The Most Ignorant Line in the History of Man

[Papageorgio]

You are in error!

I have no reason to mislead, would not benefit from misleading anyone on here and I could really give a rats blue ass about gaining some meaningless thing by misdirection on a freakin' message board. Why is your inappropriate assumption without any foundation laid to support your fantasy OK?

"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that [the business]. Somebody else made that happen."

That is what he meant, your spin is a lie.

And even if it is roads and bridges that you claim, everyone did build that because public money, funded by private individuals did pay for it with taxes.

I also have no idea why you need to lie on a message board.

If you wish to belabor that stupidity...sobeit!

You're a Bleeding Fool who is incapable of admitting error. My only error was initially omitting the Latin notation sic at the closing bracket; [the roads and bridges, sic]. But you probably wouldn't have understood that either.

So believe what you want to Bubba, 'cause there ain't no way you will ever muster up the intellectual honesty to admit there is any other way to construe those few sentences other than the way your faction wishes to discredit the other faction. Good luck in your tribal endeavors.

All your name calling and snide comments and you talk about intelectual anything? LOL!!

Have a great night.

 

[bripat9643]

We all pay for the commons. Those who use it more, pay more.

We already have a progressive tax structure.

Yes. We do. It isn't sufficient, though.

I know you will agree that the wealth gap that we have is not healthy. Stagnant wages for 20+ years is not a good thing.

How much is "sufficient," and how will taxing the rich into bankruptcy increase your income?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

I hate Obama with a passion, but this quote has been used erroneously since he said it. Obama is something of an enigma; he has intelligence, yet he does not speak well off prompter. This ad-lib of his was clear to me when he stumbled through it the first time. He was talking about the infrastructure, not the business.

Either people are far more stupid than I thought (frightening concept right there) or they are lying to use this as political ammo. Obama is an America hating piece of shit, but this is crap. If we cannot have an honest discussion, all is lost. And apparently all is lost.

You're wrong and obviously an Obama ass-kisser.

 

[Papageorgio]

"If you've got a business—you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."

Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.

It's easy to take a statement like that, standing alone, seem like something it was never intended to represent. But when the full context is revealed, so is the truth.

Here is the quote in its full context"

"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that [the roads and bridges]. Somebody else made that happen."

Some folks might think you don't know what the phuck you're talking about. But, hey, I know you must not have done due diligence and checked that out properly, right? You wouldn't try to mislead others on purpose now, would you?

Learn to diagram sentences. He didn't say "those" [bridges and roads]. He said "that" [business].

That is my take also, those or them, instead of that. The meaning is clear to those that can read. His turning bridges and roads from plural to singular doesn't make grammatical sense and thus exposes the lie he is trying to push.

 

[Peach]

“The phone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication”

Western Union

 

[dilloduck]

This will hurt me more than it will hurt you.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Second most ignorant line in the history of man

"Poor people do better if you cut their benefits"

Obviously "teach a man to fish" is the third most ignorant line in the history of man to your way of "thinking".

 

[boilermaker55]

Why not go and check out your original statement.
Then try to say it is deflection
"The most ignorant line in the history of man."
So yo don't consider georgie boy bush a man lol.
But he did make some rather ignorant stupid statements. So you try to say they don't count.
You made one of the most moronic statements then. You are in a class by yourself making that statement of deflection.
It's quite obvious you don't have an idea of how to construct a statement that is true.

Bush: Truly not concerned about bin Laden (short version) - YouTube
Try this on for size. This is 100 times worse not worried about the man suspected of killing nearly 3000 citizens.
You have a terrible memory or you just have hatred in your soul.

"If you've got a business—you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."

Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.

Wow, major league deflection there.

So everything must be compared to Bush's war, then?

.

 

[boilermaker55]

Taxing the rich to bankruptcy. Really?
This might be the most ignorant statement made by man lol.

We already have a progressive tax structure.

Yes. We do. It isn't sufficient, though.

I know you will agree that the wealth gap that we have is not healthy. Stagnant wages for 20+ years is not a good thing.

How much is "sufficient," and how will taxing the rich into bankruptcy increase your income?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Which of you nutters really thinks that the "that" in Obama's comment refers to the listeners business.....and how many know it doesn't but are saying it does anyway?

IOW, which of you are imbeciles and which are lying tools?

 

[Peach]

“People will never build a bigger plane”

On the Boeing 247

 

[LoneLaugher]

Taxing the rich to bankruptcy. Really?
This might be the most ignorant statement made by man lol.

Yes. We do. It isn't sufficient, though.

I know you will agree that the wealth gap that we have is not healthy. Stagnant wages for 20+ years is not a good thing.

How much is "sufficient," and how will taxing the rich into bankruptcy increase your income?

Nope. Not into bankruptcy......into spending. Tax the wealthy so that they are incentivised to grease the economic wheels instead of socking away their dough. Take away the tax breaks that people get just because they have a lot of money....and reward productive investment.

 

[The Rabbi]

Taxing the rich to bankruptcy. Really?
This might be the most ignorant statement made by man lol.

How much is "sufficient," and how will taxing the rich into bankruptcy increase your income?

Nope. Not into bankruptcy......into spending. Tax the wealthy so that they are incentivised to grease the economic wheels instead of socking away their dough. Take away the tax breaks that people get just because they have a lot of money....and reward productive investment.

You are an idiot. Again.
Taxes are on earned income. It does not effect spending, which is not tax deductible. The wealthy invest their money, often in new enterprises. They grease enough wheels as it is.
Then again, you probably think consumer spending drives the economy.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Taxing the rich to bankruptcy. Really?
This might be the most ignorant statement made by man lol.

Nope. Not into bankruptcy......into spending. Tax the wealthy so that they are incentivised to grease the economic wheels instead of socking away their dough. Take away the tax breaks that people get just because they have a lot of money....and reward productive investment.

You are an idiot. Again.
Taxes are on earned income. It does not effect spending, which is not tax deductible. The wealthy invest their money, often in new enterprises. They grease enough wheels as it is.
Then again, you probably think consumer spending drives the economy.

They clearly don't grease enough wheels. Trickle down didn't happen, dummy.

What so you think drives the economy? The benevolence of billionaires?

 

[The Rabbi]

Nope. Not into bankruptcy......into spending. Tax the wealthy so that they are incentivised to grease the economic wheels instead of socking away their dough. Take away the tax breaks that people get just because they have a lot of money....and reward productive investment.

You are an idiot. Again.
Taxes are on earned income. It does not effect spending, which is not tax deductible. The wealthy invest their money, often in new enterprises. They grease enough wheels as it is.
Then again, you probably think consumer spending drives the economy.

They clearly don't grease enough wheels. Trickle down didn't happen, dummy.

What so you think drives the economy? The benevolence of billionaires?

It didnt happen because the Democrats instituted higher taxes and more regulation. Or did you miss that part?
Business investment drives the economy, Einstein.

 

[LoneLaugher]

You are an idiot. Again.
Taxes are on earned income. It does not effect spending, which is not tax deductible. The wealthy invest their money, often in new enterprises. They grease enough wheels as it is.
Then again, you probably think consumer spending drives the economy.

They clearly don't grease enough wheels. Trickle down didn't happen, dummy.

What so you think drives the economy? The benevolence of billionaires?

It didnt happen because the Democrats instituted higher taxes and more regulation. Or did you miss that part?
Business investment drives the economy, Einstein.

You are wrong. If you weren't wrong, you could prove that. You can't.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Simple enough for a dummy like you to grasp. Learn something.

Economics 101 - What Drives the Economy :: Stimulate US Now!

 

[LeftofLeft]

"If you've got a business—you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."

Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.

It's easy to take a statement like that, standing alone, seem like something it was never intended to represent. But when the full context is revealed, so is the truth.

Here is the quote in its full context"

"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that [the roads and bridges]. Somebody else made that happen."

Some folks might think you don't know what the phuck you're talking about. But, hey, I know you must not have done due diligence and checked that out properly, right? You wouldn't try to mislead others on purpose now, would you?

Wouldn't one who attended top private schools and all Ivy League for advanced degrees phrase it as follows:


- "Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that infrastructure" [ clearly differentiating between the business and the roads and bridges]

- "Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build those.

He was referring to business. "THAT" can only refer to something singular and business is the only singular in the context of the sentence.

 

[LoneLaugher]

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/opinion/its-consumer-spending-stupid.html?_r=0

 

[LoneLaugher]

"If you've got a business—you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."

Spoken by someone who clearly never built anything.

It's easy to take a statement like that, standing alone, seem like something it was never intended to represent. But when the full context is revealed, so is the truth.

Here is the quote in its full context"

"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that [the roads and bridges]. Somebody else made that happen."

Some folks might think you don't know what the phuck you're talking about. But, hey, I know you must not have done due diligence and checked that out properly, right? You wouldn't try to mislead others on purpose now, would you?

Wouldn't one who attended top private schools and all Ivy League for advanced degrees phrase it as follows:


- "Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that infrastructure" [ clearly differentiating between the business and the roads and bridges]

- "Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build those.

He was referring to business. "THAT" can only refer to something singular and business is the only singular in the context of the sentence.

Nope. He was referring to infrastructure. English is a funny language. Some get it, some don't. You seem too smart to believe what you just wrote. That means you must be a lying sack of shit.