The Judicial branch, the only way to promote the liberal agenda

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Judicial Branch is needed to keep the states under control when they trample on individual rights

what about the federal government?

The great preponderance of laws, policies, and measures offensive to the Constitution are passed by the states and local jurisdictions.

Proposition 8 and the pending Texas law intended to violate citizens’ privacy rights are proof of that.

From Brown v. Board of Education in the early 50s to Hollingsworth v. Perry this year, citizens have used the courts to seek relief from state and local laws enacted to violate their civil liberties.

 

[mmmjvpssm]

As well as taking away the will of the people

You do know we have a conservative court right?

 

[Contumacious]

As well as taking away the will of the people

You do know we have a conservative court right?

We have a state supremacist court.

.

 

[JRK]

As well as taking away the will of the people

You do know we have a conservative court right?

Kennedy is not a conservative
You know that right?
GHWB was no a conservative
GWB
was not either, more of a blue dog democrat

 

[JoeB131]

As well as taking away the will of the people

You do know we have a conservative court right?

Kennedy is not a conservative
You know that right?
GHWB was no a conservative
GWB
was not either, more of a blue dog democrat

Ah, the No True Scotsman Fallacy.

Here's the thing. Reagan wasn't a conservative by your measurements.

At least the real Reagan, the one who gave amnesty to illegals, appointed moderates to SCOTUS, raised taxes after he cut them, comprimised with Democrats, and so on.

 

[Seawytch]

As well as taking away the will of the people

You do know we have a conservative court right?

Kennedy is not a conservative
You know that right?
GHWB was no a conservative
GWB
was not either, more of a blue dog democrat

That depends upon your starting point. For most people, they are considered conservatives...it's just the faaaaaarrrrr right that thinks they aren't. They're no different than the liberals that conflate Barack Obama with George Bush.

 

[NYcarbineer]

As well as taking away the will of the people

You do know we have a conservative court right?

We have a state supremacist court.

.

Which is what we are supposed to have. When a legislature at any level in this country passes a law that violates the Constitution,

you need a judicial body with the power and authority to strike that law down.

Without it, your rights would be subject to whatever were the whims of local, state, and federal lawmakers.

Want to see gun rights disappear little by little? Take away the power the Supreme Court to defend the 2nd Amendment.

 

[JRK]

You do know we have a conservative court right?

We have a state supremacist court.

.

Which is what we are supposed to have. When a legislature at any level in this country passes a law that violates the Constitution,

you need a judicial body with the power and authority to strike that law down.

Without it, your rights would be subject to whatever were the whims of local, state, and federal lawmakers.

Want to see gun rights disappear little by little? Take away the power the Supreme Court to defend the 2nd Amendment.

You really think the US would allow any court to take way there right to bear arms?
seems to me congress just showed what the will of the people thinks about that matter
that event would end that parties rein for ever
The supreme court today is a liberal court
every major choice they have made went with the Obama agenda
And there is nothing in the constitution that states 2 men have a right to become husband and wife
There is no0thing in the constitution that states the will of the people in California means nothing
There is nothing in the constitution that states I must go and buy a 9MM (whats the diff with that and health ins.?)
BTW which on is the wife?

 

[JoeB131]

[

You really think the US would allow any court to take way there right to bear arms?
seems to me congress just showed what the will of the people thinks about that matter
that event would end that parties rein for ever
The supreme court today is a liberal court
every major choice they have made went with the Obama agenda
And there is nothing in the constitution that states 2 men have a right to become husband and wife
There is no0thing in the constitution that states the will of the people in California means nothing
There is nothing in the constitution that states I must go and buy a 9MM (whats the diff with that and health ins.?)
BTW which on is the wife?

Actually, guy, less and less households have guns in them, and frankly, you are scaring the children.

So, yeah, I think that you will see the stupidity of the NRA end soon enough.

Long before that, gays will be allowed to married and homophobes will be looked at funny.

 

[JakeStarkey]

 

[Seawytch]

We have a state supremacist court.

.

Which is what we are supposed to have. When a legislature at any level in this country passes a law that violates the Constitution,

you need a judicial body with the power and authority to strike that law down.

Without it, your rights would be subject to whatever were the whims of local, state, and federal lawmakers.

Want to see gun rights disappear little by little? Take away the power the Supreme Court to defend the 2nd Amendment.

You really think the US would allow any court to take way there right to bear arms?

That's the point. If a state like CA were to pass a sweeping anti gun law, you'd expect that to be taken to court, wouldn't you? Wouldn't you want it to be challenged? Of course, that woulndn't be "judicial activism" then in your mind would it?

seems to me congress just showed what the will of the people thinks about that matter

Like they did with the Voting Rights Act? That was passed unanimously in Congress and still the SCOTUS struck it down. Does "Heller" ring any bells for you at all?

that event would end that parties rein for ever
The supreme court today is a liberal court
every major choice they have made went with the Obama agenda

Really? The Voting Rights Act? Citizens United? Come on, think before you type, seriously.

If anything, the current majority in the court is corporate.

And there is nothing in the constitution that states 2 men have a right to become husband and wife
There is no0thing in the constitution that states the will of the people in California means nothing
There is nothing in the constitution that states I must go and buy a 9MM (whats the diff with that and health ins.?)

You do understand that not all your rights are enumerated in the Constitution don't you? Where in the Constitution does it say you have a right to interstate travel? Procreation? Look up the term "fundamental rights".

BTW which on is the wife?

Should we ask your spouse that question?

 

[JRK]

Which is what we are supposed to have. When a legislature at any level in this country passes a law that violates the Constitution,

you need a judicial body with the power and authority to strike that law down.

Without it, your rights would be subject to whatever were the whims of local, state, and federal lawmakers.

Want to see gun rights disappear little by little? Take away the power the Supreme Court to defend the 2nd Amendment.

You really think the US would allow any court to take way there right to bear arms?

That's the point. If a state like CA were to pass a sweeping anti gun law, you'd expect that to be taken to court, wouldn't you? Wouldn't you want it to be challenged? Of course, that woulndn't be "judicial activism" then in your mind would it?


Like they did with the Voting Rights Act? That was passed unanimously in Congress and still the SCOTUS struck it down. Does "Heller" ring any bells for you at all?




Really? The Voting Rights Act? Citizens United? Come on, think before you type, seriously.

If anything, the current majority in the court is corporate.

And there is nothing in the constitution that states 2 men have a right to become husband and wife
There is no0thing in the constitution that states the will of the people in California means nothing
There is nothing in the constitution that states I must go and buy a 9MM (whats the diff with that and health ins.?)

You do understand that not all your rights are enumerated in the Constitution don't you? Where in the Constitution does it say you have a right to interstate travel? Procreation? Look up the term "fundamental rights".

BTW which on is the wife?

Should we ask your spouse that question?

I agree until the will of the people state other
they have in many states to include California
If there was specific talk to 2 mene having the right to marry or should I say to be treated as equals as the minorities are protected, then so be it

The voting rights act? went left
sweeping gun mandates in a blue state is not the same as a federal mandate in 50 states
this is why the left will not touch it in congress
just proved the same, again