The irony of the abortion issue.

Women trumpet their right to exercise control of their own bodies regarding reproduction. However, abortion is needed when a woman loses control of her reproductive cycle and gets pregnant unintentionally. A woman who is in control of her reproductive life knows when she is likely to get pregnant and has little need for abortion.
Bingo!

Party girls who drink too much and hook up with strange men at the club should know better

But they dont, and abortion is their failsafe
 
Bingo!

Party girls who drink too much and hook up with strange men at the club should know better

But they dont, and abortion is their failsafe
So it’s all on the “party girls”?

The bros that are on the other end of the thing just walk away but the women must be punished for their “indiscretion “?

Yeah. You’re selling it
 
Legal definition would make an 8.5 month gestated fetus “similarly situated” to a newborn.
no, they are not similarly situated.

You are a liar.

One is inside another person’s body and the other is outside of another person’s body. There is nothing similarly situated about that.

Stop lying to yourself
 
So it’s all on the “party girls”?

The bros that are on the other end of the thing just walk away but the women must be punished for their “indiscretion “?

Yeah. You’re selling it
I understand that abortion us a big issue for some married women too

But within that demographic conservative women tend to be more pro life

Its single women having unprotected sex that drives the pro abortion vote
 
Last edited:
They didn’t think they needed to bypass the filibuster because of Roe. Republicans blocked it with the filibuster and then killed Roe

You’re welcome for the history lesson. But you knew all that
The current admin held both Houses post Roe being overturned dum dum.... Remember when we were talking about some women being stupid and lazy?
 
Last edited:
So it’s all on the “party girls”?

The bros that are on the other end of the thing just walk away but the women must be punished for their “indiscretion “?

Yeah. You’re selling it
So only women should have reproductive rights then? If women aren't responsible for what happens as a result of sex, and they get to choose to either have a child or not why shouldn't men? Why should men be forced into fatherhood against their will? You just want to control men's bodies.
 
Were on track for slot less kids conceived as more young couples make the choice not to have kids. Then the same people will actually believe there aren't enough kids being born. Nothing makes em happy.
There aren't enough kids being born to fill the ever-expanding bottom layers of the economic pyramid scheme our economy is based on. We're between a rock and a hard place. We need more workers for the pyramid, but overpopulation is ruining the quality of life.
 
The other thing about this issue that is ironic is that neither Trump nor Harris can do a damn thing about abortion rights at the national level, cuz neither one will have the 60 votes necessary to pass any such legislation in the Senate. So, as far as the presidency is concerned, abortion is a non-issue.
Well, Kamala did say that "If abortion legislation hits her desk, she would sign it immediately."
 
no, they are not similarly situated.

You are a liar.

One is inside another person’s body and the other is outside of another person’s body. There is nothing similarly situated about that.

Stop lying to yourself

The "one" inside is a human being...
 


Yeah , the rhythm method according to the apostolic catholic church with shit for brains .
"We practiced the rhythm method. Now all our kids are musically inclined."
 
So it’s all on the “party girls”?

The bros that are on the other end of the thing just walk away but the women must be punished for their “indiscretion “?

Yeah. You’re selling it
The point there is that women should be aware of two things,

1. Their fertility cycle.
2. That men are fertile 24/7/365.

However, men could help out by getting a vasectomy while they are single and having it reversed when they marry and want kids.
 
Last edited:
no, they are not similarly situated.

You are a liar.

One is inside another person’s body and the other is outside of another person’s body. There is nothing similarly situated about that.

Stop lying to yourself
And neither are same sex couples? Blacks?

Bigot.
 
Abortions for rape, and incestual relations is not the issue at all, if it were you people would be up in arms demanding harsher penalties for such!
 
And neither are same sex couples? Blacks?
similar situations for blacks and same-sex couples occurs for situated persons have been born. Why is that so hard for you to understand. The constitution says all persons are created equal therefore they have to be created equal. A reborn human is not considered a person and accordance with the constitution. It’s a rather simple reality that you cannot deny is true..
 
Abortions for rape, and incestual relations is not the issue at all, if it were you people would be up in arms demanding harsher penalties for such!
if you want to force society to accept the fact that a fertilized human egg is a person with equal protection under the law for the pursuit of life and liberty and happiness, then you have to go all the way. An egg fertilized, resulting from an active rape, can be executed because of the circumstance by which he or she came into existence?

Your only solution is to abandon your oppressive religious style crusade to have the state government force full-term gestation on all women when they get pregnant without intent even though you know, it’s none of your fucking business if she does.
 
Last edited:
similar situations for blacks and same-sex couples occurs for situated persons have been born. Why is that so hard for you to understand. The constitution says all persons are created equal therefore they have to be created equal. A reborn human is not considered a person and accordance with the constitution. It’s a rather simple reality that you cannot deny is true..
You use the same argument all bigots use.

Similar situated for heterosexual opposite sex couples.

Similar situated for a whites, regardless of nationality

See how that works bigot.
 
You use the same argument all bigots use


that makes no sense because I am arguing for the protection of rights of all persons meeting the live birth requirement for protection under the law under the constitution.

An unborn person does not meet that requirement at any stage of gestation.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom