The Inuit Green Deal

[ding]

^^^^^^^


doesn't realize she's been thrashed by reality...


McBullshit Milankovich already destroyed here on both poles...

Thread 'The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago'

Aug 9, 2023

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure...

We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, and clearly they did not live on top of 2+ mile thick ice at -60F...

• EMH
• Replies: 63
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

Thread 'How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?'

May 15, 2023

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is...

• EMH
• Replies: 134
• Forum: Environment

• 

GAME OVER

Says the guy who thinks the geologic record is a conspiracy theory.

 

[EMH]

Says the guy who thinks the geologic record is a conspiracy theory.

Fudged data is easily outed as fudge. The "geologic record" consists of FUDGE and BS dirty data like oxygen isotopes. Nobody with an IQ over 5 takes it seriously once that is outed.


Now, why isn't Earth's surface air pressure rising?

It would be rising if Earth was

a. warming
b. experiencing an ongoing net ice melt

 

[ding]

Fudged data is easily outed as fudge. The "geologic record" consists of FUDGE and BS dirty data like oxygen isotopes. Nobody with an IQ over 5 takes it seriously once that is outed.


Now, why isn't Earth's surface air pressure rising?

It would be rising if Earth was

a. warming
b. experiencing an ongoing net ice melt

It's crazy that you think the entire geologic community of scientists is conspiring to perpetrate fraud.

 

[ding]

Fudged data is easily outed as fudge. The "geologic record" consists of FUDGE and BS dirty data like oxygen isotopes. Nobody with an IQ over 5 takes it seriously once that is outed.


Now, why isn't Earth's surface air pressure rising?

It would be rising if Earth was

a. warming
b. experiencing an ongoing net ice melt

Is this a conspiracy?

Geologic evidence for ice ages includes massive landforms like moraines (mounds of unsorted rock debris) and U-shaped valleys carved by glaciers, distinctive features on rocks like striations (scratches) and polished surfaces from rocks embedded in moving ice, and unique deposits called tillites (lithified till) and dropstones (large rocks in fine sediment). Scientists also analyze ancient climate data from deep-sea and ice cores, studying fossil distributions and chemical signals to reconstruct past glacial conditions.

Direct Glacial Landforms & Deposits

• Moraines: Ridges or mounds of unsorted sediment (till) deposited by glaciers as they melt or advance, like terminal (end), lateral (side), and ground moraines.
• U-Shaped Valleys & Fjords: Glaciers erode existing river valleys, transforming them into distinctive U-shaped troughs with steep sides.
• Drumlins & Eskers: Streamlined hills (drumlins) and winding ridges (eskers) of till deposited under or within ice.
• Cirques & Tarns: Bowl-shaped depressions (cirques) carved into mountainsides by glacial ice, often holding small lakes (tarns).

Rock & Sediment Features

• Striations & Polishing: Parallel scratches (striations) and polished bedrock surfaces left by rocks dragged by glaciers.
• Glacial Erratics: Large boulders of a rock type different from the local bedrock, transported and deposited far from their source by ice.
• Tillites (Diamictites): Sedimentary rocks (lithified till) composed of poorly sorted mud, sand, pebbles, and boulders.
• Dropstones: Large, isolated clasts (rocks) found within fine-grained, laminated lake or marine sediments, dropped from melting icebergs.

Paleoclimate Proxies (Indirect Evidence)

• Ice Cores: Trapped air bubbles, dust, and isotopic ratios in ancient ice from Greenland and Antarctica provide detailed records of past temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric composition.
• Ocean & Lake Sediments: Cores from the seafloor or lakebeds reveal changes in fossil organisms (like foraminifera) and sediment types (e.g., fine clays from glacial meltwater), indicating shifts in ice volume and sea level.
• Fossil Distribution: Changes in the geographic range of cold-adapted plants and animals (or their absence) in higher latitudes.

Ancient Shorelines & Sea Levels

• Wave-Cut Terraces: Raised, flat surfaces on islands or coasts indicate past, higher sea levels during warmer interglacial periods.
• Ancient Lake Beds: Features like the shorelines of prehistoric Lake Bonneville show evidence of massive, ice-age lakes that have since evaporated.

 

[EMH]

It's crazy that you think the entire geologic community of scientists is conspiring to perpetrate fraud.

Then why are they completely wrong?

Your side has NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE of warming at all, NONE.

It has color fudge charts and a bs talking point that it isn't a "conspiracy." Not cutting it. The first issue is that the "top climate scientists" are all 100% WRONG about Earth warming at all in the past 60 years. The next question is why are they wrong, and how come the media never notices ...

 

[EMH]

Is this a conspiracy?

This is, this is the actual satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING getting FUDGED with BS excuses that do not match what the fudge job did to the data...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[ding]

Then why are they completely wrong?

Your side has NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE of warming at all, NONE.

It has color fudge charts and a bs talking point that it isn't a "conspiracy." Not cutting it. The first issue is that the "top climate scientists" are all 100% WRONG about Earth warming at all in the past 60 years. The next question is why are they wrong, and how come the media never notices ...

They aren't wrong. You are. The ice age began ~3 million years ago and we are still in it. We are in an interglacial period. The northern hemisphere is deglaciating and the planet is warming like it always does when the northern hemisphere deglaciates..

 

[ding]

This is, this is the actual satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING getting FUDGED with BS excuses that do not match what the fudge job did to the data...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

Are the glacial cycles of the last 3 million years a conspiracy?

 

[EMH]

Are the glacial cycles of the last 3 million years a conspiracy?

Thread '"Interglacials" are 100% refuted by ice cores'

Oct 28, 2025

CO2 FRAUD is 100% about getting science invalids to believe planet Earth warms and cools as a whole. That conclusion was completely blown out of the water by the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed during the past 1 million years.

The "interglacial" is part of CO2 FRAUD's attempt to mislead on that issue.

Google Search

The last interglacial...

• EMH
• Replies: 4
• Forum: Environment

• 

Thread 'Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...'

Jun 23, 2023

What is an ICE AGE?

Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice retreats, as if "Day After Tomorrow" movie is accurate... LOL!!! What was North American Ice Age before 2010 is now spun into a series of rapid "ice ages" where it took a mere 75k years for the "ice age" to start in Northern Canada and put 2.5 mile thick glaicers on Chicago. This is "Milankovich"...

• EMH
• Replies: 338
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

 

[ding]

Thread '"Interglacials" are 100% refuted by ice cores'

Oct 28, 2025

CO2 FRAUD is 100% about getting science invalids to believe planet Earth warms and cools as a whole. That conclusion was completely blown out of the water by the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed during the past 1 million years.

The "interglacial" is part of CO2 FRAUD's attempt to mislead on that issue.

Google Search

The last interglacial...

• EMH
• Replies: 4
• Forum: Environment

• 

Thread 'Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...'

Jun 23, 2023

What is an ICE AGE?

Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice retreats, as if "Day After Tomorrow" movie is accurate... LOL!!! What was North American Ice Age before 2010 is now spun into a series of rapid "ice ages" where it took a mere 75k years for the "ice age" to start in Northern Canada and put 2.5 mile thick glaicers on Chicago. This is "Milankovich"...

• EMH
• Replies: 338
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

What about this geologic evidence that says there have been glacial cycles over the past 3 million years?

Direct Glacial Landforms & Deposits

• Moraines: Ridges or mounds of unsorted sediment (till) deposited by glaciers as they melt or advance, like terminal (end), lateral (side), and ground moraines.
• U-Shaped Valleys & Fjords: Glaciers erode existing river valleys, transforming them into distinctive U-shaped troughs with steep sides.
• Drumlins & Eskers: Streamlined hills (drumlins) and winding ridges (eskers) of till deposited under or within ice.
• Cirques & Tarns: Bowl-shaped depressions (cirques) carved into mountainsides by glacial ice, often holding small lakes (tarns).

Rock & Sediment Features

• Striations & Polishing: Parallel scratches (striations) and polished bedrock surfaces left by rocks dragged by glaciers.
• Glacial Erratics: Large boulders of a rock type different from the local bedrock, transported and deposited far from their source by ice.
• Tillites (Diamictites): Sedimentary rocks (lithified till) composed of poorly sorted mud, sand, pebbles, and boulders.
• Dropstones: Large, isolated clasts (rocks) found within fine-grained, laminated lake or marine sediments, dropped from melting icebergs.

Paleoclimate Proxies (Indirect Evidence)

• Ocean & Lake Sediments: Cores from the seafloor or lakebeds reveal changes in fossil organisms (like foraminifera) and sediment types (e.g., fine clays from glacial meltwater), indicating shifts in ice volume and sea level.
• Fossil Distribution: Changes in the geographic range of cold-adapted plants and animals (or their absence) in higher latitudes.

Ancient Shorelines & Sea Levels

• Wave-Cut Terraces: Raised, flat surfaces on islands or coasts indicate past, higher sea levels during warmer interglacial periods.
• Ancient Lake Beds: Features like the shorelines of prehistoric Lake Bonneville show evidence of massive, ice-age lakes that have since evaporated.

 

[EMH]

What about this geologic evidence that says there have been glacial cycles over the past 3 million years?

post 69 above completely refutes that.

 

[ding]

post 69 above completely refutes that.

So all of the geologic evidence is a conspiracy and fraud?

 

[EMH]

So all of the geologic evidence is a conspiracy and fraud?

interglacials are refuted bullshit
the planet Earth does not warm or cool all at once.
Greenland froze while North America thawed, removing atmosphere, CO2 in atmosphere, and sun as suspects
600 miles to the pole is a law you cannot refute
Milankovich is completely laughable BS cooked up after homO hid the CO2 FRAUD prosecution in the closet, then gave it to the "climate scientists" who cooked up Milankovich as a desperate attempt to hide the truth that GREENLAND FROZE while NORTH AMERICA THAWED
CO2 FRAUD cloud seeds, squirts chemical bleach into coral, races after every ocean tectonic event in hopes of measuring "warming," fudges data, lies, and the Mossad is its enforcer...


Too bad for you the FBI knows all of that, and SURFACE AIR PRESSURE too....

 

[ding]

interglacials are refuted bullshit
the planet Earth does not warm or cool all at once.
Greenland froze while North America thawed, removing atmosphere, CO2 in atmosphere, and sun as suspects
600 miles to the pole is a law you cannot refute
Milankovich is completely laughable BS cooked up after homO hid the CO2 FRAUD prosecution in the closet, then gave it to the "climate scientists" who cooked up Milankovich as a desperate attempt to hide the truth that GREENLAND FROZE while NORTH AMERICA THAWED
CO2 FRAUD cloud seeds, squirts chemical bleach into coral, races after every ocean tectonic event in hopes of measuring "warming," fudges data, lies, and the Mossad is its enforcer...


Too bad for you the FBI knows all of that, and SURFACE AIR PRESSURE too....

So Direct Glacial Landforms & Deposits are fake news?

 

[EMH]

So Direct Glacial Landforms & Deposits are fake news?

ice cores refute pretty much everything your side claims about ice.

 

[ding]

ice cores refute pretty much everything your side claims about ice.

And Rock & Sediment Features are fake news too, right?

 

[ding]

ice cores refute pretty much everything your side claims about ice.

You said ice cores are fudge.

 

[EMH]

And Rock & Sediment Features are fake news too, right?

600 miles to the pole is irrefutable, no matter how many fake scratches your side counts as glacier movement that wasn't.

Found any land inside of 600 miles to a pole not in ice age?

LOL!!

 

[ding]

600 miles to the pole is irrefutable, no matter how many fake scratches your side counts as glacier movement that wasn't.

Found any land inside of 600 miles to a pole not in ice age?

LOL!!

And Ancient Shorelines & Sea Levels are fudge too, right?

 

[EMH]

And Ancient Shorelines & Sea Levels are fudge too, right?

We are still waiting for one single photo documenting "ocean rise."

Still haven't found any, can you explain why....