The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[daws101]

it's ridicules .....but entertaining to watch these ass clowns at work!

Ass pirates is probably more accurate.

Hey look, it's CANDY DICK. Fuckin' fags.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

four farts in a row from daws.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

thats ******* hilarious!

Exactly! No reflection in history has recoiled and separated from a head, except in the altered Zapruder film.

excellent point seven.I never noticed that before till now.so much for the fairy tales from the lone gunman theorists that thats the sunlight reflection from his head.

 

[Obamerican]

4 indisputable facts:

1. Kennedy is dead.
2. Oswald shot him.
3. 7foreskin loves to see his own posts no matter how repetitive.
4. Rimjob is a little **********.

 

[7forever]

4 indisputable facts:

1. Kennedy is dead.
2. Oswald shot him.
3. 7foreskin loves to see his own posts no matter how repetitive.
4. Rimjob is a little **********.

4 indisputable facts:

1. Kennedy is dead.
2. Greer shot him.
3. Obama is the worst President in United States history.
4. Obamerican is a little ********** and a retard.

 

[7forever]

Fake red mist? What color is real head mist from a real gunshot?

Fake red mist. I know, how silly. What color is real head mist from a real gunshot? Show us one besides jfk.LOL Another silly bunch of board trolls.

Clear bullet smoke on face, no fake mist.

Clear bullet smoke on rear, no fake mist.

Clear bullet smoke on right front in all three jfk films, confirming Greer's entry on right forehead.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. Okay kids, now, I want you to say openly that you believe that the image where it looks like a gun that recoils, toward the drivers seat "Is A Gun"
2. SAY IT!



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[daws101]

Fake red mist? What color is real head mist from a real gunshot?

Fake red mist. I know, how silly. What color is real head mist from a real gunshot? Show us one besides jfk.LOL Another silly bunch of board trolls.

Clear bullet smoke on face, no fake mist.

Clear bullet smoke on rear, no fake mist.

Clear bullet smoke on right front in all three jfk films, confirming Greer's entry on right forehead.

 

[7forever]

It took almost 47 years to prove Greer was jfk's real assassin. We know now the only one important thing Greer kept secret.

V. Palamara: Notes on Bill Greer
Greer retired in July 1966 after having undergone a stomach operation and Jackie Kennedy sent him a letter thanking him for being with the President until the end.
He said he "saw blood on Connally's shirt" and looked back only "one time", in direct contrast to the Zapruder film. He went on to say that he "didn't really see the President at all".
Said the Zapruder film "was proven legitimate".
Claimed to have not seen anyone on the triple overpass.
Regarding the assassination itself, Greer claimed that "we never stopped...there was no reason to stop...no need to stop." In regard to the direction of the shots, he said that "everyone was hit from the rear...my back was covered with it [debris from head shot]." When told that Connally has always insisted that he was hit with a different bullet than had hit JFK, Greer said "I feel that way, too. They [the Warren Commission] had lawyers working on it...these lawyers had already made up their mind". Greer also believed that the back wound [which he referred to as being in the "back of the shoulder"] did not go through and that that was also the first thought of the autopsy doctors in attendance.
Greer claimed he was "in the OPERATING ROOM at Parkland" [emphasis added] and stated that JFK's clothing "were in my custody from Parkland to Washington."
Greer denied that there was a hole in the limousine's windshield. He said there was only a "star"; a spidering crack.
Greer did not know why the photographers were out of their usual position in front of and close to JFK's limousine that fateful day in Dallas, but did not seem to regard this as suspicious.
Regarding agent Roy Kellerman, Greer said twice that he was "a very fine gentleman." Regarding President Kennedy, Greer said "He and I were pretty close friends. He treated me just wonderful."
Regarding William Manchester and his book "Death of a President", Greer said harshly "He's garbage...didn't like it at all", further commenting on Manchester's criticism concerning his age and reflexes behind the wheel [Greer thought that his experience was an advantage, coming from "years of experience" , and certainly not a disadvantage]. He went on to say that he thought that Jim Bishop's book ("The Day Kennedy Was Shot") was the best book of all regarding the events of November 22, 1963. (However, keep in mind that his comments were made in 1970)
Greer said, somewhat cryptically, "there's alot of things I know that no one else knows." (!)

Finally, Greer said that the Warren Commission closed up shop too soon and that "there might have been a conspiracy in another part of the country." [!!!]

 

[7forever]

And it did happen because you say so.
You telling the truth - How about you telling what you want us to believe to be the truth. 47 years later, when does your book come out, and if Greer is still alive when is he going to trial.
________________
"FIRE IN THE HOLE"

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

 

[daws101]

And it did happen because you say so.
You telling the truth - How about you telling what you want us to believe to be the truth. 47 years later, when does your book come out, and if Greer is still alive when is he going to trial.
________________
"FIRE IN THE HOLE"

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

make that fantasy from all directions...if this case is silly why are you wasting sooo much time on it.
when you could be doing something really valuable like say explaing gov Connelly's wounds ....

 

[Rationalist1016]

And it did happen because you say so.
You telling the truth - How about you telling what you want us to believe to be the truth. 47 years later, when does your book come out, and if Greer is still alive when is he going to trial.
________________
"FIRE IN THE HOLE"

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

REALLY!?
Then how come when you are shown VISUAL PROOF that refutes your "silly case", you claim..............Oh, THAT visual proof,................that's fake!!

 

[7forever]

And it did happen because you say so.
You telling the truth - How about you telling what you want us to believe to be the truth. 47 years later, when does your book come out, and if Greer is still alive when is he going to trial.
________________
"FIRE IN THE HOLE"

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

REALLY!?
Then how come when you are shown VISUAL PROOF that refutes your "silly case", you claim..............Oh, THAT visual proof,................that's fake!!

What have you refuted? Greer passed the gun in Z and his left arm crosses in nix and muchmore...that's it. You can only deny and ignore those visual facts.

 

[7forever]

And it did happen because you say so.
You telling the truth - How about you telling what you want us to believe to be the truth. 47 years later, when does your book come out, and if Greer is still alive when is he going to trial.
________________
"FIRE IN THE HOLE"

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

make that fantasy from all directions...if this case is silly why are you wasting sooo much time on it.
when you could be doing something really valuable like say explaing gov Connelly's wounds ....

It's silly because Greer's guilt has always been obvious and the researchers ignoring his guilt makes it ridiculous.

 

[Liability]

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

REALLY!?
Then how come when you are shown VISUAL PROOF that refutes your "silly case", you claim..............Oh, THAT visual proof,................that's fake!!

What have you refuted? Greer passed the gun in Z and his left arm crosses in nix and muchmore...that's it. You can only deny and ignore those visual facts.

They aren't visual facts. They don't even SEEM to appear on the tapes.

You are just a lying dumbshit.

 

[daws101]

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

make that fantasy from all directions...if this case is silly why are you wasting sooo much time on it.
when you could be doing something really valuable like say explaing gov Connelly's wounds ....

It's silly because Greer's guilt has always been obvious and the researchers ignoring his guilt makes it ridiculous.

nice dodge ! what was that about explaining Connelly's wounds again? you know the ones that came from behind?

 

[Obamerican]

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

make that fantasy from all directions...if this case is silly why are you wasting sooo much time on it.
when you could be doing something really valuable like say explaing gov Connelly's wounds ....

It's silly because Greer's guilt has always been obvious and the researchers ignoring his guilt makes it ridiculous.

You were asked about Connelly's wounds.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. I get it now, I see it was the driver, I am convinced Greer actually did it.
2. It took a while, but I can see it now.
3. Yeah that bastard!
4. NOT!!!!!!!!!



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[7forever]

REALLY!?
Then how come when you are shown VISUAL PROOF that refutes your "silly case", you claim..............Oh, THAT visual proof,................that's fake!!

What have you refuted? Greer passed the gun in Z and his left arm crosses in nix and muchmore...that's it. You can only deny and ignore those visual facts.

They aren't visual facts. They don't even SEEM to appear on the tapes.

You are just a lying dumbshit.

They are visual facts. Your brain doesn't appear to exist.

You are just a lying dumbshit.

 

[Rationalist1016]

I provided evidence from all directions, most importantly Greer's arm crossing. Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof, except maybe suggesting he fired by accident. I've researched this silly case for only two years.

REALLY!?
Then how come when you are shown VISUAL PROOF that refutes your "silly case", you claim..............Oh, THAT visual proof,................that's fake!!

What have you refuted? Greer passed the gun in Z and his left arm crosses in nix and muchmore...that's it. You can only deny and ignore those visual facts.

"I" haven't refuted anything. The VISUAL PROOF has done all the refuting.

"You" are the one that said "Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof".
The visual proof is that there is NO GUN in any of the films of the assassination.

So, since there is no gun in any video (or photo) and since "Nothing can be done in defense of visual proof", then Greer is out as a shooter. It's pretty hard to shoot someone without a gun!!