The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

Watch those videos and you'll be able to at least start to reason your way thru the events of 9/11, and how your government's intelligence institutions operate.

You don't have to be in complete agreement with the information presented - I certainly am not - but understanding those things is what I would consider the baseline minimum primer for beginning to study 9/11.

Accepting the official narrative without having a basic knowledge of how your intelligence agencies operate is a fools errand.
Government pilots took over the airplanes and eliminated a lot of humans?
 
I've posted these videos before, you obviously haven't watched them.

I talk about Able Danger, Able Warrior, and Door Hop Galley, and those of you who cling to the official narrative have no idea what I'm talking about. So no, you don't understand how the intelligence and defense institutions of our government work.

If you don't have that basic understanding, it would be almost impossible for you to unravel the official narrative for the fraud that it is.

Mind you, I don't agree with Webster Tarpley's worldview or politics in the least, but I can accept that he is a detailed researcher with an in depth understanding of our intelligence/defense infrastructure. For that reason, his research and presentation is invaluable.

Watch his presentation and learn some things. Doing so will not transform you into a deranged werewolf ;)


How long and where were they being trained to demolish 4 airplanes, kill hundreds of passengers and citizens in the towers and who taught them to crash an airplane at Shanksville?
 
And here's another Glaring Truth,.............. Jet Air Liners do not crash in to the ground, & Bury all of the wreckage.
 
And here's another Glaring Truth,.............. Jet Air Liners do not crash in to the ground, & Bury all of the wreckage.


Have you seen the video showing the outline of the airplane crash site? You can see where the wings were, the fuselage and the tail section outlined in the dirt!

 
Which means that You can't answer those questions.

The Answers to My Questions defy the "Official Narrative" Robert.
Look, you know very well that to reply to you, means II must use the Internet to tell you what you asked. When you can look that up yourself.

I have posed questions you don't reply to.
What you do is a counter narrative. But based as you tell me on your personal ignorance. For instance, you want me to look up temperatures for you when you could supply them yourself.
 
How long and where were they being trained to demolish 4 airplanes, kill hundreds of passengers and citizens in the towers and who taught them to crash an airplane at Shanksville?
Watch the videos. You don't seem to have any understanding whatsoever as to how our intelligence and defense institutions work.

Unless you're willing to learn those ABC's, you're destined to always believe everything your government tells you - which, I can assure you is fiction.
 
Watch the videos. You don't seem to have any understanding whatsoever as to how our intelligence and defense institutions work.

Unless you're willing to learn those ABC's, you're destined to always believe everything your government tells you - which, I can assure you is fiction.

you showed up here depending on posters like me to simply take your word. What employment have you had justifying your claims so far? And links to bs is as good as sites with bs.
 
you showed up here depending on posters like me to simply take your word. What employment have you had justifying your claims so far? And links to bs is as good as sites with bs.
Robert, in those videos there are numerous Phd's from accredited institutions, and pilots with decades of experience lending their expertise to analyze the facts and data.

Believe them or not is up to you.

What I'm saying is take their information under advisement, and arrive at your own conclusions. You don't know me from Adam, I'm telling you not to take my word for it.

I've offered you some well produced and thoughtful information from credentialed experts.

I've read thru a good deal of the 9/11 report, and if I didn't research what might be wrong with the picture I might accept it as you have.

But that is not how science works. A true scientist doesn't accept that something is valid and true until it has been tested and analyzed to disprove it.

My background is in chemistry. I understand the basics of scientific principles very well.
 
And here's another Glaring Truth,.............. Jet Air Liners do not crash in to the ground, & Bury all of the wreckage.
Nor did any plane on 911 crash in to the ground and bury all of the wreckage so your claim is irrelevant
 
Which means that You can't answer those questions.

The Answers to My Questions defy the "Official Narrative" Robert.
No they do not

For one thing the so called official narrative you keep talking about does not exist.

If you wish to challenge the official narrative then cite the official narrative first as in which specific publication are you talking about?
 
Watch the videos. You don't seem to have any understanding whatsoever as to how our intelligence and defense institutions work.

Unless you're willing to learn those ABC's, you're destined to always believe everything your government tells you - which, I can assure you is fiction.
Your claims about the intel intitutions is opinion ONLY and not grounded in fact
 
15th post
Robert, in those videos there are numerous Phd's from accredited institutions, and pilots with decades of experience lending their expertise to analyze the facts and data.

Believe them or not is up to you.

What I'm saying is take their information under advisement, and arrive at your own conclusions. You don't know me from Adam, I'm telling you not to take my word for it.

I've offered you some well produced and thoughtful information from credentialed experts.

I've read thru a good deal of the 9/11 report, and if I didn't research what might be wrong with the picture I might accept it as you have.

But that is not how science works. A true scientist doesn't accept that something is valid and true until it has been tested and analyzed to disprove it.

My background is in chemistry. I understand the basics of scientific principles very well.
Thank you and I took a course in College on Chemistry, so I appreciate your background.

Why am I standing in my spot? After 911, it did not take long for a collection of looneys to create massive doubt and put the blame, not mind you, on the Arabs but sneaky Government officials. Supposedly we are to ignore the Arabs role in the crashes. They ignore the pilot training those men had. They ignore the tracking of them all by the FBI who are who named all of them in reports.

Listen to this, please. Did you study the engineers reports on the crashes? Did you study the NTSB report on them? Did you know actual engineers examined how the towers fell so fast?

Suppose you were told by a pilot that salt is just a made-up term and not sodium chloride? That putting salt on a snail which dissolves them will dissolve humans too?

It is fun to bat around ideas. But many kooks have ideas and merely them being alleged PhDs does not help me a bit.

Now look at motive. We know for sure what motivated the Arabs. Can you explain why professional workers in intelligence for the Feds would dream up such a whacky idea? All it took for the Arabs was pilot training, desire to murder, and an ideology promoting murder. The Government officials lacked any of those skills. See the Feds could not impersonate the Arabs, could they? When I soloed as a beginning pilot, it took under 10 hrs. flight time for the instructor to let me solo the airplane. I grasped flying very fast. So, I see how some nutty Arabs, going to flight schools, could learn how to aim an airliner. They more than likely could not take off or land. But once in the air, they could understand instruments and how to handle controls. It is easier to believe the Arabs did it than to blame workers at the Government. Am I making sense?
 
Thank you and I took a course in College on Chemistry, so I appreciate your background.

Why am I standing in my spot? After 911, it did not take long for a collection of looneys to create massive doubt and put the blame, not mind you, on the Arabs but sneaky Government officials. Supposedly we are to ignore the Arabs role in the crashes. They ignore the pilot training those men had. They ignore the tracking of them all by the FBI who are who named all of them in reports.

Listen to this, please. Did you study the engineers reports on the crashes? Did you study the NTSB report on them? Did you know actual engineers examined how the towers fell so fast?

Suppose you were told by a pilot that salt is just a made-up term and not sodium chloride? That putting salt on a snail which dissolves them will dissolve humans too?

It is fun to bat around ideas. But many kooks have ideas and merely them being alleged PhDs does not help me a bit.

Now look at motive. We know for sure what motivated the Arabs. Can you explain why professional workers in intelligence for the Feds would dream up such a whacky idea? All it took for the Arabs was pilot training, desire to murder, and an ideology promoting murder. The Government officials lacked any of those skills. See the Feds could not impersonate the Arabs, could they? When I soloed as a beginning pilot, it took under 10 hrs. flight time for the instructor to let me solo the airplane. I grasped flying very fast. So, I see how some nutty Arabs, going to flight schools, could learn how to aim an airliner. They more than likely could not take off or land. But once in the air, they could understand instruments and how to handle controls. It is easier to believe the Arabs did it than to blame workers at the Government. Am I making sense?
We can't have a productive dialogue until you can get a handle on this question you asked,

"... Can you explain why professional workers in intelligence for the Feds would dream up such a whacky idea?"

You need to have at least a basic understanding of false flags before you can dig into why, and then how.

You do not have a basic understanding of false flags - which is why I linked to you the Gladio video, and the Webster Tarpley video.

Gladio is very well documented. Europeans my age are well acquainted with Gladio. On the other hand, Americans have no clue what it is.

How can I explain to you something like Able Danger when the very topic is a foreign premise explained in a foreign language.

Hence, I recommend you watch the videos. I can answer any questions you would have after that.
 
We can't have a productive dialogue until you can get a handle on this question you asked,

"... Can you explain why professional workers in intelligence for the Feds would dream up such a whacky idea?"

You need to have at least a basic understanding of false flags before you can dig into why, and then how.

You do not have a basic understanding of false flags - which is why I linked to you the Gladio video, and the Webster Tarpley video.

Gladio is very well documented. Europeans my age are well acquainted with Gladio. On the other hand, Americans have no clue what it is.

How can I explain to you something like Able Danger when the very topic is a foreign premise explained in a foreign language.

Hence, I recommend you watch the videos. I can answer any questions you would have after that.
Let's ease me into your videos using this system.

Start with the Arabs. First if they never flew the airplanes, who do you believe flew them. They are the basis to start any schemes. Why would Government workers agree to die in airplane crashes?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom