Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 136,320
- 28,243
- 2,180
The Japanese thought of the Anglos as a decadent society that would not fight. .
That was not the case.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Japanese thought of the Anglos as a decadent society that would not fight. .
The Japanese thought of the Anglos as a decadent society that would not fight. .
That was not the case.
The Japanese thought of the Anglos as a decadent society that would not fight. .
That was not the case.
That was certainly the case. The Bushido cult had nothing but contempt for surrender and when the Japanese ended up with thousands of Brit prisoners at Singapore and later the entire Philippine army (minus the commander) at Battan and Corrigador it became evident that the Allies did not have the will to fight. The Japanese had respect for the American industrial war machine but not for the American fighting spirit. Guadalcanal was a risky venture by the US and after the island was taken the Japanese were shocked into re-evaluating their strategy on land and sea.
You make a number of assumptions and statements which are not borne out by the historical record but only based on your beliefs. FDR is rated by historians as America's greatest president, so I'll let you have your beliefs and Monday morning assumptions and let the historians have theirs.
Most absurd. FDR was one of the worst presidents America has ever had to endure. Please tell me what he did that was so great?
I would suggest some good history books. FDR has never been rated lower than third greatest president by historians and recently rated the greatest.
Regent and Unkotare, please read real history books by real historians about the real FDR.
Regent and Unkotare, please read real history books by real historians about the real FDR.
The racism cut both ways. We know that the US had no espionage network prior to WW2. The information we managed to gather was in bits and pieces that the Brits thought we needed to hear and stuff that the Navy picked up. It's not hard to find evidence that the US government including both political parties actually held unofficial opinions that the Japanese were nearsighted little savages who had trouble with balance and couldn't manufacture a ship that would float or a plane that would fly. The focus was on the Nazi war machine. The Japanese thought of the Anglos as a decadent society that would not fight. The mass surrender of the Brits at Singapore and the US forces at Battan and Corrigador reinforced the racism. The Japanese were not as quick as the US to readjust their thinking even after the the land and Naval engagement at Guadalcanal proved the fighting ability of the Marines and Navy commanders but the US was quick to reevaluate it's war effort .
Regent and Unkotare, please read real history books by real historians about the real FDR.
Please go fuck yourself, you idiot.
Regent and Unkotare, please read real history books by real historians about the real FDR.
Please go fuck yourself, you idiot.
REPORTED 05oct12
Ok, I got it, FDR had some shady politics surrounding the US entr into WWII, the supposed "memo" received weeks prior to Pearl Harbor, ok, I got it. These are discussion topics that are still being validated. And, yeah, any 6th grade history student knows about the racism in US politics during the first half of the 20th century. Great job on this careful analysis...lol.
What has been validated are the first hand accounts and books that have been written by uhmmm survivors from Bataaan and the Corregidor. Go ahead and google Lester Tenny's "My Hitch in Hell" and learn from a survivor of the attrocities committed by the JAP bastards during WWII, gee..maybe word of these attrocities got back to the mainland and helped fuel the racism that supposedly steeered ALL American activities of that era. I know how those messy facts and first hand accounts do get in the way of a good argument though.