The Left's Serious Case of Misplaced Anger....The "Mook Mafia" In Damage-Control Mode

Trumps not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. So like many merchants who erred on the side of PC sleight of hand, he believed that saying men could use the ladies rooms in Trump tower might get him brownie points. Target Stores was a lesson for all. Leave it to an idiot misogynist like a Trump also to completely overlook how that offends all sensible women.

Last time I checked, Target was doing fine.

So wait, Silly, Trump palled around with Caitlyn Jenner and let the Trannies use the ladies room, and you still think his (not really) win in 2016 was about this issue?
 
Last time I checked, Target was doing fine.

So wait, Silly, Trump palled around with Caitlyn Jenner and let the Trannies use the ladies room, and you still think his (not really) win in 2016 was about this issue?
Most presidents flaunt a certain degree of line-crossing especially when they are running for office trying to cast a broad net of appeal.

That is quite different from a sitting president who is also the figurehead of his party issuing an executive order forcing all girls in public schools to share his private perversions that they must undress in their sequestered hygiene areas alongside deranged boys.
 
Most presidents flaunt a certain degree of line-crossing especially when they are running for office trying to cast a broad net of appeal.

That is quite different from a sitting president who is also the figurehead of his party issuing an executive order forcing all girls in public schools to share his private perversions that they must undress in their sequestered hygiene areas alongside deranged boys.

Um, no, not really. Trump didn't talk about this issue and he palled around with a notable Tranny... but you keep pretending it was about that and not the racism... and keep hugging the racists, because all you haters need to stick together.
 
Um, no, not really. Trump didn't talk about this issue and he palled around with a notable Tranny... but you keep pretending it was about that and not the racism... and keep hugging the racists, because all you haters need to stick together.

Racism? What the fuck does chopping your dick off because you're so mentally ill that you can't deal with reality on its terms have to do with RACE?

And by the way, people should hate crazy behaviors because if we don't, we teach our kids to accept them by example. These sponges watch our reactions to stuff and gauge their reactions and expectations accordingly.

President Obama FORCED this insanity into the minds of children across the nation without the permission of their parents, against their will and as an extension of the Mook Mafia's agenda. To the demise of the entire democratic party. So, after Obergefell, then that, naturally, sane people on its more right-handed margin said "yeah, fuck that!" and voted up and down for conservatives. Especially in so-called "purple states".

Expect more of that the more insanity your gang dishes out. Or ignore it and spend the next two years again wondering "what went wrong???"... :popcorn:
 
Racism? What the fuck does chopping your dick off because you're so mentally ill that you can't deal with reality on its terms have to do with RACE?

Guy, what I've found is that people who tend to be homophobes also tend to be racists...

Funny how that works.

And by the way, people should hate crazy behaviors because if we don't, we teach our kids to accept them by example. These sponges watch our reactions to stuff and gauge their reactions and expectations accordingly.

So if kids grow up thinking that there's nothing wrong with being gay or trans... um.. just not seeing a problem here. It seems to me that the only one who has a problem here is you... and that your sort is less and less welcome every day.
 
Guy, what I've found is that people who tend to be homophobes also tend to be racists...

Funny how that works.

You're having a lot of trouble with nomenclature. Trannies are not homosexuals necessarily. I'm fully against what's being done to these poor people in the name of your weird sex cult. I'm afraid FOR them, not of them. For all of us because of what normalizing this mental derangement can do to the rest of society over time. Urging them that they are something they are not is a crime against the mentally ill. As for racism, I'm white and some of my best friends are people who are black, Mexican, Native American etc.

The trouble you seem to be having, or are acting like you're having but know full well better, is that behavior has nothing whatsoever to do with race.
 
You're having a lot of trouble with nomenclature. Trannies are not homosexuals necessarily. I'm fully against what's being done to these poor people in the name of your weird sex cult. I'm afraid FOR them, not of them. For all of us because of what normalizing this mental derangement can do to the rest of society over time. Urging them that they are something they are not is a crime against the mentally ill. As for racism,

Again, I'm just curious how this is the case.

The one Tranny I know of didn't undergo conversion therapy until his fifties, I think. He was an officer in the IL National Guard and a member of a prominent IL family. So how was he "tricked" into becoming a tranny?

Jennifer Pritzker - Wikipedia




As for racism, I'm white and some of my best friends are people who are black, Mexican, Native American etc.

ah the cry of the bigot... don't get me wrong, some of my best friends are...


The trouble you seem to be having, or are acting like you're having but know full well better, is that behavior has nothing whatsoever to do with race.

Discriminating against people for their sexual orientation is just as wrong as discriminating against them for their race.


Period.
 
.

The one Tranny I know of didn't undergo conversion therapy until his fifties, I think. He was an officer in the IL National Guard and a member of a prominent IL family. So how was he "tricked" into becoming a tranny?

I know plenty of people who went off the deep end in their 40s and 50s. You'll consider ANYTHING but that it is a mental illness. Let me make this plain for you: any person at any age, or any socioeconomic background can succumb to mental illness. If you have a penis and testicles and you believe staunchly that you're female, you've lost your shit. End of the story. There can be literally thousands of stressors that lead people to delusions such as those. I mean, how much time do you have?

Making others enable mental illness as a matter of executive order is beyond the pale. And it cost dems in 2016. If they keep it up, it will cost them again.
 
I know plenty of people who went off the deep end in their 40s and 50s. You'll consider ANYTHING but that it is a mental illness. Let me make this plain for you: any person at any age, or any socioeconomic background can succumb to mental illness. If you have a penis and testicles and you believe staunchly that you're female, you've lost your shit. End of the story. There can be literally thousands of stressors that lead people to delusions such as those. I mean, how much time do you have?

I don't consider it mental illness because the APA doesn't.

APA Revises Manual: Being Transgender Is No Longer A Mental Disorder

Now, since they are experts and you aren't, I think that settles the matter.

Now, there are millions of people who suffer anxiety and depression disorders. they are often less functional in society than transgenders, who still hold down jobs and get about the daily business of life. Nobody is really talking about depriving them of their rights.

Making others enable mental illness as a matter of executive order is beyond the pale. And it cost dems in 2016. If they keep it up, it will cost them again.

you still haven't proven that. Trump got less votes than Romney did, he paled around with Caitlyn Jenner and the Democrats GAINED seats in 2016. (Just not as many as they thought they would, but then again, their expectations weren't all that high).

What cost the Democrats was that they nominated a nasty shrew who alienated even the people who supported her.
 
Actually the APA DOES consider the inability to deal with stark & obvious reality on its terms a mental illness. In fact that criteria is the bedrock diagnosis. That the organization has chosen to make one exception to that hard & fast rule to placate the cult of lgbt underscores why psychologists are scrambling to leave the APA & form a new organization that relies on science & effective treatments for the mentally ill instead of cult dogma measured anew by ”group consensus & feelings” instead of hard emperical data.

If murderers took over the APA in the 1970s & urged that killing was acceptable would you blind-sheep follow/not question that either? The APA was the only professional outfit to be censured by the US Congress. The reason for the censure? Another crock of bullshit they tried to peddle/condone: that in some instances, sex between adults & children “could be beneficial” to kids. Shit you not. Yeah, the APA...you’ve come a long way baby since lgbt hijacked you in the 1970s.
 
* BEFORE YOU READ THIS POST, REALIZE THAT THE APA HAS THE FINAL SAY ON ALL POLICIES IN THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ON ISSUES REGARDING MENTAL ILLNESS. THE AMA IN TURN HAS THE FINAL SAY ON ALL PUBLIC POLICIES REGARDING WHAT IS DONE TO ACCOMODATE THINGS SUCH AS SO-CALLED "TRANSGENDERS" IN PUBLIC PLACES PREVIOUSLY RESERVED FOR WOMEN (OR MEN) ONLY...

THEREFORE, THE APA HAS MORE POWER THAN THE US CONGRESS. AND THIS IS WHY THE CULT OF LGBT SEIZED THE INSTITUTION BACK IN THE 1970S & 80S. THEY KNEW FULL WELL WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND HOW MUCH POWER THE APA HAD/HAS...

I don't consider it mental illness because the APA doesn't.

The APA doesn't consider sex-addiction a mental issue either (got that you folks who are wrecking your lives with a sex addiction? It's all in your head). So the APA using their rag below are actually GASLIGHTING an entire segment of the mentally ill. The APA should not only be censured by the US Congress, they should be immediately dismantled and future organizations to oversee literally all facets of mental illness should be closely monitored for impartiality in empirical studies henceforth.


Sex Addiction: Rejected Yet Again by APA
Over the past 18 months, a debate has raged, but the victors appear to have emerged from the smoke. The American Psychiatric Association is updating their “Bible” of diagnostic categories of mental health. Yet again, the sex addiction industry has been clamoring for creation of a disorder to support their work. And yet again, the APA has turned them down flat.

This is not a new debate. My book, The Myth of Sex Addiction, details the history of this controversy, from the days of the first DSM, when nymphomania was included, through the last several revisions, as sex addiction has been rejected, again and again. Every time the book is revised, the sex addiction industry tries and tries to get their pet concept termed a mental disorder. Legitimacy would allow them to bill insurance companies, would allow the pharmaceutical companies to market libido-suppressing drugs as treatment for sex addiction, and would give some appearance of credibility to those folks who get in trouble for sexual behaviors, and either cry “I’m a sex addict,” or get labeled as one by the media

You know...because we all know sex addiction isn't real and that porn addiction, compulsive anonymous sex hookups (Grindr), divorces, family breakups, STDs that kill, unwanted pregnancies and so on from sex addictions are all just figments of society's collective imagination.

They're calling those who would seek to help sex addicts "an industry" while their chop the dick off to pretend a dude is gal sanctioned "medicine" isn't an industry???? They're doing those prescriptions and surgeries for free are they? Guess what kind of drugs they prescribe to kids to commit child abuse softening their minds and forever altering their bodies in "transgender kids" BS? Hormones that soften the normal libido of their actual gender. How about that for a double-standard? It seems the APA is addicted to sex so that it functions as the ultimate denial machine, keeping treatment for themselves and all they have ultimate control over (all of us) from seeing sexual extremes as unhealthy. Ya think?

Here's another "revision" of psychology they tried not too long ago:

Dallam - Science or Propaganda? An Examination of Rind, Tromovitch & Bauserman 1998
An article, "A Meta-analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," published in the July 1998 edition of the Psychological Bulletin resulted in an unprecedented amount of media attention and became the first scientific article to be formally denounced by the United States House of Representatives.

concluded that mental health researchers have greatly overstated CSA's harmful potential. They recommended that a willing encounter with positive reactions no longer be considered to be sexual abuse; instead, it would simply be labeled adult-child sex . The study's conclusions and recommendations spawned a debate in both the popular and scholarly press. A number of commentators suggested that the study is pedophile propaganda masquerading as science. Others claimed that the authors are victims of a moralistic witch-hunt and that scientific freedom is being threatened. After a careful examination of the evidence, it is concluded that Rind et al. can best be described as an advocacy article that inappropriately uses science in an attempt to legitimize its findings.

And speaking of inappropriately using science in an attempt to legitimize findings.... I'll refer you once again to this OP: Federal Gay-Activist Judges Aren't to Blame: They Rely on "Science"..

Here's the problem & mechanics of how the APA is coming to what they advertise are "emperical conclusions" while they are nothing but voodoo backed by the pressure of a group, a preference to "words over numbers" and if you fail to fall in line with the APA/LGBT guard? Like Scientology...you will be audited... You can't make this shit up. Mook's Mafia has been busy for a long, long time...

********************
Consensual Qualitative Research: A Practical Resource for Investigating Social Science Phenomena

This lively and practical text presents a fresh and comprehensive approach to conducting consensual qualitative research (CQR). CQR is an inductive method that is characterized by open-ended interview questions, small samples, a reliance on words over numbers, the importance of context, an integration of multiple viewpoints, and consensus of the research team. It is especially well-suited to research that requires rich descriptions of inner experiences, attitudes, and convictions.

Written to help researchers navigate their way through qualitative techniques and methodology, leading expert Clara E. Hill and her associates provide readers with step-by-step practical guidance during each stage of the research process. Readers learn about adaptive ways of designing studies; collecting, coding, and analyzing data; and reporting findings.

Key aspects of the researcher's craft are addressed, such as establishing the research team, recruiting and interviewing participants, adhering to ethical standards, raising cultural awareness, auditing within case analyses and cross analyses, and writing up the study.
Intended as a user-friendly manual for graduate-level research courses and beyond, the text will be a valuable resource for both budding and experienced qualitative researchers for many years to come.

******

You know what Consensual Qualitative Research stands for? Disregarding Quantitative Analysis & Instead, Conforming To Group-Think.... Or Else.... Forgive me if I don't worship at the APA altar like you do Joe. If you go back and read the heading to this post, you realize that the APA is a cult that is dictating policy to ALL US Citizens from a sequestered compound. It's time to shine the light on them and dismantle the organization, or fall to your knees, whichever your preference.
 
Last edited:
I would to pay $10,000 to have been in that room when HIllary realized she lost and physically attacked her staff.

That’s a hostile work environment. #metoo
 
The APA doesn't consider sex-addiction a mental issue either (got that you folks who are wrecking your lives with a sex addiction? It's all in your head). So the APA using their rag below are actually GASLIGHTING an entire segment of the mentally ill. The APA should not only be censured by the US Congress, they should be immediately dismantled and future organizations to oversee literally all facets of mental illness should be closely monitored for impartiality in empirical studies henceforth.

Well, yeah, sex addiction is kind of silly. We are all addicted to sex. I'd be more worried about people who aren't.

You know...because we all know sex addiction isn't real and that porn addiction, compulsive anonymous sex hookups (Grindr), divorces, family breakups, STDs that kill, unwanted pregnancies and so on from sex addictions are all just figments of society's collective imagination.

Again, these are all separate issues, and just that important.

Got to ask, how messed up is your sex life that you have to spend all this time worrying about what kind of sex other people are having.

It should be pointed out the APA never considered sex addiction to be a disorder, unlike revising homosexuality and gender dysphoria as no longer being disorders. The problem, of course, is what constitutes sex addiction? Is Bill Clinton a sex addict? How about Donald Trump. They could both fall into a classification when they are really just a couple of old horndogs.

No, guy, it's not that there's a "Mook Mafia", it's just most of us don't have an unhealthy obsession with other people's sex lives.
 
We are so radical. The bizarre things we believe in.
Like school lunches for poor children.
Affordable education and healthcare.
Equal pay for women
We must be crazy

Those are the good dem platforms that were sacrificed on the altar of deviant-sex-themed parades in front of kids in public; and forcing little girls in public schools to let deranged boys share showers, locker rooms and restrooms with them. THAT IS CRAZY and via association all the non-crazy good dem stuff got flushed down the commode. Feminists, healthcare advocates, advocates for poor children should be FURIOUS. Not with the Administration elected via protest from dems own middle ranks, but with the fringe left's agenda that crushed all those decades of hard work by good democrats.

It was members of the middle bloc of the democrat party that elected Trump and put a GOP majority in Congress. Let that sink in a minute...

It's why Hillary attacked Robbie Mook just after the 2016 election was finalized. She attacked him because his agenda destroyed all the stuff she and her friends had worked so hard for. People who hate the Trump Administration have a very serious case of misplaced anger.

Of course now the fringe left is in full-desperation spin mode to convince their more moderate party members to not look too deeply into who is responsible for why all the good dem causes were shit-canned. So their control of the media is geared 100% to divert the anger from where it should be, to where they want it to be instead. And still it won't win the majority because the fringe left will not stop their insanity. Instead it's like they're doubling down.

Hillary Clinton physically attacked Robby Mook and John Podesta after she realized she lost to Donald Trump

According to various reports, Clinton was at some points inconsolably emotional, possibly drunk, and physically threatening towards her top aides, as the reality that Donald Trump had defeated her slowly sank in....According to author Ed Klein, Clinton “couldn’t stop crying” once she realized she had lost the election...“She was crying, inconsolably,” he said. “Her friend said — her female friend from way, way, back — said that it was even hard to understand what she was saying, she was crying so hard.”..That’s when, according to a radio host who spoke with a CNN reporter, things got ugly.

Clinton aides blame loss on everything but themselves
“They are saying they did nothing wrong, which is ridiculous,” said one Clinton surrogate. “She was the wrong messenger and everyone misjudged how pissed working class people were.”

Well let's just say she may have not been the wrong messenger, but the guy whispering in her ears was..

Interesting bit on Robby Mook (a must-read about the "Mook Mafia"): Mook's Mafia was all about fuck the voters. Not kidding, give it a read. Quite the fatalist attitude for a campaign manager. The voters were who his client needed in order to win. No wonder she attacked him.

Secret Emails of Potential Clinton Campaign Managers Revealed
The exchanges provide a window into the clubby and pugnacious motivational styles of both Mook and Marshall, two stars of their party’s universe of field organizers and operatives.

Robby Mook is the first "openly gay" man to run a significant political campaign..


I suspect hiLIARy's violent retribution was also fueled by copious amounts of Chardonnay and Scotch.

Just sayin'.
 
I suspect hiLIARy's violent retribution was also fueled by copious amounts of Chardonnay and Scotch.

Just sayin'.

I'm sure you've spent 25 years hating on this woman...

All you had to give up was our national dignity to achieve it.


No, I have spent very little time during the past 25 years thinking about hiLIARy as politics are not the center of my universe. I am, however, quite delighted that she is Not President so there is far less cause to have to think of her at all.
 
No, I have spent very little time during the past 25 years thinking about hiLIARy as politics are not the center of my universe. I am, however, quite delighted that she is Not President so there is far less cause to have to think of her at all.

Least believable statement ever.


As I am much more of an expert on myself than you could possibly be, forgive me for not giving a flying frell what you think.
 

Forum List

Back
Top