The more guns in a country the more gun deaths.

Are you serious. I think you are messing with us. No human could be serious in making the points you are.
You can't fool me. No one is that whacked.
See? More of your ignorance, idiocy, and dishonesty

Meanwhile:
You cannot demonstrate that a nuclear weapon is a "bearable arm" and therefore protected by the 2nd Amendment.
Thus, you cannot demonstrate the fact we cannot own one is an infringement upon the right to keep and bear arms.
 
See? More of your ignorance, idiocy, and dishonesty

Meanwhile:
You cannot demonstrate that a nuclear weapon is a "bearable arm" and therefore protected by the 2nd Amendment.
Thus, you cannot demonstrate the fact we cannot own one is an infringement upon the right to keep and bear arms.
Come on,stop it. We know you are messing with us. Your schtick is up.
You do a good job sounding like an idiot
 
The more guns in a country the more gun deaths.
The more mental illness does not correlate to more gun deaths
current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis that guns make a nation safer.

The number of guns per capita per country was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death in a given country, whereas the predictive power of the mental illness burden was of borderline significance in a multivariable model. Regardless of exact cause and effect, however, the current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis that guns make a nation safer.



Yeah....not so much...the crappy work the anti-gunners do to push bad research to get guns banned is legendary....

Have you ever engaged in any of the following behaviors with a firearm to protect yourself or someone else:

  • Told someone who was threatening you that you had a firearm
  • Shown your firearm to someone who was threatening you
  • Fired your firearm in the vicinity of but not at someone who was threatening you
  • Fired your firearm at someone who was threatening you
  • None of the above
Survey respondents were also asked about their exposure to "gun violence".

Please indicate whether you have had each of the following experiences:

  • Have you ever known someone personally that has died by suicide with a firearm?
  • Have you ever been threatened with a firearm by another person?
  • Have you ever been intentionally shot with a firearm by another person?
  • Have you personally known someone, such as a friend or family member, who has been shot on purpose by another person with a firearm?
  • Have you ever personally witnessed a shooting in the neighborhood where you lived at the time?
  • Have you ever heard gun shots in the neighborhood where you lived at the time?

See the problem yet? The universe of questions regarding exposure to "gun violence" is far broader than those queries about defensive gun use, so it's not particularly surprising that the anti-gun researchers found that DGUs are far less common than being exposed to gun violence.

Anestis and his team only asked about the respondents' defensive gun use, not whether or not they knew anyone who had used a firearm in self-defense. But when asking about "gun violence", the Rutgers team was eager to include anyone the respondent might have known who took their life with a firearm or was intentionally shot. I've never used any of my guns in self-defense, and I have lost a few friends to suicide with a firearm, but I also know multiple individuals who've used one of their guns to protect themselves. Those folks, and their defensive gun uses, are completely irrelevant... at least according to the terms of Anestis's study.


 
Yeah....not so much...the crappy work the anti-gunners do to push bad research to get guns banned is legendary....

Have you ever engaged in any of the following behaviors with a firearm to protect yourself or someone else:

  • Told someone who was threatening you that you had a firearm
  • Shown your firearm to someone who was threatening you
  • Fired your firearm in the vicinity of but not at someone who was threatening you
  • Fired your firearm at someone who was threatening you
  • None of the above
Survey respondents were also asked about their exposure to "gun violence".

Please indicate whether you have had each of the following experiences:


  • Have you ever known someone personally that has died by suicide with a firearm?
  • Have you ever been threatened with a firearm by another person?
  • Have you ever been intentionally shot with a firearm by another person?
  • Have you personally known someone, such as a friend or family member, who has been shot on purpose by another person with a firearm?
  • Have you ever personally witnessed a shooting in the neighborhood where you lived at the time?
  • Have you ever heard gun shots in the neighborhood where you lived at the time?

See the problem yet? The universe of questions regarding exposure to "gun violence" is far broader than those queries about defensive gun use, so it's not particularly surprising that the anti-gun researchers found that DGUs are far less common than being exposed to gun violence.

Anestis and his team only asked about the respondents' defensive gun use, not whether or not they knew anyone who had used a firearm in self-defense. But when asking about "gun violence", the Rutgers team was eager to include anyone the respondent might have known who took their life with a firearm or was intentionally shot. I've never used any of my guns in self-defense, and I have lost a few friends to suicide with a firearm, but I also know multiple individuals who've used one of their guns to protect themselves. Those folks, and their defensive gun uses, are completely irrelevant... at least according to the terms of Anestis's study.

How many guns do you need to protect yourself or for hunting or target practice. How lethal of a gun do you need for those purposes.
 
How many guns do you need to protect yourself or for hunting or target practice. How lethal of a gun do you need for those purposes.

As many as you think you need......since this is a free f*cking country.....
 
The more guns in a country the more gun deaths.
And the more cars, the more car deaths.
The more unhinged libtards, the more unhinged libtard deaths.
Do we really need a thread that illustrates basic logic?
 
Back
Top Bottom