daws101
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,421
since he's dead, he can take the credit.By the way, the driver of the Presidential limo died in 1985.
So ... it matters so much now because ... ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
since he's dead, he can take the credit.By the way, the driver of the Presidential limo died in 1985.
So ... it matters so much now because ... ?




Grassy knoll vs. Greer and logic always wins.
Grassy knoll vs. Greer and logic always wins.
Logic, you say.
Okay Copernicus, what sort of handgun is going to deliver that sort of energy?
What was Greer using, a .50 caliber Desert Eagle?
Please, see a doctor.
Yet Abraham Zapruder, a dressmaker and amateur photographer was able to 'shoot' the only comprehensive video of the assassination from the 'grassy knoll' without any problem. You know, the video you are able to compare the President's reaction to his wounds and shows clearly that Connolly is not yet hit.
So, what's your point?
I sincerely hope that you are not comparing the skill required for making an eight mm camera shot of a motorcade to that of making a sniper head shot on a target moving diagonally across field with any number of spectators blocking (including some guy with a Super 8 camera) and then making your exit without being apprehended.
Please, tell me you're not.
You are wrong. HERE is the view of Elm Street from the grassy knoll
![]()
The President's limousine would NOT be passing diagonally across. It would be approaching at an angle in between head on and diagonally. The President's limousine was traveling at about 10 mph. Not anywhere near highway speeds.
Also, the area behind the picket fence is railroad property. There are tracks and an employee parking lot.
There is more than one witness who saw men behind the picket fence. Here is Ed Hoffman, a deaf mute who was there that day.
Fast forward one minute to hear what Hoffman saw.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veVqYo9I5gg]What they saw Ed Hoffman - YouTube[/ame]
Here is Lee Bowers, a railroad supervisor who was in a tower where could see behind the picket fence.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_wP-kCdQPE]JFK - The Death of Eyewitness Lee Bowers - YouTube[/ame]
Closeup photo of the Grassy Knoll
![]()
Grassy knoll vs. Greer and logic always wins.
Logic, you say.
Okay Copernicus, what sort of handgun is going to deliver that sort of energy?
What was Greer using, a .50 caliber Desert Eagle?
Please, see a doctor.
Your point is moot for several reasons; Here are two. Both of Greer's hands were off the wheel 3.5 seconds before the fake hand appears to come off the wheel. During those seconds he placed the gun in his left hand and never placed it back on the wheel which is proven by his left arm crossing his right shoulder in the nix film. You simply ignore the pink elephant in the room and continue on with your nonsense.
I started this around frame 238 or so. 241 is where both hands are close together before he passes the gun.
![]()
Zapruder Frames - Costella Combined Edit
Cover-ups rarely make sense and that's why they are so easily exposed as such. The fake hand was created as a reason to say Greer could NOT have shot jfk because his hand was below the seat. The truth is coming out and going forward. Millions of people in this world are going to see exactly who shot jfk and exactly how he did it. You're using the fake evidence that proves Greer could not have done it and promoting that impossible shot..
![]()
My work has proven Greer was the fatal assassin but the 'Greer did it by accident' defense is the only possibility in the real world that would surely fail for many reasons.

Your point is moot for several reasons; Here are two. Both of Greer's hands were off the wheel 3.5 seconds before the fake hand appears to come off the wheel. During those seconds he placed the gun in his left hand and never placed it back on the wheel which is proven by his left arm crossing his right shoulder in the nix film. You simply ignore the pink elephant in the room and continue on with your nonsense.
the trolls that say oswald was the lone assassin cant get around the ed hoffman or lee bowers story nor can they get around i think his name was arnorld rowland,the experienced combat officer who said a guy posing as a secret service agent told him to leave the area when he was trying to film JFK behind the fence and ordered out and then after the assassination,this experienced combat officer from ww2 said he knew from experience shots were coming from over his shoulder behind the fence so like Bill Newman who ducked and covered his kids saying he heard shots form behind him,also ducked and hit the ground.arnold then said the agent pointed a gun at him and insisted he turn it over to him.
the trolls that say oswald was the lone assassin cant get around the ed hoffman or lee bowers story nor can they get around i think his name was arnorld rowland,the experienced combat officer who said a guy posing as a secret service agent told him to leave the area when he was trying to film JFK behind the fence and ordered out and then after the assassination,this experienced combat officer from ww2 said he knew from experience shots were coming from over his shoulder behind the fence so like Bill Newman who ducked and covered his kids saying he heard shots form behind him,also ducked and hit the ground.arnold then said the agent pointed a gun at him and insisted he turn it over to him.
The problem with Ed Hoffman is that he keeps embellishing his story and appears to have made a cottage industry as a "witness" to the assassination.
Ed Hoffman -- Telltale Changes in His Story
The problem with Lee Bowers is that he really did not see anything of value. "A flash of light or some kind of disturbance" does not tell us much. For all we know, he caught sight of the reflection off the side-view mirror of a car as someone slammed the door. Fact is, he was too far away to make a detailed observation of the actions of two people standing by the stockade fence.
While it is possible that a shot came from the grassy knoll, it is difficult to believe that any any trained sniper would have chosen such a postion. It is far too exposed and far too awkward and unreliable for an assignment of this magnitude. The fact of the matter is that there were far better locations to nest a sniper in Dealey Plaza, not the least of which was the Dal-Tex building.
Your point is moot for several reasons; Here are two. Both of Greer's hands were off the wheel 3.5 seconds before the fake hand appears to come off the wheel. During those seconds he placed the gun in his left hand and never placed it back on the wheel which is proven by his left arm crossing his right shoulder in the nix film. You simply ignore the pink elephant in the room and continue on with your nonsense.
No, it is YOU who are conveniently ignoring the glaringly obvious fact that the head shot DID NOT and COULD NOT have come from a handgun. The kinetic energy demonstrated by the Zapruder film is clearly from a high powered weapon. What is more, the mass of energy cones outward from the front of the head demonstrating that the momentum of energy moved from the rear occipital region of the cranium toward the frontal region of the crannium. In other words, JFK was hit in the back of the head, not the front.
Now, kindly do us all a favor and desist with spamming up the boards with more reruns of your thoroughly idiotic theory until you can somehow demonstrate that Greer was in possession of a handgun that could fire high-powered rounds and that he was somehow able to shoot JFK in the back of the head with it.
