HEY DUMB ASS I SAID THERMETIC CUTTERS DO NOT EXPLODE THEY CUT
Oh, you said a lot of things about these mythic 'thermetic cutters'. But you have yet to factually establish they even exist. You don't know their size, what's in them, or what they look like while they're operating. YOu can't even provide a single example of 'thermetic cutters' ever being used for demolition of any building anywhere......despite your claim that the technology has been in use since the 1930s.
Its almost like you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.
You claimed they cut an entire girder in milliseconds. Even a thermal lance (one of the most powerful cutting tools on earth and the primary tool used to cut through the girders during the salvage and clearing of the WTC plaza) takes orders of magnitude longer to cut a girder. Yet your imaginary 'thermetic cutter' does it in milliseconds.
Says who?
Says you. And you're nobody. Show us anything verifiable to back up your claim.
You say that the 'thermetic cutter' disintegrates after use. Prove it. You have yet to prove your 'thermetic cutter'
even exists. Let alone what it does. Let alone that there were any in the WTC 7.
You assume all of it.
And your assumptions aren't evidence. They're an excuse for it.
not change dingleweed added to my story. get a clue!
You claimed there was a huge explosion that sounded like it was underground before the WTC 7 collapse. The video disproves that claim. There was no sound of explosives.
So we're in agreement that the WTC 7 wasn't brought down by explosive demolition.
I am showing you photos, dont ask me to set up interviews for you with the person taking them it aint gonna happen. I already told you foia release, get your citations from them.
First off, your photos don't show cut girders. They show *twisted* girders. Which are consistent with structural failure, not being cut by your imaginary 'thermal cutters'.
You've just provided some spectacular evidence of structural failure. But where are the cuts? You can't factually establish
even one....and your theory requires thousands and thousands.
Second, you 'say' they're from a FOIA request, just like you 'say' that your animated gif is from a 'forensic analysis', just like you 'say' that your imaginary thermal cutters will cut through a girder in 'milliseconds'. But when challenged to back any of that up with evidence, you run with your tail between your legs, trying to change the topic.
Show us the FOIA request. Show us where the girders are from, with evidence. You have yet to establish they are even from WTC 7. But you 'saying' it must be so means absolutely nothing, as you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. You're pulling these imagines from photobucket. And they don't even show what you claim they do, as all the girders are twisted. Not cut, as your theory requires.
Absolutely killing your conspiracy yet again.