M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Because it -is- a free society, and the right to own and use firearms cannot be infringed.Curious why you want so many guns in our free society.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it -is- a free society, and the right to own and use firearms cannot be infringed.Curious why you want so many guns in our free society.
To reduce vehicles deaths, there are laws and regulations.And the more cars, the more car deaths.
The more unhinged libtards, the more unhinged libtard deaths.
Do we really need a thread that illustrates basic logic?
And guns for self defence is a fallacy.How many guns do you need to protect yourself or for hunting or target practice. How lethal of a gun do you need for those purposes.
Indeed. Much like firearm regulations, they are not 100% successful.To reduce vehicles deaths, there are laws and regulations.
Simple reasons, the Constitution protects the right to own firearms, there has always been a tradition of firearm ownership, and gun-grabbers have not yet succeeded in eliminating that right.The most dangerous countries are developing countries. Of the developed countries, the US gun deaths per capita is substantially higher.
Worldwide, the US has the highest gun ownership at 120.5 per 100. More than 1 gun per person. The second is the falklands 62.1 per 100 people.. Isreal is 6.7 per 100 people. If any population needs guns it is Isreal Why is the USA ligh years ahead of the world in gun ownership.
![]()
List of countries by firearm-related homicide rates - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Estimated number of civilian guns per capita by country - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Except for those times when they are used to defend someone. Other than that, sure.And guns for self defence is a fallacy.
Laws and regs only reduce, and only if enforced.Indeed. Much like firearm regulations, they are not 100% successful.
Are we the only country that allows gun ownership?Simple reasons, the Constitution protects the right to own firearms, there has always been a tradition of firearm ownership, and gun-grabbers have not yet succeeded in eliminating that right.
We're one of the few, if not the only, that protect the right in their constitution.Are we the only country that allows gun ownership?
How can the people in these other countries survive without the freedom to buy all the guns they want?We're one of the few, if not the only, that protect the right in their constitution.
I don't have any comment on their situation. It is theirs, not mine.How can the people in these other countries survive without the freedom to buy all the guns they want?
Your questions assume facts not in evidence, and is just another example of your ignorance, idiocy, and dishonesty.How can the people in these other countries survive without the freedom to buy all the guns they want?
And this is the point. Guns used for self-defense are like sneeze guards at a salad bar. You really hope they never have to be used, but if they are, you're certainly glad they are there.Your questions assume facts not in evidence, and is just another example of your ignorance, idiocy, and dishonesty.
You do not know they can, you only know they have so far.
If their current condition changes, or collapses, their survival is very much in question.
Ok. Take the state of NH. They have some of the least restrictive gun laws in the country. Constitutional Carry. No permitting or registration of AR STYLE weapons. 46% of adults own a gun. Yet NH is arguably the safest state in the country.The more guns in a country the more gun deaths.
The more mental illness does not correlate to more gun deaths
current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis that guns make a nation safer.
The number of guns per capita per country was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death in a given country, whereas the predictive power of the mental illness burden was of borderline significance in a multivariable model. Regardless of exact cause and effect, however, the current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis that guns make a nation safer.
Clearly, some insist that we have to focus on the symptom of a problem (guns) while ignoring the actual problem (violent crime).Ok. Take the state of NH. They have some of the least restrictive gun laws in the country. Constitutional Carry. No permitting or registration of AR STYLE weapons. 46% of adults own a gun. Yet NH is arguably the safest state in the country.
How does that work?
Look at at all statesOk. Take the state of NH. They have some of the least restrictive gun laws in the country. Constitutional Carry. No permitting or registration of AR STYLE weapons. 46% of adults own a gun. Yet NH is arguably the safest state in the country.
How does that work?
Alabama |
Alaska |
Arizona |
Arkansas |
California |
Colorado |
Connecticut |
Delaware |
District Of Columbia |
Florida |
Georgia |
Hawaii |
Idaho |
Illinois |
Indiana |
Iowa |
Kansas |
Kentucky |
Louisiana |
Maine |
Maryland |
Massachusetts |
Michigan |
Minnesota |
Mississippi |
Missouri |
Montana |
Nebraska |
Nevada |
New Hampshire |
New Jersey |
New Mexico |
New York |
North Carolina |
North Dakota |
Ohio |
Oklahoma |
Oregon |
Pennsylvania |
Rhode Island |
South Carolina |
South Dakota |
Tennessee |
Texas |
Utah |
Vermont |
Virginia |
Washington |
West Virginia |
Wisconsin |
Wyoming |
Congrats - you've proven absolutely nothing, and left his point unchallenged.Look at at all states
Look at at all states