The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[Faun]

someone farted in here.^

Way to throw in the towel.

 

[7forever]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

 

[Soupnazi630]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

Already discussed.

He was not credible in his statements.

He does not dispute the autopsy report

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

 

[daws101]

he never say's that :
Mr. SPECTER. You say that it appeared that she was reaching as if something was coming over to the rear portion of the car, back in the area where you were coming to?
Mr. HILL. Yes, sir.
Mr. SPECTER. Was there anything back there that you observed, that she might have been reaching for?
Mr. HILL. I thought I saw something come off the back, too, but I cannot say that there was. I do know that the next day we found the portion of the President's head.
Mr. SPECTER. Where did you find that portion of the President's head?
Mr. HILL. It was found in the street. It was turned in, I believe, by a medical student or somebody in Dallas.


Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
again you are making shit up!

Clint Hill said just that in recent years. He proves that you're a pathetic lying loser. He's simply saying that one bullet entered low and blew out the area just above that. That's impossible. This fake wound path is a correct interpretation of the Autopsy Report.

Boswell submitted a diagram in 1996 to the ARRB depicting this fiction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73cwa7T7yKE

"It entered the right rear of the head . . . and exited the upper right rear quadrant of the skull.

But it was so explosive that it caused an eruption of material, and that material came over myself, the rear of the car, Mrs. Kennedy," Hill recalled.

"I got up on the back of the car. She didn't know I was there, but I got my hands on her and I put her in the back seat, and when I did that, the president's body fell farther to its left with his head in her lap, and then I could see his eyes were fixed, I could see the hole in the upper right rear of the skull. None of the brain matter in that area was still there. It was all destroyed."

Ex-Secret Service Agent Hill: Oswald Was Lone Gunman

"The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see into the skull, there was a hole in the skull. And you could see that part of the brain was gone. It wasn't even there."

gee I guess you can't see the note on the diagram that say's entry wound ?

There was a large hole on the rear as is proven by frame 313, the eyewitnesses and the AR. No such entrance wound existed. There is no proof, therefore it was made up.

Wrong you liar.

The autopsy report proves that wound was an ENTRANCE wound and none of your retarded crap proves otherwise

If an entrance wound was indeed found in the back of the skull it certainly wasn't photographed, therefore you only have the words of the AR and NO corroborating evidence.

All of the witnesses I posted refer to a large gaping hole in the right rear. No small entry hole was where it they said it was.

The entrance wound in the back of the skull is consistent with nothing because it didn't exist.

Your insistence that a bullet entered the rear is false and is backed by no evidence whatsoever.

Bullshit.

 

[daws101]

You damned sure did misrepresent what the witnesses said.

Not one of them stated an exit wound as you claim/stated they did

Does that mean you can prove that a single bullet entered and exited the rear? That's what Clint Hill was saying. The burden of proving such stupidity is on you. He saw the rear blow out.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

In his memoir, Mrs Kennedy And Me, Mr Hill said of the final shot: 'The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting a melon shattering into cement

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

As he moved towards Mrs Kennedy, he watched her reaction: 'Her eyes were filled with terror,' he wrote. 'She was reaching for something. She was reaching for a piece of the President's head.'

No that is not what Hill was saying you are lying and distorting what he said.

He did not see an exit wound he saw a wound and did not describe it in any other way.

He saw back the back of jfk's blow off, you piece of shit. That the was the exit wound, ON THE REAR.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

He never said he saw the back of the head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was not an exit wound.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

He saw the back of jfk's head blow off, you piece of WORTHLESS SHIT. That was the exit wound ON THE RIGHT REAR. You're a fun joke.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

More intenional misrepresentation.

 

[7forever]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

Already discussed.

He was not credible in his statements.

He does not dispute the autopsy report

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

 

[7forever]

He saw back the back of jfk's blow off, you piece of shit. That the was the exit wound, ON THE REAR.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

He never said he saw the back of the head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was not an exit wound.

Clint Hill saw the back of jfk's head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was definitely an exit wound.

No it is you lying about what he said.

Seeing the back of the head wounded does not mean an exit wound and he did not say exit wound.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind and HIll said nothing to contradict that finding

Seeing the back of the head blow out definitely means an exit wound. You are a piece of garbage.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

In his memoir, Mrs Kennedy And Me, Mr Hill said of the final shot: 'The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting a melon shattering into cement

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

As he moved towards Mrs Kennedy, he watched her reaction: 'Her eyes were filled with terror,' he wrote. 'She was reaching for something. She was reaching for a piece of the President's head.'

Seeing the back of the head with a gaping wound proves only a wound it does not prove an entrance wound.

Whipped you with facts again boy

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

 

[Soupnazi630]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

Already discussed.

He was not credible in his statements.

He does not dispute the autopsy report

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

Yes they do have to be am expert to perform an autopsy and to then determine where the bullet entered.

A wound is just a wound otherwise

 

[Soupnazi630]

He never said he saw the back of the head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was not an exit wound.

Clint Hill saw the back of jfk's head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was definitely an exit wound.

No it is you lying about what he said.

Seeing the back of the head wounded does not mean an exit wound and he did not say exit wound.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind and HIll said nothing to contradict that finding

Seeing the back of the head blow out definitely means an exit wound. You are a piece of garbage.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

In his memoir, Mrs Kennedy And Me, Mr Hill said of the final shot: 'The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting a melon shattering into cement

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

As he moved towards Mrs Kennedy, he watched her reaction: 'Her eyes were filled with terror,' he wrote. 'She was reaching for something. She was reaching for a piece of the President's head.'

Seeing the back of the head with a gaping wound proves only a wound it does not prove an entrance wound.

Whipped you with facts again boy

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

 

[7forever]

Clint Hill saw the back of jfk's head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was definitely an exit wound.

No it is you lying about what he said.

Seeing the back of the head wounded does not mean an exit wound and he did not say exit wound.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind and HIll said nothing to contradict that finding

Seeing the back of the head blow out definitely means an exit wound. You are a piece of garbage.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

In his memoir, Mrs Kennedy And Me, Mr Hill said of the final shot: 'The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting a melon shattering into cement

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

As he moved towards Mrs Kennedy, he watched her reaction: 'Her eyes were filled with terror,' he wrote. 'She was reaching for something. She was reaching for a piece of the President's head.'

Seeing the back of the head with a gaping wound proves only a wound it does not prove an entrance wound.

Whipped you with facts again boy

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

Go ahead and prove it. It typically bursts out the exit location. In this case it's in the right rear.

 

[7forever]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

Already discussed.

He was not credible in his statements.

He does not dispute the autopsy report

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

Yes they do have to be am expert to perform an autopsy and to then determine where the bullet entered.

A wound is just a wound otherwise

An exit wound is typically large and irregular. Nothing different happened in this case, except maybe how massive it was.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is you lying about what he said.

Seeing the back of the head wounded does not mean an exit wound and he did not say exit wound.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind and HIll said nothing to contradict that finding

Seeing the back of the head blow out definitely means an exit wound. You are a piece of garbage.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

In his memoir, Mrs Kennedy And Me, Mr Hill said of the final shot: 'The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting a melon shattering into cement

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

As he moved towards Mrs Kennedy, he watched her reaction: 'Her eyes were filled with terror,' he wrote. 'She was reaching for something. She was reaching for a piece of the President's head.'

Seeing the back of the head with a gaping wound proves only a wound it does not prove an entrance wound.

Whipped you with facts again boy

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

Go ahead and prove it. It typically bursts out the exit location. In this case it's in the right rear.

Been done many times

 

[Soupnazi630]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

Already discussed.

He was not credible in his statements.

He does not dispute the autopsy report

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

Yes they do have to be am expert to perform an autopsy and to then determine where the bullet entered.

A wound is just a wound otherwise

An exit wound is typically large and irregular. Nothing different happened in this case, except maybe how massive it was.

Any bullet wound to the head typically leaves a jagged irregular mess .

Once again the autopsy report proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

That fact kills your argument

 

[7forever]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

Already discussed.

He was not credible in his statements.

He does not dispute the autopsy report

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

Yes they do have to be am expert to perform an autopsy and to then determine where the bullet entered.

A wound is just a wound otherwise

An exit wound is typically large and irregular. Nothing different happened in this case, except maybe how massive it was.

Any bullet wound to the head typically leaves a jagged irregular mess .

Once again the autopsy report proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

That fact kills your argument

An exit wound is described as follows: Your debunked delusions have no entry or exit wound defined by any facts. Most exit wounds of the head will typically leave a jagged irregular mess. The right rear exit on jfk's head was no exception.

Exit Wounds

Exit wounds - as we have already mentioned - are usually larger than the entrance wound and this is because as the round moves through the body of the victim it slows down and explodes within the tissue and surrounding muscle. This slowing down of the projectile means that as it reaches the end of its trajectory it has to force harder to push through. This equates to the exit wound normally looking larger and considerably more destructive than its pre-cursor - the entrance wound.

Exit wounds will often bleed profusely as they are larger but entrance wounds can sometimes look only like small holes - unless the weapon is fired at close proximity to the victim.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

 

[Soupnazi630]

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

Yes they do have to be am expert to perform an autopsy and to then determine where the bullet entered.

A wound is just a wound otherwise

An exit wound is typically large and irregular. Nothing different happened in this case, except maybe how massive it was.

Any bullet wound to the head typically leaves a jagged irregular mess .

Once again the autopsy report proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

That fact kills your argument

An exit wound is described as follows: Your debunked delusions have no entry or exit wound defined by any facts. Most exit wounds of the head will typically leave a jagged irregular mess. The right rear exit on jfk's head was no exception.

Exit Wounds

Exit wounds - as we have already mentioned - are usually larger than the entrance wound and this is because as the round moves through the body of the victim it slows down and explodes within the tissue and surrounding muscle. This slowing down of the projectile means that as it reaches the end of its trajectory it has to force harder to push through. This equates to the exit wound normally looking larger and considerably more destructive than its pre-cursor - the entrance wound.

Exit wounds will often bleed profusely as they are larger but entrance wounds can sometimes look only like small holes - unless the weapon is fired at close proximity to the victim.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

Your explanations describe exit sounds in general. Not speak specifically to the head.

The bullet entered the skull from above and behind which the AR proves.

 

[7forever]

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

Yes they do have to be am expert to perform an autopsy and to then determine where the bullet entered.

A wound is just a wound otherwise

An exit wound is typically large and irregular. Nothing different happened in this case, except maybe how massive it was.

Any bullet wound to the head typically leaves a jagged irregular mess .

Once again the autopsy report proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

That fact kills your argument

An exit wound is described as follows: Your debunked delusions have no entry or exit wound defined by any facts. Most exit wounds of the head will typically leave a jagged irregular mess. The right rear exit on jfk's head was no exception.

Exit Wounds

Exit wounds - as we have already mentioned - are usually larger than the entrance wound and this is because as the round moves through the body of the victim it slows down and explodes within the tissue and surrounding muscle. This slowing down of the projectile means that as it reaches the end of its trajectory it has to force harder to push through. This equates to the exit wound normally looking larger and considerably more destructive than its pre-cursor - the entrance wound.

Exit wounds will often bleed profusely as they are larger but entrance wounds can sometimes look only like small holes - unless the weapon is fired at close proximity to the victim.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

Your explanations describe exit sounds in general. Not speak specifically to the head.

The bullet entered the skull from above and behind which the AR proves.

You haven't provided an explanation for a wound path because there isn't one that is possible for a rear entry. The bullet entered in the front and exited the right rear, which most of the evidence supports clearly.

 

[7forever]

I didn't misinterpret anything and you cannot provide one example of how I did. I used four types of evidence and only the x-rays do not match. Hill was more honest in recent years about the rear blowing off. That's a good thing.

-The AR
-Eyewitnesses
-All three films show destruction in the rear in some frames.

You damned sure did misrepresent what the witnesses said.

Not one of them stated an exit wound as you claim/stated they did

Does that mean you can prove that a single bullet entered and exited the rear? That's what Clint Hill was saying. The burden of proving such stupidity is on you. He saw the rear blow out.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

In his memoir, Mrs Kennedy And Me, Mr Hill said of the final shot: 'The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting a melon shattering into cement

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

As he moved towards Mrs Kennedy, he watched her reaction: 'Her eyes were filled with terror,' he wrote. 'She was reaching for something. She was reaching for a piece of the President's head.'

No that is not what Hill was saying you are lying and distorting what he said.

He did not see an exit wound he saw a wound and did not describe it in any other way.

He saw back the back of jfk's blow off, you piece of shit. That the was the exit wound, ON THE REAR.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

He never said he saw the back of the head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was not an exit wound.

A bullet could not have entered the rear and blown out the rear. In other words, the government's account included a major truth that was accompanied by a major lie, that a sniper from almost a football field behind the President fired the fatal headshot. Sam Kinney gave some of the best testimony ever retained. Thanks to Vince Palamara.

Kinney, the driver with the sunglasses in the follow-up car had a perfect view of the rear exploding. It's verified and proven. Clint Hill, the agent who got Jackie back in the limo stood next to Kinney.

SECRET SERVICE AGENT SAW JFK S HEAD BLOWN OUT IN THE BACK.. Causes

SECRET SERVICE AGENT SAW JFK'S HEAD BLOWN OUT IN THE BACK

DON'T MISS THIS STARTLING INTERVIEW OF SECRET SERVICE AGENT SAMUEL A. KINNEY, IN THE FOLLOW-UP CAR, WHO SAW JFK'S HEAD BLOWN OUT IN THE BACK.../5/94; 4/15/94 --THIS IS ONE OF VINCE PALAMARA'S EARLIEST AND BEST INTERVIEWS:

In regard to JFK's head wound, Kinney was explicit: "He
had no brain left- it was blown out...there was nothing left...it was)
the back of the head. I saw it (the shot) hit and I saw his hair come
out...I had brain matter all over my windshield and left arm, that's how
close we were to it...it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head". Asked to explain the 1500 gram brain at the autopsy, Sam seemed
perplexed, saying that "there was brain matter all over the place".
...Amazingly, when I told Kinney that there was a book- "High Treason"-
that alleged that "[SS agent] Emory Roberts ordered the men not to move", Sam said, "Exactly right"! ... I also attempted to get Kinney to go on the record in
writing, but I was too late: his widow Hazel informed me that Sam passed
away 7/21/97 while they were travelling through Iowa [letter to author
dated 11/20/97].

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes they do have to be am expert to perform an autopsy and to then determine where the bullet entered.

A wound is just a wound otherwise

An exit wound is typically large and irregular. Nothing different happened in this case, except maybe how massive it was.

Any bullet wound to the head typically leaves a jagged irregular mess .

Once again the autopsy report proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

That fact kills your argument

An exit wound is described as follows: Your debunked delusions have no entry or exit wound defined by any facts. Most exit wounds of the head will typically leave a jagged irregular mess. The right rear exit on jfk's head was no exception.

Exit Wounds

Exit wounds - as we have already mentioned - are usually larger than the entrance wound and this is because as the round moves through the body of the victim it slows down and explodes within the tissue and surrounding muscle. This slowing down of the projectile means that as it reaches the end of its trajectory it has to force harder to push through. This equates to the exit wound normally looking larger and considerably more destructive than its pre-cursor - the entrance wound.

Exit wounds will often bleed profusely as they are larger but entrance wounds can sometimes look only like small holes - unless the weapon is fired at close proximity to the victim.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

Your explanations describe exit sounds in general. Not speak specifically to the head.

The bullet entered the skull from above and behind which the AR proves.

You haven't provided an explanation for a wound path because there isn't one that is possible for a rear entry. The bullet entered in the front and exited the right rear, which most of the evidence supports clearly.

I do not have to provide it the AR does provide it.

It is not impossible it is quite logical and proven by all the physical evidence.

It is you who has no evidence

 

[Soupnazi630]

You damned sure did misrepresent what the witnesses said.

Not one of them stated an exit wound as you claim/stated they did

Does that mean you can prove that a single bullet entered and exited the rear? That's what Clint Hill was saying. The burden of proving such stupidity is on you. He saw the rear blow out.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

In his memoir, Mrs Kennedy And Me, Mr Hill said of the final shot: 'The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting a melon shattering into cement

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

As he moved towards Mrs Kennedy, he watched her reaction: 'Her eyes were filled with terror,' he wrote. 'She was reaching for something. She was reaching for a piece of the President's head.'

No that is not what Hill was saying you are lying and distorting what he said.

He did not see an exit wound he saw a wound and did not describe it in any other way.

He saw back the back of jfk's blow off, you piece of shit. That the was the exit wound, ON THE REAR.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

He never said he saw the back of the head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was not an exit wound.

A bullet could not have entered the rear and blown out the rear. In other words, the government's account included a major truth that was accompanied by a major lie, that a sniper from almost a football field behind the President fired the fatal headshot. Sam Kinney gave some of the best testimony ever retained. Thanks to Vince Palamara.

Kinney, the driver with the sunglasses in the follow-up car had a perfect view of the rear exploding. It's verified and proven. Clint Hill, the agent who got Jackie back in the limo stood next to Kinney.

SECRET SERVICE AGENT SAW JFK S HEAD BLOWN OUT IN THE BACK.. Causes

SECRET SERVICE AGENT SAW JFK'S HEAD BLOWN OUT IN THE BACK

DON'T MISS THIS STARTLING INTERVIEW OF SECRET SERVICE AGENT SAMUEL A. KINNEY, IN THE FOLLOW-UP CAR, WHO SAW JFK'S HEAD BLOWN OUT IN THE BACK.../5/94; 4/15/94 --THIS IS ONE OF VINCE PALAMARA'S EARLIEST AND BEST INTERVIEWS:

In regard to JFK's head wound, Kinney was explicit: "He
had no brain left- it was blown out...there was nothing left...it was)
the back of the head. I saw it (the shot) hit and I saw his hair come
out...I had brain matter all over my windshield and left arm, that's how
close we were to it...it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head". Asked to explain the 1500 gram brain at the autopsy, Sam seemed
perplexed, saying that "there was brain matter all over the place".
...Amazingly, when I told Kinney that there was a book- "High Treason"-
that alleged that "[SS agent] Emory Roberts ordered the men not to move", Sam said, "Exactly right"! ... I also attempted to get Kinney to go on the record in
writing, but I was too late: his widow Hazel informed me that Sam passed
away 7/21/97 while they were travelling through Iowa [letter to author
dated 11/20/97].

Yes indeed a bullet entering the rear of the skull can easily cause such damage .

Your claim to the contrary is false

 

[daws101]

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

Already discussed.

He was not credible in his statements.

He does not dispute the autopsy report

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Dennis was shown a 16 millimeter film of jfk at Bethesda Naval Hospital and witnessed the simple entry wound above the right eye and massive blow-out in the right rear. Bill Pitzer shot the film and was murdered three years later.

Dennis David https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5T7wR2YKkA

https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-...iracy-unravel/

"I can assure that it definitely was an entry wound in the forehead."

"It is inconceivable that anyone even vaguely acquainted with gunshot wounds would conclude that the massive wound in the rear of Jfk's of skull could have occurred from a rear-entry projectile."





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I

Already proven false

Dennis David was not a qualified pathologist nor any expert in gunshot wounds.

His view of a MOVIE does not give him any superior knowledge.

His opinion is not evidence just as yours is not.

You fail again

Nobody has to be an expert to see the massive hole in the rear. The AR and eyewitnesses confirm that location.

oh! like that massive asshole shaped wound on the back OF your head?