Ladies, we're getting off the track here.
You could fill books with decisions of the United States Supreme Court, purportedly "interpreting" the Constitution, where the Constitution is either silent on the issue, or says the opposite of what the Court declared. In fact, if you track the number of pages in the majority decision, the longer the opinion is, the more likely that that opinion turns the Constitution upside down.
Start with the First Amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion..." What it says and means is, "The U.S. won't have a national religion like England does." There is no "wall of separation between Church and State," or anything like it. This "wall" is a pure myth, copied out of a bit of personal correspondence and etched in stone as though it were ABOVE the actual words of the Constitution in importance.
When the First Amendment was written, the Founding Fathers started each session with a prayer, and many of the state constitutions overtly mentioned god. Hell, the Declaration of Independence tells us that God is the source of our basic rights. And yet the Court has interpreted this to mean that Government (and not just the Federal government) must be purged of any mention or thought of not only God and/or religion, but of anything having to do with God or religion (e.g., the Ten Commandments), despite the fact that 90% of our criminal laws are based in the Judeo/Christian ethic. In legal terms, this is "bullshit." Foisted on the American public by Liberal justices.
What about "affirmative action"? It is not only not mentioned in the Constitution or promoted in the Constitution, it is EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED by the "equal protection" clause of the 14th Amendment. And yet Liberal justices have forced this on the American public for generations now, without any Congressional or majority popular support EVER. Notice that even today, THERE IS NOT A SINGLE LAW in any State in the union (or in the United States Code) that requires affirmative action to promote the singling out of any racial or ethnic group for special treatment. Look at the word games they play even today with "diversity" and other such nonsense, so that Liberal college administrators can perpetuate this failed policy initiative that sprang from the minds of Liberals on the Supreme Court.
Liberals on the Supreme Court basically eliminated the death penalty for YEARS, simply because they didn't like it. They interpreted the expression "cruel and unusual punishment" to mean whatever they thought it ought to mean - ignoring the fact that, for example, when the 8th Amendment was ratified you could be executed for stealing a horse. It was only after the state legislatures spent years jumping through hoops to meet the Court's guidelines that the death penalty again became a reality.
There are dozens of other examples of Liberal initiatives being forced on the American public by Courts - in violation of their oaths to protect and defend the constitution and laws of the states they represent. And all this is done in the name of "interpreting" the documents.
Look at what the Massachusetts Supreme Court did with gay "marriage." They found in the Massachusetts Constitution a non-existent right of people to marry other people of the same gender. THEY MADE IT UP! And they did it in such a way that the Legislature was powerless to do anything about it for at least two years, during which time thousands of couples could be "married" under their perverse guidance.
Governor Romney (remember him?) CLEARLY had an obligation to go around the Court and refuse to abide by its decision, based on HIS obligation to govern according to the actual Massachusetts constitution, but he failed to do so.
Truly, the Judicial branch has been the tool of the Left to implement its agenda, because they have simply lacked the support of enough of the citizenry to get it done otherwise.
And it goes on even as we read this.
