The New York Times Sucks

1720446592587.webp
 
or feel a desperate need to 'both-sides' everything.

Imagine the chutzpah of a news organizations that attempts to show both sides of a story?!

This could be the end of civilization as we know it
 
The New York Times has been getting nails in their coffin for years. The internet and growing news sources did not help their cause.

It was funny when they kept throwing around the term "fake news" and then their nemesis, Trump, started calling them fake news. It's funny how Trump turns the tables on lib media all the time.
 
The New York Times has been getting nails in their coffin for years. The internet and growing news sources did not help their cause.

It was funny when they kept throwing around the term "fake news" and then their nemesis, Trump, started calling them fake news. It's funny how Trump turns the tables on lib media all the time.
**** off *****.
 
This paper's political coverage has gotten worse every year. They clearly have editors who either want to put their thumbs on the scale, or are just incompetent, or feel a desperate need to 'both-sides' everything.
Their coverage of everything else - news events, local, culture, real estate, business, obits, world events - is still among the best. But when it comes to domestic politics, they are pathetically inept. Is it on purpose?
You bet on the debate didn't ya? now ya have to fess up? btw I can see how "reporting both-sides" would seem like cheating to a white liberal and how this is upsetting to them but it really is how honest journalism is supposed work...and it only appears as though they are putting their thumbs on the scale when all they are really doing is removing it/them from the scale, however you do deserve kudos for the incompetent part...
...btw do you really feel their "coverage" of the "obits" are among the best in the country/world?
 
15th post
The Times is getting a well-deserved ration of shit today. How far they have fallen.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom