The Left's Serious Case of Misplaced Anger....The "Mook Mafia" In Damage-Control Mode

Silhouette

Gold Member
Jul 15, 2013
25,815
1,938
265
We are so radical. The bizarre things we believe in.
Like school lunches for poor children.
Affordable education and healthcare.
Equal pay for women
We must be crazy

Those are the good dem platforms that were sacrificed on the altar of deviant-sex-themed parades in front of kids in public; and forcing little girls in public schools to let deranged boys share showers, locker rooms and restrooms with them. THAT IS CRAZY and via association all the non-crazy good dem stuff got flushed down the commode. Feminists, healthcare advocates, advocates for poor children should be FURIOUS. Not with the Administration elected via protest from dems own middle ranks, but with the fringe left's agenda that crushed all those decades of hard work by good democrats.

It was members of the middle bloc of the democrat party that elected Trump and put a GOP majority in Congress. Let that sink in a minute...

It's why Hillary attacked Robbie Mook just after the 2016 election was finalized. She attacked him because his agenda destroyed all the stuff she and her friends had worked so hard for. People who hate the Trump Administration have a very serious case of misplaced anger.

Of course now the fringe left is in full-desperation spin mode to convince their more moderate party members to not look too deeply into who is responsible for why all the good dem causes were shit-canned. So their control of the media is geared 100% to divert the anger from where it should be, to where they want it to be instead. And still it won't win the majority because the fringe left will not stop their insanity. Instead it's like they're doubling down.

Hillary Clinton physically attacked Robby Mook and John Podesta after she realized she lost to Donald Trump

According to various reports, Clinton was at some points inconsolably emotional, possibly drunk, and physically threatening towards her top aides, as the reality that Donald Trump had defeated her slowly sank in....According to author Ed Klein, Clinton “couldn’t stop crying” once she realized she had lost the election...“She was crying, inconsolably,” he said. “Her friend said — her female friend from way, way, back — said that it was even hard to understand what she was saying, she was crying so hard.”..That’s when, according to a radio host who spoke with a CNN reporter, things got ugly.

Clinton aides blame loss on everything but themselves
“They are saying they did nothing wrong, which is ridiculous,” said one Clinton surrogate. “She was the wrong messenger and everyone misjudged how pissed working class people were.”

Well let's just say she may have not been the wrong messenger, but the guy whispering in her ears was..

Interesting bit on Robby Mook (a must-read about the "Mook Mafia"): Mook's Mafia was all about fuck the voters. Not kidding, give it a read. Quite the fatalist attitude for a campaign manager. The voters were who his client needed in order to win. No wonder she attacked him.

Secret Emails of Potential Clinton Campaign Managers Revealed
The exchanges provide a window into the clubby and pugnacious motivational styles of both Mook and Marshall, two stars of their party’s universe of field organizers and operatives.

Robby Mook is the first "openly gay" man to run a significant political campaign..
 
One other thing that jumped out about the "Mook Mafia" was/is their dedication to "destroy republicans".

Makes me think of Rachael Maddow's destroyed-republican-governor pulpit. It also makes the fringe left's activist agitation look organized to never concede the election to the Trump Administration. And the same type of Maddowesque diatribe/drum beat going on there. They're actually head-hunting on the fringe left. They're not even trying to hide that.

In fact, in the Mook article with Hillary, it talks about how Mook advised her to not (never?) call to concede to Trump. Hillary, fuming irate at Mook at that point ignored his manifesto & called Trump anyway to concede.
 
The more aggressive hand up the back of Mook in the Mook Mafia "Marlon Marshall"

Secret Emails of Potential Clinton Campaign Managers Revealed
“F U Republicans. Mafia till I die,” he wrote. “If you have just a few minutes, hop on that activate and punish those voters!” (“Activate” is an apparent reference to a software program allowing volunteers to contact targeted voters by phone from anywhere in the country.)
 
This article spins the democrat whipping in 2016 on Russian interference via leaked Hillary emails. But dems in Congress took a whipping too. How did Hillary's emails hurt them? Everyone expected presidential candidates to have a shady snag or seven. The article even admits the voters were unbelievably forgiving of Trump's outrageous past (for a POTUS candidate anyway). So all things being equal (two outrageous candidates) the issue COULD NOT HAVE BEEN "leaked personality flaws" in emails. The issue was something else. As I've maintained all along, the issue was the leader of the entire democratic party (B. Obama) issuing a public mandate forcing girls in public schools to shower, change and share bathrooms with deranged boys, under threat of punishment for schools should they fail to comply. That kind of shit hits home right at the dinner table and only the most insane, fringe lunatic parents of any middle demographic would continue to affiliate themselves with such horror.

Shenanigans between adults is one thing. But you put the hurt on kids as representative of your entire party's platform and you lose elections.

The Russian spin

‘They Were Never Going to Let Me Be President’
Three hours later, the Rust Belt was awash in red, and somebody had to tell Hillary Clinton....
Robby Mook, the drained and deflated campaign manager, told his boss she was going to lose. She didn’t seem all that surprised....“I knew it. I knew this would happen to me,” she said, now within a couple of inches of Mr. Mook’s ashen face. “They were never going to let me be president.”....
I figured that if anyone knew whom Mrs. Clinton was referring to with that insidious “they” that, like some invisible army of adversaries (real and imagined), wielded its collective power and caused her to lose the most winnable presidential election in modern history,......They were the vast-right wing conspiracy. They were the patriarchy that could never let an ambitious former first lady finally shatter “that highest, hardest glass ceiling.” They were the people of Wisconsin and James Comey. They were white suburban women who would rather vote for a man who bragged about sexual assault than a woman who seemed an affront to who they were.

The "they" who painted the Rust Belt red were MIDDLE DEMOCRATS who had had enough of social-engineering platforms the left seemed ever more out of control in forcing on sober sane family folk.

Hillary knew who "they" was and it's why she attacked Robby Mook.

Until the last day on the road, though, it never really felt like a winning campaign. Not that I thought Mr. Trump would win. I believed in the data. Yet I couldn’t shake the nagging sensation that no matter how many people I’d met in black churches and union halls and high school gyms around the country who told Hillary Clinton their problems, no matter how many women chanted, “Deal me in!” in unison, she wouldn’t win.

"...the nagging feeling...". Does that mean the nagging feeling that forcing middle voters to let their daughter shower with deranged boys in school was going to have consequences....only nobody on the left is allowed to talk about that as a bad thing?
 
Last edited:
The Mookesque damage-control today is to pit the entire democratic party (if they can, many are defecting, again) against "the mean Russians and GOP who did this to our good platforms!".

Ah, sleight of hand. Know who your real enemies are democrats. Save your good platforms while you still can.

Apparently Mook's old "fuck the voters!" strategy is being used again. They aren't driving people to their party with fringe platforms and violence. They are driving yet more people away. You thought the Rust Belt was red thanks to middle dems back in 2016? It will be fire-engine crimson this time if that same drum beat is used.
 
I guess this guy Mook is a major tech geek with a penchant for statistical...um.....creativity? I think that's the word I'm looking for.
 
Where the leaked Mook emails came from:

Meet the only person on Earth who can run a drama-free Clinton campaign
ABC didn’t name its source but described the person as a Mook Mafia list member who “does not support the idea of Mook or Marshall holding leadership roles” in a second Clinton presidential run. By leaking a cherry-picked series of emails, this source sought to knock Mook out of the running for the campaign manager job...But the attempt to kneecap Mook backfired...and underscored the need for a campaign chief who could manage the competing factions within Hillary Clinton’s universe....

Except that Mook failed to understand that oil and water don't mix. His attempts at emulsifying went on with him and his faithful wearing blinders. The party's organizers (still the Mook Mafia?) are wearing those blinders today..

Mook, who will be the first openly gay manager of a major presidential campaign, is largely unknown beyond the insular world of Democratic staffers but well liked within it. In addition to the email listserv, his loyal following—the Mook Mafia—plans yearly reunions, during which they return to a state where they once operated for a weekend of bar-hopping mixed with volunteering for a local campaign.

It's nice to have a very insular group of friends who all agree that oil and water DO mix. But that doesn't qualify as thinking outside the box... And so, Hillary lost. It's like the Mook Mafia is the crowd in The Emperor's New Clothes and their way of dealing with the vocal little boy was to lock him in a cage with his mouth gagged shut.

Perhaps instead of an attempt to kneecap Mook, this secret source in the ranks really did have a point. Maybe Mook's Mafia were predicted to be a death sentence to the Clinton Campaign 2016 because of their unwillingness to let in opinions outside their insular world? Perhaps a major presidential campaign management shouldn't be a "safe space", but instead a cat fight of competing ideas and observations.
 
I find it interesting that people both on the right and the left are avoiding this thread. They're reading it. They're even rating the posts with icons. But no replies as yet. Is there perchance an elephant that I just let into the living room? :popcorn:
 
I guess the author here is seriously asking: Who cost Hillary the election???

However post #7 nailed it and the thread should have been closed at that point.

REMEMBER FOLKS, IT WASN'T JUST HILLARY THAT GOT CLOBBERED IN 2016. IT WAS ALL DEMS UP AND DOWN TICKET. SO THE REJECTION WAS NOT OF HILLARY PER SE. IT WAS OF THE DEMOCRAT PLATFORM. AT LEAST ONE ELEMENT ON THAT PLATFORM.

What oh what could the democrats have been pushing at the time that would be so foul as to drive away huge chunks of their middle bloc en masse to the GOP up and down ticket? I think it's pretty clear...
 
Last edited:
Wow, this is kind of sad. Sil the Homophobe started this thread two weeks ago and no one is paying attention. Okay, I'll play.

Those are the good dem platforms that were sacrificed on the altar of deviant-sex-themed parades in front of kids in public; and forcing little girls in public schools to let deranged boys share showers, locker rooms and restrooms with them. THAT IS CRAZY and via association all the non-crazy good dem stuff got flushed down the commode. Feminists, healthcare advocates, advocates for poor children should be FURIOUS. Not with the Administration elected via protest from dems own middle ranks, but with the fringe left's agenda that crushed all those decades of hard work by good democrats.

Again, I missed the point where this was even discussed during the election. Trump mostly stayed away from LGBT issues during the campaign, and so did Hillary. It just wasn't a factor.

Here's the thing. Trump got the exact same demographic that Romney and McCain got.

He got 57% of the White Vote, 28% of the Hispanic vote and 8% of the black vote... just like Romney got (58, 27 and 6, respectively). He really didn't move the needle on how people voted, as he got 46% of the total vote compared to 47% that Romney got.

Where Hillary lost ground, and I'm sorry I have to keep explaining this to you, is with third party voters. The 1% of the electorate the voted for the Green Party was not voting for more homophobia, they were voting for more socialism.

The people who voted for the Libertarian Party did so because they could protest the two awful candidates the main parties ran.

Meanwhile, Evan McCullough, who was supposed to be the protest vote for Conservatives who realized Trump was a fraud fizzled.

At the end of the day, Hillary was a corrupt, unlikeable candidate who most Democrats had no use for, and she still got 3 million more votes for Trump.
 
Wow, this is kind of sad. Sil the Homophobe started this thread two weeks ago and no one is paying attention. Okay, I'll play.


Again, I missed the point where this was even discussed during the election. Trump mostly stayed away from LGBT issues during the campaign, and so did Hillary. It just wasn't a factor.

So for the record, JoeB says that the mid-election 2016 mandate ordered by the head of the democratic party (Obama) forcing little girls in public schools to share their restrooms, locker rooms and showers with deranged boys "was a non-issue" because the MSM wasn't debating it and politicians wouldn't touch it either in their campaigns....

OK. Let's test your theory. Let's have another prominent democrat, say...a governor or group of them, announce that they too will order similar conditions in public showers etc. at pools and so forth. Shouldn't hurt votes any so let's put your theory to the test, OK? :popcorn:
 
So for the record, JoeB says that the mid-election 2016 mandate ordered by the head of the democratic party (Obama) forcing little girls in public schools to share their restrooms, locker rooms and showers with deranged boys "was a non-issue" because the MSM wasn't debating it and politicians wouldn't touch it either in their campaigns....

Okay, guy, you are the only one getting all upset about this... nobody else was.
 
So for the record, JoeB says that the mid-election 2016 mandate ordered by the head of the democratic party (Obama) forcing little girls in public schools to share their restrooms, locker rooms and showers with deranged boys "was a non-issue" because the MSM wasn't debating it and politicians wouldn't touch it either in their campaigns....

Okay, guy, you are the only one getting all upset about this... nobody else was.
So then we try my experiment to see if you're right....OK? :popcorn:

(For the record JoeB asserts that I am the ONLY person in the US who was bothered by Obama's mandate to let deranged boys use girls bathrooms, locker rooms and showers in public schools mid-election 2016)

States push back on transgender bathroom use
May 13, 2016
RALEIGH, N.C. -- Politicians in Texas, Arkansas and elsewhere vowed defiance -- and other conservative states could follow suit -- after the Obama administration told public schools across the U.S. on Friday to let transgender students use the bathrooms and locker rooms that match their gender identity....Already, officials from eight states -- West Virginia, Arizona, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, Maine and North Carolina -- signed on to a brief in recent days asking a federal appeals court to re-hear a case in which it sided with a Virginia transgender student seeking to use the boys' bathroom.

So other than the vocal states of West Virginia, Arizona, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, Main & North Carolina (and all the purple states where being privately more conservative but not vocally so is the norm), I am the only person in the US who objected to this insane left platform....according to JoeB....

There's a reason Hillary attacked Robby Mook when she learned she'd just lost to Trump.
 
Last edited:
So for the record, JoeB says that the mid-election 2016 mandate ordered by the head of the democratic party (Obama) forcing little girls in public schools to share their restrooms, locker rooms and showers with deranged boys "was a non-issue" because the MSM wasn't debating it and politicians wouldn't touch it either in their campaigns....

Okay, guy, you are the only one getting all upset about this... nobody else was.

Bullshit.
 
This was a very informative thread.

And, as we discussed elsewhere...it is why the centrist democrats have a huge issue.

We should give Robby the game ball....sounds like he saved us from Hillary !!!!!
 
No doubt, Hellary is the reason we have the Orange Turd, but your obsession with 'little girls and restrooms' is rather disturbing, Sil. Get some help before you do something you will regret.
 
So then we try my experiment to see if you're right....OK? :popcorn:

(For the record JoeB asserts that I am the ONLY person in the US who was bothered by Obama's mandate to let deranged boys use girls bathrooms, locker rooms and showers in public schools mid-election 2016)

I'm sure the states in Jesusland were upset, but they'd still have colored water fountains if left to their own devices.... that's why you don't leave them to their own devices.

There's a reason Hillary attacked Robby Mook when she learned she'd just lost to Trump.

Because she needed to blame someone for her own incompetence?

No one caused Hillary to lose except for Hillary. No one voted for Hillary, they voted against Trump. Also, the same party retaining the WH for three terms straight is unusual.Only happened once since 1950.

But do pretend that the rest of the country shares your bizarre obsessions with trannies.
 
Put your money where your mouth is ^^. Go to purple states late September & have a democrat tell them their public women- only communal showers & dressing rooms now have to be shared with deranged men. Should not see any losses in votes according to you
 
Put your money where your mouth is ^^. Go to purple states late September & have a democrat tell them their public women- only communal showers & dressing rooms now have to be shared with deranged men. Should not see any losses in votes according to you

Oh, Sil, people aren't going to care about that in November...

The kind of people who care about that were never votign Democratic to start with. They are the kind of tools who keep voting for lower wages and less rights at work because they don't want the homos to get their children.
 

Forum List

Back
Top