Where are the motherfucking left on this one:
Lysistrata
Lakhota
Coyote
I doubt the left supports this anymore than the right supports it's extremists.
The big difference? The right's extremists haven't been using violence, they have only been using words and symbols.
OTH, Trump actually DID use dog whistle racist comments recently in a speech in Minnesota. It was awful.
Trump Preached White Supremacy in Minnesota, America Barely Noticed
Touting “the racehorse theory” and the superiority of the genes of white Minnesotans, Trump explicitly embraced eugenics
Trump Preached White Supremacy in Minnesota, America Barely Noticed
Trump told a crowd of nearly all white supporters that they have 'good genes'
Trump has previously suggested that he has superior genes and expressed pride in his "German blood."
www.businessinsider.com
"You have good genes. You know that, right? You have good genes. A lot of it is about the genes, isn't it, don't you believe? The racehorse theory. You think we're so different? You have good genes in Minnesota," Trump said.
That is the sort of thing that supposedly is provoking the extreme left into violence, if you do not understand that, there can not be a solution to this.
Dog whistle (politics)
Dog whistle (politics) - Wikipedia
" (Redirected from Dog-whistle politics)
In politics, a dog whistle is the use of coded or suggestive language in political messaging to garner support from a particular group without provoking opposition. The concept is named for ultrasonic dog whistles used in sheepherding.
Dog whistles use language which appears normal to the majority, but which communicate specific things to intended audiences. They are generally used to convey messages on issues likely to provoke controversy without attracting negative attention. One example may be use of a phrase such as family values to signal to Christians that a candidate would support policies promoting Christian values, without alienating non-Christian supporters.[1] Accusations of dog whistling are, by their nature, hard to prove and may be false. One example may be the use of the phrase 'international banks' to signal to racists that a candidate is antisemetic without alienating non-racist supporters.[2] Some argue that the concept is too vague and prone to false accusations.[3]. . . "
What a load of shit..You don't get to try and excuse, or justify the violence done by one group by saying that the opposing group is using mean words you don't like. That's some incredibly infantile reasoning at work there.
We have something called free speech in this country (or we used to before the crazy left started to attack it).
Free speech that is supposed to allow people from whatever end of the political spectrum to say whatever it is they want to, no matter how heinous, or how much someone doesn't want to hear it...without fear of violent response.
It's only the left that I see taking it to extreme ends, and treading all over the constitutional rights of people who they simply just don't like.
The left is full of waaaay more hateful violent extremists (as evidenced by the amount of violence in our streets the past 6 months, and the leftist media/Dem leaders that have made them mainstream) than pictures of the few racists you could find.
And about your Trump dog whistle BS. You guys are full on loony tunes.
You don't ever have anything concrete on Trump..so you have to resort to these kinds of ridiculous contrived twisting of words, and implied meanings to make it seem like Trump is saying something that he isn't.
I have been told many times that I have good genes, or we as a family have good genes...and it's not because of race, or some "white supremacist" doctrine.. It's because my family has been healthy and lived long lives.
It's a compliment people give to each other, and just something people say...
www.kare11.com
