The Media's Climate Change Sensationalism

[Sunsettommy]

Here are excellent example of media climate sensationalism being promoted based on lies and misleading narratives to promote governmental solutions when there is no such climate emergency ongoing.

The damage to society is significant causing many science illiterates to suffer from worry over bogus claims that really a SCAM ongoing to get increased money and control over the people.

He has a doctorate in Earth Sciences.

================

Irrational Fear

The Media's Climate Change Sensationalism​

Why You Shouldn't Get Your Climate Change Information from the MSM​

Dr. Matthew Wielicki
Mar 05, 2024

Excerpt:

Mainstream media (MSM) plays a crucial role in disseminating scientific findings to the public. However, the necessity to engage an audience can often lead to sensationalized headlines. These headlines, while effective at capturing attention and generating revenue, often reduce nuanced scientific predictions to overly simplistic statements. The headline suggesting a dramatic surge in sea levels around New York City is a case in point. It condenses a complex study into a single, alarming prediction.

LINK

 

[1srelluc]

Meh, it's called weather.

Take my AO....Last year at this time it was as dry as a popcorn fart, water use, both voluntary and mandatory, restrictions from early May well into September.

This year you have had to mow every week since April there has been so much rain. That is when it stays dry enough to do so!

 

[EMH]

And let nobody forget, the 5 simple climate questions are still 100% censored by the entire media, including Faux, RAV, and OANN...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

17 months that's been up. 100% media censorship of basic climate questions continues...

 

[EMH]

The headline suggesting a dramatic surge in sea levels around New York City is a case in point. It condenses a complex study into a single, alarming prediction.

LOL!!!

and when the media says the oceans are rising, Lady Liberty shakes her head in disgust...

• 
  
• 
  

• 
  
• 
  

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

LOL!!!

and when the media says the oceans are rising, Lady Liberty shakes her head in disgust...

• 
  
• 
  

• 
  
• 
  

The water level is always the same?

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

LOL!!!

and when the media says the oceans are rising, Lady Liberty shakes her head in disgust...

• 
  
• 
  

• 
  
• 
  

Repair and Stabilize Ellis Island’s Seawall Project - Ellis Island Part of Statue of Liberty National Monument (U.S. National Park Service)

www.nps.gov

 

[Sunsettommy]

New survey of climate scientists by Bray and von Storch confirms broad consensus on human causation
by Bart Verheggen
Bray and von Storch just published the results of their latest survey of climate scientists. It contains lots of interesting and very detailed information, though some questions are a little biased in my opinion. Still, they find a strong consensus on human causation of climate change: 87.4% of respondents are to some extent convinced that most of recent or near future climate change is, or will be, the result of anthropogenic causes (question v007). Responses were given on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much). In line with Bray (2010) a response between 5 and 7 is considered agreement with anthropogenic causation. In their 2008 survey the level of agreement based on the same question was 83.5% and in 2013 it was 80.9%.

LOL, you are not on topic at all, thus the post one article remains unaddressed.

You a perfect target for the governments who wants to expand their power over you.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

LOL!!!

and when the media says the oceans are rising, Lady Liberty shakes her head in disgust...

• 
  
• 
  

• 
  
• 
  

It has a seawall

 

[Sunsettommy]

Interview: Hans von Storch on Problems with Climate Change Models

Climate experts have long predicted that temperatures would rise in parallel with greenhouse gas emissions. But, for 15 years, they haven't. In a SPIEGEL interview, meteorologist Hans von Storch discusses how this "puzzle" might force scientists to alter what could be "fundamentally wrong" models.

www.spiegel.de

LOL, you ignore my link which means you can't address them.

Not going to see your link as you have a bad habit of not sticking with the topic which is about the MEDIA sensationalism.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

LOL, you ignore my link which means you can't address them.

Not going to see your link as you have a bad habit of not sticking with the topic which is about the MEDIA sensationalism.

Sea level goes up and down depending on global temps. This time temps are going up and it appears as if humans are the main cause

 

[westwall]

New survey of climate scientists by Bray and von Storch confirms broad consensus on human causation
by Bart Verheggen
Bray and von Storch just published the results of their latest survey of climate scientists. It contains lots of interesting and very detailed information, though some questions are a little biased in my opinion. Still, they find a strong consensus on human causation of climate change: 87.4% of respondents are to some extent convinced that most of recent or near future climate change is, or will be, the result of anthropogenic causes (question v007). Responses were given on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much). In line with Bray (2010) a response between 5 and 7 is considered agreement with anthropogenic causation. In their 2008 survey the level of agreement based on the same question was 83.5% and in 2013 it was 80.9%.

Consensus is a POLITICAL term, not a scientific one.

Come back when they can provide empirical data that supports their claims.

To date they have none.

 

[westwall]

LOL, you ignore my link which means you can't address them.

Not going to see your link as you have a bad habit of not sticking with the topic which is about the MEDIA sensationalism.

You must always remember, these people are scientific illiterates. They literally know nothing about science, or the scientific method.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

New survey of climate scientists by Bray and von Storch confirms broad consensus on human causation
by Bart Verheggen
Bray and von Storch just published the results of their latest survey of climate scientists. It contains lots of interesting and very detailed information, though some questions are a little biased in my opinion. Still, they find a strong consensus on human causation of climate change: 87.4% of respondents are to some extent convinced that most of recent or near future climate change is, or will be, the result of anthropogenic causes (question v007). Responses were given on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much). In line with Bray (2010) a response between 5 and 7 is considered agreement with anthropogenic causation. In their 2008 survey the level of agreement based on the same question was 83.5% and in 2013 it was 80.9%.

Now how many climate scientists think we need to spend $76 trillion, at least, to stop the world from ending?
How many think wind and solar are the best carbon free energy and that nuclear is the worst?

 

[EMH]

It has a seawall

The CO2 FRAUD claims that Earth is experiencing a rapid net ice melt, and that oceans are rising as a result.

Do you see any ocean rise in those photos?

 

[EMH]

Sea level goes up and down depending on global temps

Correct, it is almost an "Earth thermometer" in that regard, although two things "artificial" are biasing ocean levels higher...

1. burning fossil fuels = CO2 and H2O, meaning it adds to ocean levels
2. taking iron from land and creating ships in the sea, tonnage displacement of all human ships probably is about 1/10000th of an inch of rise

This time temps are going up

Other than the surface of growing urban areas

Google Search

your statement is completely false...

Thread 'Why do Fox News and "faux skeptics" want you, America, to believe "warming" that does not exist?'

Jul 20, 2025

They claim they don't believe CO2 does anything. They make fun of "predictions" made that are already disproven. They even show some actual data refuting "warming," but then THEY ALWAYS ACCEPT IT... YES THEY SAY, THE PLANET EARTH IS WARMING, BUT WE JUST DON'T ACCEPT CO2 as the cause...


Day after day here, we see the same self-proclaimed "skeptics" accepting clearly fudged BS as "proof" of "warming." Fox News pushes it. The Sun is the cause... no, water causes ice.... LOL!!! disproven the same way as atmosphere... GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED...

• EMH
• Replies: 16
• Forum: Environment

• 

 

[Sunsettommy]

You must always remember, these people are scientific illiterates. They literally know nothing about science, or the scientific method.

Yeah as he is doing paste/link based replies can't carry on a basic conversation on their own and actually address Post one article.

 

[Sunsettommy]

It appears no one has a dispute with Post one article thus remains unchallenged and still valid.

Snicker.........

 

[sealybobo]

It appears no one has a dispute with Post one article thus remains unchallenged and still valid.

Snicker.........

Scientists Say Trump Admin’s Climate Report Is Riddled With Errors​

Just as the tobacco industry funded scientists to question the harms of smoking, the fossil fuel industry is doing the same thing today. And now they have a President in the White House just like they did when Reagan was president. Or Bush.

More than 80 scientists have panned the Department of Energy’s recently released report on climate change, describing it as riddled with errors, founded on cherry-picked data and “just plain wrong.”

So you don't have the facts behind you. You have lies.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Scientists Say Trump Admin’s Climate Report Is Riddled With Errors​

Just as the tobacco industry funded scientists to question the harms of smoking, the fossil fuel industry is doing the same thing today. And now they have a President in the White House just like they did when Reagan was president. Or Bush.

More than 80 scientists have panned the Department of Energy’s recently released report on climate change, describing it as riddled with errors, founded on cherry-picked data and “just plain wrong.”

So you don't have the facts behind you. You have lies.

Because cigarettes are just like the energy that makes our modern economy possible.

DURR

 

[ReinyDays]

Just as the tobacco industry funded scientists to question the harms of smoking ...

Is that what the Surgeon General's Warning was all about ... "may be hazardous" is New Speak for "perfectly healthy" ... we knew Bubba would ignore a government warning ...