You have confirmation bias. The most critical aspect of science is falsification.
If you accept theories without challenging them, they have no value.
I know what the "official" party line is, most everybody does. What the 9/11 Truth movement is about is challenging the official narratives scientifically.
The 9/11 Truth movement says look at everything.
The official government position is believe us, and you can disregard anything that doesn't agree as conspiracy theory nonsense.
That is not good science, and is in no way acceptable.
I should point out that tremendous government pressure was put on scientific publications and academics not to challenge the official narrative. That is to be expected. That is how the game is played. There is almost always a cost to individuals who step out of line.
AE911Truth is a nonprofit organization that represents more than 3,000 architects and engineers who are calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11.
www.ae911truth.org