The Muslim mass exodus has begun

[Hypatia415]

Marriage between first cousins is still legal in several US states.

From here: Can You Marry Your First Cousin? Laws by State

Whether you can legally marry your first cousin depends entirely on which state you live in. Roughly 18 states plus the District of Columbia allow first-cousin marriage with no special requirements.

 

[Meathead]

Marriage between first cousins is still legal in several US states.

From here: Can You Marry Your First Cousin? Laws by State

Whether you can legally marry your first cousin depends entirely on which state you live in. Roughly 18 states plus the District of Columbia allow first-cousin marriage with no special requirements.

In Minnesogdishu you can apparently marry your brother.

 

[Hypatia415]

In Minnesogdishu you can apparently by your brother.

I doubt that.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

And why the male pronoun with regard to me?

Have you ever heard of Hypatia?

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.......

You call people names for opposing horrific sexual crimes against children while showing NO sympathy for the victims.

There is absolutely no reason for anybody to believe your b.s about your identity in light of your truly monstrous defense of the indefensable.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Yeah, I know. She claims to be an atheist but I see precious little evidence of that.

I do see a venomous Islamist lying, as their Koran tells them to.

Odd, how imaginary atheists are so committed to Islam, isn't it?

 

[Hypatia415]

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.......

Thank you for acknowledging you have no idea who Hypatia was.

You call people names for opposing horrific sexual crimes against children while showing NO sympathy for the victims.

Why are you incapable of comprehending basic English? I have never condoned the grooming gangs of Muslim men but they are not the only men abusing young women and girls in the UK. There are gangs of white men and white men within organised crime that do the same thing.

Why are you not writing about them?

I would also add that there are other forms of abuse that are equally pernicious.

From here: Britain Releases New Data on ‘Grooming Gangs’ and Child Sexual Abuse

The new report, which analyzed almost 123,000 child sexual abuse and exploitation offenses recorded by the police in England and Wales in 2024, found that the total number of offenses had risen by 6 percent from the previous year. At least 42 percent had an “online element,” up by 26 percent compared to 2023. That included children being coerced or deceived into sharing sexual images of themselves, blackmailed into committing extreme acts, or having their abuse live streamed for profit. The police called on technology companies to do more to stop children viewing violent and explicit content, and to prevent their platforms from being used to groom and extort young victims.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Thank you for acknowledging you have no idea who Hypatia was.

Why are you incapable of comprehending basic English? I have never condoned the grooming gangs of Muslim men but they are not the only men abusing young women and girls in the UK. There are gangs of white men and white men within organised crime that do the same thing.

Why are you not writing about them?

I know who Hypatia was.


You are no Hypatia.

 

[Hypatia415]

I know who Hypatia was.


You are no Hypatia.

Oh you did some Googling.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Oh you did some Googling.

Hypatia sought truth

You seek to deny it.

 

[Hypatia415]

Hypatia sought truth

You seek to deny it.

So what passes for "truth" for you ignores white men abusing and grooming young girls and women?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

So what passes for "truth" for you ignores white men abusing and grooming young girls and women?

You demand I ignore the sabretooth tiger with a child in its jaws and focus on the unruly tom cat peeing in the petunias, instead.

Show me the studies that detail how white men in Britain have raped 250,000 Muslim girls or STFU, you Islamist apologist.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

You demand I ignore the sabretooth tiger with a child in its jaws and focus on the unruly tom cat peeing in the petunias, instead.

Show me the studies that detail how white men in Britain have raped 250,000 Muslim girls or STFU, you Islamist apologist.

The wokes will deny it, and use racial moral equivalence till the world’s end.

It’s the stuff l used to do as a teenager, and l embarrassed my parents by being a “know it all”. Till l grew up, and onwards.

 

[Hypatia415]

You demand I ignore the sabretooth tiger with a child in its jaws and focus on the unruly tom cat peeing in the petunias, instead.

Show me the studies that detail how white men in Britain have raped 250,000 Muslim girls or STFU, you Islamist apologist.

You have credulously accepted a figure that is not supported by evidence.

The section Lead Stories carries this caveat

From here: Fact Check: Figure of 250,000 Girls Raped by U.K. Grooming Gangs NOT Definitively Documented -- Rhetorical Extrapolation

Fact Check: Figure of 250,000 Girls Raped by U.K. Grooming Gangs NOT Definitively Documented -- Rhetorical Extrapolation​

That figure is an extrapolation using an unclear methodology based on data from smaller communities with headline-grabbing scandals and is not an actual count of rape cases across the United Kingdom. A 2022 Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse said, "it is simply not possible to know the scale of child sexual exploitation by networks."

The claim appeared in a post (archived here) by the @XFreeze account on X on June 16, 2026. In part, it read:

250,000 Girls R@ped: The Truth They Tried to Cover Up

Survivor-led inquiry by Rupert Lowe MP exposes one of the worst crimes in British history: the systematic, industrial-scale targeting of vulnerable White British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim gangs across the UK for decades

This is what the post looked like on X at the time of writing:
[..]
The 250,000 figure, according to page 12 of The Rape Gang Inquiry Report, is not based on government or law enforcement data but, instead, on a rhetorical question (archived here) posed in the House of Lords by Lord Malcolm Pearson of Rannoch on Oct. 22, 2018. He asked:

Do the Government accept that if we extrapolate nationally the Jay report on Rotherham and other reports from Telford and Oxford, there appear to have been upwards of 250,000 young white girls raped in this century, very largely by Muslim men, usually several times a day for years?

The 2022 Jay report, also known as the 2022 Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, is published here (archived here).

Nearly seven months later, on May 14, 2019, Pearson repeated the claim (archived here) in the House of Lords, referring to what he said were "the 250,000 victims of radical Muslim grooming gangs, which in itself is probably an underestimate." He continued:

I say that because, if you take the accepted figure of 1,400 victims in Rotherham alone and extend it across the country, you come to a much larger figure. Indeed, Rotherham's MP, the courageous Sarah Champion, has put the figure at 1 million... It is still going on. I have contacts on the ground in Rotherham who say that grooming gangs are still active there.

An inquiry (archived here) into abuse in Rotherham said its "conservative estimate is that approximately 1,400 children were sexually exploited" between 1997 and 2013. How the 250,000 figure -- or the 1 million number -- was calculated is unclear. Pearson did not explain.

My emphasis

ETA. I would also add that "abuse" and "grooming" do not automatically correlate with rape.

You might also like to read this: The grooming gang debate: Navigating race, politics, and justice in the UK - Religion and Global Society

From that article:

To address the grooming gang phenomenon effectively, we must move beyond racial stereotypes and focus on evidence-based strategies. This includes improving data collection on the ethnicity of offenders and victims, allocating adequate resources to investigations, engaging with communities to build trust, and launching public awareness campaigns to challenge harmful stereotypes. The UK government’s Tackling Child Sexual Abuse Strategy (2021) recognised the inadequacy of data on offender and victim characteristics, including ethnicity, and called for improvements in data collection and analysis. By focusing on systemic failures and addressing the broader context of child exploitation, we can develop targeted interventions that protect all children, regardless of ethnicity.

Conclusion

The grooming gang phenomenon in the UK is an issue that demands a nuanced and evidence-based approach. While high-profile cases have often been associated with South Asian men, the broader data suggests that the majority of offenders are white. It is crucial to avoid racial stereotypes and focus on the systemic failures that have allowed child sexual exploitation to persist. Improving data collection, allocating resources effectively, and engaging with communities will go a long way towards a safer future for all children. The focus must remain on the protection of all children, regardless of ethnicity, from exploitation by any perpetrator, while also challenging the anti-Muslim racism that fuels the false idea of disproportionate crime being committed by Muslim men.

My emphasis.

​

 

[westwall]

Odd, how imaginary atheists are so committed to Islam, isn't it?

Yeah, it's really amazing.

 

[westwall]

Translation: Anyone who tries to be dispassionate about another group/religion must be one of that group/religion.

Arthur Miller dealt so well with that mindset.

Buuuuut you are far from dispassionate. In fact you are quite the opposite.

 

[Hypatia415]

Buuuuut you are far from dispassionate. In fact you are quite the opposite.

See my reply to Dogmaphobe.

To paraphrase Bernard Cornwell's Uhtred "context is all".

 

[westwall]

See my reply to Dogmaphobe.

To paraphrase Bernard Cornwell's Uhtred "context is all".

Indeed, and our observations about you are accurate.

 

[westwall]

No he never has.

That is a conspiracy theory promulgated by intentional video editing.

From 2009: Truth on the Cutting Room Floor - FactCheck.org

The first section opens with a portion of the address the president gave April 6, 2009, to the Turkish Parliament in Ankara.


When Obama says “I am one of them,” he was speaking not of Muslims but of “other” Americans. He was making a distinction between Muslim Americans and non-Muslims who either have Muslim relatives or have lived in a country (such as Turkey) where the population is predominately Muslim.

The video next shows a snippet of a speech Obama gave June 4 at Cairo University in Egypt.


Far from admitting he’s a Muslim, Obama says “I’m a Christian.” But the video’s creator leaves that on the cutting room floor.

The video continues with a later selection from the Cairo speech:


The edited version invites the viewer to think that Obama was saying that his own religious “conviction” is based on personal experiences in Islamic countries. But the full quote shows Obama was talking about a different sort of conviction: his belief that Americans shouldn’t be guided by false notions about the Muslim faith.

The video then gives a truncated version of an exchange between Obama and ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos from Sept. 7, 2008:



The reference to “my Muslim faith” was widely described at the time as a gaffe. The Washington Times reported it as a “slip of the tongue.” By leaving out the words “my Christian faith,” the video dishonestly attempts to reverse the meaning of what Obama was saying.

This section of the video closes with an on-screen graphic that slightly mangles a New York Times article from March 6, 2007, by columnist Nicholas Kristof.


The video exaggerates. Kristof actually described Obama’s accent as “first rate” but not “perfect.” And Obama said the call to prayer is “one of” the prettiest sounds, not the prettiest of all. These distortions are minor, but still part of a systematic misrepresentation of the record.

I watched him say it live once, I was IN THE ROOM, sweety. So no, it's not a myth.

 

[Hypatia415]

I watched him say it live once, I was IN THE ROOM, sweety. So no, it's not a myth.

This disbelief cuts both ways.

Why on earth should I believe an anonymous contributor to an insignificant internet discussion site?

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Why on earth should I believe an anonymous contributor to an insignificant internet discussion site?

Why would he want you to?