Howey
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 5,481
- 761
- 200
"if you've got a businessyou didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.![]()
"mission accomplished"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"if you've got a businessyou didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.![]()
All right. Let's go with that. Maybe if I talk like Obama you idiots will finally get it.
If you have a job today, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to get a job. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If youve got a jobyou didnt build that. Somebody else made that happen.
So you damn sure can pay "a little bit more."
See how that works?
G....
I'm pretty sure that you are trying to argue the over-arching philosophy that liberals have versus conservatives when it comes to the commons and how it ought to be paid for.
You are not accusing Obama of telling business owners that they have not been pivotal in making their businesses successful.....are you?
I am accusing Obama of class warfare populism. I think I have stated that quite plainly several times. And yes, I am of the belief that EVERYONE should pay for the commons. We should all have some skin in the game. The system has broken down and we have become a nation of "gimme gimme gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it, or borrow it from China."

"If you've got a business—you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.![]()
Bush: Truly not concerned about bin Laden (short version) - YouTube
Try this on for size. This is 100 times worse not worried about the man suspected of killing nearly 3000 citizens.
You have a terrible memory or you just have hatred in your soul.
"If you've got a businessyou didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.![]()
We all pay for the commons. Those who use it more, pay more.
We all pay for the commons. Those who use it more, pay more.
We already have a progressive tax structure.
Bush: Truly not concerned about bin Laden (short version) - YouTube
Try this on for size. This is 100 times worse not worried about the man suspected of killing nearly 3000 citizens.
You have a terrible memory or you just have hatred in your soul.
"If you've got a businessyou didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.![]()
Wow, major league deflection there.
So everything must be compared to Bush's war, then?
.
We all pay for the commons. Those who use it more, pay more.
We already have a progressive tax structure.
Yes. We do. It isn't sufficient, though.
I know you will agree that the wealth gap that we have is not healthy. Stagnant wages for 20+ years is not a good thing.
Leave it to the pseudo-cons to denigrate the unbelievable American system we've built to try and score some cheap political points with the low information voters.
You dont get it. It is Obama & Co who are denigrating the system, denigrating the tremendous hard work and sacrifice of entrepreneurs like Carnegie, Ford, Gates, etc etc who built this economy and the prosperity it has produced.
What does Gates think about the comments? Have you any idea?

We already have a progressive tax structure.
Yes. We do. It isn't sufficient, though.
I know you will agree that the wealth gap that we have is not healthy. Stagnant wages for 20+ years is not a good thing.
That is not caused by too low taxes on the rich. You are trying to cure the symptom instead of the disease, and therefore you will not cure the disease. You will succeed in punishing the innocent, though. Well done!
"If you've got a businessyou didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.![]()
It's easy to take a statement like that, standing alone, seem like something it was never intended to represent. But when the full context is revealed, so is the truth.
Here is the quote in its full context"
"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If youve got a business you didnt build that [the roads and bridges]. Somebody else made that happen."
Some folks might think you don't know what the phuck you're talking about. But, hey, I know you must not have done due diligence and checked that out properly, right? You wouldn't try to mislead others on purpose now, would you?
You are trying to mislead, why is that okay.
Yes. We do. It isn't sufficient, though.
I know you will agree that the wealth gap that we have is not healthy. Stagnant wages for 20+ years is not a good thing.
That is not caused by too low taxes on the rich. You are trying to cure the symptom instead of the disease, and therefore you will not cure the disease. You will succeed in punishing the innocent, though. Well done!
It is partially caused by too low taxes....and too many loopholes....regarding the rich. The incentive to reinvest funds into the economy is no longer present.
It's easy to take a statement like that, standing alone, seem like something it was never intended to represent. But when the full context is revealed, so is the truth.
Here is the quote in its full context"
"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If youve got a business you didnt build that [the roads and bridges]. Somebody else made that happen."
Some folks might think you don't know what the phuck you're talking about. But, hey, I know you must not have done due diligence and checked that out properly, right? You wouldn't try to mislead others on purpose now, would you?
You are trying to mislead, why is that okay.
You are in error!
I have no reason to mislead, would not benefit from misleading anyone on here and I could really give a rats blue ass about gaining some meaningless thing by misdirection on a freakin' message board. Why is your inappropriate assumption without any foundation laid to support your fantasy OK?
You are trying to mislead, why is that okay.
You are in error!
I have no reason to mislead, would not benefit from misleading anyone on here and I could really give a rats blue ass about gaining some meaningless thing by misdirection on a freakin' message board. Why is your inappropriate assumption without any foundation laid to support your fantasy OK?
"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If youve got a business you didnt build that [the business]. Somebody else made that happen."
That is what he meant, your spin is a lie.
And even if it is roads and bridges that you claim, everyone did build that because public money, funded by private individuals did pay for it with taxes.
I also have no idea why you need to lie on a message board.
Post the entire statement and then say that....
Learn to diagram sentences. He didn't say "those" [bridges and roads]. He said "that" [business]."If you've got a businessyou didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.![]()
It's easy to take a statement like that, standing alone, seem like something it was never intended to represent. But when the full context is revealed, so is the truth.
Here is the quote in its full context"
"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If youve got a business you didnt build that [the roads and bridges]. Somebody else made that happen."
Some folks might think you don't know what the phuck you're talking about. But, hey, I know you must not have done due diligence and checked that out properly, right? You wouldn't try to mislead others on purpose now, would you?