'.........won't miss ya'


“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Top of Form
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."

​

Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com


















https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf



Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.





Is a sworn affidavit evidence?

An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.


What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature







AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.8.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.11.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17

They put up the cardboard not to block observers. They were protestors who clearly were trying to intimidate workers.

Affadavits are nothing without corroborating evidence. The DOJ has said there is no evidence of any fraud that would overturn the election. Apparently the US Attorneys see these affadavits for what they are. An attempt to steal a election.

"They put up the cardboard not to block observers. "



Bulletin!!!

We have a winner in the category of "Unintentional Humor"!!!!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Georgia:

Suitcases of ballots pulled out during the night when there were no witnesses:

A lie.

Election supervisors were present.
The workers left because they were through for the day
The worker who remained was scanning ballots which by law has to be scanned after they are open
The so-called suitcase was a empty bin to put the ballots in after they were scanned
No one was ordered out
The number of ballots matched the number of voters.

As usual you are spreading propaganda from your master.

1. I'm never wrong. Watch this:

2. There are two requirements to support the belief that the election was fair and equitable. The first is to have two members of opposing parties sitting next to each other viewing mail-in ballots….registration of the voter, and signature comparison, agree that ballot is filled out correctly. This was not done. In fact, the Democrat strongholds would not allow Republican poll watchers and vote watcher into the room….and even put up cardboard to prevent viewing of vote counting from outside.



In some cases boxes of ‘votes’ were brought in after closing of the site, with no one around to see except Democrats.


3. Perhaps the most glaring example that indicates illegality is the prevalence of over-voting in swing states, where more votes turn up than registered voters, or more mail-in votes than the number of mail-in or absentee ballots requested.



Second only to that, is the discrepancy in swing states between fully filled out ballots, and those with only Biden filled in, and no down-ballot voting indicated.



“In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”



Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.



In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?


4. For comparison, check out a non-swing state, like Wyoming. Trump: 193,454 GOP Sen: 197,961 Dif:4,507 Biden: 73,445 Dem Sen: 72,720 Dif: 725 No massive flood of mysterious empty Biden votes. It's fraud. The Democrats are committing voter fraud in the Swing states.



Another control state, which Dems aren't currently trying to steaI. Montana Trump: 340,635 GOP Sen: 330,317 Dif: 10,318 Biden: 243,278 Dem Sen: 270,735 Dif: 27,457 Stable numbers for GOP, and when you factor in 3rd party vote, no mysterious Biden-only ballots like the swings.”

Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?

Via ZeroHedge In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candi…

www.theburningplatform.com

44 states seem to have a normal election......



......but those swing states....almost as if it had been planned......

 

[busybee01]

View attachment 425323

The same Giuliani that was shushing one of his crazy witnesses. She sees a lot of pink elephants as well. As was pointed out by a Republican legislator, the number of votes cast matched up with the number of voters.

 

[busybee01]

Why did the Democrats prevent Republican observers from watching the 'counting'?

That's not the case. You're lying again.

Given your history, we know that "That's not the case, you're lying again" will be the correct answer to any question you ask.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?

That's what anyone who isn't an open Stalinist ratfuk says. You Trump cultists are open Stalinist ratfuks, hence your reliance on the BigLie technique.

If you're lyin' you're dyin'.........won't miss ya'


“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Top of Form
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."

​

Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com


















https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf



Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.





Is a sworn affidavit evidence?

An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.


What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature







AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.8.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.11.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17

They put up the cardboard not to block observers. They were protestors who clearly were trying to intimidate workers.

Affadavits are nothing without corroborating evidence. The DOJ has said there is no evidence of any fraud that would overturn the election. Apparently the US Attorneys see these affadavits for what they are. An attempt to steal a election.

"They put up the cardboard not to block observers. "



Bulletin!!!

We have a winner in the category of "Unintentional Humor"!!!!!

They were not observers. They were protestors. They should have called the police. This is another example of attempting to intimidate poll workers.

 

[busybee01]

"Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times
Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan during and after Election Day testified during a public Michigan Senate Oversight Committee hearing Tuesday, describing in detail the fraud and impropriety they’d allegedly seen. "

Whistleblower witnessed xeroxed-looking copies of pro-Biden military ballot put into system, batches counted 8-10 times

Three women who witnessed the counting of ballots in Michigan testified Tuesday. One said she saw Xerox military ballots be submitted.

www.bizpacreview.com

No wonder we no longer hear 'no evidence, no evidence.'

No corroborating evidence.

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 425323

The same Giuliani that was shushing one of his crazy witnesses. She sees a lot of pink elephants as well. As was pointed out by a Republican legislator, the number of votes cast matched up with the number of voters.

So you're no longer saying "no evidence"?

Excellent.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why did the Democrats prevent Republican observers from watching the 'counting'?

That's not the case. You're lying again.

Given your history, we know that "That's not the case, you're lying again" will be the correct answer to any question you ask.

Are you saying that there is no evidence of Democrats corrupting the election?

That's what anyone who isn't an open Stalinist ratfuk says. You Trump cultists are open Stalinist ratfuks, hence your reliance on the BigLie technique.

If you're lyin' you're dyin'.........won't miss ya'


“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Top of Form
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."

​

Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com


















https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf



Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.





Is a sworn affidavit evidence?

An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.


What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature







AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.8.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.11.pdf

AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17

They put up the cardboard not to block observers. They were protestors who clearly were trying to intimidate workers.

Affadavits are nothing without corroborating evidence. The DOJ has said there is no evidence of any fraud that would overturn the election. Apparently the US Attorneys see these affadavits for what they are. An attempt to steal a election.

"They put up the cardboard not to block observers. "



Bulletin!!!

We have a winner in the category of "Unintentional Humor"!!!!!

They were not observers. They were protestors. They should have called the police. This is another example of attempting to intimidate poll workers.

Observers.

Kept from observing to hide the fraud taking place.

You know that, don't you.

 

[Mac1958]

They still think this is going to happen.

This is incredible to watch.