The Need To Ban Contraception To Increase The Domestic Supply Of Infants

[lennypartiv]

The fact is we have more than enough babies being born.

No we don't. God wants us to procreate. Banning contraceptives will get more to follow God.

 

[initforme]

Banning contraceptives could never be justified legally. It has no links to abortion.

 

[lennypartiv]

Banning contraceptives could never be justified legally. It has no links to abortion.

It was banned prior to the Griswald decision. Overturning Griswald would make things right again.

 

[SweetSue92]

And yet you want them to be able to ban medical procedures

Killing your own son or daughter is not a "medical procedure".

You want me to post the pictures of babies torn limb from limb?

 

[Blues Man]

Killing your own son or daughter is not a "medical procedure".

You want me to post the pictures of babies torn limb from limb?

Yes it is.

And 93% of all abortions take place by week 13
42% take place in the first 6 weeks
1% or less take place after week 21

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Idaho Republican Leader Says He'd Consider Banning Morning-After Pills and IUDs

The Republican Party insists they "DO NOT want to take away contraception." But some lawmakers are admitting the quiet part out loud.

jezebel.com

"Republican state Rep. Brent Crane, Assistant Majority Leader for Idaho’s House of Representatives, gave a jawdropping TV interview on Friday in which he openly admitted that his caucus would consider banning certain forms of birth control, including Plan B emergency contraception and intrauterine devices (IUDs) -- Of course, we’ve all known for some time that Republicans weren’t going to stop at banning abortion—even some U.S. senators have warned that they’re coming for birth control next. Later in the same interview, journalist Melissa Davlin asks Crane whether the state Republican Party has considered ways to support people who are facing unplanned pregnancies --Are they planning to boost social services? Crane responded bluntly: “As far as a caucus, have we had that discussion? No.”

It seems Republicans can't be honest about their intentions, so they have to talk out of both sides of their mouth...on one hand, they tell us that it's ridiculous to think anyone would actually pass legislation to ban contraceptives while at the same time trying to pass legislation to ban contraceptives....I guess that is what all of the talk about "domestic supply of infants" was ...as the racist former GOP congressman Steve King once said -- "we can't restore our civilization with someone else's babies" -- so yea, gotta get that domestic supply level up...

"In the draft, which was leaked to Politico, Alito references adoption as a reason for abortion to be overturned, using the phrase “domestic supply of infants” to indicate that less abortion would help increase the supply of babies that adoptive mothers are seeking -- Many have since condemned the commentary, comparing it to treating women as cattle for breeding, as well as “The Handmaid’s Tale,” stating that the terminology was also reminiscent of human trafficking."

What Is A ‘Domestic Supply Of Infants?’

Conservative Supreme Court justices have referenced a “domestic supply of infants” in draft explaining the decision to likely overturn Roe v. Wade—language that further alarms those against the landmark case being overturned.

www.ibtimes.com

So on the check list....we got rid of Roe V Wade...Now Republicans are on record for wanting to get rid of the Griswold decision; which is basically the 57 yr old decision that gave people the right to use birth control....so one should ask, if we are looking to increase the domestic supply of infants into our foster care/adoption system -- why do Conservatives also seek to cut funding for these services??

In fact, why do Conservatives invest so much into the life of a fetus before it becomes a child (aside from prenatal care via Medicaid, they want to cut that too) -- why not EQUALLY invest in programs that benefit that "domestic supply of infants" after they are born?? Programs like WIC, Snap, Medicaid, not abolishing free public education, improving the foster care system instead of allowing kids to fall into the cracks, be victims of abuse, etc, etc, etc?? Sounds like this is more about the desire to control a woman's vagina and the desire to punish her for not being "chaste" -- which is what most fundamentalist theocrats want....but since it is not a popular position to have, they have to lie about it....I thought lying was a sin too...

Trump Floats Dramatic Cuts to Children's Programs

President Trump wants to significantly reduce funding for programs to help children in order to pay for large corporate tax cuts, according to a new analysis.

www.newsweek.com

A small minority within the party is not and cannot speak for the party as a whole.

You people are fearmongering by peddling bullshit to dupes.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

OK.

The next time a black person does something stupid or wrong (which will be real soon), you're getting the blame for it.

How does that sound?

That is already a Conservative position....

Every time a black person does anything -- there are 10000 threads on here opining about how evil, savage and criminal blacks are and how we need to crack down on them....so please, spare me the BS.....

However, the main policy fights that black folks advocated for ended up being ones that advanced rights FOR ALL HISTORICALLY OPPRESSED GROUPS -- that is why white women latched on to the Civil Rights movement to benefit their own, that is why gay people latched on to the Civil Rights movement to benefit their own......

But when it comes to "Conservative" movements...it has always been aimed at rolling back rights for all of those groups I named.....and instead of addressing that, you deflect like a bitch as usual

 

[initforme]

If one believes in liberty then one PROMOTES contraception. We have a surplus of babies born. There's no need for people to make more.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

A small minority within the party is not and cannot speak for the party as a whole.

You people are fearmongering by peddling bullshit to dupes.

So why does this "small majority" end up getting policies passed that would indicate they are not a small majority at all??

A small majority in Conservative state after Conservative state is pushing legislation to criminalize women who not only seek abortion, but who uses something as simple as IUD's -- but instead of pushing back on this -- dic suckers like you say goofy shit like "um um um, but it's just small minority" -- fuck outta here

 

[Big Bend Texas]

That is already a Conservative position....

Every time a black person does anything -- there are 10000 threads on here opining about how evil, savage and criminal blacks are and how we need to crack down on them....so please, spare me the BS.....

However, the main policy fights that black folks advocated for ended up being ones that advanced rights FOR ALL HISTORICALLY OPPRESSED GROUPS -- that is why white women latched on to the Civil Rights movement to benefit their own, that is why gay people latched on to the Civil Rights movement to benefit their own......

But when it comes to "Conservative" movements...it has always been aimed at rolling back rights for all of those groups I named.....and instead of addressing that, you deflect like a bitch as usual

If you had a valid argument to offer you would not have to lie so reflexively.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

So why does this "small majority" end up getting policies passed that would indicate they are not a small majority at all??

A small majority in Conservative state after Conservative state is pushing legislation to criminalize women who not only seek abortion, but who uses something as simple as IUD's -- but instead of pushing back on this -- dic suckers like you say goofy shit like "um um um, but it's just small minority" -- fuck outta here

"Minority" not majority.

Small minorities are not getting anything passed in state after state much less nationally.

 

[Nostra]

Idaho Republican Leader Says He'd Consider Banning Morning-After Pills and IUDs

The Republican Party insists they "DO NOT want to take away contraception." But some lawmakers are admitting the quiet part out loud.

jezebel.com

"Republican state Rep. Brent Crane, Assistant Majority Leader for Idaho’s House of Representatives, gave a jawdropping TV interview on Friday in which he openly admitted that his caucus would consider banning certain forms of birth control, including Plan B emergency contraception and intrauterine devices (IUDs) -- Of course, we’ve all known for some time that Republicans weren’t going to stop at banning abortion—even some U.S. senators have warned that they’re coming for birth control next. Later in the same interview, journalist Melissa Davlin asks Crane whether the state Republican Party has considered ways to support people who are facing unplanned pregnancies --Are they planning to boost social services? Crane responded bluntly: “As far as a caucus, have we had that discussion? No.”

It seems Republicans can't be honest about their intentions, so they have to talk out of both sides of their mouth...on one hand, they tell us that it's ridiculous to think anyone would actually pass legislation to ban contraceptives while at the same time trying to pass legislation to ban contraceptives....I guess that is what all of the talk about "domestic supply of infants" was ...as the racist former GOP congressman Steve King once said -- "we can't restore our civilization with someone else's babies" -- so yea, gotta get that domestic supply level up...

"In the draft, which was leaked to Politico, Alito references adoption as a reason for abortion to be overturned, using the phrase “domestic supply of infants” to indicate that less abortion would help increase the supply of babies that adoptive mothers are seeking -- Many have since condemned the commentary, comparing it to treating women as cattle for breeding, as well as “The Handmaid’s Tale,” stating that the terminology was also reminiscent of human trafficking."

What Is A ‘Domestic Supply Of Infants?’

Conservative Supreme Court justices have referenced a “domestic supply of infants” in draft explaining the decision to likely overturn Roe v. Wade—language that further alarms those against the landmark case being overturned.

www.ibtimes.com

So on the check list....we got rid of Roe V Wade...Now Republicans are on record for wanting to get rid of the Griswold decision; which is basically the 57 yr old decision that gave people the right to use birth control....so one should ask, if we are looking to increase the domestic supply of infants into our foster care/adoption system -- why do Conservatives also seek to cut funding for these services??

In fact, why do Conservatives invest so much into the life of a fetus before it becomes a child (aside from prenatal care via Medicaid, they want to cut that too) -- why not EQUALLY invest in programs that benefit that "domestic supply of infants" after they are born?? Programs like WIC, Snap, Medicaid, not abolishing free public education, improving the foster care system instead of allowing kids to fall into the cracks, be victims of abuse, etc, etc, etc?? Sounds like this is more about the desire to control a woman's vagina and the desire to punish her for not being "chaste" -- which is what most fundamentalist theocrats want....but since it is not a popular position to have, they have to lie about it....I thought lying was a sin too...

Trump Floats Dramatic Cuts to Children's Programs

President Trump wants to significantly reduce funding for programs to help children in order to pay for large corporate tax cuts, according to a new analysis.

www.newsweek.com

it's fun watching the Baby Killer Cultusts have a meltdown.

 

[Vastator]

Idaho Republican Leader Says He'd Consider Banning Morning-After Pills and IUDs

The Republican Party insists they "DO NOT want to take away contraception." But some lawmakers are admitting the quiet part out loud.

jezebel.com

"Republican state Rep. Brent Crane, Assistant Majority Leader for Idaho’s House of Representatives, gave a jawdropping TV interview on Friday in which he openly admitted that his caucus would consider banning certain forms of birth control, including Plan B emergency contraception and intrauterine devices (IUDs) -- Of course, we’ve all known for some time that Republicans weren’t going to stop at banning abortion—even some U.S. senators have warned that they’re coming for birth control next. Later in the same interview, journalist Melissa Davlin asks Crane whether the state Republican Party has considered ways to support people who are facing unplanned pregnancies --Are they planning to boost social services? Crane responded bluntly: “As far as a caucus, have we had that discussion? No.”

It seems Republicans can't be honest about their intentions, so they have to talk out of both sides of their mouth...on one hand, they tell us that it's ridiculous to think anyone would actually pass legislation to ban contraceptives while at the same time trying to pass legislation to ban contraceptives....I guess that is what all of the talk about "domestic supply of infants" was ...as the racist former GOP congressman Steve King once said -- "we can't restore our civilization with someone else's babies" -- so yea, gotta get that domestic supply level up...

"In the draft, which was leaked to Politico, Alito references adoption as a reason for abortion to be overturned, using the phrase “domestic supply of infants” to indicate that less abortion would help increase the supply of babies that adoptive mothers are seeking -- Many have since condemned the commentary, comparing it to treating women as cattle for breeding, as well as “The Handmaid’s Tale,” stating that the terminology was also reminiscent of human trafficking."

What Is A ‘Domestic Supply Of Infants?’

Conservative Supreme Court justices have referenced a “domestic supply of infants” in draft explaining the decision to likely overturn Roe v. Wade—language that further alarms those against the landmark case being overturned.

www.ibtimes.com

So on the check list....we got rid of Roe V Wade...Now Republicans are on record for wanting to get rid of the Griswold decision; which is basically the 57 yr old decision that gave people the right to use birth control....so one should ask, if we are looking to increase the domestic supply of infants into our foster care/adoption system -- why do Conservatives also seek to cut funding for these services??

In fact, why do Conservatives invest so much into the life of a fetus before it becomes a child (aside from prenatal care via Medicaid, they want to cut that too) -- why not EQUALLY invest in programs that benefit that "domestic supply of infants" after they are born?? Programs like WIC, Snap, Medicaid, not abolishing free public education, improving the foster care system instead of allowing kids to fall into the cracks, be victims of abuse, etc, etc, etc?? Sounds like this is more about the desire to control a woman's vagina and the desire to punish her for not being "chaste" -- which is what most fundamentalist theocrats want....but since it is not a popular position to have, they have to lie about it....I thought lying was a sin too...

Trump Floats Dramatic Cuts to Children's Programs

President Trump wants to significantly reduce funding for programs to help children in order to pay for large corporate tax cuts, according to a new analysis.

www.newsweek.com

Personal responsibility has never been a popular position amongst the Left. Hence their insatiable appetite for abortion on demand, debt forgiveness, and… (The real Crux of this issue of security for woman, and child.) No fault divorce. Of which women initiate 70% of the time. Now they want all the security and comfort of what a husband brings to a family, without having to fulfill any obligations in turn. Just make the State do it our behalf. There has been a long standing institution that solved most of the grievances listed in your diatribe. It’s called marriage. And given the current state of law; men are opting out.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Personal responsibility has never been a popular position amongst the Left. Hence their insatiable appetite for abortion on demand, debt forgiveness, and… (The real Crux of this issue of security for woman, and child.) No fault divorce. Of which women initiate 70% of the time. Now they want all the security and comfort of what a husband brings to a family, without having to fulfill any obligations in turn. Just make the State do it our behalf. There has been a long standing institution that solved most of the grievances listed in your diatribe. It’s called marriage. And given the current state of law; men are opting out.

Yawns....

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The Supreme Court in a rare show of judicial wisdom took the power from the federal government and gave it to the states. And to the voters. Instead of taking the power, all the fools can think about is why there isn't someone telling them what to do.

 

[surada]

Idaho Republican Leader Says He'd Consider Banning Morning-After Pills and IUDs

The Republican Party insists they "DO NOT want to take away contraception." But some lawmakers are admitting the quiet part out loud.

jezebel.com

"Republican state Rep. Brent Crane, Assistant Majority Leader for Idaho’s House of Representatives, gave a jawdropping TV interview on Friday in which he openly admitted that his caucus would consider banning certain forms of birth control, including Plan B emergency contraception and intrauterine devices (IUDs) -- Of course, we’ve all known for some time that Republicans weren’t going to stop at banning abortion—even some U.S. senators have warned that they’re coming for birth control next. Later in the same interview, journalist Melissa Davlin asks Crane whether the state Republican Party has considered ways to support people who are facing unplanned pregnancies --Are they planning to boost social services? Crane responded bluntly: “As far as a caucus, have we had that discussion? No.”

It seems Republicans can't be honest about their intentions, so they have to talk out of both sides of their mouth...on one hand, they tell us that it's ridiculous to think anyone would actually pass legislation to ban contraceptives while at the same time trying to pass legislation to ban contraceptives....I guess that is what all of the talk about "domestic supply of infants" was ...as the racist former GOP congressman Steve King once said -- "we can't restore our civilization with someone else's babies" -- so yea, gotta get that domestic supply level up...

"In the draft, which was leaked to Politico, Alito references adoption as a reason for abortion to be overturned, using the phrase “domestic supply of infants” to indicate that less abortion would help increase the supply of babies that adoptive mothers are seeking -- Many have since condemned the commentary, comparing it to treating women as cattle for breeding, as well as “The Handmaid’s Tale,” stating that the terminology was also reminiscent of human trafficking."

What Is A ‘Domestic Supply Of Infants?’

Conservative Supreme Court justices have referenced a “domestic supply of infants” in draft explaining the decision to likely overturn Roe v. Wade—language that further alarms those against the landmark case being overturned.

www.ibtimes.com

So on the check list....we got rid of Roe V Wade...Now Republicans are on record for wanting to get rid of the Griswold decision; which is basically the 57 yr old decision that gave people the right to use birth control....so one should ask, if we are looking to increase the domestic supply of infants into our foster care/adoption system -- why do Conservatives also seek to cut funding for these services??

In fact, why do Conservatives invest so much into the life of a fetus before it becomes a child (aside from prenatal care via Medicaid, they want to cut that too) -- why not EQUALLY invest in programs that benefit that "domestic supply of infants" after they are born?? Programs like WIC, Snap, Medicaid, not abolishing free public education, improving the foster care system instead of allowing kids to fall into the cracks, be victims of abuse, etc, etc, etc?? Sounds like this is more about the desire to control a woman's vagina and the desire to punish her for not being "chaste" -- which is what most fundamentalist theocrats want....but since it is not a popular position to have, they have to lie about it....I thought lying was a sin too...

Trump Floats Dramatic Cuts to Children's Programs

President Trump wants to significantly reduce funding for programs to help children in order to pay for large corporate tax cuts, according to a new analysis.

www.newsweek.com

So this is social engineering.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Joe Biden: I'm going to shut down the fossil fuel industry.

The STUPIDEST thing ever said by a politician; but even worse, he MEANT IT and is DOING IT!

You leftards are over occupied with SEX while everything else is going crazy.

Idiots!

 

[Blues Man]

The Supreme Court in a rare show of judicial wisdom took the power from the federal government and gave it to the states. And to the voters. Instead of taking the power, all the fools can think about is why there isn't someone telling them what to do.

The power should be in the hands of each individual.

The state has no more right to dictate the personal choices of people than the federal government does.

 

[lennypartiv]

Once again Biff shows his true liberal colors.

 

[Rogue AI]

The OP should probably move out of Idaho before November, doesn't sound like a Buffy friendly type of place.